Citations

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Sleep and circadian rest–activity rhythm (RAR) disruption may bidirectionally relate to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Down syndrome (DS), the most common genetic cause of AD, presents sleep disorders, yet RAR patterns across the DS‐associated AD continuum remain uncharacterized. METHODS We analyzed 7‐day wrist actigraphy in 140 adults with DS (108 asymptomatic; 32 AD dementia) and 41 unimpaired controls. General linear models, adjusted for age, sex, sleep efficiency, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity, tested group differences, with interaction terms included to evaluate group‐specific associations. RESULTS DS showed lower relative amplitude and higher nocturnal activity, already in asymptomatic individuals. Rhythm strength declined further with AD progression, while regularity and phase timing remained preserved until dementia. Findings were independent of sleep duration and OSA. DISCUSSION Adults with DS showed early RAR disturbance that progressed across the AD continuum, paralleling sporadic AD. Circadian RAR features may be scalable biomarkers of AD progression.

Abstract Background The Alzheimer's disease (AD) Braak staging is a key framework for classifying tau pathology progression in AD based on histopathological post‐mortem brain examinations. However, adapting it to PET imaging can be challenging due to differences in tracer uptake patterns and binding properties, which affect sensitivity, specificity, and regional staging. This study compares Braak staging across four tau PET tracers: Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948. Methods We assessed 90 participants across the AD spectrum (46 CU, 31 MCI, 13 dementia; mean age 66.1 ± 7.8) using Aβ PET and four tau PET tracers: (Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948). Braak positivity was defined based on Aβ− CU individuals (mean +2.5 SD, SUVR). To evaluate systematic bias and agreement between tracers, we computed pairwise differences at corresponding Braak stage estimates and applied the Bland‐Altman method to assess mean bias and limits of agreement. Additionally, Tau PET Braak region trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Results Braak stage trajectories as a function of Aβ differ depending on the tracer and the sequential order of abnormality is highly variable. For instance, while for MK6240, RO948 and PI2620, Braak I is the first region to became abnormal, for Flortaucipir the earliest region to became abnormal is Braak IV (Figure 1). This variable pattern of abnormality impacts in the concordance of Braak staging between tracers with the highest Braak staging agreement resulting in concordance levels of approximately 70%. The highest levels of agreement between tracers usually happen at Braak 0 or Braak IV‐V, with intermediate stages showing very low concordance (Figure 2). The Bland‐Altman analysis identified wide limits of agreement, suggesting high variability and high tracer‐specific differences (Figure 3). On the other hand, it also identified that mean differences between tracers were small, indicating minimal systematic bias. Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620 and RO948. These findings suggest that while the tracers provide comparable stages on average, they may not be fully interchangeable in individual cases.

Abstract Background Older adults with brain tau pathology but no evident amyloid‐beta (A) pathology can be referred to as primary age‐related tauopathy (PART). However, in vivo characterization of PART using biomarkers remains unclear, varying based on the method used to define tau pathology (e.g. different tau‐PET tracers). Here, we conducted a head‐to‐head characterization of PART using two different tau‐PET tracers. Method We studied 433 individuals from the HEAD cohort (244 CU, 138 MCI, and 51 with dementia). Participants underwent clinical assessments, MRI, A‐PET, both MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir scans, and a subset with plasma biomarkers ( n = 332). A‐PET positivity was defined as Centiloid>24. Tau‐positivity(T) was determined by MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir SUVR values exceeding the mean+2SD in at least one Braak region anchored in CU A‐ individuals followed by visual confirmation in A‐/T+ cases. Concordance across biomarkers was assessed among PART (A‐/T+), A‐/T‐ and A+/T+ groups. Plasma GFAP, p ‐tau217, NFL levels, and Centiloids were compared across A/T groups using linear regression. Result We found a total of 25 (5.8 %) cases classified as A‐/T+ defined by at least one tau tracer (74±6.3 years, 52% females, 17 CU, 3 MCI, 5 with dementia). Detection of A‐/T+ cases varied by tracer: MK‐6240( n = 20), Flortaucipir( n = 16) (Figure 1A). Among A‐/T+ individuals, MK‐6240 identified 13 CU, 4 MCI, and 3 dementia cases, while Flortaucipir identified 11 CU, 3 MCI, and 2 dementia cases(Figure 1B). Concordance between MK‐6240 and Flortaucipir in A‐/T+ cases was low ( n = 11, 44%)(Figure 1C). A‐/T+ individuals showed no significant biomarker differences from A‐/T‐ but had lower biomarker levels than A+/T+: Centiloids (MK‐6240: T=15.08, p <0.001; Flortaucipir: T=14.36, p <0.001), GFAP (MK‐6240: T=5.04, p < 0.01; Flortaucipir: T=2.92, p <0.001), p ‐tau217 (MK‐6240: T=7.77, p <0.001; Flortaucipir: T=6.34, p <0.001), except for NFL (MK‐6240: T=1.35, p = 0.18; Flortaucipir: T=1.14, p = 0.25)(Figure 2). Representative A and tau biomarker cases (Figure 3A), along with discordant cases classified as T+ by only one tracer (Figure 3B), are illustrated. Conclusion Our preliminary analysis revealed a higher prevalence of A‐/T+ cases with MK‐6240 than Flortaucipir, low concordance between tracers and consistently lower biomarker levels in A‐/T+ compared to A+/T+. Larger studies and longitudinal analyses are necessary to ascertain the pathological trajectories of A‐/T+ individuals with varying tau biomarker profiles.

Abstract Background Tau phosphorylation and aggregation are hallmark features of Alzheimer's disease pathology(AD). Previous studies have shown that plasma phosphorylated tau( p ‐tau) at threonine 217 can detect AD‐related tau tangle pathology. However, the head‐to‐head association between p ‐tau217 and different tau PET tracers remains unexplored. Here, we conducted a head‐to‐head comparison of the association between plasma p ‐tau217 and four distinct tau PET tracers[MK6240, Flortaucipir(FTP), PI2620, RO948]. Method We studied 338 individuals across the AD continuum from the HEAD study[190 cognitively unimpaired elderly(CU), 109 with mild cognitive impairment(MCI), and 39 with dementia] with available FTP, MK6240, and plasma p ‐tau217 measured by ALZpath assay. A subset of 64 individuals(28 CU, 25 MCI, and 11 dementia) also had PI2620 and RO948, and p ‐tau217 measured by Lumipulse. The strength of the association was determined using t‐value maps from regression models testing the association between each tau PET tracer and plasma p ‐tau217, and the extent was measured by the percentage of significant voxels(t‐value>3.2). R‐square metric was used to determine how much of the variance in tau PET tracer estimates was explained by plasma p ‐tau217 concentrations. Associations between p ‐tau217 with tau PET were evaluated using the Spearman test. Result We found that in CU, both the extent and magnitude of the association with plasma p ‐tau217 were higher for MK6240 compared to FTP (Figure 1A‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240 than in FTP (Figure 1E‐F). In CI, the extent and magnitude of the association were similar for MK6240 and FTP. Additionally, plasma p ‐tau217 explained a similar proportion of the variance in MK6240 and FTP. Using the subset of individuals who had all tau tracers, MK6240 showed a slightly higher extent of association with p ‐tau217, followed by FTP, PI2620, and RO948 (Figure 2A‐B). The magnitude of association was stronger for MK6240, followed by PI2620, RO948, and FTP (Figure 2C‐D). Plasma p ‐tau217 explained a greater proportion of the variance in MK6240, followed by FTP, RO948, and PI2620 (Figure 2E‐F). We compared the associations between different p ‐tau217 assays, and both assays presented similar associations with all tau PET tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion In summary, our results indicate that the four tau PET tracers exhibit robust associations with plasma p ‐tau217 in similar topographical regions.

Abstract Background The overlap index (OI), previously introduced by Lee et al. (2022), has proven to be a reliable method for detecting tau accumulation via tau‐PET imaging with flortaucipir ([ 18 F]AV‐1451). This technique identifies voxel‐wise increases in standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) across serial scans. However, the relationship between tau‐PET measurements obtained with [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]AV‐1451 using the OI remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the relationship between [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET using the tau‐PET OI. Method The study included 27 participants from the HEAD project, all of whom underwent two serial tau‐PET scans (each [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]AV‐1451) along with 3T T1‐weighted MRI, acquired within an average interval of 18 months. SUVr maps for each tau‐PET tracer were normalized to the cerebellar crus grey matter, and MR images were co‐registered to the MCALT T1 template. Tau‐PET images were spatially resampled to the template space, and OI was computed within a predefined META‐ROI using an intensity threshold of 1.3 and a cutoff of 0.5. Clusters containing fewer than 20 contiguous voxels were excluded from analysis. The META‐ROI SUVr was calculated as the average SUVr across the selected region's SUVr. Additionally, a visual comparison was performed to assess the spatial overlap of OI‐identified voxels between the two tau‐PET tracers. Result OI values within the META‐ROI exhibited a broad distribution between [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET, particularly in cognitively unimpaired (CU) and younger individuals (Figure 1A). Unlike the OI distribution, the relationship between META‐ROI SUVr values of both tracers followed an exponential trend (Figure 1B). Visual inspection revealed that OI‐detected voxels in [ 18 F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET were frequently localized to the meninges, an established site of off‐target binding, which was not observed in [ 18 F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET (Figure 2). Conclusion The association between [ 18 F]MK‐6240 and [ 18 F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET, as assessed using the OI, exhibited considerable variability in CU and younger participants. Additionally, the presence of overlapping voxels in the meninges in [ 18 F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET highlights the need to account for and potentially exclude off‐target binding effects in these populations. The influence of meningeal signal and other off‐target binding on the OI in the temporal META‐ROI needs to be further evaluated.

Abstract Background Tau accumulation in the brain is postulated to follow a hierarchical pattern, known as Braak staging, originally defined in postmortem brains. PET‐based Braak stages have since been proposed, however, tau PET tracers exhibit distinct binding characteristics that might influence the detectable trajectories of tau accumulation and its relationship with other biomarkers across the AD continuum. In a head‐to‐head study, we investigated the emergence of tau positivity in each Braak region, along with plasma p ‐tau217 and GFAP, as a function of Aβ PET deposition. Method We evaluated 352 individuals from the HEAD study (205 cognitively unimpaired and 147 cognitively impaired) with head‐to‐head Aβ PET, MK6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET, and plasma p ‐tau217 (ALZpath) and GFAP (Quanterix) measures. Tau PET Braak regions, plasma p ‐tau217 and GFAP trajectories were modeled as functions of Aβ burden (Centiloid scale) using the Lowess method. Biomarkers were z‐scored anchored on young individuals ( n = 19, <28 years old). Positivity for plasma biomarkers and for each Braak region was determined when values surpassed 2.5 z‐score from the mean. Result Among the tested markers, plasma GFAP was the earliest to show abnormality as a function of Centiloid, occurring at 11 Centiloids. For MK6240, Braak I was the first regions to became positive (at 22 Centiloids), followed by Braak II (at 32 Centiloids), Braak IV (at 42 Centiloids), Braak III (at 52 Centiloids), Braak V (at 70 Centiloids) and Braak VI (at 123 Centiloid; Figure 1A). For Flortaucipir the first region to became positive was Braak IV (at 50 Centiloids), followed by Braak I and II (both at 56 Centiloids), Braak III (at 85 Centiloids) and Braak V (at 92 Centiloids). Braak VI region did not reach the threshold for positivity in our population (Figure 1B). Plasma p ‐tau217 reached the positivity threshold at 38 Centiloids. Conclusion MK6240 follows a Braak stage‐like pattern of abnormality as a function of Aβ burden, whereas for Flortaucipir, Braak IV is the first region to became abnormal. MK6240 becomes abnormal at lower Aβ burden levels compared to plasma p ‐tau217 and Flortaucipir but after plasma GFAP. Our findings suggest that MK6240 might detect tau pathology in earlier disease stages than Flortaucipir.

Abstract Background In vivo Braak staging stratifies patients across the AD spectrum and has the potential to harmonize tau PET tracer staging. This study aims to compare and test harmonization procedures for Braak staging individuals using MK6240 and Flortaucipir tau PET tracers. Methods We assessed 437 participants across the AD spectrum (245 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 192 cognitively impaired; mean age 68.5 ± 8.6) using head‐to‐head MK6240 and Flortaucipir scans. We computed SUVRs in Braak regions of interest (ROIs) and assessed four cut‐off methods for Braak positivity: (a) mean + 2.5 SD of young controls (age <28 years), (b) mean + 2.5 SD of elderly CU Aβ−, (c) Gaussian mixture modeling (GMM), and (d) the Youden index. Braak stages were assigned using seven (0 to VI) or four (0, I–II, III–IV, V–VI) categories. We evaluated inter‐ and intra‐tracer concordance (intra‐tracer, i.e., whether it follows the sequential Braak pattern). Results The intra‐tracer seven‐class Braak staging concordance ranged from 63% to 94%. With the highest intra‐tracer Braak concordance being achieved when using GMM cutoffs: 94% (MK6240) and 89% (Flortaucipir; Figure 1). Inter‐tracer agreement concordance ranged from 56% to 76%. The highest concordance emerged from the CU Elderly Aβ– cutoff optimizing the Braak II region for spill‐off (Figure 2). Using the Braak staging simplified version improved intra‐tracer concordance in both tracers (MK6240as well as inter‐tracer agreement (86.5%). Most inter‐tracer discrepancies were observed at Braak stages II–IV. Despite showing staging discordances, the distribution of cognitive status across the Braak stages is similar for both tracers (Figure 3). Conclusion These preliminary findings reveal some discrepancies in Braak staging when comparing MK6240 and Flortaucipir. Our results also suggest that adjustments in cutoffs and regions of interest can partially mitigate both inter‐ and intra‐tracer divergences. Finally, our analysis suggests robust concordance after adjustment and using 4 classes (0, I‐II, III‐IV, V‐VI).

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen's kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure 1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure 1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure 2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure 2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.

Abstract Background Precise cross‐tracer harmonization of tau PET imaging is essential for comparing tau burden across different tracers and studies. Here, we evaluated the performance of the universal tau PET scale (Uniτ) in harmonizing Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 tau PET images into a universal scale. Method We assessed 485 individuals across aging and AD spectrum scanned head‐to‐head with Flortaucipir and MK6240, and a subset of 90 individuals with additional PI2620 and RO948. We generated tau PET SUVRs using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference with a common 8mm FWHM. We estimated Uniτ parameters on a training set ( n = 200) by fitting a smoothed hyperbolic tangent equation to the Meta‐Temporal ROI anchored in the mean SUVR of young participants and the 90th percentile from cognitively impaired individuals. We compared tau positivity on the Uniτ scale with classifications from SUVRs (mean + 3 SD from Youngs). We applied the same equation to all brain voxels to generate Uniτ 3D images. Then, we extracted mean Uniτ values for key ROIs and correlated them with ROI‐based Uniτ values to evaluate voxel‐wise estimates. Result Using tracer‐specific parameters, Uniτ harmonized Flortaucipir, MK6240, PI2620, and RO948 to the same scale, aligning values near the identity line and confirming its applicability across tau PET tracers (Figure 1). For Flortaucipir, Uniτ tau positivity matched original SUVR classifications (ground truth), with only one mismatch for MK6240 (Figure 1). Applying the Uniτ transformation to all brain voxels effectively harmonized 3D images to a common scale, reducing visual variabilities (Figure 2). Furthermore, ROI‐based estimates and those extracted from the 3D Uniτ images were identical (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results indicate that tau PET tracers can be harmonized to a common scale using a large head‐to‐head dataset. The Uniτ scale can harmonize entire 3D tau PET images, suggesting that there is no need to use pre‐established ROIs, which would constrain the analysis to a few brain regions. Uniτ is freely accessible across platforms ( www.unitau.app ) for ROI and 3D tau PET harmonization.