Back to Authors

Andronesi, Ovidiu C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-0641

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 3

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on diagnosis, management, and future directions
Miller, Julie J. , Castro, L. Nicolas Gonzalez , McBrayer, Samuel K. , Weller, Michael , Andronesi, Ovidiu C. , Baumert, Brigitta G. , Berger, Mitchel S. , Chang, Susan M. , Costello, J , Huang, Raymond Y. , Jenkins, Robert B. , Mellinghoff, Ingo K. , Platten, Michael , Reardon, David A. , Schiff, David , Yan, Hai , Bent, Martin J. van den , Kaelin, William G. , Wen, Patrick Y. , Gonzalez Castro, L Nicolas , Berger, Mitchell S , Bindra, Ranjit , Cahill, Daniel P. , Horbinski, Craig , Jenkins, RB , Wick, Wolfgang , Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Platten, Michael , Mellinghoff, Ingo K , Huang, Raymond , Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Portnow, Jana , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Bi, Wenya Linda , Bindra, Ranjit S. , Horbinski, Craig , Ligon, Keith L , Nabors, Burt , Shi, Diana D. , Wick, Wolfgang , Deimling, Andreas von , Wen, Patrick Yung

Neuro-Oncology | August 24, 2022 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 4-25

10.1093/neuonc/noac207 Get It

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.
Consensus recommendations for MRI and PET imaging of primary central nervous system lymphoma: guideline statement from the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG)
Barajas, Ramon , Politi, Letterio S. , Anzalone, Nicoletta , Schöder, Heiko , Fox, Christopher P. , Quarles, C. Chad , Ellingson, Benjamin M. , Auer, Dorothee P. , Andronesi, Ovidiu C. , Ferreri, Andrés J.M. , Mrugała, Maciej M. , Neuwelt, Edward A. , Ambady, Prakash , Rubenstein, James L. , Illerhaus, Gerald , Nagane, Motoo , Batchelor, Tracy T. , Hu, Leland , Barajas, Ramon F , Ellingson, Benjamin M , Nagane, Motoo , Schöder, Heiko , Fox, Christopher P , Boxerman, Jerrold L. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Grommes, Christian

Neuro-Oncology | February 5, 2021 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1056-1071

10.1093/neuonc/noab020 Get It

Abstract Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.
Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations
Wilson, Martin , Andronesi, Ovidiu C. , Barker, Peter B. , Bartha, Robert , Bizzi, Alberto , Bolan, Patrick J. , Cudalbu, Cristina , Dydak, Ulrike , Emir, Uzay E. , González, R. Gilberto , Gruber, Stephan , Gupta, Rakesh K. , Henning, A , Hetherington, Hoby P. , Hüppi, Petra S. , Hurd, Ralph E. , Kantarci, Kejal , Kauppinen, Risto A. , Klomp, Dennis W. J. , Kreis, Roland , Kruiskamp, Marijn J., Leach, Martin O. , Lin, Alexander , Luijten, Peter R. , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Meyerhoff, Dieter J. , Mountford, Carolyn E. , Mullins, Paul G. , Murdoch, James B. , Nelson, Sarah J. , Noeske, Ralph , Öz, Gülin , Pan, Julie W., Poptani, Harish , Posse, Stefan , Ratai, Eva‐Maria , Salibi, Nouha , Scheenen, Tom W. J. , Soher, Brian J. , Tkáč, Ivan , Vigneron, Daniel B. , Howe, Franklyn A. , Choi, In‐Young , Kreis, Roland , Maudsley, Andrew A , Howe, Franklyn A , Öz, Gülin , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Kantarci, Kejal , Brindle, Kevin Michael , Choi, In‐Young, Gruetter, Rolf , Heerschap, Arend , Peet, Andrew C. , Smith, Ian C. P.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | March 28, 2019 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 527-550

10.1002/mrm.27742 Get It

Proton MRS (1H MRS) provides noninvasive, quantitative metabolite profiles of tissue and has been shown to aid the clinical management of several brain diseases. Although most modern clinical MR scanners support MRS capabilities, routine use is largely restricted to specialized centers with good access to MR research support. Widespread adoption has been slow for several reasons, and technical challenges toward obtaining reliable good‐quality results have been identified as a contributing factor. Considerable progress has been made by the research community to address many of these challenges, and in this paper a consensus is presented on deficiencies in widely available MRS methodology and validated improvements that are currently in routine use at several clinical research institutions. In particular, the localization error for the PRESS localization sequence was found to be unacceptably high at 3 T, and use of the semi‐adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence is a recommended solution. Incorporation of simulated metabolite basis sets into analysis routines is recommended for reliably capturing the full spectral detail available from short TE acquisitions. In addition, the importance of achieving a highly homogenous static magnetic field (B0) in the acquisition region is emphasized, and the limitations of current methods and hardware are discussed. Most recommendations require only software improvements, greatly enhancing the capabilities of clinical MRS on existing hardware. Implementation of these recommendations should strengthen current clinical applications and advance progress toward developing and validating new MRS biomarkers for clinical use.