Yazer, Mark H.

Background The use of low-titer group O whole blood is increasing. To reduce wastage, unused units can be converted to packed red blood cells. Supernatant is currently discarded post-conversion; however, it could be a valuable transfusable product. The aim of this study was to evaluate supernatant prepared from late-storage low-titer group O whole blood being converted to red blood cells, hypothesizing it will have higher hemostatic activity compared to fresh never-frozen liquid plasma. Methods Low-titer group O whole blood supernatant (n = 12) prepared on storage day 15 was tested on days 15, 21, and 26 and liquid plasma (n = 12) on 3, 15, 21, and 26. Same-day assays included cell counts, rotational thromboelastometry, and thrombin generation. Centrifuged plasma from units was banked for microparticle characterization, conventional coagulation, clot structure, hemoglobin, and additional thrombin generation assays. Results Low-titer group O whole blood supernatant contained more residual platelets and microparticles compared to liquid plasma. At day 15, low-titer group O whole blood supernatant elicited a faster intrinsic clotting time compared to liquid plasma (257 ± 41 vs . 299 ± 36 s, P = 0.044), and increased clot firmness (49 ± 9 vs . 28 ± 5 mm, P < 0.0001). Low-titer group O whole blood supernatant showed more significant thrombin generation compared to liquid plasma (day 15 endogenous thrombin potential 1,071 ± 315 vs . 285 ± 221 nM·min, P < 0.0001). Flow cytometry demonstrated low-titer group O whole blood supernatant contained significantly more phosphatidylserine and CD41 + microparticles. However, thrombin generation in isolated plasma suggested residual platelets in low-titer group O whole blood supernatant were a greater contributor than microparticles. Additionally, low-titer group O whole blood supernatant and liquid plasma showed no difference in clot structure, despite higher CD61 + microparticle presence. Conclusions Plasma supernatant produced from late-storage low-titer group O whole blood shows comparable, if not enhanced, in vitro hemostatic efficacy to liquid plasma. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Abstract Background The current global pandemic has created unprecedented challenges in the blood supply network. Given the recent shortages, there must be a civilian plan for massively bleeding patients when there are no blood products on the shelf. Recognizing that the time to death in bleeding patients is less than 2 h, timely resupply from unaffected locations is not possible. One solution is to transfuse emergency untested whole blood (EUWB), similar to the extensive military experience fine‐tuned over the last 19 years. While this concept is anathema in current civilian transfusion practice, it seems prudent to have a vetted plan in place. Methods and Materials During the early stages of the 2020 global pandemic, a multidisciplinary and international group of clinicians with broad experience in transfusion medicine communicated routinely. The result is a planning document that provides both background information and a high‐level guide on how to emergently deliver EUWB for patients who would otherwise die of hemorrhage. Results and Conclusions Similar plans have been utilized in remote locations, both on the battlefield and in civilian practice. The proposed recommendations are designed to provide high‐level guidance for experienced blood bankers, transfusion experts, clinicians, and health authorities. Like with all emergency preparedness, it is always better to have a well‐thought‐out and trained plan in place, rather than trying to develop a hasty plan in the midst of a disaster. We need to prevent the potential for empty shelves and bleeding patients dying for lack of blood.

BACKGROUNDABO‐incompatible platelet transfusions are common, and transfusions with ABO‐incompatible plasma are increasing with the use of group A plasma and group O whole blood (WB) in emergencies. Many centers screen blood products for anti‐A and/or anti‐B titers to help prevent hemolysis from ABO‐incompatible transfusions, yet titer methods and definition of high titers are not standardized.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSThis international multicenter study collected data on anti‐A and anti‐B titer practices for plasma, apheresis platelet (AP), and WB units from January 2015 through December 2017 to determine the prevalence of high‐titer units using local definitions.RESULTSA total of 87,701 plasma, AP and WB units were screened for high‐titer anti‐A and/or anti‐B. High‐titer detection rates for group A plasma ranged 0%–13.6%; group A AP 2.7%–9.3%; group O AP 2.3%–65.7%; and group O WB 6.4%–20.7%. At the one center that collected group B AP, the high‐titer rate was 10.9%. High‐titer rates varied from month to month, as well as between years for a given month. There was no clear pattern of when high‐titer units were donated.CONCLUSIONThe prevalence of high‐titer plasma, AP, and WB units varies by titer method and local definition of high titer. Even at the lowest titer threshold of 50, a significant proportion of units had a high‐titer antibody, although the clinical relevance of this finding needs further investigation.

Recent combat experience reignited interest in transfusing whole blood (WB) for patients with life‐threatening bleeding. US Army data indicate that WB transfusion is associated with improved or comparable survival compared to resuscitation with blood components. These data complement randomized controlled trials that indicate that platelet (PLT)‐containing blood products stored at 4°C have superior hemostatic function, based on reduced bleeding and improved functional measures of hemostasis, compared to PLT‐containing blood products at 22°C. WB is rarely available in civilian hospitals and as a result is rarely transfused for patients with hemorrhagic shock. Recent developments suggest that impediments to WB availability can be overcome, specifically the misconceptions that WB must be ABO specific, that WB cannot be leukoreduced and maintain PLTs, and finally that cold storage causes loss of PLT function. Data indicate that the use of low anti‐A and anti‐B titer group O WB is safe as a universal donor, WB can be leukoreduced with PLT‐sparing filters, and WB stored at 4°C retains PLT function during 15 days of storage. The understanding that these perceived barriers are not insurmountable will improve the availability of WB and facilitate its use. In addition, there are logistic and economic advantages of WB‐based resuscitation compared to component therapy for hemorrhagic shock. The use of low‐titer group O WB stored for up to 15 days at 4°C merits further study to compare its efficacy and safety with current resuscitation approaches for all patients with life‐threatening bleeding.