Citations

ABSTRACT Introduction In hospitalised patients with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN, premorbid body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2 ), estimated from premorbid weight (i.e., weight at the onset of weight loss preceding eating disorder development) and admission height, strongly predicts admission weight loss (i.e., premorbid weight minus admission weight). We hypothesised that maximal weight loss (i.e., maximal historical weight minus minimal weight since eating disorder onset) is also correlated with maximal BMI. Methods In 520 female adolescents with AN ( n = 503) and atypical AN ( n = 17), relationships between admission age, admission and maximal weight loss, and maximal and minimal BMI were analysed with non‐parametric Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Like premorbid BMI in previous studies, maximal BMI was strongly correlated with maximal weight loss. Discussion Maximal BMI appears to be a sound substitute for premorbid BMI in correlations with admission weight loss in hospitalised adolescents with AN and atypical AN. Consistent use of maximal (vs. premorbid) BMI and admission (vs. maximal) weight loss in research would align with the metric weight suppression (derived from both maximal and current weight), thus facilitating cross study comparisons. Additional studies should assess correlations between both premorbid and maximal BMI and admission or maximal weight loss to attempt to identify the variables with the highest predictive value.

Abstract Background Deep learning auto segmentation (DLAS) tools are widely used for radiation therapy planning, yet limited information exists on how patient positioning impacts their performance, particularly in head and neck (HN) computed tomography (CT) imaging. Purpose This study investigates the impact of abnormal neck tilt on the accuracy of DLAS‐generated contours in HN CT scans. We hypothesize that abnormal positioning degrades auto segmentation performance, particularly for organs at risk (OARs) influenced by cervical spine orientation. Methods A total of 35 HN CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. Neck tilt was quantified using principal component analysis of the spinal cord contours from C1 to C4, with patients stratified into normal and abnormal tilt groups based on percentile thresholds. Seven FDA‐cleared DLAS tools were evaluated for OAR segmentation accuracy across brainstem, parotid glands, submandibular glands, brachial plexus, and optic nerves. Gold‐standard contours were curated from manually created clinical contours and compared to DLAS output using Sorenson's volumetric dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface Dice similarity coefficient with a 2 mm threshold (sDSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA) and difference in mean dose. Statistical differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests ( p < 0.05). Results Among the evaluated OARs, the parotid glands showed consistent and statistically significant degradation in contouring accuracy for patients with abnormal neck tilt across all metrics (DSC, sDSC, MDA) and across all seven DLAS tools. Changes in contouring accuracy resulted in significant differences in both absolute and signed difference in mean dose. No consistent differences were observed for other structures across multiple DLAS tools. Conclusions Abnormal neck tilt is associated with reduced DLAS accuracy and greater dose variability for parotid gland segmentation in HN radiotherapy planning. These findings underscore the need for enhanced patient quality assurance strategies for patients with abnormal positioning when using clinical DLAS workflows. Future work should explore automated detection of anatomical outliers and site‐specific model retraining to ensure accurate contouring delineation for patients with atypical positioning or anatomy.

Objective To examine real‐world patterns in pain management among adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we focused on the sequencing of pain modalities, polypharmacy, and demographic variation. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from adults with SLE treated at a single academic medical center between 2005 and 2024. We included patients who received at least one pain‐related therapy, including glucocorticoids, opioids, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, and nonpharmacologic interventions. We used sequence analysis and Sankey diagrams to map treatment trajectories and compared patterns across two periods: 2005 to 2014 and 2015 to 2024. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving five or more pain‐related prescriptions within 12 months. We examined trends by age, sex, and race or ethnicity. Results Among 769 patients, initiation of glucocorticoids and opioids declined over time (58%–51% and 28%–22%, respectively), whereas NSAID use increased (19%–29%). The median number of pain prescriptions decreased, and polypharmacy prevalence dropped from 53% to 45%. In recent years, younger adults and men received more prescriptions, with 69% of men receiving five or more compared with 43% of women. Racial disparities narrowed overall in recent years but persisted in sensitivity analyses excluding glucocorticoids. Conclusion Pain management in SLE is shifting away from high‐risk therapies; however, prescribing intensity remains high and varies by demographic group. Visualizations serve as a complementary lens to traditional prescription counts, allowing representation of polypharmacy not only by volume but also by the diversity and sequencing of therapeutic classes over time.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective A patient‐centered approach for chronic disease management, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), aligns treatment with patients’ values and preferences, leading to improved outcomes. This paper summarizes how patient experiences, perspectives, and priorities informed the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2024 Lupus Nephritis (LN) and 2025 SLE screening, treatment guidelines. Methods We completed a cross‐sectional qualitative study using content analysis of two Patient Panel meetings for the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. Key themes were presented by Patient Panel representatives during Voting Panel Meetings along with evidence for each recommendation, to ensure comprehensive discussions and align treatment recommendations with patients’ priorities and values. Results Nineteen people (90% women) with diagnoses of SLE and/or LN participated in the Patient Panels and 17 consented to use their feedback for analysis. Thematic analysis of their discussions revealed nine patient‐reported key themes in three domains: (1) treatment and monitoring of LN and SLE: medication side effects, daily function, treatment goals, and monitoring and screening; (2) clinical communication: strategies to optimize communication and provider and structural impediments to effective communication; and (3) improving transparency and information sharing: clinical trial participation, and medical costs and insurance coverage. These themes were actively incorporated into discussions during the Voting Panels for the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. Conclusion This work supported the integration of patient experiences in the clinical practice guideline development process and aligned recommendations with real‐world patient experiences and priorities, thereby enhancing the clinical applicability of the ACR LN and SLE guidelines. image

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) is an essential cytokine that induces osteoclastic differentiation by monocyte-macrophage lineage precursors. Here, we showed that in addition to its conventional action, RANKL controls vascular permeability in the bone marrow, where it facilitates the mobilization of hematopoietic monocytic cells, including osteoclast precursors, and resultantly regulates bone metabolism. RANK, a cognate receptor for RANKL, is abundantly expressed in sinusoidal endothelial cells and controls vascular permeability by regulating the expression patterns of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. High RANKL expression was detected in perivascular C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 12-abundant reticular (CAR) stromal cells. Specific deletion of RANKL expression in CAR cells abrogated the vascular leakage, suggesting that perivascular RANKL is responsible for controlling permeability. In summary, our study revealed a role for RANK/RANKL signaling as a gatekeeper of bone marrow sinusoids in vivo.