Citations

OBJECTIVE Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond 3 months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluated prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at their institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived less than 90 days after SRS were identified and case matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. The authors modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole-brain radiation (OR 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of poor survival, whereas CNS progression before SRS (OR 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with survival < 90 days. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. CONCLUSIONS Key predictors of 90-day survival after SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurological deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.

Aims Data on revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are limited by low patient numbers and short-term follow-up. This study evaluated the mid-term outcomes of revision of UKA to TKA focusing on implant survival, radiological results, and clinical outcomes in a large series. Methods We identified 235 revisions of UKA to TKA performed between 1995 and 2022 utilizing our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 65 years (SD 10), mean BMI was 32 kg/m 2 (SD 6), and 50% were female (n = 118). The most common indications for revision were aseptic loosening (37%; n = 83), progression of arthritis in adjacent compartments (35%; n = 81), and unexplained pain (20%; n = 47). The mean time from UKA to revision to a TKA was four years (26 days to 15 years). Posterior-stabilized constructs were used in 78% of the revisions (n = 184), varus-valgus constrained implants in 14% (n = 33), and cruciate-retaining implants in 7% (n = 16). Metaphyseal fixation devices were used in 8% of cases (n = 18) and augments in 31% (n = 73). Kaplan-Meier implant survival analyses were performed, radiographs reviewed, and clinical outcomes were measured with Knee Society Scores (KSSs). Mean follow-up was eight years (2 to 25). Results The five-year survival free of any re-revision was 93% (95% CI 89 to 97). There were 17 further re-revisions with femoral and/or tibial aseptic loosening (n = 7), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 4), and stiffness (n = 2) being the most common indications. The five-year survival free of any reoperation was 87% (95% CI 83 to 92). Stiffness (n = 7) and unresurfaced patellar clunk/crepitus (n = 4) were the most common indications for reoperations without implant exchange. There were 25 nonoperative postoperative complications, most commonly stiffness (n = 5), flexion instability (n = 4), and haematoma (n = 4). No unrevised TKAs showed signs of radiological loosening. KSS function score improved from 54 (SD 18) to 69 (SD 26; p = 0.003). Conclusion In this large series of 235 revisions of UKA to TKA, the five-year survival of the TKAs free of re-revision was good. Our data suggest that the implant survival and clinical outcomes were inferior to primary TKA. Tibial component aseptic loosening was the most common reason for re-revision. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(12):1281–1287.

Background: Scoliosis has various etiologies, ranging from idiopathic, congenital, to those with spinal cord abnormalities. Advanced imaging is not always feasible and limited by cost, low-yield, and anesthesia risks in children. Given artificial intelligence's potential, we hypothesize that a deep learning (DL)–based image classifier will demonstrate superior performance in radiographic classification of scoliosis etiology compared witht experienced spine surgeons based on spine radiographs. Methods: One thousand thirty-six pediatric patients from single institution with scoliosis diagnosis and paired anterior-posterior - lateral images were included. Patients were manually classified based on their scoliosis etiology from chart review, including previous spine imaging studies when available. Categories included idiopathic, congenital, and spinal cord pathology. Images were randomized and assigned for training, validation, and testing. A DL-classifier using EfficientNet B4 architecture was trained on the radiographs. Accuracy and positive predictive value as defined by precision, recall, and F1-score were calculated to assess final performance metrics. Results: The trained classifier performed well at identifying correct etiologies, with F1-Score (harmonic mean of precision-recall) of 0.97. Model precision was 0.99 for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 0.89 for congenital, and 0.78 for spinal cord pathology. Performance was higher on more common classes, with lower performance observed in class with fewer images. The algorithm has highest overall precision (0.96), recall (0.96), and F1 (0.96), while Surgeons 1 and 2 have lower accuracies (precision 0.80, recall 0.79, and F1 0.79 and precision 0.76, recall 0.67, and F10.71, respectively). There was no clear pattern identified regarding the surgeons' errors and poor agreement on which X-rays corresponded to underlying spinal cord pathology. Conclusion: A DL-convolutional-neural-network classifier has been trained to high degree of accuracy to distinguish between 3 scoliosis etiologies on pediatric spine radiographs. This model could provide a novel tool to clinicians to decide when to refer for axial imaging. It had superior diagnostic performance compared with experienced spine surgeons. After further validation and refinement, a clinician could put a patient's X-rays into the predictive tool for analysis and use the results to discuss with the family the risk of finding spinal cord pathology, helping them determine together the best timing for an MRI. Level of Evidence: Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond three months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluates prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1,546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at our institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived fewer than 90 days post-SRS were identified and case-matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. We modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) &lt; 70 (OR: 17.4, p &lt; 0.001), prior whole brain radiation (OR: 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR: 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of early deaths, while CNS progression before SRS (OR: 0.22, p &lt; 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR: 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with a less than 90-day survival. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. Key predictors of 90-day survival following SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurologic deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.

BACKGROUND Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction. Tourette syndrome (TS) represents a rare cause of DCM that is incompletely characterized in the literature. Patients with TS might develop repetitive involuntary cervical movements that can accelerate spondylotic changes. Therefore, patients with myelopathy secondary to TS or other tic disorders might exhibit DCM symptoms at younger ages. The present study examines the surgical management of DCM secondary to TS in the literature and describes the outcomes of 3 patients who were treated for DCM secondary to TS. OBSERVATIONS In these 3 described cases, fractures led to DCM in 2 patients, while cervical spondylosis led to DCM in 1 patient, all associated with TS. Treating motor tics with medications or deep brain stimulation (DBS) provided effective tic management. All 3 patients experienced improvements in their neurological symptoms following surgery, consistent with other reports in the literature. LESSONS When treating patients with cervical myelopathy secondary to TS, the authors recommend prioritizing motor tic management prior to considering secondary interventions such as surgery. According to the authors, treating motor tics with medications or DBS provides effective tic management. This approach allows for an uncomplicated postoperative course and satisfactory relief of cervical myelopathy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24751

BackgroundObjective, controlled eye‐tracking measurement of gaze patterns during layperson evaluation of facial attractiveness is currently lacking.ObjectivesTo objectively investigate (1) where on the face laypeople direct their attention when assessing attractiveness compared with a control group, and (2) whether increased fixation on certain facial regions is associated with high attractiveness ratings.MethodsLay observers viewed a cohort of 40 faces with a diverse age, sex, and racial distribution. Observers were either allowed to free‐gaze without a specific task or rate facial attractiveness for 10 seconds per face while their gaze was recorded by an eye‐tracking system.ResultsForty‐seven observers assessed facial attractiveness (mean age 35.1 years (range 21–76), 62% female) and 57 observers free‐gazed at the facial photos without a specific task (mean age 35.5 years (range 22–66), 54% female). Preliminary analysis showed that sex of both the face and observer substantially influence gaze‐attractiveness associations (p < 0.05). Mixed effects analysis suggests that when males assessed female facial attractiveness, increased fixation time at the mouth correlated most strongly with high attractiveness (p = 0.001), whereas when females assessed male faces, increased fixation at the eyes (p < 0.001) and hair (p = 0.002) were most strongly associated with high ratings of attractiveness.ConclusionsIncreased gaze at the mouth in females and eyes and hair in males is associated with significantly higher ratings of attractiveness by observers of the opposite sex. Practitioners may want to pay special attention to these areas when designing an evidence‐based aesthetic treatment plan.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 135:1995–2002, 2025

OBJECTIVE Following resection of posterior superior frontal gyrus (PSFG) tumors, patients can experience supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome consisting of contralateral hemiapraxia and/or speech apraxia. Given the heterogeneity of PSFG tumors, the authors sought to determine the risk of postoperative deficits and assess predictors of outcomes for all intraparenchymal PSFG tumors undergoing surgery (biopsy or resection), regardless of histology. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of adult PSFG-region tumors undergoing biopsy or resection by a single surgeon. RESULTS A total of 106 consecutive patients undergoing 123 procedures (21 biopsies, 102 resections) fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anaplastic astrocytomas were the most frequent among resected tumors (39% vs 29%), while glioblastomas were most common among biopsies (38% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001). The biopsy cohort was more likely to have tumor involvement outside the PSFG (90% vs 62%) (p = 0.011), most commonly in the motor cortex (67% vs 31%) (p = 0.005). Seizures were the most common presenting symptom in the resection cohort (p = 0.017), while motor deficits were more common in the biopsy cohort (58% vs 29%) (p < 0.001). Immediate postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 71 cases (58%), but only 3 of the deficits were permanent at 6 months of follow-up (2%). Postoperative SMA syndrome occurred in 48 cases (47%) and was significantly associated with involvement of the motor cortex (p = 0.018) or cingulate gyrus (p = 0.023), which were also significant in multivariate analysis as risk factors for SMA syndrome. However, postoperative SMA syndrome was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.51). There were no perioperative deaths, but corpus callosum involvement (p < 0.001), contrast enhancement (p = 0.003), and glioblastoma pathology (p = 0.038) predicted worse overall survival in patients undergoing resection. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of all patients undergoing resection of PSFG-region tumors experience a postoperative SMA syndrome. Individuals with corpus callosum and/or motor cortex involvement may be at an increased risk of experiencing SMA syndrome. However, these deficits are usually transient, and the risk of permanent new deficits is very low (3%). Preoperative characteristics including corpus callosum involvement and tumor enhancement—in addition to pathology—might serve as predictors of overall survival within this patient population.

Study Design: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate VBQ as a predictor of interbody subsidence and to determine threshold values that portend increased risk of subsidence. Summary of Background Data: Many risk factors have been reported for the subsidence of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). MRI Vertebral Bone Quality (VQB) is a relatively new radiographic parameter that can be easily obtained from preoperative MRI and has been shown to correlate with measurements of bone density such as DXA and CT Hounsfield Units. Methods: All patients who underwent 1- to 3-level ACDF using titanium interbodies with anterior plating between the years 2018 and 2020 at our tertiary referral center were included. Subsidence measurements were performed by 2 independent reviewers on CT scans obtained 6 months postoperatively. VBQ was measured on pre-operative sagittal T1 MRI by 2 independent reviewers, and values were averaged. Results: Eight-five fusion levels in 44 patients were included in the study. There were 32 levels (38%) with moderate subsidence and 12 levels with severe subsidence (14%). The average VBQ score in those patients with severe subsidence was significantly higher than those without subsidence (3.80 vs. 2.40, P<0.01). A threshold value of 3.2 was determined to be optimal for predicting subsidence (AUC=0.99) and had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94.1% in predicting subsidence. Conclusions: VBQ strongly correlates with the subsidence of interbody grafts after ACDF. A threshold VBQ score value of 3.2 has excellent sensitivity and specificity for predicting subsidence. Spine surgeons can use VBQ as a readily available screening tool to identify patients at higher risk for subsidence. Level of Evidence: Level—IV

Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective: To determine whether the C2 exposure technique was a predictor of change in cervical alignment and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for degenerative indications. Background: In PCDF handling of the C2 posterior paraspinal musculature during the operative approach varies by surgeon technique. To date, no studies have investigated whether maintenance of the upper cervical semispinalis cervicis attachments as compared with complete reflection of upper cervical paraspinal musculature from the posterior bony elements is associated with superior radiographic and clinical outcomes after PCDF. Patients and Methods: All adult patients who underwent C2–T2 PCDF for myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy at multi-institutional academic centers between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were dichotomized by the C2 exposure technique into semispinalis preservation or midline muscular reflection groups. Preoperative and short and long-term postoperative radiographic outcomes (upper cervical alignment, global alignment, and fusion status) and PROMs (Visual Analog Scale–Neck, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-12) were collected. Univariate analysis compared patient factors, radiographic measures, and PROMs across C2 exposure groups. Results: A total of 129 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (73 muscle preservation and 56 muscle reflection). Patients in the muscular preservation group were on average younger (P = 0.005) and more likely to have bone morphogenic protein (P < 0.001) and C2 pars screws (P = 0.006) used during surgery. Preoperative to postoperative changes in C2 slope, C2 tilt, C2–C3 segmental lordosis, C2–C3 listhesis, C0–C2 Cobb angle, proximal junctional kyphosis, ADI, C1 lamina-occiput distance, C2 sagittal vertical axis, C2–C7 lordosis, and PROMs at all follow-up intervals did not vary significantly by C2 exposure technique. Likewise, there were no significant differences in fusion status, C2–C3 pseudoarthrosis, C2 screw loosening, and complication and revision rates between C2 exposure groups. Conclusions: Preservation of C2 semispinalis attachments versus muscular reflection did not significantly impact cervical alignment, clinical outcomes, or proximal junction complications in long-segment PCDF. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Objective measurement of where observers direct their attention to faces when searching for signs of facial plastic surgery (FPS) is currently lacking. Objective: To compare where laypersons direct their attention on facial photographs using eye-tracking software when they are asked to (1) search for signs of aesthetic facial surgery or (2) allowed to gaze without direction (free-gaze). Methods: Naïve observers either free-gazed or examined faces for signs of FPS (FPS-prompted) for 10 s per face while their gaze was recorded by an eye-tracking system. Faces had no known history or signs/stigmata of FPS and were selected from the FACES and CFD databases with a diverse demographic distribution. Gaze times in nine facial subregions were analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression. Results: In FPS-prompted observers ( n = 50, mean age 32.7 ± 11.3 years, 23/50 (46%) female), the nose, mouth, cheeks, and forehead experienced the most substantial increases ( p < 0.001) and a high percentage of overall gaze time (17.9%, 12.5%, 12.0%, 9.6%, respectively) compared to free-gazing observers [ n = 57, 35.5 ± 13.9 years, 31/57 (54%) female]. Conclusions: Observers direct attention differently on a face when searching for signs of plastic surgery with increased attention on the nose, mouth, cheeks, and forehead.