Rhee, Daniel H.

Background Secondary lymphedema frequently occurs following surgery, malignancy, trauma, or radiation and is characterized by limb swelling, discomfort, and recurrent infections. Two advanced supermicrosurgical techniques—lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT)—have recently gained popularity as treatment options. However, long-term outcome data for these procedures remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the long-term efficacy of LVA and VLNT in patients with secondary lymphedema followed for more than 2 years postoperatively, focusing on outcomes such as cellulitis rates and limb circumference. Methods This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving adult patients with secondary lymphedema treated with LVA or VLNT and with at least 24 months of follow-up. The primary outcomes were annual cellulitis incidence and limb circumference change, analyzed separately for upper and lower extremities. Meta-analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.1. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 648 limbs treated with either LVA (n = 216) or VLNT (n = 432). The weighted average patient age was 56.3 years, and the cohort was predominantly female (99.9%). For LVA, the pooled mean reduction in annual cellulitis events was −1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.70 to −0.57) for upper extremities and −1.32 (95% CI, −2.08 to −0.55) for lower extremities. VLNT yielded greater reductions in cellulitis, with pooled mean differences of −2.43 (95% CI, −3.36 to −1.50) and −1.38 (95% CI, −2.11 to −0.65) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Additionally, VLNT reduced limb circumference by 42.7% (95% CI, 36.7–49.7) in upper extremities and 21.98% (95% CI, 19.8–24.4) in lower extremities. Conclusion LVA and VLNT both result in durable, long-term improvements in cellulitis rates, and VLNT was shown to reduce limb circumference. Given the significant impact on patient quality of life, these interventions should remain integral to the treatment algorithm for secondary lymphedema.

Abstract Robots have been used effectively in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) for reconstruction. The utilization of robotics in all surgical specialties is expanding with the goal of offering the most appropriate patient-centered care possible, especially in complex multidisciplinary cases. Despite the safety, efficiency, and reproducibility of robotics in PRS, there is a paucity of required and formalized training in PRS residency programs. The ACGME and industry published guidelines were investigated. Robotic surgery case logs of Mayo Clinic Arizona General Surgery residents were analyzed with attention to equivalency certification (EQ). Over the past 5 years, the equivalency certification from Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA) was obtained by 30% of all general surgery residents at our institution (range, 0–100). The case numbers to obtain the equivalence certification are industry recommendations, and proficiency is determined by the program director. The ACGME does not mandate robotics training in general surgery residency. According to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), trainees must complete 20 console cases and 10 bedside cases to become industry certified. With respect to training and advancing the field, PRS residents could successfully obtain certification in their residency programs. The minimum case requirement recommended by SAGES is not burdensome and can ensure robotic privileges in PRS practice immediately following graduation. By improving the training for minimally invasive robotic surgery in plastic surgery, patients and healthcare systems benefit from improved quality of life outcomes and decreased postoperative length of stay, which results in less strain on our entire medical system.

Summary: Pleuroperitoneal (Denver) shunts have been used primarily for palliation of refractory malignant and chylous peritoneal and pleural collections. 1–5 We used a pleuroperitoneal (Denver) shunt for a recurrent, nonmalignant breast seroma in the palliation of metastatic breast cancer as a novel use of this shunt.