Citations

Abstract Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important modality for treating chronic pain in patients who have failed conservative therapy and a substantial portion of the population rely on fee-for-service Medicare or Medicaid for coverage. We aimed to determine physician professional fee reimbursement rates and the ratio of Medicaid to Medicare professional fee reimbursement (MMI) for three common Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to SCS therapy (63650, 63685, and 63655) across states. Secondarily, we explored trends in utilization and reimbursement of these procedures by Medicare at the national level between 2013 and 2023. Methods Medicaid professional fee reimbursement data were extracted from publicly available fee schedules where available for individual states, while Medicare reimbursement data were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule. Baseline and wage-adjusted MMI values were calculated for each state. Results Medicaid reimbursed 11.5–21.0% less than Medicare across the evaluated CPT codes after wage adjustment, with differences of 11.8% for CPT 63650 (facility), 18.0% for CPT 63650 (non-facility), 11.5% for CPT 63685 (facility), and 21.0% for CPT 63655 (facility). Medicaid MMI values ranged from 0.397–1.87 across codes and settings. State-level Medicaid professional fee reimbursement varied substantially, ranging from $194.52–$639.38 for CPT 63650 (facility), $978.72–$2,781.65 for CPT 63650 (non-facility), $160.82–$558.00 for CPT 63685 (facility), and $375.97–$1,045.15 for CPT 63655 (facility); Medicare reimbursement was substantially less variable. From 2013–2023, Medicare utilization, rendering providers, beneficiaries, and standardized payments generally increased, although trends varied by CPT code and site of service. Conclusions Medicare physician professional fee reimbursement largely exceeds Medicaid physician professional fee reimbursement for three of the most common SCS procedural codes, suggesting potential access barriers to chronic pain procedures. Medicaid reimbursement shows considerable variation across states and among procedural codes, suggesting substantial interstate heterogeneity in Medicaid rate-setting that may reflect differences in state policy priorities or other factors not analyzed in this study.

Background The Impella 5.5 is employed to provide left ventricular support in cardiogenic shock. Mechanistic understanding of biventricular relationships is essential in device optimization. Using a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction in tandem with pressure–volume loops, this study aimed to understand the impact of Impella 5.5 on biventricular hemodynamics. Methods Using Domestic Yorkshire pigs, an Impella 5.5 was inserted percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance via carotid/aortic access and an acute myocardial infarction was created. Biventricular pressure–volume loops and derived parameters were generated for each level of support before (n=6) and after myocardial infarction (n=6). Results With increasing Impella 5.5 support, left ventricular pressure–volume loops shifted left, and right ventricular (RV) loops shifted right. In a healthy porcine heart, the RV adequately compensated for increased preload from the device, demonstrated by increased RV performance at higher P levels. After myocardial infarction, pigs were unable to tolerate speeds beyond P7 from diminished RV stroke volume reserve compared to healthy hearts. Median RV stroke volume percentage change from P1 to P9 before myocardial infarction was from 5.7% (interquartile range, −15.1% to 9.7%) to 50.6% (interquartile range, −11.6% to 60.2; P <0.05), and following acute myocardial infarction from P1 to P7 was from 3.9% (interquartile range, −2.7 to 78.4) to 13.4% (interquartile range, −8.9% to 147.2; P =0.94). Conclusions Impella 5.5 speed modulation highlights significant interventricular interactions with opposing biventricular trends. While the heart can mount an improvement in RV stroke volume with increasing Impella 5.5 support, these data suggest an attenuated response following acute myocardial infarction, which may relate to inadequate response to increased preload needed by the device after infarction affecting the interventricular septum.

Introduction: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a devastating disease that commonly results in early onset dementia, yet its rarity and heterogeneity limit large-scale research and clinical trials. Remote monitoring via low-burden digital health tools may overcome these barriers. We evaluated clinical utility of passive smartphone monitoring in FTLD using a multi-domain mobile assessment platform. Methods: Participants were 567 adults (53% clinically normal, 21% prodromal FTLD, 26% symptomatic FTLD) who completed an in-person study visit and downloaded the ALLFTD Mobile App on their personal smartphones. The app delivered unsupervised cognitive tests and passively collected continuous data on battery percentage (proxy for smartphone use) and step count. Longitudinal follow-up included smartphone monitoring and annual in-person study visits. Primary analyses examined associations between passive smartphone features and markers of disease severity at baseline and longitudinally, and tested whether passive features added incremental value beyond app-based cognitive testing. Results: Passive smartphone features were feasible to collect and showed excellent reliability with <2 weeks of monitoring (ICCs>0.9). Features capturing smartphone use and movement demonstrated sensitivity to gold-standard clinical measures of disease severity both at baseline and longitudinally. A classification model combining passive features, the app-based cognitive composite score, and demographics detected longitudinal functional decline (AUC=0.89); passive features alone (AUC=0.84) performed comparably to a cognitive screener (AUC=0.85). Discussion: Passive smartphone monitoring is a valid, zero-burden measure of disease severity and progression in FTLD that adds modest incremental value beyond app-based cognitive testing. Findings support its use as a scalable digital endpoint in longitudinal FTLD research.

Abstract Background Cardiac valve tissue obtained during the surgical management of infective endocarditis (IE) and sent for culture may influence postoperative antibiotic therapy. We sought to identify clinical and microbiologic risk factors associated with positive valve cultures (PVC) and IE relapses in a cohort of patients undergoing surgical management. Methods This is a retrospective, multi-center study of patients with surgical management during the acute (&lt;42 days) course of IE-directed antibiotic therapy. The rate of PVC, IE relapse, and mortality were collected. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors associated with PVC. Results Of 113 patients included, 36 (31.9%) had PVC. Univariate and multivariable analyses showed preoperative antibiotic duration and pathogens were associated with PVC. Median (IQR) days of preoperative antibiotics were 6.5 (4.0-11.0) for patients with PVC compared to 13.0 (8.0-21.0) for those with negative valve cultures (NVC). In a multivariable model, preoperative antibiotic administration decreased the risk of PVC (OR 0.85 per day, CI 0.77-0.91). Enterococcal IE increased the risk of PVC compared to streptococcal IE (OR 4.16, CI 1.07-17.48). Of note, 33 (63.2%) patients with NVC received a median (IQR) of 8 (5, 18.5) days of intravenous antibiotics per patient. Only one IE relapse was identified and occurred in a patient with NVC. Conclusions Both preoperative antibiotic duration and causative pathogen were associated with PVC. IE relapses were rare and unrelated to PVC. There may be an opportunity to shorten postoperative antibiotic durations following surgical management in patients with IE.

Abstract Introduction Remote cognitive assessments offer an accessible, scalable way to support clinical characterization and longitudinal monitoring of cognition. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing Mayo Test Drive (MTD), a remote, self-administered digital cognitive assessment, within a specialized clinic focused on eligibility assessments for anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method Two-hundred and nine ( N =209) patients (M age =71.2, 53% female) were evaluated through the Mayo Clinic Rochester Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment Clinic (ADTC) and had the opportunity to complete MTD, either as a remote, patient-initiated session through a patient-facing healthcare portal or during an in-clinic neuropsychological evaluation. Results Clinical diagnoses included 55.2% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31.0% mild dementia, and 11.6% moderate dementia, in addition to 2.2% cognitively unimpaired (CU), as determined by neurology consensus at a multidisciplinary case conference. Among those who initiated MTD ( n =197/209), 97.5% completed a session (70.6% remotely, 26.9% in clinic). Completion rates were high across diagnostic groups and did not significantly differ by clinical severity ( p =.12): CU (100%), MCI (99.1%), mild dementia (97.0%), and moderate dementia (89.5%). Remote completion rates overall were high (97.9%). Among completers, administration setting (remote vs. in-clinic) did not significantly differ by clinical stage, χ²(3)=2.37, p =.49. Reasons for non-initiation included not receiving or opening portal messages and other/unknown factors. Discussion Remote digital cognitive assessment is feasible within the context of clinic eligibility evaluations for AD therapies. The high completion rates of MTD across clinical impairment levels in this setting support development of paths for broader use in cognitive characterization in AD care.

ABSTRACT Aim To systematically review and meta‐analyze cohort studies evaluating associations of gingival inflammation, periodontitis, and tooth loss with cognitive decline and incident mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Methods PROSPERO‐registered searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library identified cohort studies from inception through October 10, 2025, with a PubMed update on June 24, 2026. Random‐effects meta‐analyses pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia/MCI; cognitive function outcomes were summarized qualitatively. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results Fifty‐nine studies met inclusion criteria; 28 contributed to dementia/MCI meta‐analyses. Severe periodontitis (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06–1.27; I 2 = 0%; Q ‐test p = 0.49), periodontitis of unspecified severity (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.21–1.73; I 2 = 98%; Q ‐test p < 0.001), edentulism (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.19–1.33), and low tooth count (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14–1.42; I 2 = 94%; Q ‐test p < 0.001) were associated with elevated dementia/MCI risk. RoB was low in 31 studies (53%), moderate in 25 (42%), and high in 3 (5%); inadequate confounder adjustment was common. Meta‐regression showed stronger estimates for ICD‐code periodontitis definitions (fold change (FC) = 1.44 95% CI: 1.04–2.01), older cohorts (FC per year = 1.02 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), and weaker estimates with lower RoB (FC per NOS star = 0.81 95% CI: 0.73–0.92). Follow‐up duration, cohort age, and RoB were not associated with tooth‐count estimates. Conclusion Periodontitis and tooth loss are associated with modestly higher dementia/MCI risk and poorer cognitive function, but heterogeneity, residual confounding, and bias temper causal interpretation. Longitudinal studies with rigorous baseline cognition assessment and intervention studies are needed.

Objective To assess the effect of Moses™ 2.0 (Lumenis Be Ltd., Yokneam Illit, Israel; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) for lithotripsy of renal stones of 8–20 mm in diameter on operative time, surgeon workload, and retropulsion. Subjects/Patients and Methods In our multicentre, randomised, double‐blind clinical trial, patients were randomised 1:1 to standard or Moses 2.0 laser lithotripsy and stratified by stone size. Patients and surgeons were blinded to laser modality. Primary outcomes were total operative time as well as surgeon workload assessed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration‐Task Load Index (NASA‐TLX). Secondary outcomes were stone retropulsion evaluated by blinded video review and postoperative clinical outcomes. Linear regression modelling was used for analysis. Results A total of 153 patients (79 Standard, 74 Moses 2.0) with similar clinical, stone, and operative characteristics were evaluated. There was no significant difference in operative times between the Standard and Moses 2.0 groups ( P = 0.73). Moses 2.0 was associated with lower effort, frustration, mental, physical, and temporal workload, as well as higher rated overall performance compared to the standard laser. Video review demonstrated no difference in rates of retropulsion ( P = 0.13). Complication rates (Standard: 13%; Moses 2.0: 10%) and stone‐free rates (Standard: 51%; Moses: 2.0 55%) were comparable. Conclusion Our study evaluated the impact of Moses 2.0 technology on high‐powered renal stone dusting, constituting the largest double‐blind trial of its kind to date. There was insufficient evidence to suggest any difference in operative times or clinical outcomes when using Moses 2.0 compared to standard laser lithotripsy. Moses 2.0 was associated with reduced surgeon workload, which has implicit impact on surgeon wellness.