Citations

Background: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing radiation therapy face potential risks of device malfunction. Proton beam therapy (PBT), with its reduced neutron scatter, has emerged as a potentially safer alternative, yet real-world safety data remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 100 patients with CIEDs (76 pacemakers, 24 ICDs) who underwent PBT from 2016 to 2023 at a quaternary center. Baseline and serial device interrogations were performed before, during, and after treatment to assess lead impedance, capture thresholds, battery function, and arrhythmic events. Patients were stratified by pacemaker dependence and monitored accordingly. Primary outcomes included device malfunction and new-onset arrhythmias during treatment. Secondary outcomes included device parameter changes, one-year arrhythmia incidence, and cardiac-related hospitalizations. Results: No treatment-related deaths or major device failures occurred. Device malfunction was rare (2 pacemaker patients, 2.6%), with no malfunctions in ICD recipients. Transient, non-clinically significant changes in lead impedance and capture thresholds were observed. Arrhythmias during treatment occurred in 26% of pacemaker and 25% of ICD patients, but only 4% developed new arrhythmias. At one year, device-related complications and cardiac outcomes remained comparable across groups. Independent predictors of arrhythmias during treatment included a higher radiation dose per fraction (OR 1.45; p=0.001), a longer treatment duration (OR 1.12; p=0.04), and a higher number of fractions (OR 1.20; p=0.01). Conclusion: Proton beam therapy appears safe in patients with CIEDs, with a low incidence of clinically significant device malfunctions or arrhythmias. These findings support the integration of PBT into routine practice for this population and underscore the importance of structured monitoring protocols and prospective guideline refinement.

Abstract Aims The increasing adoption of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) offers a promising therapeutic option for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. However, many of these patients have pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), raising concerns about potential lead-related complications. Despite these concerns, limited data exist on the impact of TTVR on CIED integrity and function. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of TTVR on CIED lead function, including pacing thresholds, sensing, and impedance, in patients undergoing TTVR with the EVOQUE valve system. Methods and results A retrospective observational study was conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester, including 32 consecutive patients who underwent TTVR with pre-existing CIEDs. A total of 32 patients were included, with a mean age of 79.2 ± 8.4 years; 59% were female. A total of 62.5% had a permanent pacemaker, 12.5% had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, 15.6% had a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker, and 9.4% had a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Following TTVR, 10 (31%) of patients developed lead function changes during a median device follow-up of 210 days (IQR: 43–307 days). The right ventricular lead was primarily affected, with only one case involving an atrial lead. Neither the Ottawa score nor the anatomical lead position reliably predicted lead abnormality (P = 0.86 and P = 0.53, respectively). R-wave sensing changes were the most common lead change observed, affecting 55% of cases. In 67% of these cases, R-wave sensing alterations occurred as an isolated finding, with no significant change in impedance or thresholds, and were managed conservatively without any need for device reprogramming. Four patients (13%) had findings concerning for a lead insulation breach, in which one (3%) required a lead revision. Among five patients with follow-up exceeding 600 days, two patients exhibited a statistically significant gradual decline in impedance without other lead dysfunction, suggesting potential subclinical lead degradation. Conclusion Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the EVOQUE system in the setting of cardiac device leads is associated with lead function changes in 31%. The majority of lead-related changes were managed conservatively, but 13% of patients had findings concerning for an insulation breach. Future studies should focus on refining implantation techniques and defining optimal strategies for managing device-lead interactions in this population.

ABSTRACT Background Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV‐TAVR) is increasingly used to treat structural valve degeneration. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet predictors specific to ViV‐TAVR remain poorly defined. Objective To identify clinical and procedural predictors of PPI in patients undergoing ViV‐TAVR. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive ViV‐TAVR cases at the Mayo Clinic from 2012 to 2022. Clinical, ECG, procedural data and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding. Predictors of PPI were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 261 patients, 24 (9.2%) underwent PPI. Balloon‐expandable valves were used in 66.7% and self‐expanding valves in 33.3%. Predictors of PPI included Preprocedural bifascicular block (OR 12.15, 95% CI: 2.52–68.89, p = 0.003), greater septal implantation depth (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04–1.65, p = 0.019), and post‐procedural new left (OR 23.56, 95% CI: 4.91–48.52, p = 0.0004) and right bundle branch blocks (OR 24.4, 95% CI: 3.82–30.51, p = 0.001). Aortic regurgitation as the mechanism of prosthetic valve failure was associated with reduced PPI odds (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p = 0.014). Pacing requirement—defined as > 90% ventricular pacing—increased from 25% at 3 months to 56.25% at 12 months. At a median follow‐up of 962.5 days (IQR 481.5–1555.3), adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the PPI group (aOR 9.4, 95% CI: 1.9–60.4, p = 0.028). Conclusion Bifascicular block, greater septal depth, and new bundle branch blocks predict PPI post‐ViV‐TAVR, while aortic regurgitation appears protective. Risk stratification and procedural planning are critical.

BACKGROUND: This individual participant data meta-analysis aimed to determine whether time to treatment influences the effect of intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT), intravenous thrombolysis, and conservative standard therapy on visual outcomes in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase up to June 2023 for studies reporting treatment modality and peri-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for ≥5 participants, excluding patients with nonsevere vision loss (BCVA <1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) or treated after 24 hours of symptom onset. The primary outcome was recovery from severe vision loss (final BCVA <1.0 logMAR). We used mixed-effect models and local polynomial regression to investigate nonlinear relationships between time to treatment and recovery from severe vision loss. RESULTS: Of 4074 screened studies, individual participant data were sought from 52, with 35 contributing individual participant data for 1038 participants. In total, 783 patients met inclusion criteria (age, 64.8±13.3 years; 35.5% female; baseline BCVA, 2.3±0.5 logMAR). For every hour decrease in time to treatment, thrombolysis was associated with greater improvement in BCVA (intraarterial, 0.02 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.04]; intravenous, 0.04 logMAR [95% CI, 0.00–0.07]) than conservative standard therapy (0.01 logMAR [95% CI, 0–0.02]). A nonlinear relationship was detected for intraarterial thrombolysis with a changepoint at 8 hours (95% CI, 6.7–9.4). Thrombolysis was associated with increased recovery from severe vision loss compared with conservative standard therapy (intraarterial within 6 hours: odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.02–7.28], 27.2% versus 12.0%; intravenous within 4.5 hours: odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.24–8.92], 28.8% versus 11.1%). Findings were consistent in subgroup analysis restricted to patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. Monte-Carlo simulations showed that a randomized controlled trial would require 95 participants per group to achieve 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 for recovery from severe vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention in nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion is associated with improvement in visual recovery, with intraarterial thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis outperforming nonthrombolytic treatments. These findings warrant confirmation in sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials.

Abstract In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the possible prognostic impact of concomitant medications in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy combinations. This real‐world analysis aims to evaluate the impact of concomitant medications on survival outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTCs) treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine and durvalumab (CGD) therapy. The study cohort included patients with a diagnosis of advanced BTCs who were taking concomitant medications for their comorbidities before the start of CGD. The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). The initial population consisted of 666 patients, who were retrospectively collected from 41 sites in 12 countries. Data on concomitant medications were available for 493 patients. After a median follow‐up of 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.8–9.8), patients who did not take steroids (prednisone >10 mg/day or equivalent) or nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, before the start of CGD, had longer OS and PFS in univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis confirmed longer OS for patients who did not take steroids. Patients who did not take steroids had an OS of 14.8 months (95% CI: 13.1–29.1) versus 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.14–11.32) of patients who took prednisone >10 mg/day or equivalent. No differences were reported in terms of overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) ( p = 1.0 and p = .16, respectively), and safety profile between the two groups. Our analysis suggests that patients who did not receive steroids before the start of GCD had longer survival and highlighted the relevance of balancing concomitant medications and chemoimmunotherapy.

Abstract Background Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and durvalumab combination is a standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer. This study aimed to assess the impact of genetic alterations on outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and durvalumab in real-world clinical practice. Methods Patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine plus durvalumab across 39 centers in 11 countries in Europe, the United States, and Asia were included in this analysis. Results The cohort included 513 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The 5 most frequently altered genes were TP53 (22.1%), KRAS (13.7%), CDKN2A/B (13.6%), ARID1A (12.2%), and IDH1 (9.2%). In multivariate analysis, SMAD4 mutations were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, P = .018) and overall survival (HR = 0.11, P = .023), while TP53 mutations were linked to worse PFS (HR = 1.62, P = .0047) and TERT mutations to worse overall survival (HR = 8.92, P = .0012). No other genomic alterations were statistically associated with outcomes. Subgroup analysis showed that TP53 mutations negatively affected PFS and overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, while KRAS mutations were associated with poorer PFS in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. No gene alterations were linked to outcomes in gallbladder cancer. Conclusions This large-scale analysis, with comprehensive molecular profiling, supports the positive prognostic impact of SMAD4 mutations for PFS and overall survival and highlights the negative prognostic roles of TP53 (PFS) and TERT (overall survival) mutations, providing valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies in biliary tract cancer.

Background Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) is increasingly used to treat structural valve degeneration. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet predictors specific to ViV-TAVR remain poorly defined. Objective To identify clinical and procedural predictors of PPI in patients undergoing ViV-TAVR. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive ViV-TAVR cases at the Mayo Clinic from 2012 to 2022. Clinical, ECG, procedural data and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding. Predictors of PPI were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 261 patients, 24 (9.2%) required PPI. Balloon-expandable valves were used in 66.7% and self-expanding valves in 33.3%. Predictors of PPI included pre-procedural bifascicular block (OR 12.15, 95% CI: 2.52–68.89, p=0.003), greater septal implantation depth (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04–1.65, p=0.019), and post-procedural new left (OR 23.56, 95% CI: 4.91–48.52, p=0.0004) and right bundle branch blocks (OR 24.4, 95% CI: 3.82–30.51, p=0.001). Aortic regurgitation as the mechanism of prosthetic valve failure was associated with reduced PPI odds (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76, p=0.014). Pacing requirement—defined as >90% ventricular pacing—increased from 25% at 3 months to 56.25% at 12 months. At a median follow-up of 962.5 days (IQR 481.5–1555.3), adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the PPI group (aOR 9.4, 95% CI: 1.9–60.4, p=0.028). Conclusion Bifascicular block, greater septal depth, and new bundle branch blocks predict PPI post-ViV-TAVR, while aortic regurgitation appears protective. Risk stratification and procedural planning are critical.

ABSTRACT Background Over the years, prognostic indexes have been developed to help clinicians stratify patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) into risk groups. This study aims to identify a new prognostic index for patients with BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine and durvalumab (CGD) in the first‐line setting. Patients and Methods The study population consisted of patients with BTC from 11 Eastern and Western Countries. Using multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), we identified 5 baseline statistically significant variables: stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, albumin levels, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Metastatic disease is a prognostic factor with a superior weight considering the HR of 3.62, while all the others can be considered prognostic factors with equivalent weight as the HRs are quite similar (HRs between 1.55 and 1.92). Based on these reasons, we developed a prognostic model called the MAGIC‐D index by assigning a score of 2 for metastatic disease, and a score of 1 for CEA increased levels, albumin decreased levels, GGT increased levels, NLR ≥ 3. Patients were stratified into three risk groups as follows: low‐risk group (Score from 0 to 2), intermediate‐risk group (Score from 3 to 4) and high‐risk group (Score from 5 to 6). At the first data cutoff (April 2024), these data were available for 319 patients that composed the training cohort used for the analysis. At the second data cutoff (May 2025), 79 patients were further enrolled and composed the validation cohort. Results Median progression‐free survival was 11.7 months in low‐risk group (20.7%), 8.7 months in intermediate‐risk group (46.4%) and 5.4 months in high‐risk group (32.9%) [low‐risk hazard ratio (HR): 0.27, intermediate‐risk HR: 0.55, high‐risk HR: 1, p < 0.0001]. Median OS was 18.4 months in low‐risk group,15.9 months in intermediate‐risk group and 7.8 months in high‐risk group (low‐risk HR: 0.17, intermediate‐risk HR: 0.43, high‐risk HR: 1, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in overall response rate (low‐risk: 31.8%, intermediate‐risk: 36.5% and high‐risk: 25.7%; p = 0.0718), while disease control rate was significantly different across the three risk groups (low‐risk: 83.3%, intermediate‐risk: 70.9% and high‐risk: 60.9%; p < 0.0001) as well as the rate of patients receiving a second‐line therapy (low‐risk: 54.5%, intermediate‐risk: 48.6% and high‐risk: 25.7%; p = 0.0061). Finally, the prognostic role in terms of OS and PFS of the MAGIC‐D index was confirmed in a validation cohort of 79 patients. Conclusion The MAGIC‐D index is an easy‐to‐use tool able to stratify patients with BTC with different prognoses undergoing first‐line therapy with CGD.

ABSTRACT Background Transvenous lead removal (TLR) is a Class I indication for patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, disparities in the utilization of TLR have not been fully explored, particularly concerning demographic and socioeconomic factors. Objectives This study aims to examine whether disparities exist among patients hospitalized for CIED infections with respect to the utilization of TLR, focusing on sex, race, and income characteristics. Methods We utilized the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to assess patients hospitalized with CIED infections and identify those who underwent TLR. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for TLR utilization, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic characteristics. Results A total of 56 709 patients were hospitalized for CIED infection in the United States in 2019, of which 9867 (17.4%) underwent TLR. On an adjusted analysis, females and Black patients were found to have lower odds of undergoing TLR compared to males and White patients (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.59–0.78; p < 0.01; and OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.39–0.57; p < 0.01, respectively). Hispanic patients also had reduced odds of TLR (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58–0.93; p = 0.01). No significant associations were observed between income or insurance status and the likelihood of receiving TLR after adjustment. Conclusions This study identified significant disparities in the utilization of TLR among patients hospitalized for CIED infections. Female, Black, and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive TLR.