Rubenstein, James L.

Abstract Background: Curative therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) consists of methotrexate-based induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy consolidation. There is no standard of care for patients unfit for dose-intensive consolidation, leaving these patients at high risk of relapse. Median progression-free survival (PFS) is as low as 7-12 months from the time of induction in newly diagnosed patients treated with methotrexate-based regimens without consolidation (Batchelor et al. J Clin Oncol 2003; Omuro et al. Lancet Haematol 2015). Patients with relapsed disease also have dismal outcomes. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) with single-agent activity in relapsed and refractory PCNSL. We have previously published our experience with 13 patients receiving low-dose lenalidomide for maintenance of remission in PCNSL (Vu et al. Br J Haematol 2019). Here, we report long-term follow up data from an expanded cohort. Methods: We evaluated low-dose lenalidomide maintenance at a starting dose of 5 mg/day in two cohorts: (1) patients in complete remission after methotrexate-based induction and (2) patients in complete or partial remission after salvage therapy upon first relapse. Patients with PCNSL treated with methotrexate-based induction and subsequently treated with maintenance lenalidomide at a starting dose of 5 mg/day at UCSF between Jan 2011 – Jun 2025 were eligible for inclusion. Retrospective chart review was performed. Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis. Results: A total of 89 patients treated with lenalidomide maintenance were identified. We first evaluated outcomes for 39 patients who did not receive dose-intensive consolidation and were treated with lenalidomide maintenance following first-line methotrexate-based induction. 64% were ineligible for consolidation chemotherapy due to age (>74), 18% due to performance status/co-morbidities, and 18% declined consolidation. Median age at diagnosis was 76 (range: 57-86). 20 patients were male and 19 female. Median International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group score at diagnosis was 3 (range: 1-4) and median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80 (range: 50-100). With median follow up of 73.9 months, median PFS was 38.5 months from the start of lenalidomide maintenance, and median overall survival (OS) was 64.5 months. 59% of these patients have not relapsed. We next evaluated outcomes for 50 patients treated with lenalidomide maintenance after salvage therapy: methotrexate + rituximab (52%), focal XRT (20%), intraocular therapy (14%), dose-intensive etoposide + cytarabine (8%), ASCT (2%), and WBRT (2%). With median follow up of 91.4 months, median PFS was 13.4 months from the start of lenalidomide maintenance, and median OS was 43.9 months. 30% of these patients have not relapsed. Low-dose lenalidomide was well tolerated, with adverse events consistent with the drug's known toxicity profile. Common toxicities included fatigue, rash, constipation, and mild myelosuppression. One patient experienced reversible bradykinesia and there was one pulmonary embolism. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. None of the patients treated with lenalidomide have yet developed a myeloid neoplasm. Strikingly, among 42 patients drawn from both cohorts treated with lenalidomide maintenance who later relapsed, 60% achieved a complete response to the next line of therapy, 26% achieved a partial response, while 14% had refractory disease. 26 patients (62%) went on to receive subsequent IMiD maintenance therapy (27% lenalidomide at doses exceeding 5 mg/day, 73% pomalidomide); median PFS from IMiD re-initiation was 13.3 months. Conclusions: Low-dose lenalidomide maintenance therapy after methotrexate-based induction therapy is an effective strategy for less fit PCNSL patients. Lenalidomide maintenance following salvage therapy likewise demonstrates impressive efficacy, with survival outcomes surpassing published historical values. Low-dose lenalidomide is well-tolerated in both of these settings, with low rates of discontinuation. Importantly, most patients progressing on lenalidomide maintenance achieve remission with salvage therapy and respond to further treatment with IMiDs. While our analysis has limitations including its small sample size and retrospective single-center design, the survival outcomes are encouraging and support further investigations of lenalidomide in PCNSL, including the ongoing Alliance A51901 trial.

Background: The rising incidence of PCNSL in the elderly represents an unmet need with an undefined standard approach [Villano Br J Cancer 2011]. High-dose methotrexate-based (HD-MTX) therapy is feasible and effective in older patients, but outcomes in this population remain poor. Despite high response rates to HD-MTX induction therapy, poor candidacy for intensive consolidative therapy results in transient disease control that may benefit from maintenance strategies [David Am J Hematol 2023]. Lenalidomide (len) has demonstrated activity in PCNSL even at low doses and represents a potential alternative to consolidation considering its extensive use in maintenance settings [Vu Br J Haematol 2019]. Anecdotal activity in PCNSL by checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab (nivo) has been reported [Nayak Blood 2017], and its immune response may be enhanced by len [Görgün Clin Cancer Res 2015]. A051901 evaluates the feasibility of the addition of len and nivo to rituximab (R) and HD-MTX as first line induction therapy followed by len-nivo maintenance in elderly patients with PCNSL not eligible for intensive consolidation. Study Design and Methods: This is a single-arm phase 1 multicenter US study (NCT04609046) conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology with a traditional 3+3 design. Eligible patients are 18 years of age or older with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma PCNSL diagnosed through brain biopsy or resection, or cerebrospinal (CSF) or vitreous fluid not considered candidates for high dose chemotherapy consolidation. This study is available to all eligible patients, regardless of race, gender, or ethnic origin. Patients must have adequate end-organ function including creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min. Use of systemic corticosteroids for disease control to be tapered after initiation of therapy is allowed. Induction consists of six 14-day cycles with rituximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, HD-MTX 3g/m2 i.v. on day 2. In the most recent treatment schedule, a 5-day course of lenalidomide PO at different dose levels (dose level (DL) 1 = 10 mg, DL2 = 15 mg, DL3 = 20 mg) is initiated immediately after adequate clearance of HD-MTX. Once a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of len is defined, a subsequent cohort will evaluate the addition of nivo 240 mg i.v. to the day 14 of the induction cycle of R-HD-MTX plus len at the MTD. Patients who present any clinical benefit from induction with at least stable disease by International PCNSL Collaborative Group response criteria are eligible for maintenance - twelve 28-day cycles of therapy with len 15 mg PO from day 1 to day 21 (regardless of dose during induction) +/- nivo 480 mg i.v. on day 1 (for those who received len and nivo during induction). The primary endpoint of the induction therapy is the MTD of len when given in combination with R-HD-MTX; the primary endpoint of maintenance is its feasibility, defined as the proportion of patients able to remain on maintenance for at least 6 cycles. As of July 2024, 16 patients have been enrolled with a maximum expected sample size of 47 patients with the assumption of 75% of patients being eligible to proceed with maintenance and 50% of those who begin maintenance not progressing in the first 6 cycles. Overall response, adverse events, progression-free and overall survival will be evaluated in all eligible patients with a focus on the outcome of patients treated at the MTD. For patients who consent to biobanking, diagnostic tissue, peripheral blood and CSF from different timepoints are collected and banked with planned exploratory analyses including whole exome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA, proteomics, metabolomics. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

Abstract The determination of the genetic subtypes of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and their relationship to differential chemoimmunotherapeutic response has not been established. There is a particular need for genomic biomarkers that identify patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL at high risk of early progression and death. We applied targeted next-generation sequencing for detection of recurrent single-nucleotide variants, copy number alterations, and zygosity abnormalities in diagnostic specimens from 78 patients with PCNSL treated with a standard methotrexate-based regimen, to identify prognostically significant molecular subgroups. All patients received induction immunochemotherapy, and 44 proceeded to dose-intensive consolidation. Genomic aberrations at 4 loci were associated with 91% of lymphoma progression events and all 15 deaths: (1) chromosome 6p copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) or focal homozygous deletion (HD) at 6p21.3, and mutations of tumor suppressor genes (2) BTG1, (3) ETV6, and (4) TP53. Cox regression multivariate analysis demonstrated a high risk of progression in patients with aberrations at these loci. Genomic aberrations at these loci were also associated with significantly shorter survival. Lower expression of HLA-DR was associated with 6p CN-LOH/6p21.3 HD and inferior prognosis. These genomic aberrations identify a high-risk molecular subgroup that may inform risk stratification in PCNSL. Further elucidation of the mechanisms of therapeutic resistance associated with the high-risk genetic phenotype is requisite to facilitate precision medicine and progress in therapy.

Abstract Although it is evident that standard-dose whole-brain radiotherapy as consolidation is associated with significant neurotoxicity, the optimal consolidative strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. We performed a randomized phase 2 clinical trial via the US Alliance cancer cooperative group to compare myeloablative consolidation supported by autologous stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative consolidation after induction therapy for PCNSL. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to be initiated that eliminates whole-brain radiotherapy as a consolidative approach in newly diagnosed PCNSL. Patients aged 18 to 75 years were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to induction therapy (methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab, and cytarabine) followed by consolidation with either thiotepa plus carmustine and autologous stem cell rescue vs induction followed by nonmyeloablative, infusional etoposide plus cytarabine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 113 patients were randomized, and 108 (54 in each arm) were evaluable. More patients in the nonmyeloablative arm experienced progressive disease or death during induction (28% vs 11%; P = .05). Thirty-six patients received autologous stem cell transplant, and 34 received nonmyeloablative consolidation. The estimated 2-year PFS was higher in the myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative arm (73% vs 51%; P = .02). However, a planned secondary analysis, landmarked at start of the consolidation, revealed that the estimated 2-year PFS in those who completed consolidation therapy was not significantly different between the arms (86% vs 71%; P = .21). Both consolidative strategies yielded encouraging efficacy and similar toxicity profiles. This trial was registered at www.clininicals.gov as #NCT01511562.

7506 Background: Optimal consolidative therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. Avoidance of whole brain radiation may reduce risk of neurotoxicity. Non-radiation consolidative options include myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) or non-myeloablative chemotherapy. Methods: This is a randomized phase 2, National Clinical Trials Network study of induction methotrexate (MTX) (8 g/m2 days 1, 15), temozolomide (TMZ) (150-200 mg/m2 D7-11), and rituximab (RTX) (C1 D3, 10, 17, 24 and C2 D3, 10 ) in four 28-day cycles followed by one cycle of cytarabine (ARA-C) (2 g/m2 BID, D1, 2) (MTRA). After induction, patients (pts) received consolidation with thiotepa (5 mg/kg BID, D -5, -4) plus carmustine (400 mg/m2, day -6) and ASCT (Arm A) or one cycle of ARA-C (2 g/m2 BID, D1-4) plus infusional etoposide (40 mg/kg over 96h) (Arm B). Pts were stratified on age and performance status and randomized 1:1 before induction. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization. With 110 pts, there was 84% power to detect an improvement in PFS using a log-rank test (1-sided α= 10%), assuming a median PFS of 3 months for pts who progress during induction, and a median PFS of 2 years (yrs) for Arm B and 4.5 yrs for Arm A consolidation. This report includes the results for the primary endpoint analysis. Results: 113 pts (median age 61 yrs, range 33-75) were randomized (Arm A: 57, Arm B: 56) across 27 centers. 108 eligible pts who received induction therapy were included in the primary endpoint analysis (Arm A: 54, Arm B: 54). 72/108 pts started consolidation and 70/72 completed consolidation per protocol (Arm A: 36, Arm B: 34). With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, median PFS from randomization was 6 yrs (95% CI 3.9-not reached) in Arm A vs 2.4 yrs (95% CI 0.6-not reached) in Arm B (p = 0.02). However, more pts randomized to Arm B went off treatment before consolidation due to progression or death (28% vs 11%, p = 0.05). PFS landmarked at start of consolidation demonstrated a trend for improved PFS favoring Arm A (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.36; p = 0.21). Median OS was not reached in either arm, and 3-yr estimates were 83% (95% CI 69-91; Arm A) vs 72% (95% CI 57-82; Arm B). Toxicities were similar between arms with no treatment-related mortality during consolidation. Conclusions: MTRA induction followed by myeloablative consolidation (Arm A) had improved PFS vs MTRA induction followed by non-myeloablative consolidation (Arm B), though more progressions or deaths leading to treatment discontinuation prior to consolidation in Arm B were noted. Both consolidation regimens were well-tolerated with encouraging PFS and OS in newly-diagnosed PCNSL. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01511562.

Abstract Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.

8042 Background: Optimal consolidative therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not defined. Avoidance of whole brain radiation may reduce risk of neurotoxicity. Non-radiation consolidative options include myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) or non-myeloablative chemotherapy. Methods: This is a randomized phase 2, National Clinical Trials Network study of induction methotrexate (MTX) (8 g/m2days 1, 15), temozolomide (TMZ) (150-200 mg/m2 D7-11), and rituximab (RTX) (C1 D3, 10, 17, 24 and C2 D3, 10) in four 28-day cycles followed by one cycle of cytarabine (ARA-C) (2 g/m2 BID, D1, 2) (MTRA). Following induction, patients (pts) received consolidation with thiotepa (5 mg/kg BID, D -5, -4) plus carmustine (400 mg/m2, day -6) and ASCT (Arm A) or one cycle of ARA-C (2 g/m2 BID, D1-4) plus infusional etoposide (40 mg/kg over 96h) (Arm B). The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS), designed to compare consolidation regimens. This report describes the results of the 5 cycles of induction therapy. Results: 113 pts (median age 61 years, range 33-75) were randomized (Arm A: 57, Arm B: 56) across 27 centers. 108 eligible pts who received induction therapy were evaluated. 36 pts (33.3%) did not proceed to consolidation, mainly due to disease progression (17), pt withdrawal (8), or adverse events including death (6). Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 12 pts (11.1%) during induction. Dose modifications of MTX were required in 75% of pts and 63.3% of cycles, mainly due to renal adjustments. Dose delays of MTX were required in 52.8% of pts and 22.2% of cycles. Overall response rate (CR, CRu, PR) at the end of induction was 65.7% (95% CI, 56%, 74.6%). Conclusions: While MTRA is feasible and active a significant proportion of pts did not receive consolidation, supporting the need to develop more effective induction strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT01511562 .

Abstract To describe the demographic and tumor related characteristics and outcomes for patients with primary T-cell central nervous system lymphoma (TPCNSL). A retrospective series of patients with TPCNSL was compiled from twelve cancer centers and seven countries. This study involved 35 male and 10 female patients with a median age of 60 years (range 3–84). Twenty (44%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. Twenty six (58%) had involvement of a cerebral hemisphere and sixteen (36%) had lesions of deeper sites in the brain. Two patients had primary spinal cord lesions and one had meningeal disease only. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was elevated in 7 of the 22 cases (32%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein was elevated above normal in 19 of the 24 cases (79%) with available data. The median disease specific survival (DSS) for all patients was 25 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 11–38 months). The two and five-year DSS were 51 % (CI 35–66 %) and 17 % (CI 6–34 %) respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for the following factors: age (≤ 60 vs. > 60 years), PS (0 or 1 vs. 2, 3 or 4), involvement of deep structures of the central nervous system (no vs. yes), and methotrexate (MTX) use in the primary treatment (yes vs. no). Only PS and MTX use were significantly associated with better outcome with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.2 (CI 0.1–0.4) and 0.4 (CI 0.2–0.8) respectively. This is the largest series ever assembled of TPCNSL. The presentation and outcome appear similar to that of PCNSL of B cell origin. PS 0 or 1 and administration of MTX are associated with better survival. TPCNSL does not appear to require a different therapeutic management approach than B-cell PCNSL.

Abstract Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), also known as primary intraocular lymphoma, is a rare malignancy typically classified as a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and most frequently develops in elderly populations. PVRL commonly masquerades as posterior uveitis and has a unique tropism for the retina and central nervous system (CNS). Over 15% of primary CNS lymphoma patients develop intraocular lymphoma, usually occurring in the retina and/or vitreous. Conversely, 65%–90% of PVRL patients develop CNS lymphoma. Consequently, PVRL is often fatal because of ultimate CNS association. Current PVRL animal models are limited and require further development. Typical clinical findings include vitreous cellular infiltration (lymphoma and inflammatory cells) and subretinal tumor infiltration as determined using dilated fundoscopy, fluorescent angiography, and optical coherent tomography. Currently, PVRL is most often diagnosed using both histology to identify lymphoma cells in the vitreous or retina and immunohistochemistry to indicate monoclonality. Additional adjuncts in diagnosing PVRL exist, including elevation of interleukin-10 levels in ocular fluids and detection of IgH or T-cell receptor gene rearrangements in malignant cells. The optimal therapy for PVRL is not defined and requires the combined effort of oncologists and ophthalmologists. PVRL is sensitive to radiation therapy and exhibits high responsiveness to intravitreal methotrexate or rituximab. Although systemic chemotherapy alone can result in high response rates in patients with PVRL, there is a high relapse rate. Because of the disease rarity, international, multicenter, collaborative efforts are required to better understand the biology and pathogenesis of PVRL as well as to define both diagnostic markers and optimal therapies.