Back to Authors

Gruetter, Rolf

0000-0003-1870-4025

Mayo Clinic

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Citations 2

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the rodent brain: Experts' consensus recommendations
Lanz, Bernard , Abaei, Alireza , Braissant, Olivier , Choi, In‐Young , Cudalbu, Cristina , Henry, Pierre‐Gilles , Kantarci, Kejal , Lutz, Norbert W. , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Mlynárik, Vladı́mir , Xin, Lijing , Valette, Julien , brain, the Experts' Working Group on Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the rodent, Deelchand, Dinesh K. , Öz, Gülin , Tkáč, Ivan , Kara, Firat , Lee, Phil , Lutz, Norbert W , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Öz, Gülin , Kantarci, Kejal , Deelchand, Dinesh K , Gruetter, Rolf , Rasche, Volker , brain, the Experts' Working Group on Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the rodent

NMR in Biomedicine | September 2, 2020 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/nbm.4325 Get It

In vivo MRS is a non‐invasive measurement technique used not only in humans, but also in animal models using high‐field magnets. MRS enables the measurement of metabolite concentrations as well as metabolic rates and their modifications in healthy animals and disease models. Such data open the way to a deeper understanding of the underlying biochemistry, related disturbances and mechanisms taking place during or prior to symptoms and tissue changes. In this work, we focus on the main preclinical 1H, 31P and 13C MRS approaches to study brain metabolism in rodent models, with the aim of providing general experts’ consensus recommendations (animal models, anesthesia, data acquisition protocols). An overview of the main practical differences in preclinical compared with clinical MRS studies is presented, as well as the additional biochemical information that can be obtained in animal models in terms of metabolite concentrations and metabolic flux measurements. The properties of high‐field preclinical MRS and the technical limitations are also described.
Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations
Wilson, Martin , Andronesi, Ovidiu C. , Barker, Peter B. , Bartha, Robert , Bizzi, Alberto , Bolan, Patrick J. , Cudalbu, Cristina , Dydak, Ulrike , Emir, Uzay E. , González, R. Gilberto , Gruber, Stephan , Gupta, Rakesh K. , Henning, A , Hetherington, Hoby P. , Hüppi, Petra S. , Hurd, Ralph E. , Kantarci, Kejal , Kauppinen, Risto A. , Klomp, Dennis W. J. , Kreis, Roland , Kruiskamp, Marijn J., Leach, Martin O. , Lin, Alexander , Luijten, Peter R. , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Meyerhoff, Dieter J. , Mountford, Carolyn E. , Mullins, Paul G. , Murdoch, James B. , Nelson, Sarah J. , Noeske, Ralph , Öz, Gülin , Pan, Julie W., Poptani, Harish , Posse, Stefan , Ratai, Eva‐Maria , Salibi, Nouha , Scheenen, Tom W. J. , Soher, Brian J. , Tkáč, Ivan , Vigneron, Daniel B. , Howe, Franklyn A. , Choi, In‐Young , Kreis, Roland , Maudsley, Andrew A , Howe, Franklyn A , Öz, Gülin , Marjańska, Małgorzata , Kantarci, Kejal , Brindle, Kevin Michael , Choi, In‐Young, Gruetter, Rolf , Heerschap, Arend , Peet, Andrew C. , Smith, Ian C. P.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | March 28, 2019 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 527-550

10.1002/mrm.27742 Get It

Proton MRS (1H MRS) provides noninvasive, quantitative metabolite profiles of tissue and has been shown to aid the clinical management of several brain diseases. Although most modern clinical MR scanners support MRS capabilities, routine use is largely restricted to specialized centers with good access to MR research support. Widespread adoption has been slow for several reasons, and technical challenges toward obtaining reliable good‐quality results have been identified as a contributing factor. Considerable progress has been made by the research community to address many of these challenges, and in this paper a consensus is presented on deficiencies in widely available MRS methodology and validated improvements that are currently in routine use at several clinical research institutions. In particular, the localization error for the PRESS localization sequence was found to be unacceptably high at 3 T, and use of the semi‐adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence is a recommended solution. Incorporation of simulated metabolite basis sets into analysis routines is recommended for reliably capturing the full spectral detail available from short TE acquisitions. In addition, the importance of achieving a highly homogenous static magnetic field (B0) in the acquisition region is emphasized, and the limitations of current methods and hardware are discussed. Most recommendations require only software improvements, greatly enhancing the capabilities of clinical MRS on existing hardware. Implementation of these recommendations should strengthen current clinical applications and advance progress toward developing and validating new MRS biomarkers for clinical use.