Citations

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), likely driven by systemic inflammation. Treating inflammation may reduce this risk. We aimed to investigate MACE across different therapies in patients with IBD. Methods We used Swedish nationwide registers (2007–2023) to describe MACE rates (ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality) in patients with IBD receiving different therapies. For contextualization, we compared MACE rates during therapy exposure periods in patients with IBD with matched (by age, sex, and residence) general population comparators without IBD. Comparisons included exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapies and periods of different treatments (immunomodulators, TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi), vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and Janus kinase inhibitors). Each patient could contribute with multiple periods, with a new period starting upon switch of therapy. Incidence rates (IRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated by using Cox regression (Model 1: conditioned on matching variables; Model 2: additional adjustment for Charlson Comorbidity Index). Among patients with IBD, we performed 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched analysis, with exposure periods of TNFi or vedolizumab as the reference, to compare MACE rates between advanced therapies. In these comparisons, we adjusted for demographics, disease characteristics, healthcare utilization, prior treatment, and cardiovascular risk factors. Results We included 106,894 patients with IBD with 99,661 exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy, 60,573 exposure periods of immunomodulators, and 71,551 of advanced therapies. Distribution of age, sex and disease duration differed substantially across therapy exposures (data not shown). Compared with the general population, MACE rates in patients with IBD were similar across therapies (IRs=3.0-13.0/1,000 person-years; aHRs=1.02-1.49) (Table 1), and significantly increased only for exposure periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy, immunomodulators, or ustekinumab. In PS-matched comparisons, no significant differences were found between periods of TNFi, vedolizumab and other advanced therapies (Table 2). Conclusion Therapy exposure periods in patients with IBD showed only slightly increased MACE rates compared to corresponding periods in the general population, and significantly so only for periods naïve to immunomodulators/advanced therapy and exposure to immunomodulators or ustekinumab. In PS-matched analyses of patients with IBD, no significant differences in MACE rates were observed when comparing exposure periods of different advanced therapies. Conflict of interest: Eriksson, Carl: Served as speaker/advisory board member for Janssen Cilag AB and Tillotts Pharma. Forss, Anders: Served as speaker/advisory board member for Janssen Cilag AB and Tillotts Pharma. Singh, Siddharth: Dr. Singh has research grants from Pfizer. Halfvarson, Jonas: Grant support: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (RB13-0160 to J.H.), the Swedish Research Council (2020-02021 to J.H.), the Örebro University Hospital research foundation (OLL-890291 to J.H.), NordForsk (90569 to J.H.) and Vinnova ( 2019-01185 to JH and 2024-01155 co-applicant), IHI, EU, INTERCEPT (Grant agreement number 101194780, co-applicant), miGut-Health, HORIZON-HLTH-2022, EU (Grant Agreement 101095470, Co-applicant), 3TR, IMI 2, EU, (Grant agreement number 831434, Co-applicant), Janssen, MSD, and Takeda. Consulting and/or advisory board fees from: AbbVie, Alfasigma, Aqilion, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Hospira, Index Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Johnson &amp Johnson, MEDA, Medivir, Medtronic, Merck, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Laboratories Inc., Sandoz, Shire, STADA, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tillotts Pharma, Vifor Pharma, UCB and speaker’s fees from: AbbVie, Alfasigma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Johnson &amp Johnson, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tillotts Pharma and research grant support from Janssen, Merck Sharp &amp Dohme and Takeda. Sun, Jiangwei: No conflicts Söderling, Jonas: Dr. Söderling has worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet and SWIBREG partly financed by grants from Ferring and Janssen. Everhov, Åsa H: Dr Everhov has worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet and SWIBREG, partly financed by grants from Ferring and Janssen. Bröms, Gabriella: Dr. Bröms has served as a speaker for Takeda and Janssen and worked on projects at Karolinska Institutet, partly financed by Janssen, UCB and Pfizer. James, Stefan: Dr. James reports institutional research grants from Novo Nordisk, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Jansen, Alnylam and proctor fees from Medtronic. Ludvigsson, Jonas: Dr. Ludvigsson has coordinated an unrelated study for the Swedish IBD Quality Register (SWIBREG). That study received funding from Jansen Corporation. Ludvigsson has also received financial support from MSD/Merck for unrelated research on inflammatory bowel disease, and for developing a paper reviewing national healthcare registers in China. Ludvigsson has an ongoing research collaboration with Takeda about celiac disease and is discussing additional collaboration on chronic liver disease with this company. Olen, Ola: Karolinska Institutet has received research grants from Pfizer, Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Ferring, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Alfasigma for projects led by Olén. Ola Olén has also received fees for lectures from Pfizer, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda.

Abstract Purpose :Tamoxifen undergoes bioactivation to its active metabolite (Z)-endoxifen, which blocks estrogen-dependent breast tumor growth at high potency. We tested the feasibility and safety of supplementing standard tamoxifen therapy with low-dose (Z)-endoxifen in patients with breast cancer with compromised tamoxifen bioactivation. Patients and Methods :We conducted a prospective, interventional, three group randomized trial including 235 patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer who received standard tamoxifen therapy (20 mg/day). Patients were stratified by CYP2D6 genotype (n = 78), defining poor, intermediate, and normal metabolizers, or by baseline (Z)-endoxifen plasma concentration (n = 78), defining ≤15, 15 to 25, and ≥25 nmol/L. Co-treatment with (Z)-endoxifen 3 and 1.5 mg/day or placebo was performed, respectively. A control group (n = 79) received placebo regardless of metabolizer phenotype. The primary endpoint was the number of patients with (Z)-endoxifen levels >32 nmol/L after 6 weeks of treatment. Adverse events were continuously monitored. Results: A higher proportion of patients in both intervention groups achieved target concentrations >32 nmol/L compared with control (P < 0.0001). At 3 mg (Z)-endoxifen supplementation, 92.3% of CYP2D6 poor metabolizer patients and all patients with baseline (Z)-endoxifen ≤15 nmol/L achieved the target concentration. At 1.5 mg (Z)-endoxifen supplementation, 88% of CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer patients and 95% of patients with 15 to 25 nmol/L baseline (Z)-endoxifen levels achieved the target concentration. Similar proportions of patients receiving (Z)-endoxifen (6/80, 7.5%) or placebo (8/155, 5.2%) experienced grade 3 adverse events. Conclusions: Adding low-dose (Z)-endoxifen to standard tamoxifen is safe and provides a new approach to personalized antiestrogen treatment for patients with low endoxifen plasma levels.

Background: The ethical discourse regarding the delivery of global surgical care has increased in the 21st century. The aims of this manuscript are to explore the differences in ethical domains in the global cleft surgical literature discussed by authors from high-income countries versus lower-middle-income countries and to elucidate changes in ethical discussions over the last decade. Methods: A thematic coding analysis was completed using NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software. Articles were analyzed and coded for discussion of 24 distinct subdomains in the global cleft surgical literature from 1992 to 2022. Findings: The domains with the most significant discourse in the global cleft surgery literature found were (1) clinical care and delivery and (2) engagement in collaborations and partnerships. Furthermore, when manuscripts are first authored by low- and middle-income country (LMIC) authors, the subdomains of (1) level of visiting trainee supervision, (2) relevance of educational activities, and (3) patient/procedure/location selection increase in relative discourse. The impact of visiting trainees on local educational programs is the ethical subdomain that has the largest increase in the last decade. There are barriers to publication as evidenced by the exclusion of abstracts which included LMIC authors but did not result in publications in peer-reviewed journals. Conclusions: A critical finding of this study is that the distribution of discussed ethical domains differs when LMIC authors are included as authors, in particular when primary authorship is from an LMIC author. To the authors' knowledge, there is no other study to date which has attempted this form of analysis.

This study investigates the sex-specific role of the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Gonadal axis in Alzheimer’s disease progression, utilizing ADNI1 data for 493 individuals, analyzing plasma levels of gonadotropic and sex hormones, and examining neurodegeneration-related brain structures. We assessed plasma levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P4), and testosterone (T), along with volumetric measures of the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and hypothalamic subunits, to explore their correlation with Alzheimer’s disease markers across different cognitive statuses and sexes. Significant cognitive status effects were observed for all volumetric measures, with a distinct sex-by-cognitive status interaction for hypothalamic volume, indicating a decrease in males but not in females across cognitive impairment stages. Regression analyses showed specific hypothalamic subunit volume related to hormone levels, accounting for up to approximately 40% of the variance (p < 0.05). The findings highlight sex differences in neurodegeneration and hormonal regulation, suggesting potential for personalized treatments and advancing the understanding of Alzheimer’s disease etiology.

Introduction: In people with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the associations between BMI, comorbidities and outcomes are not well-defined. This retrospective cohort study examined the association between BMI and hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF. Hypothesis: Higher BMI is associated with more HF-related hospitalizations and shorter time to HF-related hospitalization. Methods: Data for patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 at the time of HFpEF diagnosis were extracted from LCED, a US claims-electronic medical record data set. Patients were categorized into 5 BMI groups: overweight and obesity classes I-IV (Figure A). Negative binomial and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate associations between BMI and number of HF-related hospitalizations and risk of HF-related hospitalization during follow-up. Analyses were adjusted for relevant baseline comorbidities, with age, sex and diabetes status as effect modifiers. Results: Among 4,975 patients, median age was 74 years and 57.5% were female. Compared with the overweight group, higher BMI groups had a lower median age (years: overweight 80; obesity III 68; obesity IV 64), fewer patients with cardiovascular (CV) history (overweight 81.0%; obesity III 77.0%; obesity IV 66.0%) and a greater proportion of female patients (overweight 56.4%; obesity III 57.9%; obesity IV 69.0%) (Figure A). Mean HF-related hospitalizations/100 patient-years was higher for obesity III (12) and IV (16) vs overweight (10) (effect of BMI: p=0.002; Figure B). The hazard ratio [95% CI] for HF-related hospitalization was 1.36 [0.97; 1.91] and 1.86 [1.32; 2.64] for obesity III and IV, relative to overweight (effect of BMI: p=0.010). Conclusions: Results suggest even though patients with HFpEF in higher BMI groups are younger and have less CV history at baseline, higher BMI is associated with greater burden of HF-related hospitalizations during follow-up, irrespective of age, sex and diabetes status.

Abstract Type 2 diabetes has reached endemic proportions and is a substantial burden for the affected patients and the society. Along with lifestyle factors, a number of genetic loci predisposing to type 2 diabetes have been identified, including SORCS1 that encodes the transmembrane receptor SorCS1. The ectodomain of SorCS1 (sol-SorCS1) is shed from plasma membranes but the biological function of this fragment is unknown. Here we show that sol-SorCS1 acts as a high-affinity binding partner for the insulin receptor to stabilize the receptor and increase insulin affinity, protein kinase B activation, and glucose uptake in myocytes. Sol-SorCS1 is liberated from adipocytes, and in diabetic patients the plasma concentration positively correlates with body mass index, but inversely with plasma glucose. In mouse models of insulin resistance, exogenous sol-SorCS1 restored insulin sensitivity. We conclude that sol-SorCS1 increases peripheral insulin sensitivity and propose sol-SorCS1 as a novel insulin sensitizing adipokine and potential antidiabetic agent.

Teplizumab treatment of nondiabetic relatives at high risk for T1D induces partially exhausted CD8 + T cells and improves beta cell function.