Van Cleve Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA.
Citations 2
Biventricular Pressure–Volume Loop Assessment of Impella 5.5 in an Acute ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Shock Model Unmasks Diminished Right Ventricular Reserve
Background The Impella 5.5 is employed to provide left ventricular support in cardiogenic shock. Mechanistic understanding of biventricular relationships is essential in device optimization. Using a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction in tandem with pressure–volume loops, this study aimed to understand the impact of Impella 5.5 on biventricular hemodynamics. Methods Using Domestic Yorkshire pigs, an Impella 5.5 was inserted percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance via carotid/aortic access and an acute myocardial infarction was created. Biventricular pressure–volume loops and derived parameters were generated for each level of support before (n=6) and after myocardial infarction (n=6). Results With increasing Impella 5.5 support, left ventricular pressure–volume loops shifted left, and right ventricular (RV) loops shifted right. In a healthy porcine heart, the RV adequately compensated for increased preload from the device, demonstrated by increased RV performance at higher P levels. After myocardial infarction, pigs were unable to tolerate speeds beyond P7 from diminished RV stroke volume reserve compared to healthy hearts. Median RV stroke volume percentage change from P1 to P9 before myocardial infarction was from 5.7% (interquartile range, −15.1% to 9.7%) to 50.6% (interquartile range, −11.6% to 60.2; P <0.05), and following acute myocardial infarction from P1 to P7 was from 3.9% (interquartile range, −2.7 to 78.4) to 13.4% (interquartile range, −8.9% to 147.2; P =0.94). Conclusions Impella 5.5 speed modulation highlights significant interventricular interactions with opposing biventricular trends. While the heart can mount an improvement in RV stroke volume with increasing Impella 5.5 support, these data suggest an attenuated response following acute myocardial infarction, which may relate to inadequate response to increased preload needed by the device after infarction affecting the interventricular septum.
Elimination of Purkinje Fibers by Electroporation Reduces Ventricular Fibrillation Vulnerability
Background The Purkinje network appears to play a pivotal role in the triggering as well as maintenance of ventricular fibrillation. Irreversible electroporation ( IRE ) using direct current has shown promise as a nonthermal ablation modality in the heart, but its ability to target and ablate the Purkinje tissue is undefined. Our aim was to investigate the potential for selective ablation of Purkinje/fascicular fibers using IRE . Methods and Results In an ex vivo Langendorff model of canine heart (n=8), direct current was delivered in a unipolar manner at various dosages from 750 to 2500 V, in 10 pulses with a 90‐μs duration at a frequency of 1 Hz. The window of ventricular fibrillation vulnerability was assessed before and after delivery of electroporation energy using a shock on T‐wave method. IRE consistently eradicated all Purkinje potentials at voltages between 750 and 2500 V (minimum field strength of 250–833 V/cm). The ventricular electrogram amplitude was only minimally reduced by ablation: 0.6±2.3 mV ( P =0.03). In 4 hearts after IRE delivery, ventricular fibrillation could not be reinduced. At baseline, the lower limit of vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation was 1.8±0.4 J, and the upper limit of vulnerability was 19.5±3.0 J. The window of vulnerability was 17.8±2.9 J. Delivery of electroporation energy significantly reduced the window of vulnerability to 5.7±2.9 J ( P =0.0003), with a postablation lower limit of vulnerability=7.3±2.63 J, and the upper limit of vulnerability=18.8±5.2 J. Conclusions Our study highlights that Purkinje tissue can be ablated with IRE without any evidence of underlying myocardial damage.