Shaw, Jeremy D.

Abstract Background The increased frequency of spinal surgeries has led to a rise in postoperative spine infections (PSIs), now recognized as the third most common surgical complication. Currently, there is no standardized definition of PSI, complicating clinical management and research. This meta-epidemiological study aimed to develop clear diagnostic criteria to assist clinicians and researchers in identifying and reporting PSIs consistently. 2020 PRISMA flow diagram Sankey diagram showing the distribution of combination of criteria or definitions used by the authors. This refers to 21 articles that used a definition derived by the authors. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted by a medical librarian using Ovid MEDLINE (March 14, 2024). Studies were included if they reported on at least ten adult patients diagnosed with PSI and provided clear diagnostic definitions. The primary objective was to evaluate existing PSI diagnostic criteria and categorize them into thematic clusters. We constructed standardized diagnostic combinations using 13 predefined criteria derived from clinical practice guidelines and prior research (Table 1).Characteristics of the included studies*Total can be more than 100% since some variables can be present in multiple categories.This refers to 21 articles that used a definition derived by the authors. For articles #411 and #630 categorization was not possible as the definition provided only information about the depth of infection and not the criteria for diagnosis. Article #1148 was included as, defining “presumed aspetic” cases meant, by definition, also defining infectious cases.Abbreviations. The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Results From an initial 1,466 studies screened, 101 were included (Figure 1). Most studies were retrospective (91/101, 92.1%), and a majority (77/101, 76.2%) relied on established criteria such as those from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) or the CDC. Seven studies combined predefined criteria with additional detailed explanations. Among the remaining studies using independent definitions, clinical signs and symptoms were the most common criteria (13/24, 54.2%) (Table 1). Criteria were grouped into clinical, microbiological, and radiological categories, with most studies primarily using clinical criteria alone or in combination with microbiological or imaging findings (Figure 2). Conclusion There was no clear consensus in the literature on what defines a PSI. Our findings emphasize the necessity of establishing a standardized PSI definition that integrates clinical, microbiological, and radiological criteria. Implementing such a unified framework could enhance diagnostic accuracy, address existing limitations associated with hardware complications, wound drainage interpretations, and imaging ambiguities, and improve upon the current shortcomings of surveillance systems. Disclosures Jeremy D. Shaw, MD, Globus: Grant/Research Support|Purgo Scientific: Advisor/Consultant|Purgo Scientific: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Study Design. Modified Delphi consensus process Objective. To establish a standardized, consensus-driven definition for postoperative spine infection (PSI) for research, diagnosis, and management. Summary of Background Data. Postoperative infection is a devastating and common complication following spine surgery. Rates of PSI in the literature range from 0% to over 20% depending on surgical indication and invasiveness. Despite the implications of PSI, there is no universally accepted diagnostic standard or consensus definition for infection following spine surgery, hindering research and treatment of this challenging clinical condition. Methods. A multispecialty workgroup convened by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) conducted a systematic literature review. Using data from the systematic review, an expert panel completed a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus. The panel included nine fellowship-trained, board-certified physicians with expertise in infectious diseases, orthopaedic and neurologic spine surgery, and musculoskeletal radiology. Iterative rounds focused on criterion selection, importance ranking, categorical grouping, and final constellation development for PSI diagnosis. Consensus was defined as a 2/3 majority, with a target of 100%. Results. The workgroup achieved 100% consensus on a new PSI definition, which incorporates six clinical domains: wound features, microbiology, imaging, inflammatory biomarkers, intraoperative findings, and histology. A single microbiological stand-alone criterion—identification of a phenotypically indistinguishable organism from two or more deep operative site specimens—was established as pathognomonic for postoperative spine infection. Additional primary and secondary supporting criteria were defined, with specific combinations required to classify cases as definite or probable PSI. Final definitions were ratified by the boards of MSIS and the European Bone & Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) Conclusion. This consensus-based definition provides a standardized framework for diagnosing postoperative spine infection, facilitating research and clinical management. The criteria balance sensitivity and specificity across diverse clinical scenarios and represent the first multispecialty, society-endorsed definition for PSI.

Background The rising number of spinal surgeries has been paralleled by an increase in postoperative spine infections (PSIs), now identified as the third most common surgical complication. The absence of a standardized PSI definition complicates clinical management and research. This meta-epidemiological study was conducted to establish clear diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians and researchers in consistently identifying and reporting PSIs. Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE on March 14, 2024, by a medical librarian. Studies were considered eligible if they reported clear diagnostic definitions of PSI in at least ten adult patients. The primary objective was to review existing PSI diagnostic criteria and classify them into thematic clusters. We developed standardized diagnostic combinations based on 13 predefined criteria sourced from clinical practice guidelines and previous research (see Table 1). Results From an initial pool of 1,466 studies, 101 were included. The vast majority were retrospective (91/101, 92.1%), with most studies (77/101, 76.2%) utilizing established criteria, such as those from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) or the CDC. Seven studies combined these predefined criteria with additional detailed descriptions. Among studies using independent definitions, clinical signs and symptoms were the most commonly reported criteria (13/24, 54.2). The criteria were grouped into clinical, microbiological, and radiological categories, with most studies employing clinical criteria either alone or alongside microbiological or imaging findings (Figure 1). Conclusion These findings highlight the urgent need for a standardized definition of PSI that integrates clinical, microbiological, and radiological elements. Implementing such a unified diagnostic framework could enhance accuracy, address limitations related to hardware complications, wound drainage interpretation, and imaging ambiguities, and improve current surveillance practices. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.