Boughey, Judy C.

Abstract Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within molecular subtypes defined by receptor status and MammaPrint (MP) risk to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. Tucatinib is a potent HER2 (ErbB2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, selective for HER2 vs. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is active vs. brain metastases. Safety and efficacy of tucatinib combined with paclitaxel, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab are unknown and were tested in a planned 10 patient (pt) safety run-in of the I-SPY 2 trial. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. Only pts with tumors that were HER2+ by FISH were eligible for this treatment. Treatment included tucatinib (max dose 300 mg) BID for 12 weeks with weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and trastuzumab (2 mg/kg weekly following loading), and pertuzumab (420 mg every 3 weeks following loading), followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 2 weeks x 4. The control arm was weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab with pertuzumab for 12 weeks followed by AC every 2 weeks x 4. All pts undergo serial MR imaging and response at 3 & 12 weeks is combined with real time pCR data to estimate, and continuously update, the predicted pCR rate for each trial arm. The goal of the trial is to identify/graduate regimens with ≥85.% Bayesian predictive probability of success (i.e. demonstrating superiority to control) in a future 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial with a pCR endpoint. This run-in arm was conducted to determine safety of combining tucatinib with paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, monitoring special adverse events of interest including LFT elevations and gastrointestinal toxicities.Methods: The I-SPY 2 methods have been previously published. Results: 20 pts were evaluable in tucatinib treatment arm. The control arm included 329 historical controls enrolled since April 2010. The initial tucatinib dose was 300 mg BID. After enrollment of the first 8 pts, there were 3 pts with grade 3 LFT elevations, 2 pts with grade 2/3 diarrhea, 1 pt with grade 2 neutropenia, and 1 pt with grade 3 nausea. After this safety review, the tucatinib dose was lowered to 250 mg BID. Among 5 additional pts enrolled, 3 developed grade 2/3 LFT abnormalities. The protocol was then modified to tucatinib 150 mg BID days 1-28 and then 250 mg BID days 29-84; 7 pts were treated. Safety data were reviewed after 20 pts were enrolled; the arm was then suspended due to similar LFT elevations regardless of tucatinib dose reduction or schedule. 7 of 20 pts (35%) had reversible Grade 3 or higher ALT/AST elevation (Table). No pt met criteria for Hy’s Law. In terms of efficacy, 12 of 14 evaluable pts had > 80% reduction of tumor volume by 12 weeks, measured by MRI assessment of functional tumor volume (FTV). Conclusion: The goal of the run-in arm was to determine the safety of adding tucatinib to the combination of paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab. The addition of tucatinib resulted in unacceptable but reversible LFT elevations despite tucatinib dose reduction. Tucatinib containing therapy resulted in >80% decline in tumor volume at 12 weeks in 86% of pts. Tucatinib showed a high level of activity when combined with paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, but the combination is not feasible. Table: Number of pts with grade 2, 3, and 4 LFT elevations by treatment schedule (highest grade per patient per event, ALT or Treatment scheduleGrade 2 LFT elevationGrade 3 LFT elevationGrade 4 LFT elevationTucatinib 300 mg BID030Tucatinib 250 mg BID210Tucatinib 150 mg BID days 1-28 followed by 250 mg BID days 29 to 84112 Citation Format: David A Potter, Erin Roesch, Christina Yau, Ruixiao Lu, Denise Wolf, Susan Samson, Debra Stafford, Kathy S Albain, Claudine Isaacs, Meghana Trivedi, Douglas Yee, Judy Boughey, Alexandra Thomas, A. Jo Chien, Nola Hylton, Wen Li, Angela DeMichele, Jane Perlmutter, W. Fraser Symmans, Dawn L Hershman, Michelle Melisko, Laura J van 't Veer, Amy Wilson, Smita M Asare, Donald A Berry, Richard Schwab, Hope S Rugo, Laura J Esserman. Evaluation of Tucatinib + (Paclitaxel + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab) followed by AC in high-risk HER2 positive (HER2+) stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-07.

Abstract Background: Patients with homologous recombin ation (HR) deficient tumors may benefit from treatment with DNA damaging agents. Markers of genomic instability can be used to identify HR deficiency, including a 3-biomarker Genomic Instability Score (GIS). For patients with ovarian cancer (OC), the FDA-approved GIS threshold for identifying HR deficiency is 42, set as the 5th percentile for BRCA deficient tumors. Recently, a lower 1st percentile cutoff of 33 was explored in OC; this threshold was significantly associated with improved outcome after platinum-based treatment.1,2 Determining an optimal GIS threshold for different types of tumors is crucial, as the GIS distribution may vary between different cancers and even between different cancer subtypes. We propose GIS thresholds for breast cancer separately for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, using the exploratory threshold of 33 for OC as a comparator. Methods: GISs in BRCA deficient tumors were determined for patients newly diagnosed with varying stages of OC, TNBC, or ER+ breast cancer across 5 cohorts (Timms et al,3 TCGA,4 Abkevich et al,5 TBCRC008,6 the OlympiaD trial7). GIS was determined as a combination of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric-allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions. BRCA deficiency was defined by loss of function resulting from a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 or by methylation of the BRCA1 promoter region, with loss of heterozygosity in the affected gene. GIS distributions in different cancer types and subtypes were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A normal distribution was fit to GISs in BRCA deficient ER+ breast tumors. The 1st percentile of the fitted distribution was chosen as the threshold. Results: A total of 561 OC tumors (190 BRCA deficient), 99 TNBC tumors (44 BRCA deficient), and 406 ER+ breast tumors (76 BRCA deficient) were included across the 5 cohorts. When score distributions were evaluated for BRCA deficient tumors, the GIS distribution within ER+ breast cancer was significantly different than for OC (p=9.6x10-5) and TNBC (p=3.2x10-4). This indicates that different GIS thresholds are appropriate for breast cancer subtypes and that the GIS threshold developed for OC is not appropriate for ER+ breast cancer. The 1st percentile of a normal distribution fit in BRCA deficient ER+ breast cancer tumors yields a threshold of 24. Using this threshold, 45.1% (183/406; 75 BRCA deficient, 108 BRCA intact) of ER+ breast tumors were HR deficient. In contrast, the GIS distribution for TNBC was not significantly different than for OC (p=0.77). Using the exploratory threshold of 33, 63.6% (63/99; 44 BRCA deficient, 19 BRCA intact) of TNBC tumors were HR deficient. Conclusions: When compared to OC, the distribution of GIS in BRCA deficient tumors was different for ER+ breast cancer, but not for TNBC. These findings are consistent with the fact that OC and TNBC are known to have similar molecular signatures.8 Exploratory thresholds of 24 for ER+ breast cancer, and 33 for TNBC and OC could be examined to determine if these cutoffs are associated with a benefit from treatment with DNA targeting agents. Clinical validity and utility of these more inclusive 1% thresholds would require demonstration of correlation with clinical outcomes. The threshold difference observed between these cancer subtypes also suggests that cancer or cancer subtype specific thresholds may be needed as evaluations of HR deficiency expands beyond OC to identify candidates for PARP inhibitors. References: 1 Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16(7):1103-11. 2 Cancers. 2021;13(5):946. 3 Br J Cancer. 2012;107(10):1776-82. 4 Nature. 2012;490(7418):61-70. 5 Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(145):1-9. 6 J Nucl Med. 2015;56(1):31-7. 7 NEJM. 2017;377(17):1700. 8 Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):759. Citation Format: Kirsten M Timms, Lauren Lenz, Chris Neff, Cara Solimeno, Darl Flake, Judy C Boughey, Matthew P Goetz, Andrea Richardson, Anna Maria Storniolo, Alexander Gutin, Roisin M Connolly, Vered Stearns, Jerry S Lanchbury. Identifying homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: Genomic instability score thresholds differ in breast cancer subtypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-09.

Abstract Introduction. The standard treatment for non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and nearly 50% exhibit pathological complete response (pCR). However, patients with residual disease after NAC are at increased risk for recurrence and death. Prior studies examining the transcriptome of TNBC pre/post-NAC have examined a limited number of genes (<500) in heterogeneous subgroups of TNBC (e.g. LAR and non-LAR). We explored the transcriptome of androgen-receptor (AR) negative (non-LAR) TNBC subtype both pre/post NAC to identify pathways associated with NAC response. Methods. Tumors obtained pre/post NAC from TNBC patients enrolled in the Breast Cancer Genome Guided therapy study (BEAUTY) underwent RNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein array (RPPA). EdgeR was applied for differentially expressed (DE) analysis and regression methods for RPPA. Digital deconvolution method (CIBERSORTx) and TNBC single-cell data were used to obtain cell types. Pathway analysis was carried out using 2972 gene sets and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). Functional enrichment analysis was conducted with significant genes. Results. Of the 44 TNBC patients, 32 patients were excluded from the analysis cohort due to: LAR tumor (6 pts.), non-LAR tumor with pCR (23 pts.), and cell type issues with RNA-seq data (3 pt.). Paired RNA-Seq data were available for 12 TNBC patients (4 with progression <2 years [EP]) and 8 who were progression-free > 4 years [NP]) and paired RPPA data were available for 9 of these 12 patients. Differentially expressed genes, proteins and cell types between EP and NP in post-NAC. We identified 489 genes differentially expressed (DE) between EP and NP (logFC=|2|, FDR < 0.05). Analysis of cytobands from these 489 genes showed an enrichment of genes on chromosome 6p22.1-2 and 17q25.3 regions (enrichment ratio >5; p-value <10E-4). Critical genes identified in the AR- network (p-value < 10E-3) were IL1RN, SLAMF9, KRT81, BHLHE22, B3GALT5, PCP4, TREM1, AQP9, NRTN, and COL2A1.In addition, preliminary results from RPPA data of post-NAC tumors showed astrocytic phosphoprotein (PEA-15), involved in apoptosis, proliferation, glucose metabolism, as well as cell proliferation and Y box binding (YB1) proteins (involved in metastases), were more DE in EP than NP (p < 0.05). CIBERSORTx was applied to estimate the proportions of different cell types in post-NAC tumors. Cancer-associated fibroblasts iCAFs were low and myCAFs are high in EP vs NP. It is known that the cross-talk between CAFs and tumor cells may induce tumor resistance to chemotherapy. Differentially expressed pathways in post and pre-NAC EP tumors. Using genome-wide expression data from the paired 12 tumors and the GSVA method, we obtained individual pathway scores for 2972 pathways. One hundred ninety pathways were downregulated and 61 pathways were upregulated (p-value <= 0.05) in the post-NAC residual disease of EP relative to NP. We further examined these 190 pathways in the paired EPs and found 71% of those pathways were upregulated in the pre-NAC. These 190 downregulated pathways were enriched with FOXO, TGF-beta, PI3k, FGFR1, insulin and others. The 61 upregulated pathways in post-NAC EP tumors were enriched with mismatch repair, purine, tubulin, telomere, polymerase and gap-junction related pathways; 77% of those 61 pathways were downregulated in pre-NAC. Conclusions. Using a comprehensive “omics” approach, we have identified novel cancer and drug response pathways associated with recurrence in AR-TNBC disease. Further work to evaluate these as markers of outcome and potential drug targets is warranted. Citation Format: Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Xiaojia Tang, Jason P Sinnwell, Kevin J Thompson, Peter T Vedell, Jodi M Carter, Sarah A McLaughlin, Alvaro Moreno Aspitia, Donald W Northfelt, Richard J Gray, Richard Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Judy C Boughey, Matthew Goetz. Multi-omics data shows downregulation of mismatch repair, purin and tublin pathways in AR-negative triple-negative chemotherapy-resistant tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-05.

Abstract Background: The importance of the antitumor immune response in TNBC is well established. TNBC with higher TILs are less likely to recur and more responsive to systemic therapy. Likewise, PD-L1+ TNBC are more likely to benefit from chemoimmunotherapy. However, TNBC is highly heterogeneous. Of the TNBC molecular subtypes, LAR TNBC is less sensitive to systemic therapy, has lower TILs and lower rates of PD-L1 positivity. The role of other immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is not well established. Here, we evaluated differentially expressed (DE) immune related proteins in the stromal and intratumoral compartments of LAR vs non-LAR TNBC tumors. Methods: We used the Nanostring GeoMX DSP platform to quantitate 58 proteins within spatially distinct intraepithelial, cytokeratin (CK)-positive tumor segments and adjacent CK-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments in 248 TNBC tumors included in a tissue microarray generated from a cohort of pts with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent breast surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy. A subset (n=111) underwent bulk tumor RNA sequencing and were classified as LAR or non-LAR TNBC. DE proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR>2, p<0.05). A targeted set of DE proteins was dichotomized at the 80th percentile. Results: Of 111 TNBC tumors, 17 (15%) were LAR and 94 (85%) non-LAR. Compared to non-LAR TNBC, pts with LAR TNBC were older (age ≥50: 82% vs 52%, p<0.01), with tumors that were more often of apocrine histology (35% vs 0%, p <0.01), grade 1-2 (24% vs 1%, p<0.01), and had lower Ki67 (Ki67 ≤15: 24% vs 11%, p=0.06). Most tumors were T1-2 (94% vs 93%, p=0.82) and N0 (53% vs 62%, p=0.09), respectively. As expected, expression of most immune-related proteins was higher in the stromal vs the intratumoral compartment for both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. When focusing on the stromal compartment, expression of multiple immune related proteins was significantly lower in LAR compared to non-LAR TNBC, including the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 (log-2 fold change [log2FC]: 0.552, p=0.05), the macrophage marker CD14 (log2FC: 0.834, p=0.06), CD44 (lof2FC: 0.637, p=0.07), and the immune checkpoint proteins IDO1 (log2FC: 0.914, p=0.04), VISTA (log2FC: 0.471, p=0.07), ICOS (log2FC: 0.444, p=0.08), and STING (log2FC: 0.544, p=0.09). Proteins with expression levels too low for comparisons included PD-L1, LAG3, FOXP3 and BCL-2. When focusing on the intratumoral compartment, expression of most immune-related proteins was very low in both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. Like in the stromal compartment, CD45 expression was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.78, p=0.02). Expression of the immune checkpoint B7-H3 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.737, p=0.02), while expression of the T cell marker CD127 was higher (log2FC: -0.528, p=0.34). With regards to relevant non-immune markers, expression of Ki67 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.5498, p=0.05), consistent with the clinical assay. Conclusion: In this ultra high-plex spatial analysis, we provide first insights into the differential expression at the protein level of several targetable immune checkpoint molecules in LAR vs non-LAR TNBC. The lower expression of several immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is consistent with the hypothesis that LAR TNBC exhibits a “cold” immune microenvironment compared to other TNBC subtypes, potentially rendering itself less susceptible to immunotherapy-based strategies. These data support the need to consider TNBC molecular subtypes in future evaluations of immune-based therapeutic approaches. Funding: This work was supported by NIH grant P50CA116201 to RLF, JMC, KRK, FJC, DZ, JNI, and MPG; BCRF grant 19-161 to EAT and NCATS grant CTSA KL2 TR002379 to RLF. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH Citation Format: Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David M. Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Xue Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Jose C. Villasboas Bisneto, Fergus J. Couch, E. Aubrey Thompson, Matthew P. Goetz. Digital spatial profiling of immune-related proteins in luminal androgen receptor (LAR) vs non-LAR triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Abstract Background Transcriptomic immune-related gene signatures have been associated with achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) and prognosis in the neoadjuvant setting. I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 platform trial using response-adaptive randomization within subtypes defined by receptor status (HR/HER2) and MammaPrint (MP) risk to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. Given racial disparities in mortality from breast cancer and the paucity of racial demographic data from clinical trials, we aimed to evaluate the association between racial groups and baseline characteristics, including expression-based subtypes and immune signatures, treatment response, and prognosis of patients enrolled in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Methods Our study population included 990 I-SPY 2 patients. 15 patients identified as part of a racial group with <10 patients enrolled in the trial and were excluded from analysis. Pre-treatment expression data was available for 971 patients. Follow-up data was available for 907 patients; median follow-up time of 4.4 yrs. Chi-square test was used to assess associations between racial groups and pre-treatment SBR grade, HR/HER2 defined subtypes, intrinsic subtype (defined by BluePrint 80-gene molecular subtyping) and residual cancer burden (RCB) class. Logistic regression was used to evaluate race association with pCR. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess the association between racial groups and event free survival (EFS) in a univariate setting, adjusting for pCR status. Association between racial groups and 28 expression signatures related to immune, proliferation, ER and HER2 pathway was analyzed using ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test in the overall population and in each receptor subtype. Results Of 975 patients included in our analysis, 787 (81%) were White, 68 (7%) were Asian, and 120 (12%) were Black or African American. No significant associations between race and pre-treatment SBR grade (p=0.49), HR/HER2 defined subtypes (p=0.09), or expression-based subtypes (p=0.25) were observed. pCR rates do not significantly differ by racial groups (Odds ratio of pCR relative to White: 1.00 for Asian and 0.89 for Black or African American); and no significant differences in RCB class distribution by race was observed (p=0.88). Event free survival was not associated with patient racial group in a univariate Cox model (Hazard ratio relative to White: 1.10, p=0.73 for Asian and 1.37, p=0.13 for Black or African American). Among the 28 expression signatures evaluated, four were differentially expressed among racial groups within the overall population (F-test p<0.05): IFN module, B cell signature, Dendritic cell signature, and Mitotic score. Pairwise comparisons between racial groups with post-hoc Tukey test identified significant differences in IFN module expression between Black or African American vs. White (p=0.019) and Dendritic cell signature expression between Asian vs White (p=0.047). Among patients in the TNBC subtype, three signatures (dendritic cell signature, macrophage signature and ERBB2 module) were differentially expressed between Black or African American and White patients (p=0.002, 0.016 and 0.007). Conclusion Our analysis demonstrates that among women with high risk breast cancer, race does not affect subtype specific response rates nor event free survival. Distribution of subtypes previously shown to be associated with pCR in the I-SPY2 trial did not significantly differ among racial groups indicating race is less likely than tumor biology to predict response. The decreased expression of immune signatures observed in Black or African American women with TNBC suggests possible differential sensitivity to immunotherapy plus combination chemotherapy. Tumor immune multiplex studies are underway to further investigate. Citation Format: Beverly Kyalwazi, Christina Yau, Olufunmilayo Olopade, A. Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Andres Forero-Torres, Lajos Pusztai, Erin Ellis, Kathy Albain, Anne Blaes, Barbara Haley, Judy Boughey, Anthony Elias, Amy Clark, Claudine Isaacs, Rita Nanda, Hyo Han, Rachel Yung, Debu Tripathy, Kristen Edmiston, Rebecca Viscusi, Donald Northfelt, Qamar Khan, Ashish Sanil, Scott Berry, Smita Asare, Amy Wilson, Gillian Hirst, Nola Hylton, Michelle Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope Rugo, Fraser Symmans, Laura van ‘t Veer, Donald Berry, Laura Esserman. Analysis of clinical outcomes and expression-based immune signatures by race in the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.

Background: Since its first description in 2012, the Goldilocks procedure has become an option for immediate breast reconstruction, particularly for obese patients who are poor candidates for traditional implant or autologous reconstruction. In this work, the authors performed a longitudinal study of patients who underwent mastectomy with Goldilocks reconstruction to assess the incidence of additional surgical procedures, and to assess surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure only at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January of 2012 and September of 2019 was performed. Demographics, complications, additional breast procedures performed to attain the final results, and patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q were recorded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify statistical associations and risk factors. Results: Sixty-three patients (108 breasts) were included. Mean age was 57.8 years. Mean body mass index was 37.6 kg/m2. Median follow-up time after the mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure was 15 months. The major complication rate within the first 30 days was 9.3 percent. Forty-four breasts (40.7 percent) underwent additional surgery. Dyslipidemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of additional surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; p = 0.045). Scores in the four BREAST-Q domains were not statistically different between patients who had additional procedures and those who did not. Conclusions: Based on the results, the authors recommend a thorough preoperative discussion with patients who are candidates for the Goldilocks procedure to explore all options for reconstruction and their expectations, because it is crucial to reduce the necessity for additional operations in this high-risk population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

AbstractSurgical trials in breast cancer have catalyzed contemporary trial design for solid organ cancers and are a prime example of surgeons taking the lead in clinical trial design. Surgeons have lead trials that have improved patient outcomes and quality of life without sacrificing oncologic safety. We have evolved from radical mastectomy to breast conservation and sentinel node biopsy. Contemporary trial design in breast cancer now focus on personalizing care based on tumor genomics

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for complications in breast reconstruction. Thus, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in obese women may be controversial. The authors analyzed obese patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy using Wise-pattern incisions (Goldilocks procedure) and compared outcomes between two groups: Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction and Goldilocks only. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher who underwent the Goldilocks procedure at the Mayo Clinic Health System from 2012 to 2019. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Minor complications (partial-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, or tissue expander/implant malposition) and major complications (full-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, capsular contracture, tissue expander/implant explantation, or unplanned reoperation or readmission) were compared between groups. Patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q questionnaires were also assessed. Results: One hundred five patients (181 breasts) were included. Mean ± SEM age and body mass index were 57.1 ± 10.4 years and 37.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks-only group and 51.5 ± 1.1 years and 35.5 ± 0.4 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group, respectively. Median follow-up time was 15.1 months (interquartile range, 10.0 to 28.6 months). Overall, 96 breasts underwent the Goldilocks-only procedure and 85 Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariable analyses revealed a higher rate of minor complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.83; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 7.02) and major complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95 percent CI, 1.25 to 4.24) in the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group compared with the Goldilocks-only group, at any given time. Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: The Goldilocks procedure is a feasible breast reconstructive option in obese patients; however, when it is performed with immediate breast reconstruction, it is associated with higher rates of complications. For patients with a body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or greater, the authors recommend the Goldilocks-only procedure or delayed reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.