ABSTRACT Aim To systematically review and meta‐analyze cohort studies evaluating associations of gingival inflammation, periodontitis, and tooth loss with cognitive decline and incident mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Methods PROSPERO‐registered searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library identified cohort studies from inception through October 10, 2025, with a PubMed update on June 24, 2026. Random‐effects meta‐analyses pooled adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia/MCI; cognitive function outcomes were summarized qualitatively. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results Fifty‐nine studies met inclusion criteria; 28 contributed to dementia/MCI meta‐analyses. Severe periodontitis (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06–1.27; I 2 = 0%; Q ‐test p = 0.49), periodontitis of unspecified severity (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.21–1.73; I 2 = 98%; Q ‐test p < 0.001), edentulism (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.19–1.33), and low tooth count (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14–1.42; I 2 = 94%; Q ‐test p < 0.001) were associated with elevated dementia/MCI risk. RoB was low in 31 studies (53%), moderate in 25 (42%), and high in 3 (5%); inadequate confounder adjustment was common. Meta‐regression showed stronger estimates for ICD‐code periodontitis definitions (fold change (FC) = 1.44 95% CI: 1.04–2.01), older cohorts (FC per year = 1.02 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), and weaker estimates with lower RoB (FC per NOS star = 0.81 95% CI: 0.73–0.92). Follow‐up duration, cohort age, and RoB were not associated with tooth‐count estimates. Conclusion Periodontitis and tooth loss are associated with modestly higher dementia/MCI risk and poorer cognitive function, but heterogeneity, residual confounding, and bias temper causal interpretation. Longitudinal studies with rigorous baseline cognition assessment and intervention studies are needed.
Survey on Patient Perception of At‐Home Bacterial Biofilm Control in Relation to Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue Health
ABSTRACT Objective Bacterial biofilm control around dental implants is critical for the health of the peri‐implant soft tissue and longevity of dental implants. The patient's role in regular biofilm removal around dental implants is just as important as that of the dental hygienist. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between at‐home dental implant care and patients' perceptions of peri‐implant soft tissue health. Methods A 15‐item paper survey was distributed to adult patients undergoing professional dental hygiene maintenance at a specialty dental practice within a 3‐month period and had at least one dental implant. Survey items included participant demographics, patient‐reported adjunctive aids for dental implants and patient perceptions of dental implant oral hygiene practices and peri‐implant soft tissue health. Results There was a statistical difference between time spent cleaning dental implants and peri‐implant soft tissue health. An association was found between patients who reported spending more time cleaning their dental implants and less bleeding ( p = 0.046/54%), gingival inflammation ( p = 0.026/58%) and gingival tissue redness ( p = 0.036/53%). Additionally, patients who more frequently underwent professional dental hygiene maintenance perceived less gingival inflammation ( p = 0.001/66%). Conclusion To promote peri‐implant soft tissue health and reduce oral biological complications, best practice guidelines should be implemented, including optimal at‐home dental implant care and regular professional dental hygiene maintenance.
Hypercementosis development in a patient with Crouzon syndrome
AbstractOral cavity lymphomas constitute only 3% of all lymphomas in the general population but are the third most common oral malignancy. A 67‐year‐old female with a history of osteoporosis, Graves’ disease and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma was referred to the Department of Dental Specialties with a chief complaint of persistent soft tissue swelling facial to the maxillary incisors of possible non‐odontogenic origin. To expedite care, the patient was first seen via teledentistry and subsequently appointed for an in‐person evaluation and treatment. Examination revealed 1–3 mm probing depths and a firm, non‐tender, non‐fluctuant mass in the facial soft tissues approximating teeth nos. 7–10. Biopsy of the affected area was performed. A diagnosis of recurrent follicle center cell lymphoma, a form of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma, was rendered. The patient was subsequently referred to the Oncology and Hematology team, followed for 6 weeks and remained symptom‐free. This case underlies the importance of teledentistry to expedite care and manage patient expectations. Additionally, it also underscores the importance of microscopic examination of tissue samples from oral lesions that appear non‐odontogenic in nature and reinforces the role of dentistry in uncovering the oral‐systemic link.