Qazi, Taha

Abstract Background Complications such as intermittent pouchitis (IP) and chronic inflammatory disorders of the pouch (CP) are common after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), particularly among patients with both ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). There are no standardized approaches for prophylaxis against these complications for patients with PSC undergoing IPAA. We compared outcomes among patients with PSC and IPAA who received antibiotic or immunosuppressive therapies to those who did not. Methods We designed a retrospective cohort study that included patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC from 7 tertiary care centers that underwent IPAA between 1994 and 2023. Patients were categorized on whether they received medications following IPAA that may provide primary prophylactic benefit, such as antibiotics, probiotics, immunomodulators, or biologic medications; and the proportion of patients developing IP and CP was evaluated. Results A total of 172 patients were included in the cohort, and 13 (7.6%) patients received antibiotics or immunosuppressant medications. Antibiotics and probiotics were the most common therapy (5 patients, 2.9%), followed by biologics, small-molecule inhibitors, immunomodulators, or mesalamine (all 1 patient, 0.6%). Compared to patients not receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression, patients receiving antibiotics or immunosuppression were significantly less likely to develop IP (69.2% vs 91.2%; P = .03; odds ratio 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.80) and CP (23.1% vs 56.0%, P = 0.04; OR 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06-0.89). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC undergoing IPAA, usage of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression was low. However, use of concomitant antibiotics or immunosuppression may decrease the burden of inflammatory conditions of the pouch in these high-risk patients.

Abstract Background & Aims Stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD) is a significant problem, and no selective anti-fibrotic therapies are available. Anti-inflammatory approaches are the mainstay of medical treatment. However, data on the efficacy of ustekinumab (USTE) in ileal stricturing CD are lacking. Our aim was to assess its efficacy in this setting. Methods We performed an international multicenter observational cohort study evaluating adult CD patients who received USTE within 6 months of imaging-confirmed symptomatic stricturing small bowel disease. Outcomes were rates of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), surgery, intervention (defined as the composite need for EBD or surgery), recurrent obstructive symptoms, and USTE persistence. Results Fifty-seven patients were included (51% female, median age 43 years). Median follow-up was 17 months. Intervention rates were 35%, 45%, and 69% of patients, at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. USTE persistence was 78%, 76%, and 52% at 12, 24, and 48 months. Estimated obstructive symptoms rates were 31% and 49% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. EBD within 6 months prior to starting USTE was associated with an increased risk of intervention. Increased bowel wall thickness on imaging, prior biologic use, and obstructive symptom duration were associated with USTE discontinuation. Occurrence of obstructive symptoms during treatment was associated with prior biologic use, EBD within 6 months of starting USTE, and a lower BMI. Conclusions USTE appears to be an appropriate medical option in biologic-experienced CD patients with ileal strictures. Further prospective data are needed to better define outcomes and predictors of response in this setting.

Abstract Background Global data demonstrate an inverse relationship between hospital ileoanal pouch volume and adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for quality metrics for this technically demanding procedure.1-4 Currently, there are no standardised quality indicators to define high-quality pouch surgery. This study aimed to establish international consensus on key performance indicators (KPIs) in pouch surgery. Methods A modified Delphi process was conducted among an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts. Participants were identified through professional networks, literature review, and direct email invitation; additional participants recruited via a snowball sampling approach over one month. Candidate KPIs were generated from literature review and expert input across 5 domains. Each item was rated on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 9 = critically important); consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% of respondents rating an item 7–9. Items not reaching consensus were re-rated in a second round following anonymized group feedback. Results Round 1 included 312 participants from 37 countries. Demographics (Table 1): 53% were age 45 years, 35.2% were female, and included surgeons (68.6%) and gastroenterologists (31.1%). Most (76.6%) practice at academic or university hospitals, with a median of 11 (5–17) years in practise; 78.9% perform >1 pouchoscopy per month, and 39.5% of surgeons perform 5 pouches/year. Respondents’ regions included North America (51%), Europe (26%), Oceania (9%), Asia (6%), Latin America (4%), and the Middle East/Africa (4%). Seven (18%) countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Malaysia, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Sweden, and Switzerland) reported pouch surgery is already centralised, while 70.6% agreed pouch centralisation should be implemented. Cost/logistics and professional autonomy were the most important barriers to centralisation, whereas capacity and training exposure were least important. Overall, 37/59 (62.7%) candidate KPIs reached consensus after Round 1. The Round 2 response rate was 61%, and 2 additional KPIs reached consensus (preop ileitis and long-term risk of pouchitis). Additionally, 14 of 25 (56%) informed consent items reached consensus, and 64% of respondents felt informed consent for pouch surgery requires 2 or more office visits. Consensus items were used to populate a KPIPS Checklist (Figure 1). Conclusion Through an international Delphi process, the KPIPS study identified a consensus-derived set of key performance indicators to measure quality in pouch surgery. These quality metrics provide a foundation for benchmarking outcomes and represent a critical step towards centralization and the development of designated pouch centres of excellence to improve global standards of care for pouch patients. References: 1. Worley GHT, Fearnhead NS, Brown SR, et al. Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: Lessons learned from the ileoanal pouch registry and the 2017 ileoanal pouch report. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:913–22. 2. Giddings HL, Yang PF, Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Ng KS. Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Systematic review. Br J Surg 2024;111. 3. Hoang CM, Maykel JA, Davids JS, et al. Distribution of elective ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cases for ulcerative colitis: A study utilizing the university health system consortium database. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2613–9. 4. Moojen TB, Visser E, Reijntjes MA, et al. One-year stoma-free survival of ileoanal pouches for uc in european centers: The miracle project. Ann Surg Open 2025;6:e596. Conflict of interest: Prof. Holubar, Stefan: No conflict of interest Soop, Mattias: No conflict of interest Poskus, Tomas: No conflict of interest Neary, Peter: No conflict of interest Uchino, Tairin: No conflict of interest Yang, Song-soo: No conflict of interest Adamina, Michel: No conflict of interest Avellaneda, Nicolas Luis: No conflict of interest Barnes, Edward: No conflict of interest Brouquet, Antoine: No conflict of interest Brown, Steven Ross: No conflict of interest De Buck Van Overstraeten, Anthony: No conflict of interest Buskens, Christianne J.: No conflict of interest Chiorean, Michael: No conflict of interest Clark, David: No conflict of interest Cohen, Benjamin: No conflict of interest El Ouali, Sara: No conflict of interest Faiz, Omar Darius: No conflict of interest Fichera, Alessandro: No conflict of interest Hahnloser, Dieter: No conflict of interest Hancock, Laura: No conflict of interest Herfarth, Hans: No conflict of interest Johnston, Michael: No conflict of interest Kayal, Maia: No conflict of interest Laharie, David: No conflict of interest Liberman, Sender: No conflict of interest Loftus, Jr, Edward: No conflict of interest Moeslein, Gabriela: No conflict of interest Myrelid, Pär: No conflict of interest Poylin, Vitaliy: No conflict of interest Qazi, Taha: No conflict of interest Raffals, Laura: No conflict of interest Rubin, David T.: No conflict of interest Spinelli, Antonino: No conflict of interest Steinhagen, Emily: No conflict of interest Tozer, Philip: No conflict of interest Verstockt, Bram: No conflict of interest Warusavitarne, Janindra: No conflict of interest Wexner, Steven: No conflict of interest Winter, Desmond: No conflict of interest

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with chronic pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) are treated with biologics; however, the comparative effectiveness of advanced therapies in this population has not been systematically evaluated. We sought to compare the effectiveness of antitumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) therapies and ustekinumab in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions of the pouch. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. We included patients with chronic pouchitis and CLDP initiating treatment with anti-TNF therapies or ustekinumab. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 6 months after induction. We also evaluated clinical remission at 6 months among patients with chronic pouchitis and CLDP separately. RESULTS: Among 132 patients, 106 (80%) had a diagnosis of CLDP and 82 (62%) initiated therapy with ustekinumab. A significantly higher proportion of patients with CLDP treated with ustekinumab were in clinical remission at 6 months as compared with patients treated with anti-TNF therapy (62% vs 40%, P = 0.027); however, there was no significant difference among patients with chronic pouchitis ( P = 0.946). There was no independent statistical significance in the odds of remission at 6 months among patients with CLDP among patients receiving ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF therapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.91, 95% confidence interval 0.69–5.30) after adjusting for presence of a fistula, number of preoperative advanced therapies, and number of advanced therapies after IPAA. DISCUSSION: These data suggest the potential benefit of ustekinumab in patients with CLDP and should prompt future novel effectiveness evaluations in this population.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to establish the clinical utility of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-supported, model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach (precision-guided dosing [PGD]) by assessing the impact of pharmacokinetic (clearance [CL]) and clinical laboratory parameters on adalimumab (ADA) dosage adjustments during maintenance therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In the EMPOWER study, blood was collected at any time post-ADA injection. Pharmacokinetic (PK) testing was conducted in an accredited lab. Inputs for the PGD test included ADA concentrations, antibodies to ADA, albumin levels, and the current dosing regimen. CL was calculated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Results were reported to health care providers (HCPs) within 3 days. HCPs’ treatment decisions were recorded and classified as treatment reduction, continuation, intensification, or ADA discontinuation. The physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity was collected. Relationships between drug concentrations, CL, disease activity, and physician decision-making were assessed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 213 cases were assessed by 21 HCPs. ADA treatment was intensified in 24% and discontinued in 13% of cases. An ADA concentration ≤ 10 μg/mL was associated with a 23.7-fold and 3.0-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification and PGA > 0, respectively, compared to concentrations > 10 μg/mL. An ADA concentration < 5 μg/mL was associated with a 3.3-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation. CL ≥ 0.318 L/day was associated with a 10.4-fold higher likelihood of therapy intensification. Higher CL (>0.8 L/day) was associated with a 3.5-fold and 4.2-fold higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation and PGA > 0, respectively. Conclusions: PGD enables earlier and precise optimization of ADA dosing by predicting trough levels at any time during the therapy cycle. Optimized dosing to achieve target ADA concentrations and low clearance is crucial to mitigate therapy discontinuation and active disease in IBD patients.

Lay Summary In this prospective, multicenter observational study of highly refractory patients with Crohn’s disease of the pouch, risankizumab achieved the primary outcome of clinical remission in 50% and the more stringent secondary outcome of antibiotic- and steroid-free remission in 30.8% at 12 weeks.

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–associated peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) decreases quality of life and remains poorly understood. Given the prevalence of this condition and its negative impact, it is surprising that evidence-based disease definitions and diagnostic strategies are lacking. This systematic review summarizes available data to facilitate development and validation of diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, and imaging indices specific to this condition. Methods A literature search was conducted. Consensus or classification criteria, case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials related to diagnosis were included. Results A total of 44 studies reporting data on approximately 1500 patients with pSpA were eligible for analysis. Data quality across studies was only graded as fair to good. Due to large heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. The majority of studies incorporated patient-reported outcomes and a physical examination. A total of 13 studies proposed or validated screening tools, consensus, classification, or consensus criteria. A total of 28 studies assessed the role of laboratory tests, none of which were considered sufficiently accurate for use in diagnosis. A total of 17 studies assessed the role of imaging, with the available literature insufficient to fully endorse any imaging modality as a robust diagnostic tool. Conclusions This review highlights existing inconsistency and lack of a clear diagnostic approach for IBD-associated pSpA. Given the absence of an evidence-based approach, a combination of existing criteria and physician assessment should be utilized. To address this issue comprehensively, our future efforts will be directed toward pursuit of a multidisciplinary approach aimed at standardizing evaluation and diagnosis of IBD-associated pSpA.

Abstract Background Since 2009, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists have utilized “IBD LIVE,” a weekly live video conference with a global audience, to discuss the multidisciplinary management of their most challenging cases. While most cases presented were confirmed IBD, a substantial number were diseases that mimic IBD. We have categorized all IBD LIVE cases and identified “IBD-mimics” with consequent clinical management implications. Methods Cases have been recorded/archived since May 2018; we reviewed all 371 cases from May 2018–February 2023. IBD-mimics were analyzed/categorized according to their diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Results Confirmed IBD cases made up 82.5% (306/371; 193 Crohn’s disease, 107 ulcerative colitis, and 6 IBD-unclassified). Sixty-five (17.5%) cases were found to be mimics, most commonly medication-induced (n = 8) or vasculitis (n = 7). The evaluations that ultimately resulted in correct diagnosis included additional endoscopic biopsies (n = 13, 21%), surgical exploration/pathology (n = 10, 16.5%), biopsies from outside the GI tract (n = 10, 16.5%), genetic/laboratory testing (n = 8, 13%), extensive review of patient history (n = 8, 13%), imaging (n = 5, 8%), balloon enteroscopy (n = 5, 8%), and capsule endoscopy (n = 2, 3%). Twenty-five patients (25/65, 38%) were treated with biologics for presumed IBD, 5 of whom subsequently experienced adverse events requiring discontinuation of the biologic. Many patients were prescribed steroids, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate, and 3 were trialed on tofacitinib. Conclusions The diverse presentation of IBD and IBD-mimics necessitates periodic consideration of the differential diagnosis, and reassessment of treatment in presumed IBD patients without appropriate clinical response. The substantial differences and often conflicting treatment approaches to IBD versus IBD-mimics directly impact the quality and cost of patient care.