Giunta, Riccardo E.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Brustrekonstruktion mittels autologem Gewebe ist fester Bestandteil eines ganzheitlichen Therapiekonzeptes bei Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom. Während zahlreiche Studien den körperlichen und psychischen Gesundheitszustand von Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs nach Mastektomie und konsekutiver Brustrekonstruktion untersuchen, mangelt es an objektiven Daten zur Beurteilung des Einflusses von Ablatio und Brustrekonstruktion auf die Wahrnehmung von externen Beobachtern. Diese Studie untersucht die Blickmuster bei Betrachtung einer Brust in verschiedenen Stadien der Brustrekonstruktion mittels DIEP Lappenplastik. Material und Methoden Mittels Eye-Tracking-Technologie wurden die Augenbewegungen von 58 Studienteilnehmer*in- nen beim Betrachten von 2D-Fotografien einer Patientin in den verschiedenen Stadien der Brustrekonstruktion (1. Ablatio, 2. Aufbau mittels DIEP Lappenplastik, 3. MAK Rekonstruktion) analysiert. Die Zeit bis zur ersten Fixierung und die Dauer der Fixierung wurde in jedem Bild für die rechte und linke Brust aufgezeichnet. Ergebnisse Die Dauer der kompletten Fixierung der operierten Brust zeigte über die verschiedenen Stadien der Brustrekonstruktion insgesamt eine signifikante Abnahme mit p<0,001. Gleichzeitig zeigte sich keine statistisch signifikante Veränderung der Blickdauer auf der nicht-operierten Gegen- seite mit p=0,174. Die Zeit bis zur ersten Blickfixierung der betroffenen Brust zeigte eine signifikante Zunahme über die verschiedenen Rekonstruktionsschritte, mit p<0,001. Bei der Gegenseite zeigte sich kein statistisch signifikanter Unterschied in der Zeit bis zur ersten Fixierung, mit p=0,344. Schlussfolgerung Die Ablatio mammae und die einzelnen Schritte der Brustrekonstruktion verändern die äußerliche Wahrnehmung von Patientinnen. Im Laufe der einzelnen re- konstruktiven Teilschritte kommt es zu einer zunehmenden Aufhebung der Blickdeviation in Richtung erkrankte Brust.

AbstractObjectiveTo the knowledge of the authors, no data about the reproducibility and accuracy of 3‐dimensional surface imaging of the face using a whole‐body scanner are available. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to assess the reproducibility of facial scans acquired using a whole‐body imaging device.Material and MethodsThis investigation investigated 220 3‐D scans of a total of 22 healthy volunteers (with a mean age of 29.36 years). Two consecutive 3‐D images using a Vectra WB360 of the volunteers were obtained utilizing a whole‐body imaging device. Predefined distances in the face were performed in each scan and compared. Furthermore, surface deviation between two consecutively captured scans was assessed.ResultsThe distance with the smallest statistical significance was found to be at the nose with p = 0.998, while the biggest statistical significance was found in the midface with p = 0.658. The area with the biggest surface deviation between the superimposed scans was the neck with a root mean square (RMS) of 1.62 ± 1.71, and the area with the smallest surface deviation was the forehead with a RMS of 0.17 ± 0.05.ConclusionThe whole‐body imaging device investigated in this study can be utilized to capture the face and provides enough accuracy to compare scans. Even though not directly investigated, it can be hypothesized that the error caused by repositioning the patient between a baseline and a follow‐up scan will not be too big to consider measurements performed with the whole‐body imaging device as impractical.

Abstract Background The objective assessment of beauty remains challenging despite ongoing research efforts. A new method of objectively determining the aesthetic appeal of body features by analyzing gaze patterns and eye movements has recently been investigated. Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by means of objective eye-tracking technology, differences in the gaze patterns of observers presented with standardized 3-dimensional images showing different degrees of breast asymmetry. Methods A total of 83 Caucasian study participants with a mean age of 38.60 (19.8) years were presented with 5 images depicting varying degrees of breast asymmetry. In addition to the assessment of eye movements, participants were asked to rate the aesthetic appeal and the asymmetry of the breasts on a 5-point Likert scale. Results Overall, the data showed that participants’ rating of the breasts’ aesthetic appeal was inversely related to the level of asymmetry. The mean [standard deviation] time until fixation was shortest for the image depicting the greatest breast asymmetry (50 cc) at 0.77 [0.7] seconds (P &lt; 0.001). In addition, the mammary region was also viewed longest in this image at 3.76 [0.5] seconds (P &lt; 0.001). A volume difference of 35 cc between breasts deflected the observers’ gaze significantly toward the larger of the asymmetric breasts (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Surgeons should focus on achieving symmetric breast volume (ie, differences &lt;35 cc between breasts) to avoid noticeable asymmetry with regard to breast size.

Abstract Background Facial aging is a multifactorial process that involves all tissues of the face, including skin, muscles, fat, ligaments, and bone. Whereas robust evidence is available for age-related changes of bone and facial fat, the influence of age on facial muscle activity is poorly understood. Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the motor unit action potential of facial muscles by utilizing surface-derived, noninvasive electromyography in young and old healthy volunteers. Methods The study investigated a total of 32 healthy volunteers with a mean [standard deviation] age of 42.6 [19.6] years (range, 21-82 years) and a mean BMI of 23.9 [2.7] kg/m2 (range, 18.5-29.7 kg/m2) by performing surface-derived, noninvasive facial electromyography. Nine facial muscles were investigated bilaterally, resulting in a total of 1632 measurements of the signal, baseline noise, and signal-to-noise ratio of these muscles. Results The results of the study revealed that age does not significantly influence the signal (P = 0.234), the baseline noise (P = 0.225), or the signal-to-noise ratio (P = 0.432) of younger individuals (&lt;30 years) vs older individuals (&gt;50 years) in a gender- and BMI-matched statistical model. Exceptions were the zygomaticus major muscle (reduced activity), procerus muscle (increased activity), and corrugator supercilii muscle (increased activity). Conclusions The results of this facial electromyography study may help to increase the understanding of facial aging. Future studies need to reproduce the results presented herein to further increase our understanding of facial aging.

Background: Although injectable soft-tissue fillers are frequently used for facial rejuvenation, there is a dearth of objective data evaluating the tissue-lifting effects. Current practices for efficacy evaluation include some subjectivity. This study seeks to evaluate the lifting effects of facial soft-tissue fillers in a quantifiable, objective setting. Methods: Twenty fresh hemifaces obtained from 10 Caucasian body donors (seven women and three men) with a mean age of 83.5 ± 6.8 years and a mean body mass index of 25.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2 were injected with soft-tissue fillers following a predefined treatment algorithm. Three-dimensional surface scanning procedures were performed to assess postinjection effects. Results: Injections in the medial face [i.e., forehead, medial midface, and perioral (chin and labiomandibular sulcus)] increased the local surface volume by 0.67, 0.56, and 0.87 cc and created local (but not regional) lifting effects of 1.11, 0.11, and 0.74 mm. Injections in the lateral face (temple, lateral midface, and jawline) changed the local surface volume by 0.45, 0.02, and −0.38 cc, and created local lifting effects of 0.57, 0.81, and 0.29 mm, respectively. Lateral face injections, however, created additional regional lifting effects by co-influencing neighboring lateral facial regions, which was not observed for medial face injections. Conclusions: This cadaveric study provides evidence that soft-tissue fillers, although typically classified as volumizers, can induce lifting effects of the face. Whereas temporal deep supraperiosteal injections have limited lifting effects, the combined effects of subdermal injections of the temple, lateral midface, and mandibular angle can induce lifting effects of the total lateral face. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Abstract Background Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic facecovers have become a common sight. The effect of facecovers on the gaze when looking at faces has not yet been assessed. Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate any potential differences in eye movement pattern in observers exposed to images showing a face without and with a facecover to identify if there is truly a change of gaze when identifying (masked) facial features. Methods The eye movement of 64 study participants (28 males and 36 females) with a mean [standard deviation] age of 31.84 [9.0] years was analyzed in this cross-sectional observational study. Eye movement analysis was conducted based on positional changes of eye features within an x- and y-coordinate system while two images (face without/with facecover) were displayed for 8 seconds. Results The results of this study revealed that the sequence of focusing on facial regions was not altered when wearing a facecover and followed the sequence: perioral, nose, periorbital. Wearing a facecover significantly increased the time spent focusing on the periorbital region and also increased the number of repeated eye fixations during the 8-second visual stimulus presentation. No statistically significant differences were observed between male and female participants in their eye movement pattern across all investigated variables (P &gt; 0.433). Conclusions The altered eye movement pattern caused by wearing facecoverings that this study has revealed suggests that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, aesthetic practitioners might consider developing marketing and treatment strategies that principally target the periorbital area.

AbstractObjectiveNeuromodulator injections of the forehead are often performed using standardized protocols. This study was designed to identify the individual skin motion pattern of the forehead and to relate this pattern to the underlying frontalis muscle morphology to offer guidance for neuromodulator placement.Material and MethodsThirty‐seven healthy volunteers (29 Caucasians, six African Americans, two Asians) with a mean age of 39.84 ± 14.4 years [range: 22‐73] were enrolled. 3D images of the forehead were analyzed using a Vectra H1 camera system computing skin displacement vectors between the noncontracted and the maximally contracted forehead of the volunteers. Relationships between the shape of the horizontal forehead lines (straight vs wavy) and the forehead motion pattern were calculated.ResultsIndependent of age or gender, a greater forehead motion angle was associated with the presence of wavy forehead lines 21.34°± 5.9 with P < 0.001, whereas straight forehead lines were associated with a smaller forehead motion angle 6.68°± 2.9 P < 0.001. Females had more frequently straight horizontal forehead lines versus males: 68.4% vs 44.4% (P = 0.037). Young volunteers (<39.8 years) did not differ in their mean forehead motion angle when compared to older volunteers (>39.8 years): 13.70°± 9.0 vs 12.39°± 8.0 with P = 0.530.ConclusionInjections of neuromodulators in the forehead can be individualized by respecting the shape of the horizontal forehead lines. Wavy lines require injection points that are located more laterally, whereas straight lines require more centrally located injection points.