Allen, Alina M

Background: Accurate identification of patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) at risk of disease progression (at-risk MASH) is critical for guiding resmetirom and semaglutide therapy. Inconsistent definitions of at-risk MASH complicate clinical risk classification and comparisons across studies. This study aimed to standardize the definition of at-risk MASH and propose optimized MRE-based liver stiffness (LS-MRE) cutoffs to improve noninvasive risk stratification and better guide pharmacotherapy. Methods: In this prospective study, 413 patients with suspected or diagnosed MASLD from two medical centers underwent liver biopsy and MRE. Results: A simplified definition of at-risk MASH (MASH with fibrosis stage≥2) identified a broader group of patients requiring clinical attention than a stricter definition requiring NAFLD Activity Score≥4 with ≥1 point in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning (n=122 vs. 77). LS-MRE alone showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for identifying at-risk MASH using the simplified definition (AUC 0.91 [0.87, 0.95]) and cirrhosis (AUC 0.93 [0.88, 0.99]), compared with FIB-4 and individual laboratory parameters (AST, ALT, and platelet count) ( p <0.01 for all, paired DeLong tests). Optimized LS-MRE cutoffs (2.8–6.4 kPa) captured 25 additional biopsy-proven pharmacotherapy candidates (28% of all eligible patients) compared to AASLD guidelines–recommended cutoffs (3.1–4.4 kPa), improving sensitivity (80% vs. 50%) with acceptable specificity (73% vs. 88%). Conclusions: A simplified definition of at-risk MASH enables broader identification of treatment candidates. LS-MRE demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and improves noninvasive risk stratification when paired with optimized cutoffs. These findings support the use of MRE to guide resmetirom and semaglutide eligibility and improve access to emerging therapies.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to identify nationwide access to transient elastography (TE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and gastroenterologists. METHODS: We used public data from each test's manufacturer's website to identify the number of TE and MRE units in the United States. We used public data from the Health Resources and Services Administration to identify the number of gastroenterologists in the United States. RESULTS: Overall, 82.4% of US counties do not contain TE or MRE, and 69.2% do not contain a gastroenterologist. Two-thirds (67.4%) of US counties do not contain either elastography or a gastroenterologist. DISCUSSION: There is limited access to TE, MRE, and gastroenterologists in the United States.

This practice recommendation serves as an update to the 2023 AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now known as metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and provides implementable guidance on patient selection for treatment, consideration of comorbidities, and monitoring of treatment safety and efficacy of semaglutide. FDA-indication and Practice Recommendation: The Wegovy formulation, whose main ingredient is semaglutide, received accelerated FDA approval in August 2025 for treating MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (consistent with stages F2–F3 fibrosis), based on interim results of the phase 3 ESSENCE trial where 72 weeks of 2.4 mg/week subcutaneous injection resulted in achievement of both primary histologic endpoints: (1) resolution of MASH without worsening of fibrosis (62.9% vs. 34.3% placebo, p <0.001) and (2) ≥1 stage reduction in liver fibrosis without worsening of MASH (36.8% vs. 22.4% placebo, p <0.001); final approval awaits long-term outcomes. Patient Selection: Candidates should have MASH with stage 2–3 fibrosis, identified using non-invasive tests (NITs) such as VCTE (8–15 kPa), MRE (3.1–4.4 kPa), or ELF (9.2–10.5), rather than liver biopsy, which is impractical and unnecessary for most patients. In those with VCTE (15–20 kPa), MRE (4.4–5 kPa), or ELF (10.5–11.3), an individualized decision to treat should be based on exclusion of cirrhosis with another confirmatory NIT, or cross-sectional imaging excluding nodular-appearing liver contour and signs of portal hypertension, or a platelet count of <150,000/mm 3 . While semaglutide is not approved to treat patients with MASH cirrhosis (VCTE >20 kPa, MRE>5.0 kPa, ELF>11.3, and/or evidence of portal hypertension), those with compensated cirrhosis who are receiving semaglutide for another FDA-approved indication should be monitored carefully. Monitoring and Safety: Semaglutide showed a favorable hepatic safety profile in the ESSENCE trial, with no discontinuations due to liver enzyme elevations. Routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea, constipation, vomiting), generally mild and transient; patient education and dose titration help improve tolerance. Clinicians should monitor for rare but serious risks, including acute kidney injury (from dehydration), symptomatic gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, and lean mass loss. Treatment Response and Concomitant Therapy: Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone of MASLD/MASH management alongside semaglutide. Combination use of resmetirom with semaglutide 2.4mg/week has not been studied. While no NITs reliably predict histologic response at the individual patient level, reductions from baseline to 72 weeks of treatment suggest significant improvement in MASH resolution (ALT ≥17 U/L or ≥20%) and fibrosis improvement (VCTE LSM ≥30%; MRE LSM ≥20%; ELF ≥0.5). Non-response may be suspected if ALT or NITs worsen. The benefit is uncertain if a suboptimal response occurs, and may require an individualized approach and further follow-up.

ABSTRACT Background & Aims Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is characterised by liver fat accumulation exceeding 5%. Lean body weight (BMI ≤ 25 kg/m 2 ) with non‐alcoholic SLD is a rare phenotype, and the balance of risks related to metabolic conditions or genetic predisposition, or the risk of progressive liver disease, is not known. This study evaluates clinical and genetic predictors of non‐alcoholic SLD and advanced liver disease in lean individuals. Methods We used International Classification of Disease codes, radiology and pathology review to identify 177 lean non‐alcoholic SLD cases (47 cryptogenic, 130 MASLD), 677 matched lean controls, and 3090 overweight/obese SLD cases in the Mayo Clinic Biobank and Tapestry databases. We performed case–control and cross‐sectional comparisons of clinical and genetic factors between these groups, using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Lean individuals with non‐alcoholic SLD exhibited metabolic and genetic profiles that were intermediate between those of lean controls without SLD and overweight/obese SLD individuals, including intermediate rates of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and of homozygosity for the risk allele of PNPLA3 . Multivariable analysis indicated that diabetes was an independent predictor of SLD among lean individuals. Among lean individuals with non‐alcoholic SLD, those with metabolic‐associated SLD (MASLD), as compared to those with cryptogenic SLD (without metabolic risk factor), were more likely to be homozygous for risk alleles in GCKR . The Fib‐4 score, a tool for screening advanced liver disease in SLD, accurately predicted advanced fibrosis among lean individuals with non‐alcoholic SLD. Conclusion Diabetes serves as a primary predictor of non‐alcoholic SLD in lean individuals. These results support the recommendation to screen for SLD in patients with diabetes, regardless of BMI. The GCKR risk allele is associated with MASLD in lean individuals, and the risk factors for cryptogenic SLD remain unclear.

INTRODUCTION: Building on prior results, we hypothesized that an electrocardiogram (ECG)-enabled machine learning (ML) model could be used to detect advanced chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: A cohort with CLD and 12-lead ECGs was matched with controls from electronic health records. A ML model was trained as a binary classifier. RESULTS: There are 12,930 patients with CLD and 64,577 controls in the cohort. The model's discriminative ability to classify CLD showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.858 (95% confidence interval: 0.850–0.866), and at the chosen threshold, CLD ECGs had 12 times higher odds of being classified as CLD (diagnostic odds ratio 12.33, 95% confidence interval: 11.16–13.63). DISCUSSION: An ECG-enabled ML model affords great promise in identifying advanced CLD in low resource areas.

Background and Aims: Screening for diseases can have psychological impacts, such as anxiety, and requires acceptability from the population to be effective. This study examined the perspectives on the benefits and harms of screening for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among the general population to optimize screening practices. Approach and Results: A survey was sent to participants enrolled between 2020 and 2024 in a prospective MASLD screening study in Olmsted County, MN. The survey assessed participants' perceived anxiety, stigma, quality of life, preferred screening methods, financial concerns, and lifestyle impacts following screening and diagnosis. Of the 461 participants, 342 (74%) completed the survey. Overall, 14% of participants reported screening-related anxiety, and 14% were concerned about disclosing a potential MASLD diagnosis to others. Among those without a MASLD diagnosis, 99% felt reassured about their liver health, 48% reported an improved quality of life, and 25% made lifestyle changes pertaining to their diet, alcohol use, and physical activity. Of the 77 participants diagnosed with MASLD, 52% experienced some anxiety about their new diagnosis; however, 95% and 97% considered it important to receive an early MASLD diagnosis to mitigate the risk for cirrhosis and cardiovascular disease, respectively. Notably, 79% of diagnosed participants found the diagnosis beneficial in adopting healthier habits, with 30% achieving a >10% weight loss after screening. Conclusion: This population-based survey demonstrates that the perceived benefits of proactive MASLD screening, such as increased awareness, lifestyle changes, and early diagnosis, outweigh the harms. These findings highlight the importance of early screening through patient-centered protocols to improve health outcomes.

Background and Aims: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease management guidelines have been published worldwide; we aimed to summarize, categorize, and compare their lifestyle intervention recommendations. Approach and Results: We searched metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease/NAFLD management guidelines published between January 1, 2013, and June 31, 2024, through databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, and CINAHL. In total, 35 qualifying guidelines were included in the final analysis. Guideline recommendations were categorized into 5 domains (ie, weight reduction goals, physical activity, nutrition, alcohol, and tobacco smoking) and were ranked based on how frequently they appeared. A recommendation was defined as widely adopted if recommended in ≥24 (≥66.6%) of the guidelines. These included increasing physical activity; reducing body weight by 7%–10% to improve steatohepatitis and/or fibrosis; restricting caloric intake; undertaking 150–300 or 75–150 minutes/week of moderate or vigorous-intensity physical activity, respectively; and decreasing consumption of commercially produced fructose. The least mentioned topics, in ≤9 of the guidelines, evaluated environmental determinants of health, mental health, referring patients for psychological or cognitive behavioral therapy, using digital health interventions, and assessing patients’ social determinants of health. Conclusions: Most guidelines recommend weight reduction through physical activity and improving nutrition, as these have proven positive effects on health outcomes when sustained. However, gaps regarding mental health and the social and environmental determinants of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease were found. To optimize behavioral modifications and treatment, we recommend carrying out studies that will provide further evidence on social support, environmental factors, and mental health, as well as further exploring digital health interventions.