Casey, William J.

Abstract The da Vinci Single-Port (SP) system is a robotic surgery platform that allows access into the abdominal cavity through a single short surgical incision. The omentum is an attractive donor site for vascularized omental lymph node transfer (VOLT) in the treatment of lymphedema. We hypothesize that SP robotic VOLT will allow for improvement in perioperative outcomes as compared to open laparotomy for omental flap harvest. A retrospective cohort study was performed, comprised of a study sample of patients with a diagnosis of lymphedema who presented to our institution for VOLT using either an open or SP robotic technique between May 2020 and February 2023. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative complication rate, postoperative complication rate, and length of surgery. Fifteen patients underwent da Vinci SP omental flap harvest, and 14 patients underwent open harvest. There was no significant difference in average age, BMI, sex, or lymphedema etiology between the two groups. Average length of stay was 2.2 ± 1.7 days in the SP group and 2.3 ± 2.1 days in the open group (p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications between the two groups. Ninety-three percent of SP robotic and 86% of open patients reported at least partial subjective improvement following VOLT (p = 0.50). Our findings suggest that SP robotic omental harvest for VOLT is feasible. Perioperative outcomes show comparable results in terms of length of hospital stay, complications, and subjective postoperative improvement when comparing the open to the SP approach.

Background Secondary lymphedema frequently occurs following surgery, malignancy, trauma, or radiation and is characterized by limb swelling, discomfort, and recurrent infections. Two advanced supermicrosurgical techniques—lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT)—have recently gained popularity as treatment options. However, long-term outcome data for these procedures remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the long-term efficacy of LVA and VLNT in patients with secondary lymphedema followed for more than 2 years postoperatively, focusing on outcomes such as cellulitis rates and limb circumference. Methods This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving adult patients with secondary lymphedema treated with LVA or VLNT and with at least 24 months of follow-up. The primary outcomes were annual cellulitis incidence and limb circumference change, analyzed separately for upper and lower extremities. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.1. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 648 limbs treated with either LVA (n = 216) or VLNT (n = 432). The weighted average patient age was 56.3 years, and the cohort was predominantly female (99.9%). For LVA, the pooled mean reduction in annual cellulitis events was −1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.70 to −0.57) for upper extremities and −1.32 (95% CI, −2.08 to −0.55) for lower extremities. VLNT yielded greater reductions in cellulitis, with pooled mean differences of −2.43 (95% CI, −3.36 to −1.50) and −1.38 (95% CI, −2.11 to −0.65) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Additionally, VLNT reduced limb circumference by 42.7% (95% CI, 36.7–49.7) in upper extremities and 21.98% (95% CI, 19.8–24.4) in lower extremities. Conclusion LVA and VLNT both result in durable, long-term improvements in cellulitis rates, and VLNT was shown to reduce limb circumference. Given the significant impact on patient quality of life, these interventions should remain integral to the treatment algorithm for secondary lymphedema.

Abstract Abdominally based free flaps are commonly utilized in the context of breast reconstruction. Historically, postoperative care of these patients involved liberal amounts of intravenous fluid administration; however, overadministration of fluids puts patients at risk of developing flap edema via fluid shifts, electrolyte imbalances, wound dehiscence, and other sequelae. The purpose of this study is to assess fluid administration trends in this cohort at the authors' institution and assess its impact on patient outcomes. A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent free-flap breast reconstruction. Patient demographics and hospitalization data were collected, and type of abdominal flap and reconstruction timing was noted. Perioperative fluid administration volumes were tracked, and primary outcomes included complication rate and type (e.g., acute blood loss anemia [ABLA], partial/total flap loss, etc.). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of fluid volume on patient outcomes. A total of 115 patients (mean age of 51.3 ± 10.5 years) underwent 188 abdominally based free flaps. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps were performed most often (n = 91), followed by muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis flaps (n = 88). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that high perioperative fluid administration (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of medical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 21.7; confidence interval [CI]: 5.54–84.5; p < 0.001). Patients with high fluid administration volumes experienced an increased (but nonstatistically significant) flap complication rate (OR = 2.96; CI: 0.89–9.88; p = 0.08) and developed ABLA at a higher rate (OR = 15.86; CI: 5.30–46.4; p < 0.001). High-volume resuscitation (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of ABLA as well as a greater likelihood of medical and flap complications in patients undergoing abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction. These data should be used to guide the development of protocols within institutions, which perform free flaps for breast reconstruction.

Abstract Robots have been used effectively in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) for reconstruction. The utilization of robotics in all surgical specialties is expanding with the goal of offering the most appropriate patient-centered care possible, especially in complex multidisciplinary cases. Despite the safety, efficiency, and reproducibility of robotics in PRS, there is a paucity of required and formalized training in PRS residency programs. The ACGME and industry published guidelines were investigated. Robotic surgery case logs of Mayo Clinic Arizona General Surgery residents were analyzed with attention to equivalency certification (EQ). Over the past 5 years, the equivalency certification from Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA) was obtained by 30% of all general surgery residents at our institution (range, 0–100). The case numbers to obtain the equivalence certification are industry recommendations, and proficiency is determined by the program director. The ACGME does not mandate robotics training in general surgery residency. According to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), trainees must complete 20 console cases and 10 bedside cases to become industry certified. With respect to training and advancing the field, PRS residents could successfully obtain certification in their residency programs. The minimum case requirement recommended by SAGES is not burdensome and can ensure robotic privileges in PRS practice immediately following graduation. By improving the training for minimally invasive robotic surgery in plastic surgery, patients and healthcare systems benefit from improved quality of life outcomes and decreased postoperative length of stay, which results in less strain on our entire medical system.

Background: Vertebral body defects pose a significant challenge in spinal reconstructive surgery. Compression fractures of the vertebral corpus are typically treated with vertebral augmentation procedures. There are significant risks associated with the introduction of foreign material in the spine, including infection and pseudarthrosis. Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) have become a popular alternative for spinal reconstruction in the last decade thanks to their robust blood supply and autologous nature. VBGs have been described predominantly for the reconstruction of posterior vertebral defects. The objective of this study is to describe a novel procedure for the reconstruction of vertebral corpus defects in the lumbar and distal thoracic spine. Methods: This is a cadaveric anatomy study. The authors performed the novel surgical technique on an anonymized cadaveric donor in the prone position and recorded the procedure through clinical photography. Consent for the procedure and photography was obtained from the Center for Procedural Innovation. Results: A 5-cm-long posterior iliac crest VBG (IC-VBG) was successfully harvested on a pedicle of the quadratus lumborum muscle. The VBG was rotated and mobilized anteromedially to the vertebral corpus. In this donor, the IC-VBG could be inset with minimal tension anywhere along the vertebral bodies of the spine from the L5 to the T9 level. Conclusions: A rotated, anteromedially mobilized IC-VBG represents a novel technique for reconstruction of the anterior vertebral corpus of the lumbar and distal thoracic spine with a lower risk of infection and pseudarthrosis than reconstruction with foreign materials.

Background: Delivering ethical care in global plastic surgery is challenging due to the unique complexities of resource-limited settings. Additionally, the rise of medical tourism has highlighted the importance of informed consent and awareness of the potential risks that are associated with seeking medical care in foreign countries. This article aims to consider core medical ethics principles and apply them in the context of delivering global plastic surgery. Methods: This article examines the application of the four core medical ethics principles in a framework set forth by Beauchamp and Childress, namely autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, in the context of delivering plastic surgery in international settings. A literature review was performed, where all potential global plastic surgery articles were reviewed to better understand the application of the four core medical ethics framework in this context. Results: Increased communication between visiting surgeons and local healthcare providers; heightened education of surgeons traveling to low-to-middle-income countries regarding local medical practices, resource availability, and cultural norms before providing surgical education; and a greater emphasis on collecting and publishing data analyzing short- and long-term outcomes in low-to-middle-income countries are all likely to improve the success of international medical missions, ensuring that all patients receive medical treatment in a manner that upholds Beauchamp and Childress’ four core medical ethics principles. Conclusion: Providing plastic and reconstructive surgery abroad can be done ethically if the four main principles of medical ethics (respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice) are used.

Objective: This study investigates Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols’ impact on long-term opioid and sedative use following mastectomy with or without implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Background: ERAS protocols for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR are associated with decreased length of stay, increased rate of same-day discharge, decreased postoperative pain, and decreased postoperative opioid requirements. However, less is known about their effect on opioid and sedative use beyond 90 days after surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR at a single institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Mastectomy ERAS protocols were implemented in February 2017, creating 2 groups: pre-ERAS and ERAS. Baseline characteristics and prevalence of chronic opioid and sedative use were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression predicted factors associated with increased odds of chronic opioid and sedative use. Results: A total of 756 patients were evaluated: 405 pre-ERAS and 351 ERAS. Post-ERAS, chronic opioid use decreased in opioid-naive (40% vs 30%, P=0.024) and opioid-tolerant patients (58% vs 37%, P=0.002), with no increase in chronic sedative use. There were decreased odds of chronic opioid use for all ERAS patients (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.42–0.76), and of IBBR patients, those receiving subcutaneous implants (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.20–0.48). There was increased chronic opioid-use odds if undergoing bilateral surgery (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.14–2.08), 2-stage reconstruction (OR=9.78, 95% CI: 5.94-16.09), and for patients with higher PACU pain scores (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.03–1.14) or >150 discharge OMEs (OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.48–4.68). Conclusion: ERAS protocols for mastectomy patients with or without IBR are associated with decreases in chronic opioid use, without concomitant increases in chronic sedative use.

Abstract Background The presence of a chimeric gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with a common arterial pedicle has been demonstrated on computed tomography angiography in up to 59% of patients and confirmed in a cadaveric model. Already utilized for head and neck reconstruction by Heredero et al, this novel flap could provide more volume than either flap alone which is advantageous, particularly in patients with sizable defects. The purpose of this study was to determine the average tissue volume that can be utilized from this chimeric flap. Methods CT Angiogram imaging studies exhibiting chimeric flap anatomy were reviewed over a 7-year period at a single institution utilizing Visage Version 7.1, a radiology picture archiving and communication system. This software was used to trace the flap pedicles and to capture estimated soft tissue volumes of each respective flap. Results A total of 31 patients, consisting of 52 lower extremity gracilis and PAP chimeric flaps, underwent tissue volume analysis. The average total volume of soft tissue supplied by the gracilis flap was found to be 70.21 cm3 (standard deviation [SD] = 26.99). The average volume of the PAP flap was 31.73 cm3 (SD = 26.12). The average total volume captured by the chimeric gracilis and PAP flap was 101.94 cm3 (SD = 62.40). Conclusion The potential soft tissue volume that can be harvested from a chimeric gracilis and PAP flap is significantly greater than solitary gracilis or PAP flaps. This chimeric flap may serve as a viable and advantageous reconstructive option for patients requiring large volume soft tissue coverage, particularly if other sizable options are not available.

Summary: Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction; however, the region may not be ideal for patients with inadequate soft tissue or history of abdominal surgery. This case describes the use of a novel conjoined flap based on the profunda artery perforator and upper gracilis pedicles, named the perforator and upper gracilis (PUG) flap. This flap design aims to maximize medial thigh flap volume while ensuring robust tissue perforation. Here, we present our experience with the PUG flap in a breast cancer patient undergoing autologous reconstruction. The patient was a 41-year-old woman seeking nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction with the PUG flap due to limited abdominal tissue availability. The gracilis and profunda artery perforator flaps were elevated using one boomerang-style skin paddle. Once harvested, the flaps were inset with antegrade and retrograde flow off the internal mammary arteries and both respective internal mammary veins. The donor site was closed in a V-Y pattern resulting in a thigh lift–type lift and concealed scar. In conclusion, the boomerang-style PUG flap maximizes medial thigh free tissue transfer volume, offers internal blood flow redundancy, and maintains good cosmesis of the donor site.

Background: There is limited research on the impact of revisional surgery after breast reconstruction on patient experience and postoperative quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based or autologous free-flap breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. These patients were categorized by revisions (0–1, 2–3, and 4+) and surveyed on QoL metrics using BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. BREAST-Q QoL, satisfaction, and WIWI metrics between revision groups were evaluated. Results: Among 252 patients, a total of 150 patients (60%) underwent zero to one revisions, 72 patients (28%) underwent two to three revisions, and 30 patients (12%) underwent four or more revisions. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1–11 years). BREAST-Q satisfaction among patients with four or more revisions was significantly lower ( P = 0.03), while core QoL domains (chest physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) did not significantly differ. Analysis of unplanned reoperations due to complications and breast satisfaction showed no significant difference in QoL scores between groups ( P = 0.08). Regarding WIWI QoL metrics, four or more revisions were associated with a higher rate of worse QoL ( P = 0.035) and worse overall experience ( P = 0.001). Most patients in all revision groups felt it was worthwhile to undergo breast reconstruction (86%), would choose breast reconstruction again (83%), and would recommend breast reconstruction to others (79%). Conclusions: Overall, a majority of patients undergoing revisions after breast reconstruction still have a worthwhile experience. Although reoperations after breast reconstruction do not significantly impact long-term BREAST-Q QoL domains, patients undergoing four or more revisions have significantly lower breast satisfaction, worse QoL, and a postoperative experience worse than expected.