Back to Authors

Solé, Françesc

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-2161

Mayo Clinic

Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute

Citations 9

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q
Navarro, Vı́ctor , Haferlach, Claudia, Chan, Onyee , Schulz, Felicitas , Briski, Robert , Al-Ali, Najla, Xicoy, Blanca , Lopez-Cadenas, Felix, Bosch, Francesc, Aguilera, Anna, Meggendorfer, Manja , Eder, Lea Naomi, Jérez, Andrés, Betz, Beate, Kewan, Tariq, Zindel, C., Al‐Kali, Aref , Platzbecker, Uwe, Haase, Detlef Thomas, Zeidan, Amer M., Fenaux, Pierre, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Germing, Ulrich, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P., Haferlach, T, Montoro, Maria Julia , Navarro, Víctor , Chan, Onyee , Kubota, Yasuo , Briski, Robert , Xicoy, Blanca , Romero, Anna Aguilera , Campagna, Alessia , Lanino, Luca , Santini, Valeria , Bernal, Teresa , Such, Esperanza , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Gurnari, Carmelo , Zindel, Carla , Kulasekararaj, Austin , Voso, Maria Teresa , Sekeres, Mikkael A , Venugopal, Sangeetha , Al-Kali, Aref , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Wiseman, Daniel H , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Komrokji, Rami S , Solé, Francesc , Palomo, Laura , Valcárcel, David , Acha, Pamela , Haferlach, Claudia , Al‐Ali, Najla, Cadenas, Félix López , Bosch, Francesc, Jerez, Andrés , Wang, Y C , Campagna, Alessia , Lanino, Luca , Santini, Valeria , Gurnari, Carmelo , Kulasekararaj, Austin , Voso, Maria Teresa , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Varela, Nicolas A Diaz , Platzbecker, Uwe , Haase, Detlef, Zeidan, Amer M. , Fenaux, Pierre , Díez‐Campelo, María , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Wiseman, Daniel H. , Germing, Ulrich , Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P. , Komrokji, Rami S. , Solé, Françesc , Haferlach, Torsten , Valcárcel, David

Blood Advances | July 17, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020633 Get It

Myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q [MDS-del(5q)] constitute a distinct biological entity traditionally associated with favorable outcomes, although up to one quarter of patients progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Existing prognostic models, developed in heterogeneous MDS populations, may not adequately capture risk within this subgroup. We assembled an international cohort of 682 patients with MDS-del(5q) to evaluate the performance of the IPSS-R and IPSS-M, identify prognostic variables, and develop a disease-specific prognostic tool, the IPSS-del(5q). Most patients were classified as lower-risk by IPSS-R (94.4%) and IPSS-M (85.5%), yet both systems showed limited discriminatory ability (C-indices ≈0.5). Independent adverse prognostic factors included age ≥70 years, male sex, anemia (hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelets ≤100×10⁹/L), the presence of one additional chromosomal abnormality, ≥2 gene mutations, SF3B1 mutations, and high-risk TP53 status. Six variables were included in the IPSS-del(5q), stratifying patients into standard-risk (74.3%) and high-risk (25.7%) groups with significantly different LFS (69.2 vs. 32.0 months; p<0.01). Moreover, this model reclassified 19.1% of lower-risk IPSS-R and 14.6% of lower-risk IPSS-M patients into the high-risk IPSS-del(5q) group. However, its discriminative power remained modest, with a C-index of 0.60. Overall, this study provides the most comprehensive prognostic evaluation of MDS-del(5q) to date, demonstrates the limited discriminatory capacity of existing MDS scores in this entity, and underscores the need to develop refined disease-specific prognostic approaches for this MDS subtype.
Molecular-Based Ecosystem to Improve Personalized Medicine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Lanino, Luca , Hunter, Anthony M. , Gagelmann, Nico, Robin, M., Dall'Olio, Daniele , Flamigni, Alice, Gurnari, Carmelo, Wang, Yu‐Hung , Pleyer, Lisa , Xicoy, B., Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo, Shih, Lee-Yung, Alsugair, Ali, Gregorio, Caterina, Platzbecker, Anne Sophie, Sallman, David A., Fariselli, Piero, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Platzbecker, U, Solé, Francesc Gessé, Díez-Campelo, María, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw, Bejar, Rafael, Thol, Felicitas, Kroger, N., Fenaux, Pierre, Sanz, G. F., Kordasti, S., Santini, Valeria, Zeidan, Amer M., Komrokji, Rami S., Haferlach, Torsten, Germing, Ulrich, Castellani, Gastone, D'Amico, Saverio, Patnaik, M., Ieva, F., Tefferi, Ayalew, Padron, Eric , Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della, Alliance, for the iCPSS, Haque, Tamanna, Abdel-Wahab, Omar, Geissler, Klaus, Bataller, Alex, Bazinet, Alexandre , Meggendorfer, Manja , Quintavalla, Mirco, Bruseghini, Alessandro , Carota, Luciana , Dall'Olio, Lorenzo, Travaglino, Erica , Zamora, Lurdes López, Quintela, David, Jerez, Andrés , Cornejo, Elena, Martín, Paloma García, Díaz-Beyá, Marina, Pita, Alejandro Avendano, Roldán, Verónica , Suarez, Dolly Viviana Fiallo, Velasco, Estefania Cerezo, Calabuig, Marisa , Such, Esperanza, Castilla-Llorente, Cristina, Bulabois, Claude Eric, Souchet, Laëtitia, Bernardi, Massimo, Chiusolo, Patrizia, Borin, Lorenza, Follo, Matilde Yung, Consagra, Angela , Passamonti, Francesco, Diral, Elisa , Vucinic, Vladan, Bergonzi, Gregorio Maria , Hou, Hsin-An, Russo, Antonio, Tentori, Cristina Astrid , Buizza, Alessandro , Ferrari, Ivan, Matteo, Maria Di, Crespi, Alessandra, Figini, Giulia , Delponte, Camilla, Zampini, Matteo, Riva, Elena, Delleani, Mattia , Iascone, Eleonora, Ficara, Francesca , Ventura, Denise, Pinocchio, Nicole, Santoro, Armando, Kiwan, Ahmad , Ali, Najla H. Al, Zeidan, Amer M. , Robin, Marie , Dall’Olio, Daniele , Riva, Elena , Gagelmann, Nico , Robin, Marie , Sala, Claudia , Gurnari, Carmelo , Wang, Yu-Hung , Shih, Lee‐Yung , Alsugair, Ali , Fathima, Saubia , Gregorio, Caterina , Rollo, Cesare , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Asti, Gianluca , Itzykson, Raphael , Sallman, David A , Fariselli, Piero , Kern, Wolfgang , Garcia-Manero, Guillermo , Platzbecker, Uwe , Solé, Francesc , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P , Bejar, Rafael , Thol, Felicitas , Savona, Michael R , Sanz, Guillermo F , Kordasti, Shahram , Santini, Valeria , Zeidan, Amer M , Komrokji, Rami S , Castellani, Gastone , D'Amico, Saverio , Patnaik, Mrinal , Ieva, Francesca , Solary, Eric , Padron, Eric , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Buizza, Alessandro , Ficara, Francesca , Lanino, Luca , Gagelmann, Nico , Gurnari, Carmelo , Xicoy, Blanca , Montalban‐Bravo, Guillermo , Fathima, Saubia , Gregorio, Caterina , Palomo, Laura , Itzykson, Raphaël , Sallman, David A. , Kern, Wolfgang , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Platzbecker, Uwe , Solé, Françesc , Díez‐Campelo, María , Thol, Felicitas , Kröger, Nicolaus , Savona, Michael R. , Fenaux, Pierre , Sanz, Guillermo , Santini, Valeria , Fontenay, Michaëla , Komrokji, Rami S. , Haferlach, Torsten , Germing, Ulrich , Solary, Éric , Tefferi, Ayalew , Haque, Tamanna , Bataller, Alex , Sauta, Elisabetta , Sanavia, Tiziana , Dall'Olio, Lorenzo, Díaz‐Beyá, Marina , Roldan, Veronica, Fiallo, Dolly Viviana , Such, Esperanza , Castilla‐Llorente, Cristina , Bulabois, Claude‐Eric , Awada, Hussein , Chiusolo, Patrizia , Curti, Antonio , Giaccone, Luisa , Finelli, Carlo , Casetti, Ilaria Carola , Onida, Francesco , Passamonti, Francesco , Vučinić, Vladan , Voso, Maria Teresa , Hou, Hsin-An, Chou, Wen‐Chien , Yao, Chi‐Yuan , Lin, Chien‐Chin , Tien, Hwei‐Fang , Campagna, Alessia , Ubezio, Marta , Todisco, Gabriele , Maggioni, Giulia , Matteo, Maria Di, Pesce, Francesco , Zampini, Matteo , Crisafulli, Laura , Ventura, Denise , Pinocchio, Nicole , Brindisi, Matteo , VanOudenhove, Jennifer , Ali, Najla H. Al, Graubert, Timothy Aaron , Thota, Swapna , Griffiths, Elizabeth A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1608-1623

10.1200/jco-25-02116 Get It

PURPOSE Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare myeloid neoplasm characterized by clinical heterogeneity and is associated with poor outcomes. To date, limited molecular information has been incorporated into disease classification and risk stratification. We aimed to integrate genomic features into the clinical decision-making process for CMML. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 3013 patients with CMML (training set) and a prospective population of 516 patients (validation set). Using an innovative framework for multimodal data analysis, we developed molecular-based disease taxonomy and prognostication. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering identified nine entities with distinct genomic features and outcomes ( P < .001), including splicing machinery, transcription factors, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures. Notably, 15% of patients showed molecular/clinical overlap with other myeloid neoplasms. We integrated molecular and clinical information to build the international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS), incorporating mutations in nine genes together with hematologic parameters and cytogenetic abnormalities. The iCPSS identified five groups with distinct probability of overall and leukemia-free survival in both training and validation cohorts ( P < .001), outperforming existing prognostic models. Importantly, 55% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk groups by the iCPSS. Decision analysis demonstrated that iCPSS could refine the optimal timing of allogeneic transplantation at the individual level; compared with conventional prognostic tools, iCPSS-based decision modeling changed transplantation strategy in 31% of cases, resulting in a significant gain-in-life expectancy for eligible patient population ( P < .001). A federated learning platform was implemented to enable continuous, privacy-preserving model update across multiple centers. CONCLUSION Molecular information improves CMML classification and prognostication, supports more effective clinical decision making, and potentially refines the design of clinical trials.
Prognostic and therapeutic impact of FLT3 mutations and allelic burden in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Results from a multicenter cohort study
Chien, Kelly S. , Li, Ziyi , Li, Ruoxing , Ali, Najla Al , Sallman, David A. , Kanagal‐Shamanna, Rashmi , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Jerez, Andrés , Castaño‐Díez, Sandra , Rey, Mónica Del , Montalban‐Bravo, Guillermo , Padron, Eric , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Kanagal-Shamanna, Rashmi , Rodríguez‐Sevilla, Juan José , Jelloul, Fatima Zahra , Csizmar, Clifford M. , Montoro, Maria Julia , Valcárcel, David , Díaz‐Beyá, Marina , Esteve, Jordi , Díez‐Campelo, María , Calvo, Xavier , Solé, Françesc , Komrokji, Rami S.

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2085-2085

10.1182/blood-2025-2085 Get It

Abstract Background: While mutations in the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene are well-established adverse drivers in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their role in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) remains insufficiently defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 115 patients with FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut) MDS (n=63) or CMML (n=52), comparing their clinical, genomic, and therapeutic characteristics at diagnosis or first referral to 677 FLT3 wild-type (FLT3wt) controls (MDS n=388; CMML n=289) using multivariate analyses and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: FLT3mut MDS and CMML exhibited a proliferative phenotype with higher leukocyte and neutrophil counts and lower platelet levels (p&lt;0.02); in MDS, median white blood cell counts remained below 13,000/µL. In MDS, FLT3mut cases were enriched in the MDS with increased blasts subtype (57% vs 39%, p=0.01) and favorable-risk cytogenetics (64% vs 41%, p&lt;0.01). Genomically, FLT3mut MDS showed higher frequencies of NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, RUNX1 and CBL co-mutations (p&lt;0.05), and a markedly lower prevalence of TP53 mutations (2% vs 36%, p&lt;0.001). In CMML, FLT3mut cases were more often transfusion-dependent (50% vs 23%, p&lt;0.01), classified as CMML-2 (39% vs 25%, p=0.04), and enriched in ASXL1 (68% vs 47%; p&lt;0.01) and SETBP1 (24% vs 8%; p&lt;0.01) mutations. Notably, they exhibited multi-hit TET2 mutations less frequently than FLT3wt CMML (27% vs 53%, p=0.01). After adjusting for age, sex, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, FLT3 mutations were independently associated with worse outcomes. To further assess the prognostic impact of FLT3 mutations, we conducted PSM analyses using a 1:1 ratio of FLT3mut to FLT3wt patients, adjusting for key clinical and biological confounders. In MDS, matching was based on age, sex, bone marrow blast percentage, and cytogenetic risk category; in CMML, variables included age, CMML-2 subtype, peripheral blood counts, normal karyotype, and ASXL1 mutation status. After matching, FLT3mut MDS cases showed significantly shorter overall survival (OS; 19.9 vs 44.2 months, p=0.046) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; 13.8 vs 37.1 months, p=0.023) compared to FLT3wt patients. Similarly, in CMML, FLT3mut patients experienced inferior OS (30.4 vs 67.2 months, p=0.017) and LFS (17.2 vs 65.6 months, p=0.014). Competing risk models confirmed a markedly increased cumulative incidence of AML transformation in both FLT3mut MDS and CMML (p&lt;0.001), without significant differences in the risk of non-leukemic death. Among FLT3mut cases, tyrosine kinase domain mutations (FLT3-TKD) were associated with superior survival compared to internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD; MDS hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, p=0.003; CMML HR: 0.34, p=0.012). FLT3 allelic ratio (AR), assessed by conventional PCR in 63 patients (MDS n=34, CMML n=29), provided additional prognostic value. An AR ≥0.21 identified a subgroup with significantly shorter OS (MDS: 24.4 vs 38.8; CMML: 6.7 vs 30.4 months) and LFS (MDS: 9.0 vs 18.5 months; CMML: 5.8 vs 30.4 months; all p&lt;0.05), supporting the utility of quantitative FLT3 assessment in clinical risk stratification. FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) were administered in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) to 16 (27%) FLT3mut MDS and 15 (33%) CMML patients. Compared to HMA, FLT3i treatment was associated with higher overall response rates (MDS: 69% vs 22%, p&lt;0.01; CMML: 73% vs 35%, p=0.06). Molecular clearance, defined as post-treatment reduction in AR to ≤0.01, was observed more frequently with FLT3i than with HMA (MDS: 56% vs 10%, p=0.03; CMML: 60% vs 20%, p=0.09). FLT3 clearance was associated with prolonged survival. In MDS, median OS and LFS were 66.0 vs 14.5 (p=0.12) and 29.0 vs 9.9 months (p=0.056), respectively; in CMML, it was 37.6 vs 14.6 months for both OS (p=0.043) and LFS (p=0.032). Conclusions: This study expands the current understanding of FLT3mut MDS and CMML by characterizing their clinical, molecular, and therapeutic features in the largest multicenter cohort reported to date. These cases exhibit a proliferative phenotype, frequent co-mutations in RAS pathway genes, and an elevated risk of leukemic transformation. Quantitative assessment of FLT3 allelic burden refines prognostication beyond mutation status alone. The observed associations between FLT3 inhibitor use, molecular clearance, and improved outcomes support further evaluation of targeted strategies in selected patients.
Refining the prognostic hierarchy of TP53 multihit alterations and isolated deletion of chromosome 5q in myelodysplastic syndromes
Prince-Eladnani, Raja, Schulz, Felicitas , Briski, Robert , Ali, Najla Al , López, Félix, Meggendorfer, Manja , Eder, Lea Naomi, Jerez, Andrés , Betz, Beate, Castillo, Teresa Bernal Del, Zindel, C., Al‐Kali, Aref , Pollini, Antonella, Diral, Elisa , Memoli, Mara , Haase, Detlef, Fenaux, Pierre , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Germing, Ulrich, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P. , Haferlach, Torsten , Montoro, Maria Julia , Acha, Pamela , Haferlach, Claudia , Chan, Onyee , Kubota, Yasuo, Xicoy, Blanca , Palomo, Laura , Bosch, Francesc , Wang, Yu‐Hung , Campagna, Alessia , Santini, Valeria , Castillo, Teresa Bernal Del, Such, Esperanza , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Kewan, Tariq Zuheir , Gurnari, Carmelo , Zindel, Carla, Kulasekararaj, Austin , Voso, Maria Teresa , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Varela, Nicolas A Diaz , Platzbecker, Uwe , Zeidan, Amer M. , Díez‐Campelo, María , Wiseman, Daniel H. , Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della , Germing, Ulrich , Komrokji, Rami S. , Solé, Françesc , Valcárcel, David

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2068-2068

10.1182/blood-2025-2068 Get It

Abstract Background & aim: Myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q (MDS-del(5q)) are associated with low-risk features and favorable prognosis. In contrast, TP53 multihit alterations, typically reflecting biallelic inactivation, are associated with high-risk features and adverse outcomes across MDS subtypes. Although current classification systems exclude MDS-del(5q) cases with TP53 multihit from low-risk categories, the prognostic significance of these alterations in this specific context remains unclear. Methods: We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective study comparing MDS-del(5q) per 2017 WHO criteria with TP53 multihit alterations (MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit) from 21 international institutions, to MDS with low blast counts with TP53 multihit alterations without isolated del(5q) (MDS-LB TP53 multihit) from the public data from the study of Bernard et al., Nat Med 2020. Clinical and biological data were collected at diagnosis. Genetic profiling included G-banding and NGS of myeloid genes. TP53 multihit was defined as &gt;1 TP53 mutation or a single mutation with 17p deletion, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH), or variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥50%. Patients were stratified as lower- or higher-risk based on IPSS-R and IPSS-M scores. Lower-risk included those with IPSS-R ≤3.5 points or very-low, low, or moderate-low IPSS-M, while higher-risk included those with IPSS-R &gt;3.5 points or moderate-high, high, or very-high IPSS-M. Clinical, molecular features, overall survival (OS), and AML progression were compared between MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit and MDS-LB TP53 multihit groups. Finally, outcomes between patients with likely biallelic TP53 multihit status, defined as harboring a single TP53 mutation accompanied by a co-occurring deletion/LOH of 17p or a TP53 VAF ≥50%, versus those considered less likely to be biallelic, thus still classified as multihit, defined as having &gt;1 TP53 mutation but a combined VAF &lt;50%, were compared in both MDS-del(5q) and MDS-LB groups. Statistical analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.2). Results: We included 113 patients with a median follow-up of 81.1 months (95% CI 74.9–NR). A total of 45 (39.8%) were MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit, and 68 (60.2%) MDS-LB TP53 multihit. Compared to MDS-LB TP53 multihit, patients with MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit had significantly higher platelet counts (209 ×10⁹/L vs. 77 ×10⁹/L) and were more frequently classified as lower-risk by both IPSS-R (75.4% vs. 9.8%) and IPSS-M (90.2% vs. 24.6%). The median number of mutations per patient, excluding TP53, was 1 in both groups, and only SF3B1 mutations were significantly more frequent in the MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit group compared to MDS-LB TP53 multihit (20.5% vs. 2.9%; p&lt;0.01). Regarding survival, MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit patients showed an improved OS compared to MDS-LB TP53 multihit (median OS of 57.0 months (95%CI, 43.0–112.0) vs 14.0 months (95%CI, 8.6–19.0); p&lt;0.01). Moreover, while the risk of progression to AML at 48 months were comparable between groups (34.9% for MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit and 33.0% for MDS-LB TP53 multihit; p=0.8), a significant difference was observed in the timing of AML progression: median time to AML evolution of 31.7 months (IQR 23.4–55.3) in the MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit group and 7.2 months (IQR 4.1–12.9) in the MDS-LB TP53 multihit group (p&lt;0.01). Notably, no significant differences in outcomes were found between TP53 multihit and most likely biallelic cases in both MDS-del(5q) and MDS-LB cohorts. The impact of complex karyotype (CK) in MDS-LB TP53 multihit was also explored. MDS-LB TP53 multihitwith CK showed a significantly worse OS compared to MDS-LB TP53 multihitwithout CK (median OS of 10.0 months (95% CI 7.5–17.0) vs 40.0 months (95% CI 14.0–NA); respectively; p&lt;0.001. However, the incidence of AML and median time to AML evolution were comparable between both groups. Finally, OS between MDS-LB TP53 multihit patients without CK and the MDS-del(5q) TP53 multihit cohort was compared. Median OS was significantly shorter in the former group (median of 40 months) compared to the latter (median of 61 months) (p &lt;0.01) Conclusions: These findings underscore that, in contrast to other TP53-multihit MDS subtypes, MDS-del(5q) with TP53 multihit alterations constitute a clinically distinct entity with better outcomes, thereby warranting reconsideration of its place in current classification systems.
Wide variability and inconsistency in reporting of results of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) clinical trials: An icMDS systematic review of published manuscripts
Getz, Ted M. , Pugh, Kelly , Brunner, Andrew M. , Borate, Uma , Buckstein, Rena , Hasserjian, Robert P. , Fenaux, Pierre, Sallman, David A. , Nimer, Stephen D. , Little, Richard F. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Greenberg, Peter L. , Xu, Mina L. , Bejar, Rafael, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Padron, Eric , Gore, Steven D. , Bennett, John M. , Metzeler, Klaus H. , Pleyer, Lisa , Loosdrecht, Arjan van de, Cluzeau, Thomas , Mufti, Ghulam, Sébert, Marie , Götze, Katharina S. , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Al‐Kali, Aref , Yacoub, Abdulraheem , Li, Bing, Stahl, Maximilian , Götze, Katharina , Brunner, Andrew, Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Kewan, Tariq Zuheir , Platzbecker, Uwe , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Wei, Andrew H. , Kordasti, Shahram , Roboz, Gail J. , Savona, Michael R. , Loghavi, Sanam , Fenaux, Pierre , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della , Santini, Valeria , Efficace, Fabio , Taylor, Justin , Kim, Tae Kon , Halene, Stephanie , Komrokji, Rami S. , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Xie, Zhuoer , Bejar, Rafael , Sanz, Guillermo , Figueroa, María E. , Carraway, Hetty E. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Starczynowski, Daniel T. , Boultwood, Jacqueline , Daver, Naval , Churpek, Jane E. , Majeti, Ravindra , List, Alan F. , Orgueira, Adrián Mosquera , Solé, Françesc , Steensma, David P. , Adès, Lionel , Lanino, Luca , Madanat, Yazan F. , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Lindsley, R Coleman , Gurnari, Carmelo , Li, Bing, Kotsianidis, Ιoannis , Zeidan, Amer M.

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3852-3852

10.1182/blood-2025-3852 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Standardized reporting of clinical trials results for MDS is essential to improve clinical interpretation and cross-study comparison. However, reporting of patient characteristics, response criteria, and endpoints in publications is often inconsistent; there is no systemic analysis of MDS trial reporting available. We conducted a systematic review of published MDS trial manuscripts on behalf of the international consortium for MDS (icMDS) to assess variability in reporting practices. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials registered for adults (≥18 years) with MDS that reported results between 2015-2024. Clinical trials that included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were included if they enrolled ≥5 MDS patients. We excluded trials without an MDS cohort; non-therapeutic trials; trials focused on transplant interventions; or those which enrolled solid malignancies or other hematologic malignancies (chronic myeloid leukemia or lymphoid diseases). Finally, trials were required to have a manuscript available on Larvol, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Trials were categorized by disease risk (lower-risk [LR] vs. higher-risk [HR]) and trial phase (early phase [EP] vs. late phase [LP]). Results We identified 502 MDS trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 351 did not meet inclusion criteria and 79 lacked a manuscript. A total of 72 trials (32 EP, 40 LP) with 80 publications (34 EP, 46 LP) were analyzed. Frequently reported baseline characteristics included age (100% EP, 100% LP), disease risk (74% EP, 74% LP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (85% EP, 72% LP), prior treatments (71% EP, 67% LP), and RBC transfusion dependency (32% EP, 70% LP). Less frequently reported characteristics included blood counts (hemoglobin [Hb; 38% EP, 54% LP], platelet count [38% EP, 54% LP], neutrophil count [24% EP and LP]) and bone marrow blasts (29% EP, 43% LP). Although disease risk was widely reported, definitions varied: IPSS and IPSS-R were each reported in 54% of manuscripts, while IPSS-M appeared in only 3%. Cytogenetic risk was separately reported in 39% of manuscripts (38% EP, 39% LP), and mutational data in 45% (47% EP, 43% LP). Responses per IWG 2006 criteria were reported in 84% of manuscripts. The primary endpoint involved safety/tolerability in 85% of EP manuscripts, though definitions were variable; recommended phase 2 dose was the most common (26% of EP manuscripts). In LP trials, primary endpoints were risk-specific: transfusion independence (TI) in 77% of LR, overall response rate (ORR) in 28% of HR, and complete remission (CR) or overall survival (OS) in 22% of HR. In HR manuscripts, CR was reported in 100%, ORR in 73%, hematologic improvement (HI) in 48%, RBC-TI in 23%, and OS in 80%. However, seven different definitions were used for ORR: CR + marrow CR + partial remission + HI per IWG 2006 was most common (35%). Event-free survival was reported in 25%; progression-free survival and relapse-free survival in 13%; and leukemia-free survival in 5%. Early mortality rate was reported in 35% (18% EP, 56% LP) and transplant rate in 58% (50% EP, 67% LP). Only 47% of HR and 90% of LR manuscripts identified HI-eligible patients. In LR-MDS, RBC-TI was reported in 72% of manuscripts but used six definitions. The most common were RBC-TI ≥8 weeks at any time during treatment (24%), ≥8 weeks within 28 weeks of treatment (13%), ≥8 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.0 (4%), ≥12 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.5 (4%), and ≥16 weeks within 24 weeks of treatment (12%). The remainder did not report RBC-TI, did not define it, or used a custom definition not used in another trial. HI was reported in 80% of LR papers with most of those reporting HI using IWG 2006 criteria (90%). Conclusion Reporting of baseline characteristics, response criteria, and outcomes is inconsistent in MDS clinical trials, with wide variability in response definitions, including ORR and TI. This heterogeneity limits interpretability, hampers historical comparisons and may obscure efficacy signals. Our findings highlight the need for standardized reporting guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency in MDS trial publications. As a next phase of this effort, we will conduct a formal Delphi process among icMDS experts to establish consensus recommendations for minimal and optimal MDS clinical trial reporting in manuscripts by disease risk (LR/HR) and trial phase (EP/LP).
A Molecular-Based Ecosystem to Improve Personalized Medicine in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)
Dall'Olio, Lorenzo, Pleyer, Lisa , Montalban‐Bravo, Guillermo , Bazinet, Alexandre , Meggendorfer, Manja , Sauta, Elisabetta, Travaglino, Erica , Quintela, David, Jerez, Andrés , Cornejo, Elena, Martín, Paloma García, Roldán, Verónica , Suarez, Dolly Viviana Fiallo, Velasco, Estefania Cerezo, Calabuig, Marisa , Souchet, Laëtitia, Borin, Lorenza, Diral, Elisa , Vučinić, Vladan , Russo, Antonio , Tentori, Cristina Astrid , Buizza, Alessandro, Delleani, Mattia , Consagra, Angela , Kiwan, Ahmad , Ali, Najla H. Al, Sallman, David A. , Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Follo, Matilde Y. , Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P. , Bejar, Rafael, Thol, Felicitas , Fenaux, Pierre , Haferlach, Torsten, Germing, Ulrich, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Padron, Eric , Lanino, Luca , Hunter, Anthony M. , Gagelmann, Nico , Robin, Marie , Sala, Claudia , Dall’Olio, Daniele , Gurnari, Carmelo , Dall'Olio, Lorenzo, Wang, Yu‐Hung , Xicoy, Blanca , Shih, Lee‐Yung , Haque, Tamanna Zohra , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Geissler, Klaus H. , Bataller, Alex , Casetti, Ilaria Carola , Sauta, Elisabetta , Palomo, Laura , Zamora, Lurdes , Díaz‐Beyá, Marina , Pita, Alejandro Avendaño, Roldan, Veronica, Such, Esperanza , Sanz, Guillermo , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Castilla‐Llorente, Cristina , Bulabois, Claude‐Eric , Awada, Hussein , Bernardi, Massimo , Chiusolo, Patrizia , Curti, Antonio , Giaccone, Luisa , Onida, Francesco , Passamonti, Francesco , Bergonzi, Gregorio Maria , Voso, Maria Teresa , Hou, Hsin‐An , Chou, Wen‐Chien , Yao, Chi‐Yuan , Lin, Chien‐Chin , Tien, Hwei‐Fang , Campagna, Alessia , Ubezio, Marta , Todisco, Gabriele , Maggioni, Giulia , Asti, Gianluca , Zampini, Matteo , Riva, Elena , Ficara, Francesca , Santoro, Armando , Carota, Luciana , Sanavia, Tiziana , Rollo, Cesare , VanOudenhove, Jennifer , Fariselli, Piero , Kern, Wolfgang , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Thota, Swapna , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Finelli, Carlo , Platzbecker, Uwe , Solé, Françesc , Díez‐Campelo, María , Bejar, Rafael , Kröger, Nicolaus , Itzykson, Raphaël , Graubert, Timothy Aaron , Fontenay, Michaëla , Zeidan, Amer M. , Komrokji, Rami S. , Santini, Valeria , Haferlach, Torsten , Germing, Ulrich , D'Amico, Saverio , Castellani, Gastone , Solary, Éric , Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della

Blood | December 5, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1003-1003

10.1182/blood-2024-200104 Get It

Background. Study of myeloid neoplasms (MN) has been rapidly transformed by genome characterization. Gene mutations have been reported to influence disease phenotype and risk of disease progression, and the evaluation of mutational status can provide valuable insights to improve the decision-making process. In this international study, we evaluated the clinical impact of mutational screening in patients with CMML, which is characterized by significant clinical and genomic heterogeneity, including a substantial proportion of patients with poor outcomes and unmet needs. Currently, only limited molecular information has been incorporated into CMML classification and prognostication. Methods. We retrospectively collected 3182 CMML patients. We used MOSAIC, an AI-based framework for multimodal analysis in rare cancers (PMID: 38875514) to develop innovative, molecular-based tools for classification and prognostication. An independent validation of the results on 516 prospectively collected patients was performed. Results. Bayesian Networs and Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were used to identify genomic associations and define a CMML molecular classification. We identified 11 clusters with distinct clinical and genomic features, including splicing machinery, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures (i.e., AML-like and TP53 mutations). Up to 15% of patients showed clear genomic overlap with other MN. Importantly, extensive multi-color flow cytometry on T lymphocytes, NK and myeloid cells (BD FACSymphony A5 Cell Analyzer) revealed specific immunologic and inflammation signatures associated with molecular subgroups. We then integrated molecular and clinical information to build an international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS). We assessed the performance of different statistical and AI-based methods; L1-penalized Cox Model resulted as the best performing method. Selected features included hematological parameters (WBC, Hb, PLT and marrow blasts), cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutations in 10 genes (ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, NRAS, RUNX1, SETBP1, STAG2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1). By Bayesian thresholds optimization, we identified 5 risk classes (i.e., very-low, low, intermediate, high and very-high) with median overall survival (OS) ranging from 99 to 9 months (P&lt;.001), and median leukemia-free survival (LFS) ranging from 210 to 18 months (P&lt;.001). iCPSS provided better patient discrimination across all clinical endpoints compared to currently available prognostic tools, with a Concordance Index (CI) for OS of 0.75 versus 0.62-0.64, respectively. Notably, compared to available scoring systems, up to 40% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk classes by the iCPSS. External validation on an independent prospective cohort confirmed that the performance of iCPSS is superior to existing prognostic models (CI for OS 0.71 vs 0.54-0.61, respectively) To demonstrate the clinical utility of iCPSS, we focused on 753 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In multivariable analysis, iCPSS stratified the probability of OS post-HSCT (P&lt;.001) and identified groups of patients with different probabilities of disease relapse, ranging from 9% to 62% (P&lt;.001). We employed a clinical- and genomic-based decision support system (PMID: 38723212) to determine the optimal timing of HSCT. Preliminary analyses indicated that higher-risk patients according to iCPSS (i.e., intermediate, high, and very high) benefit from an immediate HSCT strategy. Lower-risk patients (i.e., very low and low) had life expectancy maximized with delayed HSCT. Modeling decision analysis using iCPSS compared to conventional scores, resulted in a change in transplantation policy for a significant proportion of patients (up to 25%). Conclusion. Molecular information significantly improves the classification of CMML patients, providing a basis for refining diagnostic boundaries with other MN and for a more rational inclusion of patients in clinical trials. The iCPSS demonstrated superior performance over currently available scoring systems and improved HSCT decision making process.
Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia
Duncavage, Eric J., Bagg, Adam , Hasserjian, Robert P. , DiNardo, Courtney D. , Iacobucci, Ilaria , Jaiswal, Siddhartha , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Patel, Keyur P. , Arcila, Maria E. , Borowitz, Michael J., Cargo, Catherine , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Haferlach, Torsten , Hellström‐Lindberg, Eva , Klco, Jeffery M. , Loh, Mignon Lee-Cheun, Papaemmanuil, Elli , Reiter, Andreas , Skoda, Radek C. , Solé, Françesc , Stone, Richard M. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Wu, David , Ebert, Benjamin L. , Cazzola, Mario , Godley, Lucy A , Iacobucci, Ilaria , Jaiswal, Siddhartha , Malcovati, Luca , Vannucchi, Alessandro M , Patel, Keyur P , Arber, Daniel A , Bejar, Rafael , Branford, Susan , Brown, Anna L , Döhner, Hartmut , Falini, Brunangelo , Kim, Annette S , Komrokji, Rami S , Loghavi, Sanam , Mullighan, Charles G , Ogawa, Seishi , Ross, David M , Savona, Michael R , Shimamura, Akiko , Solé, Francesc , Walter, Matthew J , Wu, David , Ebert, Benjamin L , Cazzola, Mario , DiNardo, Courtney , Godley, Lucy A. , Malcovati, Luca , Arber, Daniel A. , Berliner, Nancy , Branford, Susan , Brown, Anna , Falini, Brunangelo , Komrokji, Rami S. , Loh, Mignon L. , Loghavi, Sanam , Mullighan, Charles G. , Orazi, Attilio , Savona, Michael R.

Blood | September 21, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2228-2247

10.1182/blood.2022015853 Get It

Abstract Myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias derive from the clonal expansion of hematopoietic cells driven by somatic gene mutations. Although assessment of morphology plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with these malignancies, genomic characterization has become increasingly important for accurate diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapeutic decision making. Conventional cytogenetics, a comprehensive and unbiased method for assessing chromosomal abnormalities, has been the mainstay of genomic testing over the past several decades and remains relevant today. However, more recent advances in sequencing technology have increased our ability to detect somatic mutations through the use of targeted gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-transcriptome sequencing or RNA sequencing. In patients with myeloid neoplasms, whole-genome sequencing represents a potential replacement for both conventional cytogenetic and sequencing approaches, providing rapid and accurate comprehensive genomic profiling. DNA sequencing methods are used not only for detecting somatically acquired gene mutations but also for identifying germline gene mutations associated with inherited predisposition to hematologic neoplasms. The 2022 International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias makes extensive use of genomic data. The aim of this report is to help physicians and laboratorians implement genomic testing for diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision making and illustrates the potential of genomic profiling for enabling personalized medicine in patients with hematologic neoplasms.
Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies
Akkari, Yassmine, Baughn, Linda B. , Dubuc, Adrian M. , Smith, Adam C. , Mallo, Mar , Cin, Paola Dal , Díez‐Campelo, María , Gallego, Marta S., Granada, Isabel , Haase, D., Schlegelberger, Brigitte , Slavutsky, Irma , Mecucci, Cristina , Levine, Ross L. , Hasserjian, Robert P. , Solé, Françesc , Levy, Brynn , Xu, Xinjie , Akkari, Yassmine M N , Dal Cin, Paola , Granada Font, Isabel , Baughn, Linda B , Solé, Francesc , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Haase, Detlef

Blood | February 15, 2022 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2273-2284

10.1182/blood.2021014309 Get It

Abstract Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing.
Will a Peripheral Blood (PB) Sample Yield the Same Diagnostic and Prognostic Cytogenetic Data as the Concomitant Bone Marrow (BM) In Myelodysplasia? An International Study Comparing Cytogenetics and Interphase FISH Using Parallel PB and BM Samples
Cherry, Athena M. , Slovak, Marilyn L., Chun, Kathy , Éclache, Virginie , Haase, Detlef, Hagemeijer, Anne, Hildebrandt, Barbara, Iqbal, M. Anwar , Jhanwar, Suresh C., LeBeau, Michelle M., Ohyashiki, Kazuma , Solé, Françesc , Dyke, Daniel L. Van , Dewald, Gordon W., Solé, Francesc , Campbell, Lynda J. , Haferlach, Claudia

Blood | October 12, 2019 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2922-2922

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2922.2922 Get It

Abstract Abstract 2922 The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematological malignancies characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and a highly variable clinical course, for which novel treatments are beginning to emerge. Conventional cytogenetic studies (CCS) of bone marrow (BM) are routinely used in clinical practice to detect abnormal clones in proliferating (metaphase) cells, identifying clonal aberrations in ∼50% of de novo MDS cases. Cytogenetics is also one of the key International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) components used to estimate overall survival and leukemia-free survival in MDS. Chromosome abnormalities may be quantified at presentation and during treatment by the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with DNA probes for specific chromosome loci (e.g., chromosomes 5, 7, 8 and 20) in non-proliferating (interphase) nuclei. However, it is not clear whether or not peripheral blood CCS will yield the same diagnostic and prognostic data as bone marrow CCS at disease presentation or whether patients without apparent chromosome abnormalities by CCS have “hidden” abnormalities that can be identified by interphase FISH. To answer these questions, 15 members of the International Working Group on MDS Cytogenetics agreed to perform CCS and FISH in parallel on both peripheral blood and bone marrow samples collected from MDS patients. To be certain that all participating sites scored and interpreted their individual FISH data in a similar fashion, a quality assurance (QA) study was completed with each site studying two identical test (proficiency) samples. Concordance among sites was very good to excellent allowing for the establishment of a standardized protocol with clear scoring criteria before patient samples were processed. In the second phase of the study, a total of 77 MDS patients were accrued to the study with 61% showing an abnormal karyotype. A FISH panel consisting of eight probe sets [-5/5q-, -7/7q-/der(1;7), +8/8q-, -11/+11/11q-/add(11q), 12p-/+21/t(12;21), -13/13q-, 17p- and 20q-/i(20q)/i(20p), Abbott Molecular, Inc.] was performed on both specimen types. While CCS was frequently unsuccessful (57.5%) in the PB specimens, FISH was informative (concordant with BM/PB CCS) in 92% of cases, with 49% of PB FISH demonstrating an abnormal clone. FISH was discordant in 4 of 77 BM and PB samples (5%), while CCS and FISH on BM and PB were discordant in 6 of 77 BM specimens (8%) and 6 of 73 PB specimens (8%). The data suggest that evaluation of interphase nuclei from PB on follow-up (non-diagnostic) FISH studies on MDS patients will be equally informative (and less costly and stressful) as a BM sample. Disclosures: Slovak: PerkinElmer: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Ohyashiki:Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding.