Citations

ABSTRACT Background Obesity is an important risk factor associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) on recurrent AF among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GLP‐1 RA on the recurrence of AF among obese patients after catheter ablation. Methods Utilizing the TriNetX research network, we identified patients aged over 18 with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent AF ablation from January 1, 2015, to December 1, 2022, using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were categorized based on their baseline GLP‐1 RA use. Through propensity‐score matching, each cohort comprised 1558 patients. The primary outcome encompassed a composite of cardioversion, initiation of new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or redo AF ablation. Additional outcomes during the 12‐month follow‐up included AF readmission, heart failure readmissions, readmissions due to ischemic stroke, and mortality, with a separate analysis done for patients with BMI > 40. Results GLP‐1 RA use in patients with obesity undergoing AF ablation was linked to a significantly reduced risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and the need for redo AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [0.65–0.80]; p < 0.001). At 12 months, individuals on GLP‐1 agonists exhibited a lower likelihood of mortality (HR 0.61 [0.40–0.93]; p < 0.001). Although all other secondary outcomes were lower in the GLP‐1 RA group, there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke between the groups. These results were consistent among patients with BMI > 40, although apart from ischemic stroke, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusion The utilization of GLP‐1 RA in individuals with obesity is linked to a decreased likelihood of arrhythmia recurrence following AF ablation, leading to a reduced requirement for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or redo AF ablation.

Abstract Aims Catheter ablation is commonly performed in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) for management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). The impact of catheter ablation on cardiac function is unknown. The aim is to assess the impact of catheter ablation for VAs on cardiac function in patients with ARVC. Methods and results This retrospective study included consecutive patients with ARVC who underwent catheter ablation for VAs. Cardiac and valvular functions were assessed on pre- and post-procedure cardiac imaging. The severities of tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonic regurgitation, right ventricular (RV) enlargement, and RV systolic dysfunction was graded as absent (=0), mild (=1), mild-moderate (=2), moderate (=3), moderate-severe (=4), or severe (=5). Thirty-four patients were included. Median age at the time of ablation was 49 [inter-quartile range (IQR), 23] years, and 10 (29%) patients were female. After a median follow-up of 1 (IQR, 0) day, 11 (34%) patients had worsening RV function, and 4 (12%) patients had worsening left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &gt;5%. Five (15%) patients required inotropic support. After a median follow-up of 6.5 (IQR, 6.4) months, 20 (59%) patients had repeat transthoracic echocardiograms. Among patients with worsening RV function post-ablation, one-sixth (17%) had improvement in the RV function at follow-up. In contrast, among patients who had an acute drop in LVEF post-ablation, two-thirds (67%) had improvement at follow-up. Conclusion Right ventricular dysfunction following catheter ablation in patients with ARVC is common, affecting one-third of patients. Patients undergoing catheter ablation of VAs should be counselled on the potential negative impact of ablation on cardiac function.

Background Atrial dysfunction is a risk factor for atrial arrhythmia and can be detected by atrial strain imaging in patients with biventricular circulation. However, the role of atrial strain imaging for risk stratification of atrial arrhythmia in patients with Fontan palliation has not been studied, despite the high prevalence and prognostic implications of atrial arrhythmia in this population. We hypothesized that pulmonary venous atrial strain was associated with new‐onset and recurrent atrial arrhythmia in Fontan physiology. Method and Results This is a retrospective study of adults with Fontan palliation and no prior history of atrial arrhythmia who underwent atrial strain imaging by speckle tracking echocardiography (2003–2023). New‐onset and recurrent atrial arrhythmias were ascertained from baseline encounter to last follow‐up. Of 404 patients, atrial reservoir strain assessment was feasible in 329 patients (81%), with modest intra‐ and interobserver agreement. The median atrial reservoir strain was 18% (interquartile range, 13%–24%), and atrial dysfunction (atrial reservoir strain <28%) was present in 294 (89%). Atrial reservoir strain <15% was associated with new‐onset atrial arrhythmia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.59 [95% CI, 1.09–2.34]; P =0.009), and recurrent atrial arrhythmia (adjusted HR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.06–3.93]; P =0.003). Rhythm control therapy was associated with lower risk of recurrence compared with rate control therapy (adjusted HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86–0.98]; P =0.003). Conclusions Atrial dysfunction was common and was associated with new‐onset and recurrent atrial arrhythmias. The higher prevalence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with reduced atrial strain and the apparent protective effect of rhythm control therapy suggest that rhythm control therapy may be the preferred treatment in patients with reduced atrial strain.

ABSTRACT Background Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) carries an increased risk of complex ventricular arrhythmias, which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Many of these patients undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, but their ICD outcomes are not known. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ICD implantation and the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in patients with MAD. Methods The study included patients with MAD who underwent ICD implantation. Clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and device therapy data were collected. Results Forty‐nine patients with MAD and ICD were included. Median age was 49 (21) years, and 29 (59%) were female. 13 (27%) patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention and 36 (73%) patients for secondary prevention. Over a median follow‐up of 27.3 (35.3) months, 23 (47%) patients received ICD therapies. 18 (37%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies, and 5 (10%) patients had inappropriate ICD shocks. Median time to first appropriate therapy was 22.3 (63.3) months. In patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 44%, while in patients with a primary prevention ICD indication, it was 15%. Among patients with appropriate ICD therapies, the first therapies were delivered for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 7 (39%) patients and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 11 (61%) patients. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more likely to have a history of SCA ( p = 0.003) and/or low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ( p = 0.022) before ICD implantation as compared to patients without appropriate ICD therapies. Conclusions In our cohort of patients with MAD and ICD, appropriate ICD therapies were common. Most appropriate ICD therapies were delivered for polymorphic VT or VF. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of VAs and refine risk stratification in MAD.

ABSTRACT Background Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a serious complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Despite guideline recommendations for complete device removal, disparities in healthcare access and resource availability between urban and rural settings may influence patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate rural–urban disparities in the management and outcomes of patients hospitalized with CIED infections. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2021. Patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with CIED infections were identified using ICD‐10 codes. Hospital location was categorized as urban or rural based on the Urban Influence Codes. Baseline characteristics, complications, and outcomes were compared using chi‐square and t ‐tests, and a multivariable logistic regression model was employed to assess the independent association of hospital settings with transvenous lead removal (TLR) utilization. Results A total of 288,402 patients were hospitalized for CIED infections, with 94.9% treated in urban hospitals and 5.1% in rural hospitals. Urban hospital patients had a higher prevalence of key comorbidities, including heart failure, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation and peripheral vascular disorders. In‐hospital mortality was significantly higher in urban hospitals (6.2% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.01) likely due to higher burden of comorbidities and higher rates of acute complications such as stroke (3.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.01) and systemic embolism (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.01). TLR was more frequently performed in urban hospitals (20.1% vs. 9.6%, p < 0.01), with rural hospitals exhibiting 59% lower odds of receiving TLR (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.36–0.47, p < 0.01). TLR was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day readmission rates across both hospital settings. Conclusion Our study highlights significant rural–urban disparities in CIED infection management. Despite rural hospitals admitting patients with a lower comorbidity burden, TLR utilization was significantly lower, potentially due to limited access to specialized expertise and procedural resources. Given TLR's association with improved survival and reduced readmissions, regardless of the hospital setting, targeted interventions are needed to enhance access to specialized care in rural settings. Further research is warranted to explore strategies for bridging these disparities and optimizing CIED infection outcomes nationwide.

Introduction: Advances in cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) have significantly improved outcomes for patients with heart failure. However, there is a bereft of recent real- world data on the relative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacing and defibrillator (CRT-D) and continuous resynchronization therapy with pacing (CRT-P) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We hypothesized that the addition of defibrillation therapy in patients with NICM would offer no significant benefit. Methods: We searched the National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016-2020 to identify hospitalizations with NICM using appropriate ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes. The cohort was further divided into groups with NICM and CRT-D implantation and NICM with CRTP implantation. Results and Discussion: Our final cohort included 8,801 hospitalizations with NICM and CRT-D implantation and 3,399 hospitalizations with NICM and CRT-P implantation. Propensity matching was performed using comorbidities through multivariate logistic regression. Two thousand nine hundred seventeen hospitalizations were included in each of the two groups, CRT-D and CRT-P. Analysis of the propensity-matched cohorts at 180 days revealed a trend toward lower heart failure readmission, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality rates in the group with CRTP implantation. However, there was no difference noted in the 180-day hazard ratios of HF readmission [1.08 (0.98-1.19); p = 0.1], all-cause readmission [1.04 (0.87-1.12); p = 0.23], and all-cause mortality [0.83 (0.58-1.19); p = 0.32]. Conclusion: It was found that NICM patients with CRT-D have a trend towards higher HF readmissions, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality compared to those with CRT-P, but no significant difference was noted in hazard ratios. The findings of our study raise further questions about the need for defibrillator therapy in patients with NICM and merit further studies to better select candidates for each of these therapies.

Introduction: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy, procedural efficiency, and safety profile remain uncertain. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.Gov databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HPSD with CPD ablation for PVI in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). R version 4.4.2 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Seven RCTs with 1,006 patients (514 HPSD, 489 CPD) were included. No significant differences were found in freedom from arrhythmia during the follow-up period (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41–1.45; p=0.424). AF recurrence did not differ (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.65–1.36; p=0.733) between groups. HPSD had a significantly shorter procedural (MD -22.61 min; 95% CI -33.18, -12.04; p<0.001) and RF ablation times (MD -15.70 min; 95% CI -20.86, -10.55; p<0.001). No differences were observed in fluoroscopy time and first-pass isolation for right and left pulmonary veins. There was no difference in esophageal lesion rates, pericardial, or neurological complications, but there was a higher incidence of steam pops in HPSD (RR 3.42; 95% CI 1.45–8.09; p=0.005). Conclusion: In patients with AF undergoing PVI, HPSD did not increase freedom from arrhythmia as compared with CPD ablation, however it was associated with shorter procedure and RF ablation times with a similar safety profile.

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe factors contributing to sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) >30 days after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are not well‐established.ObjectivesThis study aimed to predict the factors associated with late sustained VAs after LVAD implantation and develop a predictive score to identify patients with an increased risk of late sustained VAs after the procedure.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on a training cohort of 623 patients and a validation cohort of 157 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2020. Late sustained VAs were defined as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurring >30 days after the LVAD procedure. Detailed chart reviews of the electronic health records within the Mayo Clinic and outside medical records were performed.ResultsA total of 780 patients were included in our study. Late sustained VAs occurred in 30% (n = 232) of the patients. The significant factors associated with late sustained VAs after LVAD were the history of VAs prior to LVAD (34.1% vs. 23.0%, p < 0.01), implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) (87.9% vs. 77.6%, p < 0.01) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in situ (43.5% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.008), VT ablation prior to LVAD (5.2% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.010), use of amiodarone (49.1% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.007), use of mexiletine (15.5% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.01), and higher left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD) on echocardiography prior to LVAD implantation (71.4 vs. 68.7 mm, p = 0.002). During follow‐up, the patients who developed late sustained VAs after LVAD had lower survival than those who did not (HR = 1.96, 95% CI:156–2.4, p < 0.001). The average time from LVAD to orthotopic heart transplant was longer among late sustained VAs patients (23 vs. 14 months, p < 0.01). The “VIN” risk score was created to identify four risk groups: low (scores 0), intermediate (score 1), high (score 2), and very high (score 3). The rates of late VA's in the training cohort at 1 year were 9.5%, 14%, 18%, and 25% which was almost similar to the risk of late VA's at validation cohort 10%, 12%, 20%, and 63%, respectively.ConclusionsLate sustained VAs occurred in 30% of the patients who received LVAD and were associated with lower survival. The VIN risk score was developed and validated to stratify patients into low, intermediate, high, and very high risk of late sustained VAs.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2024. Pairwise, prognostic, and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were conducted using R V. 4.3.1. Our primary end point was time to first AF recurrence, with secondary end points of all-cause mortality, tamponade, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: Our cohort included 23 studies with 43 711 patients. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with reduced AF recurrence across both paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups ( P <0.01). There was a significant decrease in benefit for paroxysmal AF over time and a slight decrease in benefit for persistent AF over time. However, the benefit remained significant in both over time. DAT per year was significantly associated with a 10% increased risk of AF recurrence. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that DAT >1 year was significantly associated with a 70% increased risk of AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF and 30% in persistent AF. DAT ≤1 year was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality ( P <0.01) and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke ( P =0.08). However, there was no significant difference in heart failure between DAT ≤1 year and DAT >1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early ablation is more beneficial in paroxysmal AF, with a notable decrease in benefit over time, while in persistent AF, the benefit remains significant but slightly decreases over time. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ; Unique identifier: CRD42024525542.