Citations

Clear

6411 citation(s) found for "Su, Christopher".

Amyloid PET Quantitation and Centiloid Thresholds in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Chiotis, Konstantinos, Allen, Isabel E., Rabinovici, Gil D., Joie, Renaud La , Group, Meta-Centiloid Study, Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M., Benzinger, Th., Betthauser, Tobey J., Bluma, Marina, Bombois, Stephanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Bouteloup, Vincent , Braskie, Meredith N., Brendel, Matthias, Brickman, Adam M., Bryant, Natalie, Bullich, Santiago , Carrillo, Maria C., Casaletto, Kaitlin, Cash, David M., Chang, Chiung-Chih, CHANG, H L, Chao, Yishu , Collij, Lyduine E., Corrada, Maria M., Craft, Suzanne , Dickerson, Bradford C., Dubois, Bruno, Dufouil, Carole, Fajardo, Alfonso, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan, Frings, Lars , Frisoni, Giovanni B., Gardner, Raquel C., Gnörich, Johannes , Gordon, Brian A., Gu, Yuna , Guan, Yihui, Guo, Tengfei, Hanseeuw, Bernard J., Hansson, Oskar, Harrison, Theresa M., Huang, Qi, Huang, ST , Iaccarino, Leonardo, Ishii, Kazunari, Ishi, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Johnson, Sterling C., Kato, Takashi, Katsumi, Yuta, Kaye, Jeffrey, Kolinger, Guilherme D., Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lao, Patrick J., Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J., Lowe, Val J. , Luchsinger, José A., Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Meyer, Philipp T., Mezenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, Nordberg, Agneta, O’Brien, John T., O’Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis, Peretti, Debora E., Rowe, Christopher C., Rowe, James B., Schwartz, Daniel L., Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Snyder, Heather M. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan, Taggett, Jacinda Z., Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Vaillancourt, David E., Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Vijverberg, Jort, Villemagne, Victor L. , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei-en, Weiner, Michael, Woodworth, Davis, Xiao, Cally , Xie, F, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, Mijin, Severanc, A4, ABIDE, ADNI*, ADNI-DoD, AgeWell, AIBL, AMYPAD, BACS, BATON, BIOCARD, BLSA, BioFINDER-2, BrANCH, CPAS, DETECT-AD, GEMS, GHABS, HABS, HABS-HD, IDEAS, IMAP, INSIGHT-preAD, Insight46, K-ROAD, LEADS, MCSA, MULNIAD, MEMENTO, SCAN, PREVENT-AD, SPIN,, Corrada, María M. , La Joie, Renaud , Blazhenets, Ganna , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Blūma, Marina , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Braskie, Meredith N. , Brendel, Matthias , Brickman, Adam M. , Carrillo, María C. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Chiung‐Chih , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chêne, Geneviève , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dubois, Bruno , Dufouil, Carole , Fortea, Juan , Garibotto, Valentina , Gordon, Brian A. , Guan, Yihui , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Iaccarino, Leonardo , Ishii, Kazunari , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Katsumi, Yuta , Kaye, Jeffrey , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kolinger, Guilherme Domingues , Landau, Susan , Landeau, Brigitte , Lao, Patrick , Lee, Sangwon, Lleó, Alberto , Lopresti, Brian J. , Malpetti, Maura , March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Nakamura, Akinori , Nordberg, Agneta , O'Brien, John Tiernan , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Pappas, Ioannis , Quenon, Lisa , Rowe, Christopher Cleon , Rowe, James B. , Rudolph, Marc D. , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Smith, Ruben, Sokolowski, Andrzej, Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Taggett, Jacinda , Toga, Arthur W. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villain, Nicolas , Wang, Wei‐en , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Yun, M R

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jama.2026.13116 | PMID 42441390 Get It

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.
Establishing a Specialty Bipolar Clinic: The National Network of Depression Centers Consensus Recommendations
Schneck, Christopher D. , Bond, David J., Burdick, Katherine E. , Frye, Mark A. , Huber, Rebekah S., Mahon, Pamela, McInnis, Melvin G., Nurnberger, John, Öngür, Döst , Ostacher, Michael J., Parikh, Sagar V. , Raj, Kristin S. , Schweizer, Barbara , Soares, Jair C., Sullivan, Aimee E. , Suppes, Trisha , Zandi, Peter P. , Ostacher, Michael J. , Bond, David J. , Burdick, K E , Frye, Mark , Sperry, Sarah , Zandi, Peter P , DePaulo, J Raymond , Bond, David J , Ostacher, Michael J , Almeida, Jorge , Goes, Fernando , Huber, Rebekah S. , Machado‐Vieira, Rodrigo , Mahon, Pamela B. , McInnis, Melvin G. , Nurnberger, John I , Respino, Matteo , Soares, Jair C. , Sperry, Sarah H. , Veldić, Marin

Mayo Clinic

Bipolar Disorders | July 10, 2026 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/bdi.70154 | PMID 42429592 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective To provide expert recommendations for the development of a specialty bipolar clinic that promotes best clinical practices for the delivery of safe and effective care. Methods Members of the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Bipolar Clinics Work Group met in a series of 1‐h monthly video calls over 18 months to discuss all aspects of their respective institution's bipolar clinics, including services provided, administrative processes, staffing models, characteristics of patients treated, patient volumes, finances, and research. The group also invited psychiatrists from outside of the NNDC who ran large bipolar clinics to contribute their thoughts and experiences on the subject. In addition, the NNDC sent a 20‐question survey to all 27 sites asking clinic directors specific questions about their bipolar clinics, if applicable. Further meetings and discussions incorporating results from the survey took place to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations. Results Twenty‐one of 27 NNDC sites (81%) responded to the survey. Twelve of 21 (57%) sites had a specific bipolar clinic, and another 4 (19%) were looking to start one. Clinics were based in university settings. The meetings, clinic survey, and discussions resulted in 10 recommendations describing services and operations for bipolar specialty clinics. Conclusions Given the complexity of bipolar disorder, specialty clinics are important to enhance care. Clinics with a wide array of services that include consultation, medication management, bipolar‐specific psychotherapies, and patient/family psychoeducation provide the most comprehensive care. Challenges to these clinics include maintaining ongoing patient access as well as ensuring long‐term financial stability.
Standardized endpoint definitions for trials of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure: a consensus from the Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium
Garot, Philippe , Mehran, Roxana , Backer, Ole De , Freeman, James V. , Wunderlich, Nina, Hibbert, Benjamin , Tzikas, Apostolos , Nair, Devi, Berti, Sergio, Saw, Jacqueline , Freixa, Xavier, Doshi, Shephal K. , Cruz-Gonzalez, I, Coylewright, Megan, Aminian, Adel, Sanchis, L, Ruff, Christian T, Landmesser, Ulf, Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Alasnag, Mirvat, Yamamoto, Masanori , Iwamoto, Shin, Shiba, Takeshi , Jin, Y Z, Jagadeesan, Vikrant, Krucoff, Mitchell W., Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik, Gibson, C Michael, Gurol, Edip Mahmut, Cutlip, Don E, Leon, Martin B, Holmes, David R. , Morice, M C, Alkhouli, Mohamad, De Backer, Ole , Räber, Lorenz , Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Ellis, Christopher , Yamamoto, Masanori , Schmidt, Boris , Hildick-Smith, David , Oliva, Angelo , Spitzer, Ernest , Holmes, David R , Mehran, Roxana , Hibbert, Benjamin , Freeman, James V , Tzikas, Apostolos , Freixa, Xavier , Cruz‐González, Ignacio , Coylewright, Megan , Aminian, Adel , Price, Matthew J. , Räber, Lorenz , Yao, Xiaoxi , Sanchís, Laura , Ruff, Christian Thomas , Landmesser, Ulf , Ellis, Christopher R. , Alasnag, Mirvat , Ferro, Enrico Giuseppe , Shiba, Takeshi, Jin, Yu, Reddy, Vivek Y. , Spitzer, Ernest , Nielsen‐Kudsk, Jens Erik , Gibson, C. Michael , Gurol, M. Edip , Cutlip, Donald E. , Leon, Martin B. , Alkhouli, Mohamad

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehag482 | PMID 42425446 Get It

Abstract Since its introduction in 2002, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of stroke. Harmonized processes for data collection, analysis, and reporting in LAAC trials are essential to enhance research quality and improve clinical practice. The Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium (LAARC) initiative is an independent collaboration of academic research organizations, cardiology and neurology experts, clinical trialists, and regulatory authorities from the USA, Europe, and Asia. The consortium engaged clinical experts, regulators—including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Notified Bodies, and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)—and industry leaders to define standardized study elements and endpoints for LAAC trials. Key considerations included alignment with prior Academic Research Consortium initiatives, procedural and mechanistic insights, and clinical relevance. Consensus definitions were proposed for mortality, stroke, bleeding, and device performance, along with composite endpoints for safety and effectiveness. The proposed LAARC consensus definitions aim to standardize endpoint reporting, improve comparability across studies, and support regulatory and clinical trial applications for this evolving therapy through broad dissemination in the peer-reviewed literature.
Cross-definition GWAS of IBS in 2.8 million individuals reveals cardiometabolic and triglyceride-linked mechanisms
Lorenzo, Biagio Di, Tavares, Letícia Camargo , Díaz-Muñoz, Cristian , Heredia-Fernández, Francisco , Bozzarelli, Isotta, Blanco, Cristina Esteban, Wang, Zhe, Smit, Roelof A J, Loos, Ruth J F, Hirbo, Jibril, Cox, Nancy J, Straub, Peter, Favé, Marie-Julie , Pozdeyev, Nikita, Gignoux, Christopher R, Gudbjartsson, Daniel F, Thorleifsson, Gudmar, Jónsdóttir, Ingileif , Stefansson, Kari, Palta, Priit, Sze, Gerald , John, Catherine, Richmond, Anne, McCartney, Daniel, Hayward, Caroline, Mulford, Ashley J, Sanders, Alan R, Dombrovska, Marija Simona, Capasso, Mario, Faro, Valeria Lo, Maya, Esteban Alexander Lopera, Zhernakova, A, Cohort, Lifelines, Martin, Alicia, Vanderwerff, Brett , Zöllner, Sebastian, Ferolito, Brian R. , Pereira, Alexander Castanho, Gaziano, J. Michael , Caruth, Lanna, Guare, Lindsay, Kripke, Colleen Morse , Rader, Daniel J, Verma, Shefali S, Verma, Anurag, BioBank, Penn Medicine, Saad, Chadi, Chao, Pei-Yu, Chen, Tzu-Ting, Lin, Yen-Feng, Feng, Yen‐Chen Anne , Khalili, Hamed , Andries, Aristomo , Ness‐Jensen, Eivind , Grover, Madhusudan , FinnGen, Lemmelä, Susanna, Abner, Erik , Challa, Prasanna K , Khalili, Hamed , Ness-Jensen, Eivind , Grover, Madhusudan , D'Amato, Mauro , Loos, Ruth J F , Camargo Tavares, Leticia , Lorenzo, Biagio Di , Smit, Roelof A. J. , Loos, Ruth J. F. , Hirbo, Jibril B , Cox, Nancy J., Awadalla, Philip , Pozdeyev, Nikita V. , Gignoux, Chris , Gudbjartsson, Daniel Fannar , Þorleifsson, Guðmar , Priit, Palta , Williams, Alexander T. , Coley, Kayesha , John, Catherine , Richmond, Anne , Mulford, Ashley J. , Pečulis, Raitis , Rovīte, Vita , Capasso, Mario , Faro, Valeria Lo , Sinha, Trishla , Lopera-Maya, Esteban A. , Zhernakova, Alexandra , Wang, Ying, Vanderwerff, Brett , Zöllner, Sebastian , Cho, Kelly , Guare, Lindsay A. , Rader, Daniel J , Verma, Shefali S. , Saad, Chadi , Mbarek, Hamdi , Brumpton, Ben , Lemmelä, Susanna M. , Sanna, Serena , Bonfiglio, Ferdinando , D’Amato, Mauro

Mayo Clinic

Gut | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: gutjnl-2026-338800

10.1136/gutjnl-2026-338800 | PMID 42425734 Get It

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex disorder of gut-brain interaction, with heterogeneous symptoms, no available biomarkers and limited pathogenetic insight. Objective To identify genetic risk factors and actionable mechanisms for future clinical translation in IBS. Design We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of IBS in 2 775 539 individuals from 22 biobanks. IBS genetics was studied across multiple ancestries, different case definitions and symptom-related subtypes. Heritability and genetic correlations with other traits were estimated, and Mendelian randomisation was used to test causal relationships. GWAS data were functionally annotated and fine-mapped to prioritise tissues, cell types, pathways, candidate genes, specific mechanisms and druggable targets. Results Significant heritability was only detected in individuals of European ancestry, with near-identical genetic architecture across case definitions. Genetic correlations with GI, psychiatric and cardiometabolic traits were observed, including causal relationships with triglyceride (TG) levels. Functional annotation of IBS risk loci highlighted cell types and pathways relevant to brain, enteric neuro-glial and cardiometabolic domains, as well as actionable targets like GCKR, a regulator of TG metabolism. Druggability analyses converged on cardiometabolic mechanisms, including TG modulation. IBS polygenic risk scores were derived and showed a significant association with case status in an independent case-control dataset, supporting further evaluation in external population-based and clinically ascertained cohorts. Conclusions This study provides the most comprehensive assessment of IBS genetics to date, demonstrating reproducible polygenic inheritance. We link IBS risk to convergent neurogastrointestinal and novel cardiometabolic mechanisms, highlight specific biological pathways and actionable mechanisms and outline translational opportunities emerging from integrated computational analyses.
Evaluating MAPT p.A152T as a risk factor for the 3R tauopathy Pick’s disease
Tamvaka, Nicole , Scotton, William J. , Lilley, Meredith T. , Shoai, Maryam , Gavrielatos, Marios , HECKMAN, M, Roemer, Shanu F, Baker, Matthew C, Rademakers, Rosa, Hardy, John , Cook, Casey , Lashley, Tammaryn , Jaunmuktane, Zane, Mok, Kin, Revesz, Tamas, Christopher, Elizabeth, DeTure, Michael, Koga, Shunsuke, Graff-Radford, Neill R, Boeve, Bradley F, Josephs, Keith A. , Petersen, Ronald C, Whitwell, Jennifer , Duara, Ranjan, Lyons, Kelly E, Miller, Bruce, Schlereth, Athena, Spina, Salvatore, Irwin, David J, Wolk, David A, Suh, EunRan, Deerlin, Vivianna M Van, Lee, Edward B, Frosch, Matthew P. , Molina-Porcel, Laura, Aldecoa, Iban, Balasa, Mircea, Borrego-Ecija, Sergi, Sanchez-Valle, Raquel, Gascón‐Bayarri, Jordi , Sanz-Cartagena, Pilar , Huélamo, Rosa Maria de Eugenio, Gefen, Tamar, Castellani, Rudolph J, Rogalskı, Emily , Weıntraub, Sandra , Bieniek, Kevin F, Zhu, Xiongwei, Redding-Ochoa, Javier, Troncoso, Juan C. , Ghetti, Bernardino, Newell, Kathy L. , Jacobsen, Max, Roncaroli, Federico, Jones, Matthew, Richardson, Anna, Snowden, Julie, Allinson, Kieren, Beach, Thomas G, Teich, Andrew F, Flowers, Xena, Heaps, Allison C, Leskinen, Sandra , Keith, Julia , Masellis, Mario, King, Andrew, Sarraj, Safa-Al, Hodges, John R. , Gearing, Marla , Roeber, Sigrun, Attems, Johannes, Boluda, Susana , Seilhean, Danielle, Ber, Isabelle Le, Turbant-Leclere, Sabrina, Mackenzie, Ian R. , Sieben, Anne, Cras, Patrick , Vil, Bart B De, Deyn, P P De, Keene, C Dirk, Latimer, Caitlin S. , Schantz, Aimee, Bird, Thomas D, Haroutunian, Vahram, Purohit, Dushyant, Rissman, Robert, Cykowski, Matthew D. , Wang, Shih-Hsiu J, Ervin, John F. , Nennesmo, Inger , Nagra, Rashed M. , Riehl, James, Kovacs, Gabor G, Neumann, Manuela, Ang, Lee-Cyn, Cunha, Cristina, Blauwendraat, Cornelis , Nalls, Mike A., Singleton, Andrew B, Perrin, Richard J. , Chaffee, Anne M, Scotton, William , Murray, Melissa E , Dickson, Dennis W , Ross, Owen A , Hardy, John , Shoai, Maryam , Lashley, Tammaryn , Heckman, Michael G. , Soto‐Beasley, Alexandra I. , Roemer, Shanu F. , Rademakers, Rosa , Murray, Melissa E. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Rohrer, Jonathan D. , Ross, Owen A. , Valentino, Rebecca R. , Macpherson, Hannah L. , Warner, Thomas T. , Jaunmuktane, Zane , Martínez-Carrasco, Alejandro , Revesz, Tamas, DeTure, Michael , Koga, Shunsuke , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Duara, Ranjan, Pahwa, Rajesh , Grinberg, Lea T. , Seeley, William W. , Miller, Bruce L , Spina, Salvatore , Suh, EunRan , Deerlin, Vivianna M. Van , Connors, Theresa R. , Oakley, Derek H. , Molina‐Porcel, Laura , Aldecoa, Ibán , Balasa, Mircea , Borrego‐Écija, Sergi , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Piñol‐Ripoll, Gerard , Gelpí, Ellen , Gefen, Tamar , Castellani, Rudolph J. , Flanagan, Margaret E. , Schneider, Julie A. , Bieniek, Kevin F. , Redding‐Ochoa, Javier , Chang, Koping , Prokop, Stefan , Ghetti, Bernardino, Robinson, Andrew , Roncaroli, Federico , Kobylecki, Christopher , Richardson, Anna, Rowe, James B. , Quaegebeur, Annelies , Allinson, Kieren Simon James, Beach, Thomas G. , Serrano, Geidy E. , Teich, Andrew F. , Black, Sandra E. , Masellis, Mario, Troakes, Claire , Halliday, Glenda M. , Kril, Jillian J. , Kwok, John B. , Piguet, Olivier , Morris, Christopher M. , Thomas, Alan , White, Charles L. , Evers, Bret M. , Mechawar, Naguib , Seilhean, Danielle , Ber, Isabelle Le , Leclère-Turbant, Sabrina, Vil, Bart De , Deyn, Peter Paul De , Keene, C Dirk, Haroutunian, Vahram , Purohit, Dushyant P. , Walker, Jamie M. , Rissman, Robert A. , McLean, Catriona , Graff, Caroline , Riehl, James R. , Giaccone, Giorgio , Neumann, Manuela , Finger, Elizabeth C. , Carvalho, Agostinho , Morris, Huw R. , Singleton, Andrew B, Vitale, Dan , Chaffee, Ann, Wszołek, Zbigniew K.

Mayo Clinic

Brain Communications | July 9, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcag266 | PMID 42553595 Get It

Abstract Genetic studies have significantly advanced our understanding of tauopathies, yet the genetic aetiology of Pick’s disease, a rare 3-Repeat tauopathy, remains unclear. The MAPT p.A152T variant has been identified as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, but its role in Pick’s disease is unknown. In this study, we examined the prevalence of MAPT p.A152T in the largest series of neuropathologically confirmed Pick’s disease cases to date (n = 401). Through genotyping, we identified a single mutation carrier in the Pick’s disease cohort (minor allele frequency = 0.12%). We previously reported MAPT p.A152T at a 0.20% frequency in healthy controls (n = 2456), suggesting that it does not associate with 3-Repeat tauopathy risk. To further investigate the effect of the variant on MAPT transcript expression, we used bulk RNA sequencing in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy A152T mutation carriers. We did not detect significant differences in 4-Repeat tau levels, though preliminary trends may indicate more nuanced effects that need to be examined with long-read sequencing in a larger series. Overall, our study suggests that MAPT p.A152T does not increase Pick’s disease risk and may instead be linked to 4-Repeat or mixed tau pathologies, warranting further functional investigation.
Global disparities in hearing care services and infrastructure: findings from a 47-country international provider survey
Zalaquett, Nader G., Frost, Robert, Stucki, Brenton R., Aggarwal, Komal, Useche, Mateo, Jaffer, Ali F. , Mokoh, Lilian Wairimu, Xu, Mary Jue , Patterson, Rolvix H., Chung, Sarah, Lageju, Nabin , Edouard, Amani , Sagun, Joyce Rodvie, Patterson, Rolvix H. , Patterson, Rolvix H , Zalaquett, Nader , Frost, Robert, Stucki, Brenton, Aggarwal, Komal , Useche, Mateo , Sagun, Joyce Rodvie, Waterworth, Christopher J.

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Audiology | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-14

10.1080/14992027.2026.2687005 | PMID 42421334 Get It

Participant Heterogeneity in the Prostate Cancer Biobank of the NRG: An Obstacle to Broadening the Reach of Precision Oncology
Kamran, Sophia C. , Borges, Monica, Michalski, Jeff M. , Lee, W. Robert , Sandler, Howard M. , Crook, Juanita , Pollack, Alan , Hurwitz, Mark , Valicenti, Richard K., Bruner, Deborah Watkins , Lukka, Himanshu, Jones, Christopher U. , Roach, Mack , Lawton, Colleen, PISANSKY, T, Spratt, Daniel, VAPIWALA, N, Miyamoto, David T. , Mouw, Kent, Vyfhuis, Melissa A.L. , Le, Quynh‐Thu , Willers, Henning , Franklin, Huang, Bahary, Jean-Paul , Helou, Joelle, Pugh, Stephanie L. , Wenzel, Jennifer , Michalski, Jeff M , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Efstathiou, Jason A , Miyamoto, David , Vyfhuis, Melissa , Le, Quynh-Thu , Van Allen, Eliezer M , Bahary, Jean-Paul , Wenzel, Jennifer , Tran, Phuoc T , Bruner, Deborah , Sandler, Howard M , Valicenti, Richard K., Lukka, Himanshu, Rosenthal, Seth A. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Vapiwala, Neha , Efstathiou, Jason A. , Helou, Joelle

Mayo Clinic

JCO Precision Oncology | July 8, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/po-26-00158 | PMID 42418740 Get It

PURPOSE Precision medicine has revolutionized oncology; however, tumor biomarkers are not reflective of the heterogeneous cancer population. We evaluated NRG Oncology prostate cancer (PCa) clinical trials for demographic differences among patients with optional biospecimen collection (BC) consent and biospecimen submission (BSub). METHODS Data from 19 NRG PCa clinical trials closed before 2015 were analyzed. Patients who consented to BC and completed BSub were evaluated by race, ethnicity, median income, area deprivation index (ADI; categorized as highest v lowest three quartiles), age at enrollment, site, and year of enrollment. T/chi-square tests were used for continuous/categorical variables, respectively, followed by logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 15,648 randomized patients eligible for BC, 11,796 (75%) had specimens submitted. In all, 4,598 (82.2%) of 5,597 eligible patients consented for optional BC in nine clinical trials with a separate BC consent process (consent rates by race/ethnicity: 74.1% Black, 72.8% Hispanic/Latino, 83.8% White). A smaller proportion of Black and Hispanic/Latino patients consented to optional BC compared with those who did not (12.1% v 19.5% Black, P < .0001; 3.5% v 5.8% Hispanic, P = .0006). In univariable logistic regression models, high ADI (more socioeconomic disadvantage) was associated with a decreased likelihood for optional BC consent (odds ratio [OR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82]; P = .02), but not a decreased likelihood for BSub (OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.04]; P = .08). Multivariable models demonstrated that Black/Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to consent to optional BC, and Black patients were less likely to have BSub ( P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION White/non-Hispanic patients and those with less socioeconomic disadvantage were more likely to consent to optional BC, whereas Black patients were less likely to have BSub. Targeted solutions are needed to improve biorepository representation so that precision medicine approaches better reflect the cancer population.
An Unexpected Encounter: When a Novel Device Algorithm Meets a Novel Ablation System
Makkar, Nayani , Mulpuru, Siva K., DeSimone, Christopher V. , Hayes, David L. , Tan, Nicholas Y. , Ezzeddine, Fatima , DeSimone, Christopher V , Tan, Nicholas , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Ezzeddine, Fatima M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | July 8, 2026 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1883-1885

10.1111/jce.70449 | PMID 42418732 Get It

Urinary CD4 + Effector Memory CD38 + HLA-DR + T Cells for Diagnosis of Acute Interstitial Nephritis
Sha, Wenxin , Mirkheshti, Pouneh , Shi, Feng, Skopnik, Christopher Mark , Russ, Jeremy, Daniel, C, Amann, K, Arzig, Joram, Goerlich, Nina , Chen, Jianghua, Eckardt, Kai-Uwe, Jiang, Hong, Enghard, Philipp , Herrmann, Sandra M. , Klocke, Jan , Eckardt, Kai-Uwe , Jiang, Hong

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 8, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.06.25.26356554 Get It

Abstract Introduction Acute interstitial nephritis is an important differential diagnosis in patients with deteriorating kidney function. Diagnosis currently requires kidney biopsy, an invasive procedure associated with risks. We hypothesized that urinary T cells may serve as a non-invasive biomarker for acute interstitial nephritis. Methods A total of 320 patients undergoing clinically indicated kidney biopsy were enrolled in a discovery cohort at Charité Berlin (n = 80), an internal validation cohort at Charité (n = 100), and an external validation cohort at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou (n = 140). Urinary immune cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Renal T cell infiltration was evaluated by immunofluorescence in kidney biopsy specimens from the discovery and internal validation cohorts, including 16 patients with acute interstitial nephritis and 9 patients without acute interstitial nephritis. Additionally, CXCL9 was measured by ELISA in 102 urine samples from these cohorts. Results Across all cohorts, 27 patients (8.4%) were diagnosed with acute interstitial nephritis. In the discovery cohort, multiple urinary T cell subsets were increased in acute interstitial nephritis, with activated CD4 + effector memory T cells expressing CD38 and HLA-DR showing the strongest diagnostic performance. This marker outperformed urinary monocytes, eosinophils, and CXCL9 and was validated in both independent cohorts. Across all cohorts, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 and increased to 0.91 after exclusion of 8 patients receiving corticosteroids. A cutoff of 211 activated CD4 + effector memory T cells per 100 mL urine yielded a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 81%. Urinary activated CD4 + effector memory T cell counts correlated with renal CD4 + and CD4 + CD38 + T cell infiltration in acute interstitial nephritis. Conclusions Urinary activated CD4 + effector memory T cells expressing CD38 and HLA-DR represent a promising non-invasive biomarker for the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. Lay Summary Acute interstitial nephritis is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury and is usually diagnosed by kidney biopsy, an invasive procedure that carries risks. We investigated whether immune cells in urine could help identify AIN in a less invasive manner. In this multicenter study, urine samples from 320 patients undergoing kidney biopsy in Germany and China were analyzed. We found that a specific population of activated T cells was markedly increased in the urine of patients with AIN compared with patients with other kidney diseases. This urinary marker outperformed other immune cell types and the inflammatory cytokine CXCL9 and was successfully validated in independent cohorts from both Germany and China. Importantly, urinary activated T cell counts correlated with immune cell infiltration within the kidney. These findings suggest that urinary activated T cells may serve as a non-invasive biomarker to support the diagnosis of AIN and facilitate earlier clinical decision-making.
Consensus Guidelines for Staging and Surveillance Imaging in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Kassamali, Bina , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D., Sethi, Rosh, Bakst, R H, Barker, C. A., Bradford, Carol R., Carr, David R., Chandra, Sunandana , Connolly, Karen L., Demer, Addison M. , Doonan, Bently, Emerick, Kevin, Friedman, Ben J. , Gali, Linna L., Galloway, Thomas J., Geiger, Jessica L., Kohen, Laurie, Koyfman, Shlomo, Kumar, Shweta Sharat, Learned, Kim O. , Leitenberger, Justin J., Lilley, Elizabeth J. , Lukens, John N. , Medina, Theresa , Mitra, Devarati , Ozog, David, Pashtan, Itai, Pham, Nancy , Powers, Molly, Srivastava, Divya, Taylor, Charlotte S., Witek, Matthew E. , Wysong, Ashley, Zander, David, Silk, Ann W., Jambusaria-Pahlajani, Anokhi, Ruiz, Emily S., Chen, Michelle , Kumar, Shweta S. , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bhatt, Alok A. , Bradford, Carol R. , Bunch, Paul M. , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Chen, Michelle , Connolly, Karen , Doonan, Bently P. , Emerick, Kevin S. , Friedman, Ben J. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Guenette, Jeffrey P. , Kelly, Hillary R. , Khushalani, Nikhil I. , Kohen, Laurie Linden, Leitenberger, Justin J. , Medina, Theresa M. , Pashtan, Itai , Patel, Vishal Anil , Srivastava, Divya , Swiecicki, Paul Loren , Wysong, Ashley, Silk, Ann Willman , Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Ruiz, Emily S.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Dermatology | July 8, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2163 | PMID 42418212 Get It

Importance There is no consensus on staging and surveillance imaging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Although imaging has been shown to affect management, broad recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have led to variability in clinical practice. Objective To develop multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the use of staging and surveillance imaging of localized CSCC. Evidence Review A multidisciplinary expert panel across academic and clinical practice settings convened a Delphi consensus, with 3 iterative survey rounds from January to June 2025. Data were analyzed from February 2025 to January 2026. Eligibility defined by at least 1 to 2 CSCC publications during the previous 5 years, involvement in a relevant clinical trial, experience treating at least 3 patients monthly with CSCC, and/or 5 years or longer of clinical practice. Fifty-four experts were invited and 45 (83%) completed all 3 rounds and were included in the final analysis. Structured Delphi surveys evaluated clinical scenarios, imaging modalities, and surveillance strategies for CSCC. Consensus and near-consensus recommendations were generated, defined as 80% or greater and 70% to 79% agreement, respectively. Findings The 45 participants (21 female individuals [47%] and 24 male individuals [53%]; 14 Asian individuals [31%], 1 multiracial individual [2%], and 30 White individuals [67%]) consisted of dermatology (15 [33%]), medical oncology (7 [16%]), radiation oncology (9 [20%]), radiology (9 [20%]), surgery (3 [7%]), and otolaryngology specialists (2 [4%]). The Delphi panel recommended staging and surveillance for CSCCs with at least a 15% risk of metastasis. Consensus or near consensus was reached to recommend staging and surveillance imaging for tumors with a concern for metastasis, bone invasion, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat, large-caliber nerve invasion, or a diameter of 4 cm or larger or the combination of tumors with poorly differentiated histology and any of the following: diameter of 2 cm or larger, lymphovascular invasion and subcutaneous fat invasion, or lymphovascular invasion and small-caliber perineural invasion. Computed tomography imaging was the preferred modality for nodal staging (38 [84%]) and surveillance (35 [78%]). For surveillance duration, consensus was reached to provide imaging for at least 2 years, and near consensus was reached for at least 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides an expert consensus–based framework to standardize imaging in localized CSCC that may inform future guidelines.