Citations

Objective: To determine associations between central adiposity, cognitive function, and randomized menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in a reanalysis of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study-Cognitive and Affective (KEEPS-Cog) sub-study participants. Methods: KEEPS randomized 727 women (ages 42-58) who were <36 months postnatural menopause to oral conjugated equine estrogens (o-CEE), transdermal 17-β-estradiol (t-E2), or placebo for 48 months. Participants with diabetes, body mass index >35 kg/m 2 , coronary artery calcium score >50 Agatston Units, and other cardiometabolic disease risk indicators were excluded from enrollment. In the ancillary KEEPS-Cog study, cognitive tests were completed at baseline, 18-, 36-, and 48-month post-randomization. In these analyses, cognitive variables were summarized as four cognitive domain-specific factor scores: verbal learning and memory, auditory attention and working memory, visual attention and executive function, and speeded language and mental flexibility. Waist-hip-ratio (WHR), an indicator of central adiposity, was measured at screening (baseline) and modeled as a covariate in linear latent growth models assessing associations of MHT with cognitive functions at baseline and over time. Results: Higher baseline WHR was associated with poorer performance on all domain-specific cognitive outcomes at baseline and with changes in visual attention and executive function across time. Models including interaction effects were not significant for either o-CEE x WHR or t-E2 x WHR. Conclusion: Central adiposity is a risk factor for domain-specific cognitive decline, and thus, cognitive health effects should be investigated in early postmenopausal women, even in women with low cardiovascular risk statuses.

Background. Assessment tools in surgical education help identify improvement areas for trainees. We developed and present validity evidence for a novel Transplant Operative Assessment Tool to optimize technical feedback for surgical trainees in transplantation. Methods. The Transplant Operative Assessment Tool assesses learners on anatomy, technical skills, judgment, and communication. Performance is rated across 5 competency levels. Content validity evidence included a construct map using existing literature and expert cognitive interviews. Ratings were used to develop an item response theory calibration, which was then used to evaluate the tool and provide validity evidence. Results. Eighty-two assessments for 28 trainees (16 residents, 12 fellows) were completed by 25 faculty surgeons across 4 programs. Fifty-six kidney transplants, 13 liver transplants, and 13 donor nephrectomies were assessed. The mean assessment completion time was 4.1 ± 4.3 min. Internal structure validity was evaluated by calculating item infit (range, 0.86–1.15), indicating a strong model fit and confirming a high quality of items. Internal consistency was also high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94). There was a positive correlation between ratings and training level ( P < 0.01), indicating strong discriminatory power. Warm ischemia time for transplant operations did not correlate with performance ( P = 0.16). Conclusions. These data provide validity evidence for a novel operative assessment tool. This instrument can measure performance, monitor progress, document competency, and has the potential to provide valuable feedback.

Background and Aims: With rapid changes in the management landscape of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), this technical systematic review addresses 4 critical Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions to provide guidance to the formulation of recommendations to the 2025 AASLD practice guideline for management of CHB. Approach: The review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes were evaluated across 4 key PICOs: (1) antiviral therapy for prevention of horizontal HBV transmission in high-risk groups, (2) antiviral therapy versus observation for persons in the immune-tolerant phase, (3) discontinuation versus continuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative individuals with undetectable HBV DNA, and (4) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in non-cirrhotic individuals with HBsAg clearance or co-infections with HCV, HDV, or HIV. Results: For PICO 1, limited evidence suggests antiviral therapy may reduce horizontal transmission risk, though with low certainty. PICO 2 analyses reveal uncertain benefits of treating persons in the immune-tolerant phase, with very low certainty due to heterogeneity and bias. PICO 3 analyses demonstrate that discontinuing antiviral therapy in persons who are HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV DNA increases HBsAg loss rates (OR: 12.65, 95% CI: 1.58–101.51) but carries moderate risks of virologic relapse (OR: 47.17, 95% CI: 2.79–797.35) and clinical flares. PICO 4 analyses on several cohort studies showed that in patients co-infected with HCV, HBV, or HIV, the annual incidence of HCC was higher than the level where screening becomes cost-effective, suggesting that regular liver cancer screening could be beneficial for these patients. Conclusions: Despite low certainty, the findings support shared decision-making in high-risk horizontal transmission scenarios or in treating individuals in the immune tolerance phase, caution in discontinuing antiviral therapy in virologically suppressed individuals without HBsAg loss, and tailored HCC surveillance for those with co-infection or cirrhosis.

Background and Aims: Accumulating data related to prevention, surveillance and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) provided the impetus for this updated guideline, using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Methods: The guideline was developed in compliance with the National Academy of Medicine standards. The guideline panel developed structured questions following the Population, Intervention Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework. The panel addressed 6 PICO questions covering prevention (maternal to infant transmission and horizontal transmission), surveillance for liver cancer (among hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg) persons co-infected with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus and/or human immunodeficiency viruses and after HBsAg loss) and treatment (HBsAg positive persons in immune-tolerant or indeterminate phases as well as withdrawal of antiviral therapy), providing evidence-based recommendations on these topics. Four systematic reviews of the literature were conducted, and two existing systematic reviews were utilized to support the recommendations in this practice guideline. Conclusions: This evidence-based guideline provides updated recommendations to optimize the care of persons with CHB.

Aims Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and infective endocarditis (IE) are increasingly seen as interconnected conditions, sharing similar risk factors — such as advanced age and immunosuppression — and overlapping microbial profiles, notably Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci. When these infections occur together, they present distinct challenges in diagnosis and treatment, which can obscure clear outcomes and mortality estimates. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the combined mortality associated with concurrent NVO and IE and to detail the clinical characteristics of affected patients. Methods We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA framework, searching MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus for relevant studies published between 1970 and October 2023. Studies included were those reporting mortality outcomes for at least ten adult patients with both NVO and IE. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated study quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We then performed a random-effects meta-analysis to pool in-hospital, 1-month, 1-year, and 3-year mortality rates. Results A total of 16 studies (12 retrospective, 3 prospective, and 1 mixed design) involving 641 patients (mean age 67.1 years) with concomitant NVO and IE were included. The pooled in-hospital mortality rate was 10.0% (95% CI: 5.2–14.7%), with mortality rates of 5.6% (95% CI: 2.2–9.0%) at 1 month, 12.1% (95% CI: 5.3–18.8%) at 1 year, and 14.5% (95% CI: 4.3–24.8%) at 3 years. There was significant heterogeneity among studies (I² ranging from 46% to 86%). Common comorbidities included diabetes (24.6%), renal failure (17.3%), and immunosuppression (11.1%). The predominant pathogens identified were streptococci (31.3%), S. aureus (27.3%), and enterococci (13.7%). Approximately 40.6% of patients underwent surgical intervention, though its effect on mortality remains inconclusive. Overall, the certainty of the estimates was limited by imprecision and impossibility of perform subgroup analysis. Conclusion The coexistence of NVO and IE is associated with significant mortality, emphasizing the need for earlier diagnosis, coordinated multidisciplinary management, and standardized treatment protocols. Future prospective, high-quality studies are crucial to determine optimal diagnostic and surgical strategies for managing this complex clinical scenario.

Background The rising number of spinal surgeries has been paralleled by an increase in postoperative spine infections (PSIs), now identified as the third most common surgical complication. The absence of a standardized PSI definition complicates clinical management and research. This meta-epidemiological study was conducted to establish clear diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians and researchers in consistently identifying and reporting PSIs. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE on March 14, 2024, by a medical librarian. Studies were considered eligible if they reported clear diagnostic definitions of PSI in at least ten adult patients. The primary objective was to review existing PSI diagnostic criteria and classify them into thematic clusters. We developed standardized diagnostic combinations based on 13 predefined criteria sourced from clinical practice guidelines and previous research (see Table 1). Results From an initial pool of 1,466 studies, 101 were included. The vast majority were retrospective (91/101, 92.1%), with most studies (77/101, 76.2%) utilizing established criteria, such as those from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) or the CDC. Seven studies combined these predefined criteria with additional detailed descriptions. Among studies using independent definitions, clinical signs and symptoms were the most commonly reported criteria (13/24, 54.2). The criteria were grouped into clinical, microbiological, and radiological categories, with most studies employing clinical criteria either alone or alongside microbiological or imaging findings (Figure 1). Conclusion These findings highlight the urgent need for a standardized definition of PSI that integrates clinical, microbiological, and radiological elements. Implementing such a unified diagnostic framework could enhance accuracy, address limitations related to hardware complications, wound drainage interpretation, and imaging ambiguities, and improve current surveillance practices. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Aim Cefazolin, a first generation cephalosporin, is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Research has shown that prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates are significantly higher when non-cefazolin antibiotics are used for perioperative TKA and THA prophylaxis. Cefazolin contains an R1 side chain that has not shown cross reactivity with other cephalosporins. Despite these data, the declaration of a cephalosporin allergy causes uncertainty regarding the optimal antibiotic choice in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of administering perioperative cefazolin in patients with a cephalosporin allergy undergoing joint arthroplasty. Methods We identified all patients (n=1267) with a documented cephalosporin allergy who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty at a high volume academic medical center from 2016-2024. We compared patients who received perioperative cefazolin despite the presence of a cephalosporin allergy (n=481) to patients who received alternative antibiotic prophylaxis (n=786). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions within the first 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complication rates including PJI, C. difficile infection, adverse events and readmission. Results The incidence of allergic reaction in cephalosporin allergic patients who received cefazolin was 0.0% (0/481) compared to 0.51% (4/786) in patients who received alternative antibiotics prophylaxis (p=0.12). There were no significant differences in the incidences of PJI (0.23% vs. 0.30%; p=0.83), C. difficile infection (0.0% vs. 0.0%) or readmission (3.95% vs. 4.34%; p=0.75) within 90 days. There was one adverse event related to cefazolin administration which was urethral irritation and was self-limited. There were three adverse events related to alternative antibiotic prophylaxis including cutaneous manifestations, GI distress and headache in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. All four allergic reactions in the alternative antibiotic prophylaxis cohort required supportive treatment with IV corticosteroids, fluids and antihistamines. Conclusion In this cohort of hip and knee arthroplasty patients, cefazolin administration in the setting of a cephalosporin allergy resulted in a 0.0% incidence of IgE mediated allergic reactions. These data and the fact that cefazolin's unique R1 side chain is not shared by any other cephalosporins suggests that cefazolin can safely be administered to most patients with a documented cephalosporin allergy.

Aim A consensus‑driven definition of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) outcomes is essential for unified data collection, cross‑study comparisons, and evidence‑based guidelines. Such consistency refines treatment strategies, informs decisions, and enhances patient care. We systematically summarized the evidence — using a rigorous meta‑epidemiological approach — on how PJI outcomes are defined, building on analyses of native vertebral osteomyelitis and postoperative spinal infection definitions. Methods We searched Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Scopus without date or language limits for publications that provided a specific PJI outcome definition. Eligible randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reported at least ten PJI cases. Following meta‑epidemiological guidelines adapted from PRISMA, we extracted verbatim definitions of PJI outcomes and categorized them into thematic criteria using a saturation approach. A network plot displayed the frequency and co‑occurrence of criteria across studies (Figure 1). Results Of 7,584 screened studies, 552 (7.3 %) met inclusion criteria. This pilot analysis covers 49 randomly selected studies (8,162 patients), mostly retrospective (48/49, 98 %), concerning mixed joint replacements (25/49, 51 %), two‑stage exchanges (15/49, 31 %), or mixed surgeries (24/49, 49 %). 25/49 studies (51 %) exceeded two-years follow-up. Only 6/49 (12.2 %) used a society‑endorsed definition, and 13/49 (26.5 %) cited a reference. Overall, 32/49 (65.3 %) defined “success”, 35/49 (71.4 %) “failure”, and 16/49 (32.7 %) both. Patient‑reported outcomes appeared in 14/49 (28.6 %), employing 14 PROMs, most frequently UCLA, HHS, and KSS; 13/49 (26.5 %) assessed functional outcomes. Sixteen outcome criteria clustered into seven domains: clinical signs, microbiology, imaging, histopathology, antibiotics‑related, surgical‑related, and mortality. Network analysis revealed strong links among clinical, microbiology, surgical, imaging, and mortality domains, whereas histopathology and antibiotics‑related criteria were infrequent. Conclusion Substantial heterogeneity in PJI outcome definitions and limited uptake of standardized criteria remain. Reliance on clinical and microbiological measures impedes comparability, particularly given underused histopathology, antibiotic‑related endpoints, and patient‑reported measures, whose perspectives may diverge from clinical parameters. A unified, consensus‑driven approach would enhance evidence synthesis and ultimately improve patient care in prosthetic joint infections. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.