Do, B.

OBJECTIVE Maximal safe resection of intra-axial brain tumors near the motor cortex is aided by intraoperative motor mapping. Here, the authors compared outcomes in patients undergoing either low-frequency bipolar stimulation (LFBS) or high-frequency monopolar stimulation (HFMS) for cortical and/or subcortical motor mapping during brain tumor resection. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing an asleep craniotomy with motor mapping or an awake craniotomy with motor and speech mapping with a single surgeon was performed. Three cohorts were compared: 1) asleep LFBS (AsLFBS), 2) awake LFBS (AwLFBS; motor + speech mapping), and 3) asleep HFMS. HFMS mapping was not used for awake craniotomies. RESULTS A total of 284 patients who underwent 300 craniotomies with motor mapping were identified. No significant differences in permanent neurological deficits (p = 0.377) or extent of resection (EOR) of nonenhancing tumors (p = 0.453) were identified between LFBS or HFMS motor mapping cases. Both EOR (92.7% vs 83.5%, p = 0.035) and permanent neurological deficits (7.6% vs 3.3%) occurred more frequently in enhancing tumors with LFBS, although the latter was not statistically significant. HFMS was associated with higher rates of subcortical motor pathway identification (p = 0.001) and fewer total intraoperative seizures (p = 0.003) compared with LFBS. Previous resection (HR 0.46, p = 0.003) and a higher cortical threshold (HR 0.95, p = 0.023) were significantly associated with longer survival, while preoperative aphasia (HR 2.24, p = 0.022), hospital length of stay (HR 1.1, p = 0.005), an insular-based tumor (HR 3.5, p = 0.021), and a histological diagnosis of glioblastoma (HR 2.9, p = 0.001) were negative predictors. Interestingly, overall FLAIR EOR was significantly associated with a marginally decreased overall survival (HR 1.01, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS No significant differences in postoperative neurological deficits were found between LFBS and HFMS paradigms. HFMS may identify subcortical motor fibers more reliably while resulting in significantly fewer intraoperative seizures. Although LFBS was associated with greater EOR of contrast-enhancing tumors, it may also be associated with higher rates of postoperative deficits, perhaps reflecting less reliable identification of subcortical motor fibers.

Abstract Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond three months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluates prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1,546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at our institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived fewer than 90 days post-SRS were identified and case-matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. We modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70 (OR: 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiation (OR: 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR: 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of early deaths, while CNS progression before SRS (OR: 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR: 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with a less than 90-day survival. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. Key predictors of 90-day survival following SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurologic deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.