Back to Authors

Guertler, Anne

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-0526

Mayo Clinic

LMU Klinikum

Citations 2

Precision of Soft-Tissue Filler Injections: An Ultrasound-Based Verification Study
Calomeni, Mariana, Bravo, Bruna S F, Velthuis, Peter J. , Schalet, Grant, Frank, Konstantin , Guertler, Anne , Alfertshofer, Michael , Cotofana, Sebastian , Elias, Mariana Calomeni , Frank, Konstantin , Frank, Konstantin , Alfertshofer, Michael , Cotofana, Sebastian , Schelke, Leonie , Moellhoff, Nicholas

Aesthetic Surgery Journal | October 25, 2022 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 353-361

10.1093/asj/sjac272 Get It

Abstract Background Uncontrolled product spread is an important issue to consider in facial filler injections. Lack of precision can result in reduced effectiveness and surface projection, as well as irregularities and product visibility. Objectives The authors sought to assess the precision of soft-tissue filler injections in the face by employing a cannula. Methods This single-center observational study investigated soft-tissue filler distribution utilizing real-time non-invasive ultrasound imaging. Outcome parameters included (1) the tissue plane of product distribution, (2) the extent of horizontal as well as vertical product spread at the injection site, and (3) the product surface area taking into account the multifactorial influence of several independent variables. Participants were followed up to 30 days post-injection. Results A total 100 facial injections were performed in 8 patients (2 males, 6 females) with a mean age of 37.20 (±6.34) years and a mean BMI of 22.21 (±1.39) kg/m.2. The plane of product distribution remained constant in approximately 90% of cases at day 0 (d0), d14, and d30. Mean horizontal product spread was higher compared with vertical spread, and both significantly decreased over all time points (P < .001). Mean product surface area was 22.51 ± 16.34 mm2 at d0, 15.97 ± 11.28 mm2 at d14, and 12.9 ± 9.15 mm2 at d30. Analysis employing generalized linear models revealed that injection volume and injection depth significantly influenced product surface area. Conclusions Injection of soft-tissue filler employing a cannula allows precise application of the product within the intended tissue plane. Precision can be improved by injecting less product into deeper tissue layers. Level of Evidence: 5
The Impact of Breast Symmetry on Eye Movement and Gaze Pattern: An Eye-Tracking Investigation
Kandelhardt, Chiara, Ehrl, Denis , Kohler, Lukas , Koban, Konstantin Christoph , Giunta, Riccardo E. , Guertler, Anne , Cotofana, Sebastian , Frank, Konstantin , Velthuis, Peter J. , Koban, Konstantin , Cotofana, Sebastian , Moellhoff, Nicholas , Mardini, Samir , Frank, Konstantin

Aesthetic Surgery Journal | July 17, 2021 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 11 | Pages: NP1512-NP1518

10.1093/asj/sjab285 Get It

Abstract Background The objective assessment of beauty remains challenging despite ongoing research efforts. A new method of objectively determining the aesthetic appeal of body features by analyzing gaze patterns and eye movements has recently been investigated. Objectives The objective of this study was to assess, by means of objective eye-tracking technology, differences in the gaze patterns of observers presented with standardized 3-dimensional images showing different degrees of breast asymmetry. Methods A total of 83 Caucasian study participants with a mean age of 38.60 (19.8) years were presented with 5 images depicting varying degrees of breast asymmetry. In addition to the assessment of eye movements, participants were asked to rate the aesthetic appeal and the asymmetry of the breasts on a 5-point Likert scale. Results Overall, the data showed that participants’ rating of the breasts’ aesthetic appeal was inversely related to the level of asymmetry. The mean [standard deviation] time until fixation was shortest for the image depicting the greatest breast asymmetry (50 cc) at 0.77 [0.7] seconds (P < 0.001). In addition, the mammary region was also viewed longest in this image at 3.76 [0.5] seconds (P < 0.001). A volume difference of 35 cc between breasts deflected the observers’ gaze significantly toward the larger of the asymmetric breasts (P < 0.001). Conclusions Surgeons should focus on achieving symmetric breast volume (ie, differences <35 cc between breasts) to avoid noticeable asymmetry with regard to breast size.