Sherafati, Alborz

BACKGROUND: Coronary atherosclerotic burden and adverse coronary heart disease events are related phenotypes with likely shared genetic cause. METHODS: We analyzed 6021 patients with available coronary angiography, genotyping, and exome sequencing data. We tested for associations of polygenic risk scores for coronary heart disease (PRS CHD ) with multiple measures of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity. We assessed the joint associations of PRS CHD and pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 3 familial hypercholesterolemia genes, with CAD severity. We performed mediation analyses to explore whether CAD severity mediated the association of PRS CHD with prevalent coronary heart disease and incident myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A 1-SD increase in PRS CHD was associated with multiple measures of CAD severity, including the log Gensini score (β, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.28–0.33]). Carrying a pathogenic/likely pathogenic familial hypercholesterolemia variant was associated with a higher log Gensini score after adjustment for PRS CHD (β, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.03–0.38]). A 1-SD increase in PRS CHD was associated with incident myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up of 9.2 years (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.13–1.27]; P =5×10 − 10 ), and the Gensini score mediated 90% of this association. CONCLUSIONS: PRS CHD was associated with multiple measures of CAD severity. The association of PRS CHD with incident myocardial infarction was almost fully mediated by CAD severity, indicating a considerable genetic overlap between the 2 phenotypes.

Introduction: Lp(a) is a causal risk factor for ASCVD that is often elevated in patients with personal or family history (FHx) of ASCVD. The 2019 ESC guidelines recommend universal Lp(a) testing, while the 2019 AHA/ACC guidelines include Lp(a) as a ‘risk enhancer’. We used electronic health records (EHR) to assess utilization of Lp(a) testing in patients with ASCVD, premature ASCVD, and FHx of ASCVD at Mayo Clinic sites in Rochester MN, Phoenix AZ and Jacksonville FL and the Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) from 1999-2021. Methods: We ascertained Lp(a) testing using LOINC codes and ASCVD status using validated ICD/CPT-based algorithms. ASCVD included coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (ischemic stroke and/or carotid artery stenosis), peripheral artery disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Premature ASCVD was defined as occurring in males < 55 years and females < 65 years. We ascertained FHx using EHR survey data from 2017-2021. We estimated the proportion of patients with ASCVD, premature ASCVD, or FHx of ASCVD who underwent Lp(a) testing. Results: Between 1999-2021, we identified 310,760 patients with at least 1 ASCVD subtype of whom 66,710 had premature disease. FHx data was available starting 2017. For the timeframe 2017-2021, we identified 267,177 patients with FHx of ASCVD and 90,269 ASCVD patients. As summarized in Table 1, Lp(a) was tested only in a small proportion of patients; 7% of ASCVD patients, 11% of premature ASCVD patients, and 6% of patients with FHx of ASCVD. Premature CHD patients had the highest testing proportion (17%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate underutilization of Lp(a) testing in patients with personal or FHx of ASCVD. Lp(a) is one of the mediators of “ASCVD residual risk” in patients on statins, and with new Lp(a)-lowering medications in phase III clinical trials, patient and provider education will be needed to increase awareness of Lp(a) as a modulator of ASCVD risk.

Introduction: Relatively little is known about outcomes following return of secondary findings detected in large scale sequencing projects. We assessed 1-year outcomes following return of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in phase III of the eMERGE network (2015-2019). Methods: Adult participants (n=18,544) at 7 sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort study to study the clinical impact of returning results from targeted sequencing of 68 actionable genes, including LDLR , APOB , and PCSK9 . Process, intermediate, and/or clinical outcomes within 1-year after return of results (RoR) were ascertained by electronic health record (EHR) review. A process outcome was defined as referral to a specialist or ordering new tests, including lipid profile and screening tests for coronary heart disease. An intermediate outcome was defined as new diagnosis of FH or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. A clinical outcome was defined as initiation or change in lipid-lowering medication. The primary outcomes were a new diagnosis of FH and modification of lipid lowering therapy. Results: Results were returned to 134 individuals, and data for 119 participants were available for the outcomes analysis. Process (86%), intermediate (49%), and/or clinical (26%) outcomes occurred in 92% of participants. Process outcomes included 72% with new tests ordered and 61% referred to a specialist. Before RoR, 86.5% of individuals with FH associated P/LP variants had a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia but only 17.6% had a diagnosis of FH; 89% were on a statin but only 58% were on a high intensity statin. Following RoR, 44% (52/119) received a new diagnosis of FH. Lipid lowering treatment was modified in 26% (31/119), including initiation of a statin in 5%, increasing statin dose in 13%, and adding ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor in 12.6%. Conclusions: In a multisite cohort of EHR-linked biobanks, monogenic FH was underdiagnosed (only 17.6% had a specific diagnosis) and undertreated (only 58% were on a high intensity statin); 44% of participants received a new diagnosis of FH and 26% had lipid lowering treatment modified after RoR. These results highlight the clinical utility of returning FH variants in EHR-linked biobanks.

Background: The implications of secondary findings detected in large-scale sequencing projects remain uncertain. We assessed prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) variants, their association with coronary heart disease (CHD), and 1-year outcomes following return of results in phase III of the electronic medical records and genomics network. Methods: Adult participants (n=18 544) at 7 sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort study to assess the clinical impact of returning results from targeted sequencing of 68 actionable genes, including LDLR , APOB , and PCSK9 . FH variant prevalence and penetrance (defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >155 mg/dL) were estimated after excluding participants enrolled on the basis of hypercholesterolemia. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of CHD compared to age- and sex-matched controls without FH-associated variants. Process (eg, referral to a specialist or ordering new tests), intermediate (eg, new diagnosis of FH), and clinical (eg, treatment modification) outcomes within 1 year after return of results were ascertained by electronic health record review. Results: The prevalence of FH-associated pathogenic variants was 1 in 188 (69 of 13,019 unselected participants). Penetrance was 87.5%. The presence of an FH variant was associated with CHD (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.00–4.53]) and premature CHD (odds ratio, 3.68 [2.34–5.78]). At least 1 outcome occurred in 92% of participants; 44% received a new diagnosis of FH and 26% had treatment modified following return of results. Conclusions: In a multisite cohort of electronic health record–linked biobanks, monogenic FH was prevalent, penetrant, and associated with presence of CHD. Nearly half of participants with an FH-associated variant received a new diagnosis of FH and a quarter had treatment modified after return of results. These results highlight the potential utility of sequencing electronic health record–linked biobanks to detect FH.

Background: The Clinical Genome Resource Consortium (ClinGen) recommends MaxEntScan (MES) model to predict the effects of LDLR splice variants. We developed “MaxSpliZer”, a software tool to automate the implementation of MES, and validated it using ClinVar and UK-Biobank (UKBB) data. Method: We tested concordance of MaxSpliZer predictions with ClinVar classifications of benign/likely benign (B/LB) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) for LDLR variants with potential effect on splicing. We also annotated LDLR splice variants in 200,618 UKBB participants, categorizing them using MaxSpliZer as deleterious (n=90) and non-deleterious (n=7,404). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were compared in these two groups after adjustment for lipid-lowering medication use. Results: MaxSpliZer prediction was concordant with the ClinVar classification in 128 of 138 P/LP variants (sensitivity 93%) and 432 of 436 B/LB variants (specificity 99%). In the UKBB, splice variants predicted as deleterious by MaxSpliZer had higher LDL-C than non-deleterious splice variants (158.7±47.4 vs. 146.0±34.8mg/dL, p-value = 0.014). Compared to manual curation time of 12±7 min per variant, MaxSpliZer took 0.52±0.11 min for single entries and 1.5 s per variant for biobank-scale data. Conclusion: MaxSpliZer, a software tool that implements MES based on the ClinGen guideline, can accurately classify LDLR splice variants in a rapid automated fashion.

The Clinical Genome Resource Consortium (ClinGen) recommends MaxEntScan (MES) model to predict effects of LDLR splice variants. We developed “MaxSpliZer”, a software tool to automate implementation of MES and validated it using ClinVar and UK-Biobank (UKBB) data. We tested concordance of MaxSpliZer predictions with ClinVar classifications of pathogenicity of variants in LDLR and FBN1 with potential effect on splicing. We also annotated LDLR splice variants in 200,618 UKBB participants, categorizing them using MaxSpliZer as deleterious (n=90) and non-deleterious (n=7,404). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were compared in these two groups after adjustment for lipid lowering medication use. MaxSpliZer prediction was concordant with the ClinVar classification in 96% of LDLR variants and 98% of FBN1 variants. In the UKBB, splice variants predicted as deleterious by MaxSpliZer had higher LDL-C than non-deleterious splice variants (158.7±47.4 vs. 146.0±34.8mg/dL, p-value = 0.014). Compared to manual curation time of 12±7 min per variant, MaxSpliZer took 0.52±0.11 min for single entries and 1.5 s per variant for biobank-scale data. MaxSpliZer, a software tool that implements MES based on the ClinGen guideline, can accurately classify splice variants in a rapid automated fashion.

The Clinical Genome Resource Consortium (ClinGen) recommends MaxEntScan (MES) model to predict effects of LDLR splice variants. We developed “MaxSpliZer”, a software tool to automate implementation of MES and validated it using ClinVar and UK-Biobank (UKBB) data. We tested concordance of MaxSpliZer predictions with ClinVar classifications of benign/likely benign (B/LB) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) for LDLR variants with potential effect on splicing. We also annotated LDLR splice variants in 200,618 UKBB participants, categorizing them using MaxSpliZer as deleterious (n=90) and non-deleterious (n=7,404). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were compared in these two groups after adjustment for lipid lowering medication use. MaxSpliZer prediction was concordant with the ClinVar classification in 128 of 138 P/LP variants (sensitivity 93%) and 432 of 436 B/LB variants (specificity 99%). In the UKBB, splice variants predicted as deleterious by MaxSpliZer had higher LDL-C than non-deleterious splice variants (158.7±47.4 vs. 146.0±34.8mg/dL, p-value = 0.014). Compared to manual curation time of 12±7 min per variant, MaxSpliZer took 0.52±0.11 min for single entries and 1.5 s per variant for biobank-scale data. MaxSpliZer, a software tool that implements MES based on the ClinGen guideline, can accurately classify LDLR splice variants in a rapid automated fashion.