Citations

Abstract Aims In this protocol-predefined substudy of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence. Methods and results RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial that demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging substudy. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with prespecified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (n = 9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (n = 16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs. 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received a placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized-withdrawal period, among patients receiving a placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence. Conclusions Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform the duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy and larger studies should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03737110

Background Recurrent pericarditis is characterized by painful flares and inflammation, which negatively impact health‐related quality of life. RHAPSODY (rilonacept inhibition of interleukin‐1 alpha and beta for recurrent pericarditis: a pivotal symptomatology and outcomes study) evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL‐1α and ‐β cytokine trap) in recurrent pericarditis. A secondary analysis of these data evaluated the patient‐reported outcome questionnaire score change during the trial. Methods and Results Participants completed 5 patient‐reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing pericarditis pain, health‐related quality of life, general health status, sleep impact, and overall symptom severity. PRO score changes during the treatment run‐in period (12 weeks) and the blinded randomized withdrawal period (up to 24 weeks) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and mixed model repeated measures analyses. Participants with PRO data from the run‐in period (n=84) and the randomized withdrawal period (n=61; 30 rilonacept, 31 placebo) were included in analyses. Run‐in baseline PRO scores indicated that pericarditis symptoms during pericarditis recurrence impacted health‐related quality of life. All PRO scores significantly improved ( P <0.001) on rilonacept treatment during the run‐in period. For the randomized withdrawal period, PRO scores were maintained for participants receiving rilonacept. For those receiving placebo and who experienced a recurrence, PRO scores deteriorated at the time of recurrence and then improved following rilonacept bailout. At randomized withdrawal Week 24/End of Study, scores of participants who received bailout rilonacept were similar to those of participants who had continued rilonacept. Conclusions These results demonstrate the burden of pericarditis recurrences and the improved physical and emotional health of patients with recurrent pericarditis while on rilonacept treatment. These findings extend prior rilonacept efficacy results, demonstrating improvements in patient‐reported health‐related quality of life, sleep, pain, and global symptom severity while on treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

9124 Background: Continuing a 1st generation EGFR TKI with chemotherapy upon TKI progression was not shown to be beneficial in the IMPRESS trial. However, the validity of this approach with osimertinib remains under explored. We attempted to characterize the efficacy of continuing osimertinib with chemotherapy in the post-progression setting. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of patients with metastatic EGFR mutant NSCLC who had progressed on osimertinib was performed. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were noted. Progression free survival (PFS), duration of treatment (DOT), overall survival (OS) and rates of intracranial progression were captured. ANOVA or a Fisher exact test were used to identify associations between cohort characteristics and treatment outcomes. Differences in PFS, DOT and OS were assessed using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: 73 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC with post-osimertinib treatment outcomes were identified. Cohort characteristics are summarized in Table. Median duration of follow up was 41 months. Upon progression, osimertinib was discontinued in 34 patients (Cohort A) and continued with next line of therapy in 39 patients (Cohort B). Survival analyses were adjusted for prior lines of therapy, use of platinum doublet chemotherapy, and use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the post-progression setting. After adjusting for covariates, continuing osimertinib post-progression was associated with an improved PFS (7 vs 4 months; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 – 1.00; p = 0.003) and DOT (7 vs 4 months; HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 – 0.87; p = 0.006). There was no difference in OS between Group A and B (52 vs 41 months; HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.43 – 1.24; p = 0.234). Rates of intracranial progression were similar between Group A and B (28% vs 23%; p = 0.649). Conclusions: After adjusting for covariates, continuing osimertinib with chemotherapy in the post-progression setting was associated with a significant difference in PFS and DOT, but with no differences in OS. Continuing osimertinib does not appear to influence the rate of subsequent intracranial progression. Prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal practice pattern.[Table: see text]

BACKGROUNDABO‐incompatible platelet transfusions are common, and transfusions with ABO‐incompatible plasma are increasing with the use of group A plasma and group O whole blood (WB) in emergencies. Many centers screen blood products for anti‐A and/or anti‐B titers to help prevent hemolysis from ABO‐incompatible transfusions, yet titer methods and definition of high titers are not standardized.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSThis international multicenter study collected data on anti‐A and anti‐B titer practices for plasma, apheresis platelet (AP), and WB units from January 2015 through December 2017 to determine the prevalence of high‐titer units using local definitions.RESULTSA total of 87,701 plasma, AP and WB units were screened for high‐titer anti‐A and/or anti‐B. High‐titer detection rates for group A plasma ranged 0%–13.6%; group A AP 2.7%–9.3%; group O AP 2.3%–65.7%; and group O WB 6.4%–20.7%. At the one center that collected group B AP, the high‐titer rate was 10.9%. High‐titer rates varied from month to month, as well as between years for a given month. There was no clear pattern of when high‐titer units were donated.CONCLUSIONThe prevalence of high‐titer plasma, AP, and WB units varies by titer method and local definition of high titer. Even at the lowest titer threshold of 50, a significant proportion of units had a high‐titer antibody, although the clinical relevance of this finding needs further investigation.

Background Possible transfusion‐related acute lung injury (p TRALI ) cases by definition have a clear temporal relationship to an alternative recipient risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS ). We questioned whether transfusion factors are important for the development of p TRALI . Study Design and Methods In this nested case‐control study, we prospectively identified 145 consecutive patients with p TRALI and randomly selected 163 transfused controls over a 4‐year period at the U niversity of C alifornia at S an F rancisco and the M ayo C linic ( R ochester, M innesota). Results For p TRALI , we found evidence against transfusion being important: receipt of plasma from female donors (odds ratio [ OR ], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [ CI ], 0.29‐2.3; p = 0.70), total number of units transfused ( OR , 0.99; 95% CI , 0.89‐1.10; p = 0.86), and number of red blood cell and whole blood units transfused ( OR , 0.78; 95% CI , 0.59‐1.03; p = 0.079). In contrast, we found that risk for p TRALI was associated with additional recipient factors: chronic alcohol abuse ( OR , 12.5; 95% CI , 2.8‐55; p < 0.001), current smoker ( OR , 4.2; 95% CI , 1.67‐10.8; p = 0.0024), shock before transfusion ( OR , 4.6; 95% CI , 2.0‐10.7; p < 0.001), and positive fluid balance before transfusion ( OR , 1.32/ L ; 95% CI , 1.20‐1.44; p < 0.001). Conclusion Recipient risk factors for ARDS rather than transfusion risk factors predominate in p TRALI .

BackgroundPlasma constituents have been implicated in some types of platelet (PLT) transfusion reactions. Leukoreduced apheresis PLTs stored in InterSol have 65% less plasma than apheresis PLTs stored in 100% plasma (PPs). This study compared transfusion reaction rates in InterSol PLTs (PLT additive solution [PAS] C) versus PPs.Study Design and MethodsThe study design was an open‐label, nonrandomized retrospective review. Statistical methods were applied to substantiate noninferiority and superiority of PAS C compared to PP in terms of transfusion reaction rates. Adverse reactions (ARs) were categorized using the Biovigilance Component of the National Healthcare Safety Network. Active surveillance was used to monitor all transfusions, both with ARs and without ARs.ResultsA total of 14,005 transfusions from six study sites were included, with 9845 PP transfusions given to 2202 patients and 4160 PAS C to 1444 patients. A total of 165 ARs were reported. Percentages of transfusions with ARs were 1.37% for PPs, 0.55% for PAS C, and 1.13% overall. The relative risk (RR) for PAS C versus PPs was calculated as 0.403 with an upper confidence limit (UCL) of 0.663. Overall, ARs with the highest incidence were allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), at 0.66 and 0.40% of total transfusions reported, respectively. The relative risks (UCLs) for ATRs and FNHTRs, respectively, were 0.350 (0.686) and 0.336 (0.827).ConclusionsPAS C PLTs were statistically superior and noninferior to PPs with respect to the transfusion‐related AR rate. PAS C noninferiority and superiority were also demonstrated for ATRs and FNHTRs, separately.

AbstractTransfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) is the leading cause of transfusion-related mortality. To determine TRALI incidence by prospective, active surveillance and to identify risk factors by a case-control study, 2 academic medical centers enrolled 89 cases and 164 transfused controls. Recipient risk factors identified by multivariate analysis were higher IL-8 levels, liver surgery, chronic alcohol abuse, shock, higher peak airway pressure while being mechanically ventilated, current smoking, and positive fluid balance. Transfusion risk factors were receipt of plasma or whole blood from female donors (odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-11.2, P = .001), volume of HLA class II antibody with normalized background ratio more than 27.5 (OR = 1.92/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.08-3.4, P = .03), and volume of anti–human neutrophil antigen positive by granulocyte immunofluoresence test (OR = 1.71/100 mL, 95% CI, 1.18-2.5, P = .004). Little or no risk was associated with older red blood cell units, noncognate or weak cognate class II antibody, or class I antibody. Reduced transfusion of plasma from female donors was concurrent with reduced TRALI incidence: 2.57 (95% CI, 1.72-3.86) in 2006 versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.44-1.49) in 2009 per 10 000 transfused units (P = .002). The identified risk factors provide potential targets for reducing residual TRALI.