Kaye, Kai

AbstractBackgroundAn increasing demand for in‐office aesthetic procedures aiming to improve collagen stimulation has been reported.ObjectiveTo analyze the effects of combinations of different aesthetic collagen stimulation procedures using histological analysis.MethodsHistological analysis was performed on skin samples of the excess skin of a 60‐year‐old patient after sub‐superficial musculo‐aponeurotic system facelift surgery. The excess skin before facelift surgery was divided into three areas per hemiface. Each area—with exception of area A as a control—received an isolated or combined treatment of microfocused ultrasound (MFU), injections of calcium‐hydroxylapatite/hyaluronic‐acid‐based soft tissue filler, and microneedling. The effect of the treatments was analyzed using histological analysis with H&E coloration and PAS staining.ResultsA threefold increase of epidermal and dermal thickness was achieved by treating the skin with the proposed combined treatment comprising MFU and injections of calcium‐hydroxylapatite‐ and hyaluronic‐acid‐based soft tissue fillers.ConclusionThe investigated treatments act synergistically in the production of collagen and combining these treatments allows for an increase in collagen production.

AbstractBackgroundCurrent options for the reduction of acne scarring (eg, ablative laser resurfacing) are associated with considerable side effects and limitations in terms of patient population. Percutaneous collagen induction via microneedling poses an alternative treatment method due to its low rates of reported adverse events and side effects.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and effectiveness of microneedling treatments in reducing acne scars.MethodsA total of 22 patients (18 females and 4 males) with a mean age of 38 ± 7.6 years were assessed regarding the appearance of facial acne scarring. Acne scars were assessed via the Acne Scar Assessment Scale (ASAS) and the Goodman and Baron acne scar grading scale before and after two/three treatments. Additionally, the post‐interventional development of side reactions, adverse events, and patient‐reported outcomes (eg, pain/discomfort, skin redness) was reported.ResultsCompared to baseline, the mean ASAS value was improved statistically significantly on average by 1.41 and 1.46 after the second treatment as assessed by the independent raters and the patients, respectively. In patients who received a total of three treatments, a statistically significant mean improvement in ASAS value of 1.35 and 1.66 compared to baseline was assessed by the independent raters and patients, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were reported. The severity and rate of side reactions decreased over the course of this study.ConclusionMicroneedling treatments can pose a safe and effective option in the reduction of acne scarring. In this study, microneedling helped achieving a significant reduction of acne scars while showing high patient safety.

Background: The deep intramuscular approach during buttock augmentation with fat grafting has been associated with a significantly increased risk for pulmonary fat embolism. This study was designed to provide guidance for injection into the subcutaneous fat. Methods: The authors investigated 150 Caucasian individuals with an equal distribution of men and women (n = 75 each) and a balanced distribution of age (n = 30 per decade: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years) and body mass index (n = 50 per group: ≤24.9 kg/m2, between 25.0 and 29.9kg/m2, and ≥30 kg/m2). Ultrasound-based measurements were conducted of the thickness of the total, superficial, and deep gluteal fatty layers. Results: An increase in body mass index of 1.0 kg/m2 corresponded to an increase of 3 mm of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat of men and a 4-mm increase of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat in women. With increasing age, the thickness of the deep fatty layer increased, whereas with increasing body mass index the thickness of the superficial layer primarily increased. Formulas were generated to estimate the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fatty layer for men [total thickness (in millimeters) = −33.56 + (age × 0.078) + (body mass index × 3.042)] and women [total thickness (in millimeters) = −56.997 + (age × 0.1) + (body mass index × 3.86)]. Conclusions: Knowing the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fat (i.e., the safe space) allows surgeons to estimate their operating range for cannula motion even if no ultrasound machine is available during buttock augmentation with fat grafting. This can increase safety, potentially reducing the number of adverse events.