Carrieri, Patrizia

Background and Aims: Screening for diseases can have psychological impacts, such as anxiety, and requires acceptability from the population to be effective. This study examined the perspectives on the benefits and harms of screening for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among the general population to optimize screening practices. Approach and Results: A survey was sent to participants enrolled between 2020 and 2024 in a prospective MASLD screening study in Olmsted County, MN. The survey assessed participants' perceived anxiety, stigma, quality of life, preferred screening methods, financial concerns, and lifestyle impacts following screening and diagnosis. Of the 461 participants, 342 (74%) completed the survey. Overall, 14% of participants reported screening-related anxiety, and 14% were concerned about disclosing a potential MASLD diagnosis to others. Among those without a MASLD diagnosis, 99% felt reassured about their liver health, 48% reported an improved quality of life, and 25% made lifestyle changes pertaining to their diet, alcohol use, and physical activity. Of the 77 participants diagnosed with MASLD, 52% experienced some anxiety about their new diagnosis; however, 95% and 97% considered it important to receive an early MASLD diagnosis to mitigate the risk for cirrhosis and cardiovascular disease, respectively. Notably, 79% of diagnosed participants found the diagnosis beneficial in adopting healthier habits, with 30% achieving a >10% weight loss after screening. Conclusion: This population-based survey demonstrates that the perceived benefits of proactive MASLD screening, such as increased awareness, lifestyle changes, and early diagnosis, outweigh the harms. These findings highlight the importance of early screening through patient-centered protocols to improve health outcomes.

Background and Aims: Fatty liver disease is a major public health threat due to its very high prevalence and related morbidity and mortality. Focused and dedicated interventions are urgently needed to target disease prevention, treatment, and care. Approach and Results: We developed an aligned, prioritized action agenda for the global fatty liver disease community of practice. Following a Delphi methodology over 2 rounds, a large panel (R1 n = 344, R2 n = 288) reviewed the action priorities using Qualtrics XM, indicating agreement using a 4-point Likert-scale and providing written feedback. Priorities were revised between rounds, and in R2, panelists also ranked the priorities within 6 domains: epidemiology, treatment and care, models of care, education and awareness, patient and community perspectives, and leadership and public health policy. The consensus fatty liver disease action agenda encompasses 29 priorities. In R2, the mean percentage of “agree” responses was 82.4%, with all individual priorities having at least a super-majority of agreement (> 66.7% “agree”). The highest-ranked action priorities included collaboration between liver specialists and primary care doctors on early diagnosis, action to address the needs of people living with multiple morbidities, and the incorporation of fatty liver disease into relevant non-communicable disease strategies and guidance. Conclusions: This consensus-driven multidisciplinary fatty liver disease action agenda developed by care providers, clinical researchers, and public health and policy experts provides a path to reduce the prevalence of fatty liver disease and improve health outcomes. To implement this agenda, concerted efforts will be needed at the global, regional, and national levels.