Citations

Background: Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1. Methods: Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs. Results: Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs. Conclusion: We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Abstract Background Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring. Methods Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. Results Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months. Conclusions BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

AbstractBeta‐lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve precision dosing and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, but has not been implemented widely in the United States. Mayo Clinic recently implemented a beta‐lactam TDM program. This single‐center experience forms the basis of the manuscript which outlines practical considerations involved with beta‐lactam TDM implementation, including the pharmacist's role as a leader. Our implementation effort focused on three primary domains. First, we aimed to ensure a supportive organizational infrastructure. Early leadership engagement by the pharmacist‐led core team facilitated advocacy for the clinical need, allocation of resources, and assay development. Second, core clinical workflows were developed that addressed the preferred patient population for use, desirable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets, and the preferred sampling strategy. Clinical tools to guide pharmacists in interpreting the results (e.g., pharmacokinetics calculator) and documenting decisions were developed. Third, stakeholders were offered repeated exposure to evidence and expertise to facilitate understanding and application of the new practice. This act of ‘individual internalization’ seems to be uniquely important to beta‐lactam TDM implementation compared with the implementation of other antimicrobial TDM programs. Educational strategies and supportive materials that were developed were focused on providing substantive and varied information tailored to the stakeholders' role in the process. For pharmacists, this included both clinical and operational considerations. A continuous improvement plan to support management of the process was instituted to address necessary updates and changes that inevitably emerged. In summary, the described approach to implementation of a pharmacist‐led beta‐lactam TDM program could be used as a roadmap to aid other institutions that aim to develop such a program.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology. Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Treatment of patients with elevated Lp(a) usually includes marked reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, there are uncertainties about whether all increases in Lp(a) are equivalent in there risk relationship. Purpose The aim of this investigation was to risk stratify patients with elevated Lp(a) mass [Lp(a)-M] based on Lp(a) cholesterol (Lp(a)-C) measurements. We assessed coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary angiogram and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in a cohort of patients with elevated Lp(a) mass (≥30mg/dL) over a 15 year followup. Methods Electrophoretic and immunologic assays were used to measure Lp(a)-C and Lp(a)-M, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to test for association between Lp(a) and CAD in a cohort patients with elevated Lp(a)-M (≥30mg/dL). The relationship between Lp(a) and time to major cardiac events was evaluated using cox regression analysis. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses were used to identify optimal cutoff values for Lp(a)-M and C for predicting CAD in our model. Results We analyzed 179 patients with elevated Lp(a)-M. Cutoff values of 3.3mg/dL for Lp(a)-C and 42.1mg/dL for Lp(a)-M optimally predicted CAD in an ROC analysis. Of these patients, 84 were found to have Lp(a)-C < 3.3mg/dL (low Lp(a)-C), while 95 patients had Lp(a)-C levels ≥ 3.3mg/dL (high Lp(a)-C). High Lp(a)-C was associated with CAD identified on coronary angiography in univariate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.18 – 4.00, p = 0.013) and multivariate (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.64 – 6.89, p < 0.001) models controlling for traditional risk factors. In univariate analyses high Lp(a)-C was also associated with MACE (HR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.19 – 4.75, p = 0.01) while Lp(a)-M ≥ 42.1mg/dL (high Lp(a)-M) was not (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 0.82 – 3.44, p = 0.15) (Table 1, Figure 1). Lp(a)-C remained significantly correlated with MACE after adjusting for traditional risk factors. When included in a model together, Lp(a)-C maintained its significance while Lp(a)-M failed to predict MACE, indicating that Lp(a)-C is a stronger predictor of MACE than Lp(a)-M. Conclusion This study demonstrates that patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and high Lp(a)-C are approximately 2.5 times more likely to encounter MACE over time when compared to patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and low Lp(a)-C. Our investigation suggests that Lp(a)-C can be used to risk stratify patients with elevated Lp(a)-M and identify those at higher risk.

Objective: We report the development and validation of a combined DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform to improve the evaluation of pancreatic cysts. Background and Aims: Despite a multidisciplinary approach, pancreatic cyst classification, such as a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the detection of high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma (advanced neoplasia) can be challenging. NGS of preoperative pancreatic cyst fluid improves the clinical evaluation of pancreatic cysts, but the recent identification of novel genomic alterations necessitates the creation of a comprehensive panel and the development of a genomic classifier to integrate the complex molecular results. Methods: An updated and unique 74-gene DNA/RNA-targeted NGS panel (PancreaSeq Genomic Classifier) was created to evaluate 5 classes of genomic alterations to include gene mutations (e.g., KRAS, GNAS, etc.), gene fusions and gene expression. Further, CEA mRNA (CEACAM5) was integrated into the assay using RT-qPCR. Separate multi-institutional cohorts for training (n=108) and validation (n=77) were tested, and diagnostic performance was compared to clinical, imaging, cytopathologic, and guideline data. Results: Upon creation of a genomic classifier system, PancreaSeq GC yielded a 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity for a cystic precursor neoplasm, and the sensitivity and specificity for advanced neoplasia were 82% and 100%, respectively. Associated symptoms, cyst size, duct dilatation, a mural nodule, increasing cyst size, and malignant cytopathology had lower sensitivities (41–59%) and lower specificities (56–96%) for advanced neoplasia. This test also increased the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines (IAP/Fukuoka and AGA) by >10% and maintained their inherent specificity. Conclusions: PancreaSeq GC was not only accurate in predicting pancreatic cyst type and advanced neoplasia but also improved the sensitivity of current pancreatic cyst guidelines.

Abstract Introduction Transthyretin–mediated (ATTR) amyloidosis is a progressive, multisystem, fatal disease. Patisiran, an IV RNAi therapeutic, is approved for the treatment of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. The safety and efficacy of patisiran in patients with wild–type or hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (CM) is being investigated in the ongoing APOLLO–B study. Methods Patients were 18–85 yrs old with evidence of cardiac amyloidosis by echocardiography, and ATTR amyloid by tissue biopsy or fulfilling nonbiopsy diagnostic criteria for ATTR amyloidosis with CM. Medical history of heart failure (HF) due to ATTR amyloidosis with ≥1 prior hospitalization or current clinical evidence of HF was required. Patients were randomized 1:1 to patisiran IV 0.3 mg/kg or placebo Q3W for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6–MWT at Month 12 (M12) with patisiran vs placebo. Results APOLLO–B enrolled 360 patients (patisiran, n=181; placebo, n=179): median age (range), 76.0 (41, 85) yrs; male, 89%; wtATTR, 80%. Baseline characteristics were consistent between patients on tafamidis at baseline (91/360 [25%]) and those who were not. Patisiran achieved a rapid and sustained reduction in serum TTR, irrespective of baseline tafamidis treatment. At M12, patisiran showed a significant benefit vs placebo in 6–MWT (median [95% CI] change from baseline: patisiran, –8.15 [–16.42, 1.50]; placebo, –21.35 [–34.05, –7.52]; HL estimate of median difference: 14.69 [0.69, 28.69]; p=0.0162) and KCCQ–OS (LS mean [SEM] change from baseline: patisiran, 0.300 [1.263]; placebo, –3.408 [1.277]; LS mean [SEM] difference: 3.709 [1.796]; p=0.0397). Consistent benefits with patisiran in 6–MWT and KCCQ–OS were observed across predefined patient subgroups. Time to first event of all–cause hospitalization, urgent HF visit, or death directionally favored patisiran vs placebo (HR [95% CI], 0.839 [0.557, 1.263]), as did all–cause mortality (HR [95% CI], 0.355 [0.110, 1.138]), but all composite outcomes endpoints did not achieve statistical significance over 12 months. Patisiran was well tolerated; most AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and there were no cardiac safety concerns. Conclusions Benefits at 12 months were observed with patisiran vs placebo in functional capacity, and health status and quality of life, in patients with ATTR amyloidosis with CM. The efficacy and safety of patisiran continues to be studied in the APOLLO–B open–label extension.

Abstract Introduction Transthyretin–mediated (ATTR) amyloidosis is a progressive and fatal disease. Patients with hereditary or wild–type ATTR amyloidosis frequently develop cardiomyopathy (CM). Patisiran, an IV RNAi therapeutic that inhibits synthesis of wt and variant TTR, is approved for the treatment of hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Methods In APOLLO–B, patients were 18–85 yrs old with evidence of cardiac amyloidosis by echocardiography, ATTR amyloid deposition on tissue biopsy or fulfilling nonbiopsy diagnostic criteria for ATTR amyloidosis with CM, and had prior hospitalization for heart failure (HF) due to ATTR amyloidosis or clinical evidence of HF. Patients were randomized 1:1 to patisiran IV 0.3 mg/kg or placebo Q3W for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6–MWT at Month 12 (M12) with patisiran vs placebo. Exploratory parameters at M12 included changes in cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography and Tc scintigraphy. Results APOLLO–B enrolled 360 patients (patisiran, n=181; placebo, n=179): median age, 76.0 yrs; male, 89%; wtATTR, 80%; on tafamidis at baseline, 25%. Patisiran showed a significant benefit compared with placebo in 6–MWT (median [95% CI] change from baseline: patisiran, –8.15 [–16.42, 1.50]; placebo, –21.35 [–34.05, –7.52]; HL estimate of median difference: 14.69 [0.69, 28.69]; p=0.0162). Patisiran demonstrated favorable trends in change from baseline of NT–proBNP (mean fold change ratio [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.73, 0.89]; p=1.825×10–5) and troponin I (mean fold change ratio [95% CI]: 0.87 [0.80, 0.95]; p=0.0011) at M12 vs placebo. Patisiran also demonstrated a trend towards benefit in change from baseline of most evaluated echocardiographic parameters at M12 vs placebo. Patisiran–treated patients evaluable for scintigraphy (n=37) experienced a reduction (37.8%) or no change (62.2%) in Perugini grade at M12 compared with baseline. Among placebo patients (n=28) at M12, none experienced a reduction from baseline in Perugini grade, and 1 (3.6%) increased in grade. Patisiran demonstrated an acceptable safety profile; AEs were mostly mild or moderate in severity, and there were no cardiac safety concerns. Conclusions Exploratory analyses after 12 months provide further evidence for the potential benefit of patisiran treatment on cardiac biomarkers and manifestations of cardiac amyloid involvement in patients with ATTR amyloidosis. The long–term impact of patisiran will be assessed in the ongoing APOLLO–B open–label extension.