Gotkin, Robert H.

Background: Despite various aesthetic trends, the ideal lip proportion and lip volume remains elusive. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the aesthetic perception of various lip shapes to identify the most attractive lips. Methods: Fifty-nine White study participants with a mean age of 32.73 ± 9.4 years were asked to assess lips of various proportions and of various volumes. Gaze assessment and aesthetic rating of the same set of modified lip images were performed. Results: The results revealed that the lip proportion that was rated to be most attractive was the 1:1.6 ratio (upper-to-lower lip, 4.21 of a possible 5). This lip proportion, however, was not the first one to be viewed on initial image display (1.20 sec) and had the shortest duration of a stable eye fixation within the 6-second image display interval (2.18 of 6 seconds). The lip volume that received the highest aesthetic rating was the 100 percent volume (original lip size), with 4.56 of a possible 5. This lip volume, however, had the third longest interval between initial image exposure and the first stable eye fixation (0.81 second) and had the shortest duration of stable eye fixations during the 6 seconds of image display (2.22 of 6 seconds). Conclusion: The results presented could be potentially reflective of the internal cognitive processes during the involuntary and voluntary assessment of lip attractiveness.

Background: Novel imaging methods have provided new insights into the layered anatomy of the forehead. This study seeks to critically reevaluate the layered anatomy of the forehead by using ultrasound imaging and cadaveric dissection to provide an accurate anatomical description that can be used to guide safer surgical and minimally invasive frontal procedures. Methods: This study used ultrasound imaging in a sample of 20 volunteers (12 female and eight male volunteers; aged 35.25 ± 4.2 years; body mass index, 24.28 ± 3.5 kg/m2) and cadaveric dissections of 16 body donors (12 female and four male body donors; aged 72.76 ± 9.5 years) to reevaluate the layered anatomy of the forehead. Layer-by-layer dissections and ultrasound-based measurements of the frontal structures guided conclusions. Results: The following layered arrangement was identified: layer 1, skin; layer 2, superficial fatty layer; layer 3, suprafrontalis fascia; layer 4, orbicularis oculi and frontalis muscle (same plane); layer 5, a homogenous layer of fat [preseptal fat (in the upper eyelid), retro-orbicularis fat (deep to the orbicularis oculi muscle), and retro-frontalis fat (deep to the frontalis muscle); layer 6, subfrontalis fascia; layer 7, preperiosteal fat within the prefrontal space in the lower forehead and deep compartments in the upper forehead; and layer 8, periosteum. Conclusions: The results of this study add to the current understanding of the layered arrangement of the forehead. The combination of ultrasound imaging and cadaveric dissections provided evidence for a continuous fatty layer deep to the frontalis muscle.

Background: Although injectable soft-tissue fillers are frequently used for facial rejuvenation, there is a dearth of objective data evaluating the tissue-lifting effects. Current practices for efficacy evaluation include some subjectivity. This study seeks to evaluate the lifting effects of facial soft-tissue fillers in a quantifiable, objective setting. Methods: Twenty fresh hemifaces obtained from 10 Caucasian body donors (seven women and three men) with a mean age of 83.5 ± 6.8 years and a mean body mass index of 25.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2 were injected with soft-tissue fillers following a predefined treatment algorithm. Three-dimensional surface scanning procedures were performed to assess postinjection effects. Results: Injections in the medial face [i.e., forehead, medial midface, and perioral (chin and labiomandibular sulcus)] increased the local surface volume by 0.67, 0.56, and 0.87 cc and created local (but not regional) lifting effects of 1.11, 0.11, and 0.74 mm. Injections in the lateral face (temple, lateral midface, and jawline) changed the local surface volume by 0.45, 0.02, and −0.38 cc, and created local lifting effects of 0.57, 0.81, and 0.29 mm, respectively. Lateral face injections, however, created additional regional lifting effects by co-influencing neighboring lateral facial regions, which was not observed for medial face injections. Conclusions: This cadaveric study provides evidence that soft-tissue fillers, although typically classified as volumizers, can induce lifting effects of the face. Whereas temporal deep supraperiosteal injections have limited lifting effects, the combined effects of subdermal injections of the temple, lateral midface, and mandibular angle can induce lifting effects of the total lateral face. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Background: The deep intramuscular approach during buttock augmentation with fat grafting has been associated with a significantly increased risk for pulmonary fat embolism. This study was designed to provide guidance for injection into the subcutaneous fat. Methods: The authors investigated 150 Caucasian individuals with an equal distribution of men and women (n = 75 each) and a balanced distribution of age (n = 30 per decade: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years) and body mass index (n = 50 per group: ≤24.9 kg/m2, between 25.0 and 29.9kg/m2, and ≥30 kg/m2). Ultrasound-based measurements were conducted of the thickness of the total, superficial, and deep gluteal fatty layers. Results: An increase in body mass index of 1.0 kg/m2 corresponded to an increase of 3 mm of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat of men and a 4-mm increase of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat in women. With increasing age, the thickness of the deep fatty layer increased, whereas with increasing body mass index the thickness of the superficial layer primarily increased. Formulas were generated to estimate the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fatty layer for men [total thickness (in millimeters) = −33.56 + (age × 0.078) + (body mass index × 3.042)] and women [total thickness (in millimeters) = −56.997 + (age × 0.1) + (body mass index × 3.86)]. Conclusions: Knowing the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fat (i.e., the safe space) allows surgeons to estimate their operating range for cannula motion even if no ultrasound machine is available during buttock augmentation with fat grafting. This can increase safety, potentially reducing the number of adverse events.