Gurney, Jennifer M.

Abstract Background Substituting group A whole blood (GAWB) might relieve some of the burden on the low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) inventory. This simulation examined the effect of implementing GAWB at a large trauma hospital. Study Design and Methods A civilian trauma center with LTOWB and GAWB par levels set to 22 and 10 units, respectively, was modeled as the baseline. The average daily number of WB recipients was 0.5 who received an average of four WB units per patient. LTOWB was issued in packages of five and all had to be consumed before a group A patient could be switched to GAWB. Several variations on the baseline simulation were also modeled. Results In the baseline simulation, there was a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 1 (0–2) GAWB and 16 (13–19) LTOWB recipients per month. The median (IQR) GAWB and LTOWB units transfused per month was 2 (0–9) and 56 (42–72), respectively. Fourteen percent of group A patients received any quantity of GAWB. The variations that had the most impact on GAWB usage included increasing the number of WB recipients to 2.5 per day where the median (IQR) monthly number of GAWB recipients and units transfused increased to 4 (3–5) recipients and 21 (12–29) units, respectively, and when the average WB requirements increased to eight units per patient resulting in transfusing a median (IQR) of 10 (5–15) GAWB units per month to 3 (1–4) recipients. Discussion Under routine civilian hospital circumstances, implementing GAWB will have a modest impact on LTOWB inventory.

Abstract Background The current global pandemic has created unprecedented challenges in the blood supply network. Given the recent shortages, there must be a civilian plan for massively bleeding patients when there are no blood products on the shelf. Recognizing that the time to death in bleeding patients is less than 2 h, timely resupply from unaffected locations is not possible. One solution is to transfuse emergency untested whole blood (EUWB), similar to the extensive military experience fine‐tuned over the last 19 years. While this concept is anathema in current civilian transfusion practice, it seems prudent to have a vetted plan in place. Methods and Materials During the early stages of the 2020 global pandemic, a multidisciplinary and international group of clinicians with broad experience in transfusion medicine communicated routinely. The result is a planning document that provides both background information and a high‐level guide on how to emergently deliver EUWB for patients who would otherwise die of hemorrhage. Results and Conclusions Similar plans have been utilized in remote locations, both on the battlefield and in civilian practice. The proposed recommendations are designed to provide high‐level guidance for experienced blood bankers, transfusion experts, clinicians, and health authorities. Like with all emergency preparedness, it is always better to have a well‐thought‐out and trained plan in place, rather than trying to develop a hasty plan in the midst of a disaster. We need to prevent the potential for empty shelves and bleeding patients dying for lack of blood.