Citations

Importance Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) represents the third most common stroke type with unique etiologies, risk factors, diagnostics, and treatments. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies often cluster SAH with other stroke types leaving its distinct burden estimates obscure. Objective To estimate the worldwide burden of SAH. Design, Setting, and Participants Based on the repeated cross-sectional Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, the global burden of SAH in 1990 to 2021 was estimated. Moreover, the SAH burden was compared with other diseases, and its associations with 14 individual risk factors were investigated with available data in the GBD 2021 study. The GBD study included the burden estimates of nontraumatic SAH among all ages in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2021. Exposures SAH and 14 modifiable risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Absolute numbers and age-standardized rates with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) of SAH incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) as well as risk factor–specific population attributable fractions (PAFs). Results In 2021, the global age-standardized SAH incidence was 8.3 (95% UI, 7.3-9.5), prevalence was 92.2 (95% UI, 84.1-100.6), mortality was 4.2 (95% UI, 3.7-4.8), and DALY rate was 125.2 (95% UI, 110.5-142.6) per 100 000 people. The highest burden estimates were found in Latin America, the Caribbean, Oceania, and high-income Asia Pacific. Although the absolute number of SAH cases increased, especially in regions with a low sociodemographic index, all age-standardized burden rates decreased between 1990 and 2021: the incidence by 28.8% (95% UI, 25.7%-31.6%), prevalence by 16.1% (95% UI, 14.8%-17.7%), mortality by 56.1% (95% UI, 40.7%-64.3%), and DALY rate by 54.6% (95% UI, 42.8%-61.9%). Of 300 diseases, SAH ranked as the 36th most common cause of death and 59th most common cause of DALY in the world. Of all worldwide SAH-related DALYs, 71.6% (95% UI, 63.8%-78.6%) were associated with the 14 modeled risk factors of which high systolic blood pressure (population attributable fraction [PAF] = 51.6%; 95% UI, 38.0%-62.6%) and smoking (PAF = 14.4%; 95% UI, 12.4%-16.5%) had the highest attribution. Conclusions and Relevance Although the global age-standardized burden rates of SAH more than halved over the last 3 decades, SAH remained one of the most common cardiovascular and neurological causes of death and disabilities in the world, with increasing absolute case numbers. These findings suggest evidence for the potential health benefits of proactive public health planning and resource allocation toward the prevention of SAH.

Abstract Background Since pulsed-field ablation (PFA) specifically targets myocardial tissue, it has become a cutting-edge substitute for radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation. Purpose We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of PFA vs thermal ablation for AF ablation. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies, which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through September 2023. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Seventeen studies with a total of 2,255 patients were included. PFA was significantly associated with a decreased AF recurrence (RR: 0.65, 95% CI [0.51, 0.84], P= 0.0010) but not any arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.87, 95% CI [0.69, 1.09], P= 0.22). Also, PFA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure time (MD: -15.15, 95% CI [-20.23, -10.07], P< 0.00001) and heart rate (MD: -7.56, 95% CI [-12.78, -2.34], P= 0.005); however, there was no significant difference between PFA and thermal ablation in fluoroscopy time (MD: 2.83, 95% CI [-0.38, 6.04], P= 0.08). PFA decreased phrenic nerve palsy (RR: 0.38, 95% CI [0.15, 0.98], P= 0.05) and esophageal lesions (RR: 0.09, 95% CI [0.01, 0.69], P= 0.02); however, PFA was significantly associated with increased pericardial tamponade (RR: 6.14 with 95% CI [1.43, 26.33], P= 0.01). Conclusion PFA was significantly associated with decreased AF recurrence, heart rate, total procedure time, phrenic nerve palsy, esophageal lesion, and increased incidence of pericardial tamponade compared with thermal ablation. However, current evidence is mainly weighted by observational studies, requiring further large-scale randomized trials.Figure

Abstract Background While the cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide -1 (GLP-10) agonists are well-documented in diabetic patients, their impact on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes mellitus remains debated. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to investigate the effects of GLP-1 on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity without diabetes mellitus. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing RCTs were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through December 26th, 2023. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results We included 19 RCTs with a total of 32,884 patients. There was no difference between GLP-1 agonists and placebo regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.85, 95% CI [0.71- 1.01], P= 0.07). However, GLP-1 agonists significantly decreased the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94, p < 0.0001), non-cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.96, p = 0.02), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.87, p < 0.0001). Also, GLP-1 agonists significantly increased the incidence of any adverse events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16, p < 0.0001), with no difference regarding the incidence of serious adverse events. Conclusion GLP-1 agonists not only demonstrated substantial benefits in reducing cardiovascular risks, including all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction, but also effectively promoted weight loss and improved lipid profiles and blood pressure control. However, their use is accompanied by a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and heterogeneity in outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches.

Abstract Background Previous studies have suggested that pre-treatment of coronary artery calcification with rotational atherectomy (RA) prior to stent deployment can enhance procedural success, but this does not necessarily translate into improved clinical outcomes. Recently, the Orbital Atherectomy (OA) system has been introduced into clinical practice to enhance lesion preparation. Purpose Our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both RA and OA as pre-treatment strategies before stent deployment in patients with coronary artery calcification. Methods We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. These were identified through systematic PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until January 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using Stata version 17. Results Our analysis included eleven studies encompassing 81,873 patients. No significant difference was observed between RA and OA in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR: 0.81 with 95% CI [0.64, 1.02], P= 0.07). However, OA was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.60 with 95% CI [0.52, 0.70], P< 0.01), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR: 0.43 with 95% CI [0.22, 0.82], P= 0.01), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (RR: 0.78 with 95% CI [0.62, 0.97], P= 0.03), and fluoroscopy time (MD: -3.93 with 95% CI [-7.39, -0.48], P= 0.03). There was no significant difference between RA and OA in cardiac death (RR: 2.65 with 95% CI [0.94, 7.51], P= 0.07), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (RR: 0.57 with 95% CI [0.23, 1.41], P= 0.22), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.79 with 95% CI [0.62, 1.01], P= 0.06), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.09, 1.23], P= 0.10), stroke (RR: 0.76 with 95% CI [0.57, 1.01], P= 0.06), re-admission (RR: 0.76 with 95% CI [0.48, 1.19], P= 0.23), vessel closure (RR: 0.78 with 95% CI [0.18, 3.33], P= 0.74), procedural duration (MD: -5.43 with 95% CI [-21.71, 10.84], P= 0.51), length of hospital stay (MD: 0.21 with 95% CI [-0.47, 0.90], P= 0.54), and contrast amount (MD: -3.68 with 95% CI [-9.37, 2.01], P= 0.21). Conclusion Both RA and OA as pre-treatment strategies before stent deployment demonstrate similar outcomes for numerous cardiovascular events. However, OA is associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality, TVR, CABG, and fluoroscopy time.

Abstract Background Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) and heart transplantation stand out as the two well-established and effective therapeutic approaches for managing patients with advanced heart failure. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) has been demonstrated to improve functional capacity in patients with LVAD. Purpose We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of EBCR in patients with LVAD. Also, to compare high-intensity (HIT) versus moderate-intensity (MIT) EBCR regimens in patients with LVAD. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until January 2024. We used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Six RCTs with 160 patients were included. There was no significant difference between EBCR and standard care regarding peak VO2 change [SMD: 0.24 with 95% CI (-0.14, 0.62), P= 0.21] and six-minute walk distance (6-MWD) change [SMD: 0.28 with 95% CI (-0.11, 0.66), P= 0.16]. Also, there was no significant difference between HIT and MIT exercise regarding peak VO2 change [SMD: 0.20 with 95% CI (-0.41, 0.82), P= 0.52] and 6-MWD change [SMD: 0.07 with 95% CI (-0.54, 0.69), P= 0.81]. Moreover, EBCR was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of any adverse events when compared to usual care with [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.65, 0.99), P= 0.04], while there was no significant difference between HIT and MIT exercise regarding the incidence of any adverse events [RR: 0.38 with 95% CI (0.02, 9.22), P= 0.55]. Conclusion EBCR did not improve functional capacity in patients with LVAD, with no significant effect on peak VO2 or 6-MWD.

We present the case of an elderly man with a history of diastolic congestive heart failure, severe aortic stenosis and atrial fibrillation, who presented with fatigue, weakness, coffee ground emesis and black tarry stool. Haemoglobin was 68 g/L. Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated at 1038. Evaluation by cardiology and gastroenterology specialists revealed reflux oesophagitis and a mild hiatal hernia on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, normal colonoscopy and small bowel series without obstruction. Capsule endoscopy identified angiodysplasia in the small intestine. The patient was diagnosed with Heyde’s syndrome based on the triad of severe aortic stenosis, gastrointestinal bleeding from angiodysplasia and acquired von Willebrand syndrome. The patient underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, resulting in the resolution of symptoms. Heyde’s syndrome represents a challenging clinical entity requiring a multidisciplinary approach for accurate diagnosis and management. Early recognition, prompt intervention and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial in optimising patient outcomes.

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus angiography alone in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing IVUS-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, and angiographic outcomes. Results: A total of 41 eligible studies involving 712635 patients were included in the meta-analysis. IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared to angiography-guided PCI (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.53, p<0.00001). The use of IVUS also resulted in a lower risk of all-cause mortality (pooled OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.41-1.83, p<0.00001) and reduced rates of stent thrombosis (pooled OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.82-2.86, p<0.00001) and TVR (pooled OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.42, p<0.00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the use of IVUS-guided PCI over angiography-guided PCI. IVUS-guided procedures were associated with reduced MACE rates, improved procedural success, decreased stent thrombosis, and superior angiographic outcomes. The findings suggest that incorporating IVUS into PCI procedures may lead to improved clinical outcomes and more optimal stent deployment. However, further studies are warranted to explore potential subgroup differences and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI.