Citations

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Data regarding the optimal timing of CIED reimplantation after TLE are not well established. Objective: This study aims to assess the 5-year outcomes of early (≤7 days) versus non-early (>7 days) CIED reimplantation following TLE for CIED infection using a multi-national database. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for CIED infection between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Patients were further categorized into two groups: early CIED reimplantation (≤7 days from TLE) and non-early CIED reimplantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by including patient demographics, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events during a 5-year study period. Results: A total of 1668 patients in the early CIED reimplantation group and 1550 in the non-early group were identified. After PSM, 1327 patients in each group were analyzed. Compared to non-early group, early CIED reimplantation group was associated with significantly higher odds of all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 1.837, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.532-2.203) and repeated device infection (OR: 1.569, 95% CI: 1.314-1.873) at 5-year follow-up. However, no significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.778-1.104), HF exacerbation (OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 0.855-1.218), cardiac arrest (OR:0.924, 95% CI: 0.739-1.157), stroke (OR: 1.169, 95% CI: 0.915-1.494), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.163, 95% CI: 0.749-1.808), major bleeding (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 0.857-1.358) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.759-1.123) between the two groups. Conclusion: Early reimplantation of CIED following TLE of infected devices was associated with worse outcomes in all-cause hospitalization and repeated device infection. Further large prospective studies are needed to define the optimal timing of device reimplantation.

Background: The optimal timing of pacemaker reimplantation following transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) remains unclear. Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of timing to pacemaker reimplantation after TLR of infected CIED on hospital outcomes. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients aged ≥18 years who underwent new pacemaker implantation with percutaneous approach following TLR of infected CIED from 2017 to 2020 were identified. The study population was stratified based on the timing of pacemaker reimplantation following TLR of infected CIED: early (<5 days) vs delayed (≥5 days). Weighted-propensity-score matched conditional multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the impact of the timing on various outcomes. Results: In our study, 469 (66.9%) patients received early device reimplantation, and 232 (33.1%) patients received delayed device reimplantation (≥5 days). Post-procedurally, patients in the delayed group had a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay (95% CI OR: 42.37 (6.36 – 282.11); p<0.01) and non-home discharge (95% CI OR: 2.00 (1.35 – 2.95), p<0.01). There was no significant difference between both groups in the early mortality, 30-day readmission, and procedural complications. Conclusion: Our study suggests that time-to-device reimplantation from TLR of infected CIED did not affect the overall short-term in-hospital outcomes. However, delayed device reimplantation was associated with a higher rate of prolonged hospital stay and non-home discharge.

Background Despite significant cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis, real‐world data on death due to cardiovascular disease among patients with sarcoidosis is not well established. Methods and Results We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide‐Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database for data on patients with sarcoidosis aged ≥25 years from 1999 to 2020. Diseases of the circulatory system except ischemic heart disease were listed as the underlying cause of death, and sarcoidosis was stated as a contributing cause of death. We calculated age‐adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) per 1 million individuals and determined the trends over time by estimating the annual percentage change using the Joinpoint Regression Program. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of demographic and geographic factors. In the 22‐year study period, 3301 cardiovascular deaths with comorbid sarcoidosis were identified. The AAMR from cardiovascular deaths with comorbid sarcoidosis increased from 0.53 (95% CI, 0.43–0.65) per 1 million individuals in 1999 to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75–0.98) per 1 million individuals in 2020. Overall, women recorded a higher AAMR compared with men (0.77 [95% CI, 0.74–0.81] versus 0.58 [95% CI, 0.55–0.62]). People with Black ancestry had higher AAMR than people with White ancestry (3.23 [95% CI, 3.07–3.39] versus 0.39 [95% CI, 0.37–0.41]). A higher percentage of death was seen in the age groups of 55 to 64 years in men (23.11%) and women (21.81%), respectively. In terms of US census regions, the South region has the highest AAMR from cardiovascular deaths with comorbid sarcoidosis compared with other regions (0.78 [95% CI, 0.74–0.82]). Conclusions The increase of AAMR from cardiovascular deaths with comorbid sarcoidosis and higher cardiovascular mortality rates among adults aged 55 to 64 years highlight the importance of early screening for cardiovascular diseases among patients with sarcoidosis.

Background: The outcomes of leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation after transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are not well-established. Objective: This study sought to describe the outcomes of LP implantation following TLR of infected CIED. Method: We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Embase for a combination of term including leadless pacemaker implantation, transvenous lead extraction, transvenous lead removal , transvenous lead explant , infected cardiac implantable electronic device . The inclusion criterion was LP implantation after TLR of infected CIED. The exclusion criterion was TLR for non-infectious reason. Study end-points were procedural complications and LP infection. Result: Of 132 publications reviewed, 13 studies with a total of 253 patients (74 ± 14 years of age, 69% males) were included. Amongst, 56.8% had systemic CIED infection and 43.2% had isolated pocket infection. Staphylococcus Aureus was the most common causative organism in 33% of the reported patients. Of 253 patients included, 105 patients (41.5%) underwent concomitant LP implantation during TLR procedure, and 36 patients (14.2%) had transvenous pacing as a bridge from TLR to LP implantation. During the LP implantation, 1 patient (0.4%) had an intra-procedural complication requiring sternotomy. Post-LP implantation, 2 patients (0.8%) developed groin hematoma, 2 patients (0.8%) developed femoral arteriovenous fistula, and 1 patient (0.4%) developed pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 ±10.6 months, 3 patients (1.2%) developed pacemaker syndrome, 1 patient (0.4%) developed acute on chronic heart failure exacerbation, and only 1 patient (0.4%) developed LP-related infection requiring LP retrieval. Conclusion: This study suggests that LP implant is feasible and safe post-removal of infected CIED with cumulative adverse events at 4% and a reinfection rate of 0.4%.

Introduction: Incident cardiac arrhythmias are common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the impact of a second incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization on clinical outcomes remain unclear. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and prognostic implications of a second incident arrhythmia in hospitalized COVID-19 patients over the pandemic course till vaccine availability. Methods: The multicenter COVID-RHYTHM Registry enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 3/8/2020 to 1/24/2021. Cardiac arrhythmia included documented atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), ventricular tachycardia (VT), severe sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm) or AV block. Outcomes were compared between patients with single vs. more than one incident arrhythmias adjusting for baseline variables. Results: Of 6299 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 4398 had an had an incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization, of which 822 (19%) had a second incident arrhythmia. Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had a higher baseline prevalence of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and sleep apnea (Table). Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality, need for ICU admission and need for rehab upon discharge. Length of stay was similar between the groups. Conclusions: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients with incident cardiac arrhythmias, a second incident arrhythmia during hospitalization was seen in 19%. Having >1 incident arrhythmia was associated with increased need for ICU admission and reduced survival.

Background: While cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis could be significant, data assessing geographical disparities in cardiovascular deaths (CVDs) among patients with sarcoidosis are limited. Objective: This study aims to determine the mortality attributed to CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in different geographic locations in the United States. Methods: We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and performed serial cross-sectional analyses of national death certificate data for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis among patients aged 25 and above. Diseases of the circulatory system (ICD-10 I00-I99) were listed as the underlying cause of death, and sarcoidosis (ICD-10 D86) as contributing cause of death. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1,000,000 individuals and compared the mortality among census regions and states. Results: In the 22-year study period, 5,630 CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in the United States were identified between 1999 and 2020. The South region had the highest AAMRs for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis (1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.37] per 1,000,000 individuals), followed by Northeast region (1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.32] per 1,000,000 individuals), Midwest region (1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30] per 1,000,000 individuals), and West Region (0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98] per 1,000,000 individuals). The AAMRs for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis were between 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75] per 1,000,000 individuals and 1.96 [95% CI, 1.73-2.19] per 1,000,000 individuals throughout the States, except Maryland and the District of Columbia, which recorded 2.79 [95% CI, 2.44-3.14] and 6.01 [95% CI, 4.44-7.94], respectively. Conclusion: The South region, particularly Maryland recorded the highest CVDs in sarcoidosis. Geographical disparities observed in CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis highlight the need to improve public health measures at state-level.

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disease that could result in debilitating cardiac manifestations. Despites, data on the cardiovascular deaths (CVDs) among patients with sarcoidosis are limited. Objective: This study sought to determine the longitudinal trends in mortality attributed to CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis by age, sex, and race in the United States. Methods: We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and performed serial cross-sectional analyses of national death certificate data for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis among patients aged 25 and above. Diseases of the circulatory system (ICD-10 I00-I99) were listed as the underlying cause of death, and sarcoidosis (ICD-10 D86) as contributing cause of death. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1,000,000 individuals and determined the trends over time by estimating the annual percent change using the Joinpoint Regression Program. Results: In the 22-year study period, 5,630 CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in the United States were identified between 1999 and 2020. The AAMRs from CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis increased from 1.03 (95% CI, 0.88-1.17) in 1999 to 1.38 (95% CI, 1.24-1.52) in 2020. Overall, women recorded a higher AAMRs compared to men (1.25 [95% CI, 1.21-1.30] vs. 1.10 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]). Black individuals had higher AAMRs than White individuals (5.17 [95% CI, 4.97-5.37] vs. 0.68 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71]). A higher percentage of CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis was seen in the age groups of 55-64 in men (24.68%) and 65-74 in women (22.62%). Conclusion: The CVDs in sarcoidosis have increased over the last two decades, with disparities seen in women and Black individuals. Most CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis occurred at a younger age compared to general population. This highlights the importance of early screening for cardiovascular diseases in sarcoidosis individuals.

Background Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrate more AF‐related symptoms and worse quality of life (QOL). Whether increased use of ablation in women reduces sex‐related QOL differences is unknown. Sex‐related outcomes for ablation versus drug therapy was a prespecified analysis in the CABANA (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Methods and Results Symptoms were assessed periodically over 60 months with the Mayo AF‐Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) frequency score, and QOL was assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) summary and component scores. Women had lower baseline QOL scores than men (mean AFEQT scores 55.9 and 65.6, respectively). Ablation patients improved more than drug therapy patients with similar treatment effect by sex: AFEQT 12‐month mean adjusted treatment difference in women 6.1 points (95% CI, 3.5–8.6) and men 4.9 points (95% CI, 3.0–6.9). Participants with baseline AFEQT summary scores <70 had greater QOL improvement, with a mean treatment difference at 12 months of 7.6 points for women (95% CI, 4.3–10.9) and 6.4 points for men (95% CI, 3.3–9.4). The mean adjusted difference in MAFSI frequency score between women randomized to ablation versus drug therapy at 12 months was −2.5 (95% CI, −3.4 to −1.6); for men, the difference was −1.3 (95% CI, −2.0 to −0.6). Conclusions Compared with drug therapy for AF, ablation resulted in more QOL improvement in both sexes, primarily driven by improvements in those with lower baseline QOL. Ablation did not eliminate the AF‐related QOL gap between women and men. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00911508.