Kim, W. Ray

Background: Cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related deaths have risen in the United States in recent years. Ascites is a common complication, often requiring large-volume paracentesis (LVP). The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends the administration of albumin in conjunction with LVP to prevent further complications of cirrhosis. Emerging research in cirrhosis care reveals significant variations in outcomes among different demographics. Therefore, we assessed the use of guideline-adherent albumin and outcomes in U.S. patients undergoing LVPs, particularly at the intersection of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic disparities, and cirrhosis. Methods: This retrospective study utilized Cerner Real World Data to identify adults with cirrhosis and ascites undergoing LVP between January 2016 and June 2022. We assessed albumin utilization patterns across racial and ethnic groups and payor types, and their overall impact on acute kidney injury (AKI)-related hospitalization using an adjusted generalized linear model (aGLM). Results: We identified 736 patients: 301 in the LVP + albumin group and 435 in the LVP-only group. Despite clinical recommendations, only 41% undergoing LVPs received albumin. White patients and commercially insured patients received albumin at higher rates (p=0.042 and p=0.009, respectively). The overall rate of AKI-related admissions within the 30-day post-procedure period was 26%. However, patients who received albumin during LVP had a 36% lower risk of short-term AKI-related hospitalization (OR: 0.64; p=0.03). Conclusions: These findings indicate a potential for broader albumin utilization in U.S. patients with refractory ascites undergoing repeated LVPs to reduce AKI-related admissions.

Background and Aims: Screening for diseases can have psychological impacts, such as anxiety, and requires acceptability from the population to be effective. This study examined the perspectives on the benefits and harms of screening for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among the general population to optimize screening practices. Approach and Results: A survey was sent to participants enrolled between 2020 and 2024 in a prospective MASLD screening study in Olmsted County, MN. The survey assessed participants' perceived anxiety, stigma, quality of life, preferred screening methods, financial concerns, and lifestyle impacts following screening and diagnosis. Of the 461 participants, 342 (74%) completed the survey. Overall, 14% of participants reported screening-related anxiety, and 14% were concerned about disclosing a potential MASLD diagnosis to others. Among those without a MASLD diagnosis, 99% felt reassured about their liver health, 48% reported an improved quality of life, and 25% made lifestyle changes pertaining to their diet, alcohol use, and physical activity. Of the 77 participants diagnosed with MASLD, 52% experienced some anxiety about their new diagnosis; however, 95% and 97% considered it important to receive an early MASLD diagnosis to mitigate the risk for cirrhosis and cardiovascular disease, respectively. Notably, 79% of diagnosed participants found the diagnosis beneficial in adopting healthier habits, with 30% achieving a >10% weight loss after screening. Conclusion: This population-based survey demonstrates that the perceived benefits of proactive MASLD screening, such as increased awareness, lifestyle changes, and early diagnosis, outweigh the harms. These findings highlight the importance of early screening through patient-centered protocols to improve health outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an important public health threat, potentially leading to chronic liver disease and liver cancer. Current guidelines recommend using the Fibrosis-4 score for initial identification of subjects at risk of future complications. We formulate a novel population screening strategy based on the Steatosis-Associated Fibrosis Estimator (SAFE) score, recently developed for MASLD risk stratification in primary care. METHODS: We interrogated the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, 2017–20, in which a sample of subjects representative of US civilian population underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). The current guideline and a new, SAFE-based proposal were applied to these data to project the number of subjects to be diagnosed with liver fibrosis gauged by liver stiffness measurement (LSM), including significant (LSM ≥8 kPa) and advanced (LSM ≥12 kPa) fibrosis, as well as the number of VCTEs to be performed. RESULTS: In the survey data, 2,691 subjects, projecting to 75.8 million US adults, were found to have MASLD, of whom 11% had LSM 8–12 kPa and 6% LSM ≥12 kPa. When the current guideline was applied, 18.1 million VCTEs would be needed to diagnose 3.5 million subjects with LSM ≥8 kPa and 1.7 million subjects with LSM ≥12 kPa. In comparison, a new approach based on the SAFE score would detect 4.9 million with LSM ≥8 kPa and 2.5 million subjects with LSM ≥12 kPa (37% and 45% improvement over the current guideline, respectively), while requiring 5.0 million fewer VCTEs (28% reduction). DISCUSSION: The proposed population risk stratification approach using the SAFE score is simpler and substantially more effective, yielding more subjects with liver fibrosis while requiring less resources compared with the currently recommended algorithm.

Bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis lead to a 4-fold increase in mortality. Immune dysfunction in cirrhosis further increases the risk of bacterial infections, in addition to alterations in the gut microbiome, which increase the risk of pathogenic bacteria. High rates of empiric antibiotic use contribute to increased incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and further increases in mortality. Despite continous advances in the field, major unknowns regarding interactions between the immune system and the gut microbiome and strategies to reduce infection risk and improve mortality deserve further investigation. Here, we highlight the unknowns in these major research areas and make a proposal for a research agenda to move toward improving disease progression and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and infections.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Antiviral treatment reduces the risk of HCC and mortality; nonetheless, globally in 2019, only 2.2% of CHB patients received treatment. Current international CHB guidelines recommend antiviral treatment only in subsets of patients with clear evidence of liver damage. This contrasts with hepatitis C or HIV where early treatment is recommended in all infected patients, regardless of end-organ damage. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of data on the early initiation of antiviral treatment and its related potential economic impact. Literature searches were performed using PubMed and abstracts from international liver congresses (2019–2021). Data on risk of disease progression and HCC and the impact of antiviral treatment in currently ineligible patients were summarized. Cost-effectiveness data on early antiviral treatment initiation were also collated. Accumulating molecular, clinical, and economic data suggest that early initiation of antiviral treatment could save many lives through HCC prevention in a highly cost-effective manner. In light of these data, we consider several alternative expanded treatment strategies that might further a simplified ‘treatment as prevention’ approach.