Elbenawi, Hossam

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure management following successful reperfusion with endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion remains debated. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) management improves clinical outcomes compared with a standard approach after endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science through October 2025 for relevant randomized controlled trials comparing intensive (SBP target <140 mm Hg) versus standard (SBP target <180 mm Hg) management. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) and any intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. We performed frequentist and Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses, supplemented by trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials comprising 1972 patients were included. In frequentist analysis, intensive SBP management was associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of achieving functional independence (risk ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73–0.93]). Bayesian analysis confirmed this harmful effect (posterior median risk ratio, 0.83 [95% credible interval, 0.7–1.02]), with a posterior probability of benefit of only 3.2%. Furthermore, ordinal shift analysis indicated that intensive SBP management was associated with a significant shift toward worse functional outcomes across the full modified Rankin Scale score distribution (common odds ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10–1.44]), a finding supported by a low posterior probability of benefit of 2.1%. No significant differences were observed in the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.96–1.16]). The corresponding Bayesian analysis yielded a posterior risk ratio estimate of 1.05 (95% credible interval, 0.90–1.21) for any intracranial hemorrhage, with a posterior probability of benefit of 23%. Trial sequential analysis indicated that the cumulative evidence reached the boundary for harm and futility for the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischemic stroke following successful endovascular thrombectomy, intensive SBP management was associated with worse functional outcomes and provided no clear safety benefit. These findings support a standard, guideline-based SBP management strategy over an intensive approach.

Background: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) can be evaluated using Duplex ultrasonography (US) and air plethysmography (PG), yet comparative performance remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent venous insufficiency US and PG within a 90-day interval from March 1, 2015 through July 31, 2024. CVI severity was classified by the clinical (C) component of the Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, and Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification system and categorized as mild (C0–2), moderate (C3), or severe (C4–6). PG and insufficiency US findings were compared across categories and machine learning models were trained to predict severe CVI. Results: We analyzed 1478 limbs from 839 patients who were predominantly women (62%) with a mean age of 61 years (± 14 years). Severe CVI was present in 32.3% of limbs. US detected venous incompetence in 67.4% of limbs overall and in 75.3% of severe CVI limbs. Abnormal PG findings occurred in 72.9% of limbs overall and in 88.5% of severe CVI limbs. PG parameters in machine learning models outperformed US parameters in predicting severe CVI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.82 vs 0.65). The top PG model (multilayer perceptron [MLP]) achieved an AUROC of 0.82, versus the best US model (gradient boosting) with an AUROC of 0.65. Limiting PG data to incompetence and obstruction parameters modestly reduced performance but remained higher than US (logistic regression AUROC 0.72). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that PG assessment in CVI offers superior performance compared to US. Overall, these results validate the quantitative whole-limb hemodynamic approach using PG, which provides a more complete understanding of the pathology behind CVI.

Mediastinal radiation potentiates aortic stenosis and complicates its treatment. We compared the short and midterm-outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. Electronic databases were searched from inception through December 2024. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MDs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six observational studies were identified, including 2458 TAVR patients and 1873 SAVR patients. In the short-term, TAVR was associated with lower rate of mortality (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.88), atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.15–0.65), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59–0.95), bleeding (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.33–0.42), and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: −4.30; 95% CI: −5.45 to −3.15). One-year mortality was comparable between the 2 groups (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.50–2.13). This meta-analysis of observational studies of patients with prior mediastinal radiation demonstrated that TAVR was associated with better short-term outcomes compared to SAVR. While 1-year mortality appeared similar between the 2 interventions, this finding should be interpreted with caution. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Background The optimal long-term antiplatelet monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) remains uncertain, with limited data comparing aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapy. This meta-analysis aims to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients who have completed a standard duration (≥6 months) of event-free dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following PCI with DES. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases through May 2025 to identify relevant studies that compared clopidogrel monotherapy with aspirin monotherapy in adults who had undergone PCI with DES implantation. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Pooled estimates of relative risks (RRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results Five studies [two randomized controlled trials, three observational studies; n = 16, 289 patients] were included. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a significant 31% reduction in MACCE compared with aspirin monotherapy [RR: 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–0.79; P < 0.0001]. A pooled analysis of HRs demonstrated a similar benefit (HR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.58–0.77). Incidences of major bleeding and all-cause death were comparable between the two groups (RR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.57–1.51 and RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.74–1.25, respectively). Notably, the analysis of HRs demonstrated that clopidogrel significantly reduced the risk of stroke (HR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.45–0.82; P = 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (HR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.49–0.88; P = 0.005). Conclusion Clopidogrel monotherapy is more effective than aspirin for long-term prevention of MACCE, MI, and stroke, without increasing the major bleeding risk. Prospero ID CRD420251070685

ABSTRACT Background Early catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes, but the optimal timing, especially in heart failure (HF) subtypes, remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the impact of ablation timing on outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the TriNetX database (2010–2024) to identify HF patients with AF who underwent ablation. Patients were classified as early ablation (≤ 1 year of first AF diagnosis) or delayed ablation (1–3 years), with propensity score matching (PSM) applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined by repeat ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV), or antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use after a 3‐month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included stroke, hospitalization, and mortality over 5 years. Results After PSM, delayed ablation was associated with higher AF recurrence in both HFrEF (HR = 1.28, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (HR = 1.21, p = 0.02), as seen in multivariate analysis. In HFrEF, delayed ablation was associated with higher incidence of re‐do ablation, AAD use, and DCCV, while in HFpEF, higher recurrence with delayed ablation was associated with increased AAD use. Both cohorts had similar stroke and mortality rates between early and delayed ablation. Conclusions Delayed ablation in HFrEF and HFpEF was linked to higher AF recurrence, driven by increased redo ablations, DCCV, AAD use in HFrEF, and higher AAD use in HFpEF. Stroke, HF hospitalization and mortality rates were similar, suggesting earlier ablation may enhance rhythm control over other outcomes.

Background: The growing epidemiologic burden of heart failure (HF) poses a significant public health challenge. The development of conduction abnormalities influences HF outcomes, with left bundle branch block (LBBB) established as an independent mortality predictor. However, the impact of right bundle branch block (RBBB) on HF mortality is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare survival in HF patients with and without RBBB. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to 12 October 2024. Raw data coordinates were extracted from Kaplan–Meier curves and merged into one dataset to reconstruct individual patient data. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Cox regression model. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Results: 13 studies incorporating 25714 HF patients were included in our analysis. Patients with RBBB had a significantly lower median survival of 41.0 months (95% CI: 39.0 – 44.8) compared to 51.2 months (95% CI: 49.2 – 52.8) in patients without RBBB. Survival at 1,3, and 5 years in RBBB patients was 74.2%, 54.0%, and 39.4%, respectively, compared to 77.2%, 58.1%, and 45.4% in patients without RBBB. The HR for mortality was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83 – 0.91, p < 0.001), indicating a 13% lower risk of death in patients without RBBB compared to those with RBBB. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality between groups (RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.88 – 2.05; p = 0.17). Conclusion: RBBB was associated with an increased risk of mortality in HF patients. These findings support the use of RBBB as a potential marker for risk stratification in HF. Further research with stricter inclusion criteria is warranted to better understand how the observed association is influenced by preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.

Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major contributor to death among ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching the electronic database up to April 2025. Seven studies, including 1192 patients, were identified. A random-effect model was used to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis was conducted to assess sample size adequacy. Results: Among Ischemic heart disease patients with ICDs, VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34–0.74]), a trend toward reduced VT storm (RR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.40–1.04], p = 0.07), and lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.53–1.01], p = 0.06) compared to ICD alone. However, no significant differences were observed when compared to patients receiving ICD plus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Additionally, VT ablation showed no significant impact on mortality or VT/VF recurrence compared to either ICD alone or ICD with AADs. Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence outcomes, while further data are required for other outcomes. Conclusion: Among ischemic heart disease patients with ICD, VT ablation reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only, but offers no significant advantage over ICD combined with antiarrhythmic drugs. VT ablation does not impact mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF. Trial Sequential Analysis confirmed conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while additional data is needed for other outcomes.

Background: Whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) can be discontinued after the resolution of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) remains controversial, particularly in patients without risk factors such as left ventricular aneurysms. This study aimed to identify patients who may safely discontinue OAC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with LVT resolution who completed their anticoagulation course and excluded patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysm. Clinical and echocardiographic factors were compared between patients who experienced LVT recurrence (n = 22) and those without recurrence during follow-up (n = 94). Results: The cohort had a mean age of 64.5 ± 15.0 years, and half (50%) were male. Most had an ischemic cardiomyopathy (64.6%). LVT recurred in 19% (22/116) of patients following initial resolution. Patients with recurrence were older (mean age 71.3 ± 11.9 vs. 63.4 ± 15.7 years, p = 0.03) and were more likely to have prior ischemic stroke and arterial thromboembolism (18.2% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.02 for both). At the time of thrombus resolution, LVEF was significantly lower among patients who had recurrence (33.4 ± 13.6% vs. 42.5 ± 15.5%, p = 0.012). Stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality rates were similar regardless of recurrence status. Recurrence risk by presence or absence of stroke and LEVF >50% on the LVT resolution echocardiogram is shown in Figure 1. Notably, no recurrences were observed among patients with both LVEF > 50% and no history of stroke (0/32), which was statistically significant compared to each other category. Conclusion: Among patients without left ventricular aneurysm who discontinued oral anticoagulation after LVT resolution, those with preserved LVEF (>50%) and no prior history of stroke had a very low risk of recurrence, with no events observed in this subgroup. These findings suggest that some patients may safely discontinue anticoagulation after LVT resolution.

Background: Early catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes, but the optimal timing, especially in heart failure (HF) subtypes, remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the impact of ablation timing on outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We used the TriNetX database (2010–2024) to identify HF patients with AF who underwent ablation. Patients were classified as early ablation (≤1 year of first AF diagnosis) or delayed ablation (1–3 years), with propensity score matching (PSM) applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined by repeat ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV), or antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included stroke, hospitalization, and mortality over 5 years. Results: After PSM, delayed ablation was associated with higher AF recurrence in both HFrEF (HR 1.25, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (HR 1.27, p = 0.01), as seen in multivariate analysis. In HFrEF, delayed ablation was associated with higher incidence of re-do ablation, AAD use, and DCCV, while in HFpEF, higher recurrence with delayed ablation was associated with increased AAD use. Both cohorts had similar stroke and mortality rates between early and delayed ablation. Conclusions: Delayed ablation in HFrEF and HFpEF was linked to higher AF recurrence, driven by increased redo ablations, DCCV, AAD use in HFrEF, and higher AAD use in HFpEF. Stroke and mortality rates were similar, suggesting earlier ablation may enhance rhythm control without affecting long-term survival.