Back to Authors

Bermudez, Camilo

0000-0002-9461-5094

Mayo Clinic

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 1

Feasibility of remote self-administered cognitive assessment in an Alzheimer’s disease treatment clinic
Kaser, Alyssa N , Stricker, John L. , Corriveau‐Lecavalier, Nick , Boots, Elizabeth A. , Machulda, Mary M. , Fields, Julie A. , Jones, David T. , McCarter, Stuart J. , Botha, Hugo , Coburn, Ryan P , Bermudez, Camilo , Neth, Bryan J., Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Stricker, Nikki H. , Hughes, Morgan A , Corriveau-Lecavalier, Nick , Boots, Elizabeth A , Machulda, Mary M , Jones, David T , Botha, Hugo , Coburn, Ryan P , Bermudez, Camilo , Graff-Radford, Jonathan , Ramanan, Vijay K , Stricker, Nikki H

No container title available | September 17, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.09.15.26362283 Get It

Abstract Introduction Remote cognitive assessments offer an accessible, scalable way to support clinical characterization and longitudinal monitoring of cognition. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing Mayo Test Drive (MTD), a remote, self-administered digital cognitive assessment, within a specialized clinic focused on eligibility assessments for anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method Two-hundred and nine ( N =209) patients (M age =71.2, 53% female) were evaluated through the Mayo Clinic Rochester Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment Clinic (ADTC) and had the opportunity to complete MTD, either as a remote, patient-initiated session through a patient-facing healthcare portal or during an in-clinic neuropsychological evaluation. Results Clinical diagnoses included 55.2% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31.0% mild dementia, and 11.6% moderate dementia, in addition to 2.2% cognitively unimpaired (CU), as determined by neurology consensus at a multidisciplinary case conference. Among those who initiated MTD ( n =197/209), 97.5% completed a session (70.6% remotely, 26.9% in clinic). Completion rates were high across diagnostic groups and did not significantly differ by clinical severity ( p =.12): CU (100%), MCI (99.1%), mild dementia (97.0%), and moderate dementia (89.5%). Remote completion rates overall were high (97.9%). Among completers, administration setting (remote vs. in-clinic) did not significantly differ by clinical stage, χ²(3)=2.37, p =.49. Reasons for non-initiation included not receiving or opening portal messages and other/unknown factors. Discussion Remote digital cognitive assessment is feasible within the context of clinic eligibility evaluations for AD therapies. The high completion rates of MTD across clinical impairment levels in this setting support development of paths for broader use in cognitive characterization in AD care.