Stalboerger, Paul

Background The Impella 5.5 is employed to provide left ventricular support in cardiogenic shock. Mechanistic understanding of biventricular relationships is essential in device optimization. Using a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction in tandem with pressure–volume loops, this study aimed to understand the impact of Impella 5.5 on biventricular hemodynamics. Methods Using Domestic Yorkshire pigs, an Impella 5.5 was inserted percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance via carotid/aortic access and an acute myocardial infarction was created. Biventricular pressure–volume loops and derived parameters were generated for each level of support before (n=6) and after myocardial infarction (n=6). Results With increasing Impella 5.5 support, left ventricular pressure–volume loops shifted left, and right ventricular (RV) loops shifted right. In a healthy porcine heart, the RV adequately compensated for increased preload from the device, demonstrated by increased RV performance at higher P levels. After myocardial infarction, pigs were unable to tolerate speeds beyond P7 from diminished RV stroke volume reserve compared to healthy hearts. Median RV stroke volume percentage change from P1 to P9 before myocardial infarction was from 5.7% (interquartile range, −15.1% to 9.7%) to 50.6% (interquartile range, −11.6% to 60.2; P <0.05), and following acute myocardial infarction from P1 to P7 was from 3.9% (interquartile range, −2.7 to 78.4) to 13.4% (interquartile range, −8.9% to 147.2; P =0.94). Conclusions Impella 5.5 speed modulation highlights significant interventricular interactions with opposing biventricular trends. While the heart can mount an improvement in RV stroke volume with increasing Impella 5.5 support, these data suggest an attenuated response following acute myocardial infarction, which may relate to inadequate response to increased preload needed by the device after infarction affecting the interventricular septum.

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate a therapeutic approach targeting the inflammatory response and consequent remodeling from ischemic myocardial injury. Methods and Results Coronary thrombus aspirates were collected from patients at the time of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and subjected to array‐based proteome analysis. Clinically indistinguishable at myocardial infarction (MI), patients were stratified into vulnerable and resilient on the basis of 1‐year left ventricular ejection fraction and death. Network analysis from coronary aspirates revealed prioritization of tumor necrosis factor‐α signaling in patients with worse clinical outcomes. Infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor‐α inhibitor, was infused intravenously at reperfusion in a porcine MI model to assess whether infliximab‐mediated immune modulation impacts post‐MI injury. At 3 days after MI (n=7), infliximab infusion increased proregenerative M2 macrophages in the myocardial border zone as quantified by immunofluorescence (24.1%±23.3% in infliximab versus 9.29%±8.7% in sham; P <0.01). Concomitantly, immunoassays of coronary sinus samples quantified lower troponin I levels (41.72±7.34 pg/mL versus 58.11±10.75 pg/mL; P <0.05) and secreted protein analysis revealed upregulation of injury‐modifying interleukin‐2, ‐4, ‐10, ‐12, and ‐18 cytokines in the infliximab‐treated cohort. At 4 weeks (n=12), infliximab treatment resulted in significant protective influence, improving left ventricular ejection fraction (53.9%±5.4% versus 36.2%±5.3%; P <0.001) and reducing scar size (8.31%±10.9% versus 17.41%±12.5%; P <0.05). Conclusions Profiling of coronary thrombus aspirates in patients with ST‐segment–elevation MI revealed highest association for tumor necrosis factor‐α in injury risk. Infliximab‐mediated immune modulation offers an actionable pathway to alter MI‐induced inflammatory response, preserving contractility and limiting adverse structural remodeling.