Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

972 citation(s) found for "Urík, Milan".

The efficacy and safety of continued hydroxycarbamide therapy versus switching to ruxolitinib in patients with polycythaemia vera: a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, symptom study (RELIEF)
Yacoub, Abdulraheem , Zachée, Pierre , Lyons, Roger M. , Koschmieder, Steffen , Rinaldi, Ciro R., Byrne, Jenny , Verstovšek, Srđan , Hunter, Deborah, Habr, Dany , Martino, Bruno, Mesa, Ruben, Mesa, Ruben A. , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Garg, Mamta , Hasan, Yasmin , Passamonti, Francesco , Jones, Mark M. , Zhen, Hui‐Ling , Verstovsek, Srdan , Byrne, Jennifer , Koschmieder, Steffen

British Journal of Haematology | November 8, 2016 | Volume: 176 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 76-85

10.1111/bjh.14382 | PMID 27858987 Get It

SummaryThe randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, phase 3b RELIEF trial evaluated polycythaemia vera (PV)‐related symptoms in patients who were well controlled with a stable dose of hydroxycarbamide (also termed hydroxyurea) but reported PV‐related symptoms. Patients were randomized 1:1 to ruxolitinib 10 mg BID (n = 54) or hydroxycarbamide (prerandomization dose/schedule; n = 56); crossover to ruxolitinib was permitted after Week 16. The primary endpoint, ≥50% improvement from baseline in myeloproliferative neoplasm ‐symptom assessment form total symptom score cytokine symptom cluster (TSS‐C; sum of tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake) at Week 16, was achieved by 43·4% vs. 29·6% of ruxolitinib‐ and hydroxycarbamide‐treated patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1·82; 95% confidence interval, 0·82–4·04; P = 0·139). The primary endpoint was achieved by 34% of a subgroup who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose from baseline to Weeks 13–16. In a post hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was achieved by more patients with stable screening‐to‐baseline TSS‐C scores (ratio ≤ 2) receiving ruxolitinib than hydroxycarbamide (47·4% vs. 25·0%; P = 0·0346). Ruxolitinib treatment after unblinding was associated with continued symptom score improvements. Adverse events were primarily grades 1/2 with no unexpected safety signals. Ruxolitinib was associated with a nonsignificant trend towards improved PV‐related symptoms versus hydroxycarbamide, although an unexpectedly large proportion of patients who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose reported symptom improvement.
Development of an index to define overall disease severity in IBD
Whitman, Cynthia B. , Spiegel, Brennan , Feagan, Brian G. , Loftus, Edward V. , D’Haens, Geert , Bernstein, Çharles N. , Gearry, Richard B. , Mantzaris, Gerassimos J. , Sartor, Balfour R., Silverberg, Mark S. , Riddell, Robert H. , O’Morain, Colm, Lakatos, Péter L. , Halfvarson, Jonas , Reinisch, Walter, Rogler, Gerhard , Kruis, Wolfgang , Tysk, Curt , Danese, Silvio , Sandborn, William J. , Gasché, Christoph , Pallone, Francesco, Travis, Simon , Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent , Siegel, Corey A , Sands, Bruce E , Panaccione, Remo , Bernstein, Charles Noah , Ng, Siew C. , Κoutroubakis, Ioannis E. , McGovern, Dermot , Halfvarson, Jonas , Schreiber, Stefan , Griffiths, Anne Marie , Moum, Bjørn Allan , Panés, Julián , Colombel, Jean‐Frédéric , Hanauer, Stephen B. , Loftus, Edward V , Danese, Silvio , Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent , Spiegel, Brennan , Lakatos, Peter L

Gut | October 25, 2016 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 244-254

10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312648 | PMID 27780886 Get It

Background and aim Disease activity for Crohn's disease (CD) and UC is typically defined based on symptoms at a moment in time, and ignores the long-term burden of disease. The aims of this study were to select the attributes determining overall disease severity, to rank the importance of and to score these individual attributes for both CD and UC. Methods Using a modified Delphi panel, 14 members of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) selected the most important attributes related to IBD. Eighteen IOIBD members then completed a statistical exercise (conjoint analysis) to create a relative ranking of these attributes. Adjusted utilities were developed by creating proportions for each level within an attribute. Results For CD, 15.8% of overall disease severity was attributed to the presence of mucosal lesions, 10.9% to history of a fistula, 9.7% to history of abscess and 7.4% to history of intestinal resection. For UC, 18.1% of overall disease severity was attributed to mucosal lesions, followed by 14.0% for impact on daily activities, 11.2% C reactive protein and 10.1% for prior experience with biologics. Overall disease severity indices were created on a 100-point scale by applying each attribute's average importance to the adjusted utilities. Conclusions Based on specialist opinion, overall CD severity was associated more with intestinal damage, in contrast to overall UC disease severity, which was more dependent on symptoms and impact on daily life. Once validated, disease severity indices may provide a useful tool for consistent assessment of overall disease severity in patients with IBD.
Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome treated with anakinra
Kenney‐Jung, Daniel , Vezzani, Annamaria , Kahoud, Robert J., LaFrance‐Corey, Reghann G., Ho, Mai‐Lan , Muskardin, Theresa Wampler , Howe, Charles L. , Payne, Eric T. , Kenney-Jung, Daniel L, Wirrell, Elaine C., Wirrell, Elaine , Ho, Mai-Lan , Howe, Charles L , Vezzani, Annamaria

Annals of Neurology | October 22, 2016 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 939-945

10.1002/ana.24806 | PMID 27770579 Get It

Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a devastating epileptic encephalopathy with limited treatment options and an unclear etiology. Anakinra is a recombinant version of the human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist used to treat autoinflammatory disorders. This is the first report of anakinra for treatment of a child with super‐refractory status epilepticus secondary to FIRES. Anakinra was well tolerated and effective. Cerebral spinal fluid analysis revealed elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines before treatment that normalized on anakinra, suggesting a potential pathogenic role for neuroinflammation in FIRES. Further studies are required to assess anakinra efficacy and dosing, and to further delineate disease etiology. Ann Neurol 2016;80:939–945
Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE Study
Laffey, John G. , Pham, Tài , Madotto, Fabiana , Brochard, Laurent , Esteban, Andres, Gattinoni, Luciano , Bumbaširević, Vesna, Piquilloud, Lise , Haren, Frank van , Larsson, Anders, McAuley, Daniel F. , Arabi, Yaseen M. , Ranieri, Marco, Antonelli, Massimo , Rubenfeld, Gordon D., Wrigge, Hermann , Slutsky, Arthur S. , Schultz, Marcus J. , Bajwa, Ednan K. , Ferguson, Niall D. , Frendl, György , Brown, Samuel M. , Terzi, Nicolas , Brazzi, Luca , Montini, Luca , Tomescu, Dana , Lanspa, Michael J. , Almekhlafi, Ghaleb A. , Cortegiani, Andrea , Fusari, Maurizio , González-Castro, A. , Parotto, Matteo , Sánchez‐Hurtado, Luis Alejandro , Spadaro, Savino , Szakmány, Tamás , Zani, Gianluca , Bihari, Shailesh , Laffey, John G , Bellani, Giacomo , Fan, Eddy , Esteban, Andres, Bauer, Philippe R. , Thompson, Bruce , Pesenti, Antonio Maria , Schultz, Marcus J , Arabi, Yaseen M

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | October 18, 2016 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 67-77

10.1164/rccm.201606-1306oc | PMID 27753501 Get It

Abstract Rationale Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is increasingly used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The evidence supporting NIV use in patients with ARDS remains relatively sparse. Objectives To determine whether, during NIV, the categorization of ARDS severity based on the PaO2/FiO2 Berlin criteria is useful. Methods The LUNG SAFE (Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure) study described the management of patients with ARDS. This substudy examines the current practice of NIV use in ARDS, the utility of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in classifying patients receiving NIV, and the impact of NIV on outcome. Measurements and Main Results Of 2,813 patients with ARDS, 436 (15.5%) were managed with NIV on Days 1 and 2 following fulfillment of diagnostic criteria. Classification of ARDS severity based on PaO2/FiO2 ratio was associated with an increase in intensity of ventilatory support, NIV failure, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. NIV failure occurred in 22.2% of mild, 42.3% of moderate, and 47.1% of patients with severe ARDS. Hospital mortality in patients with NIV success and failure was 16.1% and 45.4%, respectively. NIV use was independently associated with increased ICU (hazard ratio, 1.446 [95% confidence interval, 1.159–1.805]), but not hospital, mortality. In a propensity matched analysis, ICU mortality was higher in NIV than invasively ventilated patients with a PaO2/FiO2 lower than 150 mm Hg. Conclusions NIV was used in 15% of patients with ARDS, irrespective of severity category. NIV seems to be associated with higher ICU mortality in patients with a PaO2/FiO2 lower than 150 mm Hg. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02010073).
The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two‐Center Validation Study
Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Stabile, Armando , Moschini, Marco , Cucchiara, Vito , Zaffuto, Emanuele , Karakiewicz, Pierre I. , Suardi, Nazareno , Montorsi, Francesco , Briganti, Alberto , Larcher, Alessandro , Karnes, Robert Jeffrey, Dell’Oglio, Paolo , Fossati, Nicola , Zaffuto, Emanuele , Stabile, Armando , Moschini, Marco

The Prostate | October 18, 2016 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 263-273

10.1002/pros.23265 | PMID 27753114 Get It

BACKGROUNDA new prostate cancer (PCa) grading system (namely, Gleason score‐GS‐ ≤6 vs. 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3 vs. 8 vs. ≥9) was recently proposed and assessed on biochemical recurrence (BCR) showing improved predictive abilities compared to the commonly used three‐tier system (GS ≤6 vs. 7 vs. ≥8). We assessed the predictive ability of the five‐tier grade group (GG) system on harder clinical endpoint, namely clinical recurrence (CR).METHODSBetween 2005 and 2014, 9,728 clinically localized PCa patients were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at two tertiary referral centers. Kaplan–Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and concordance index (C‐index) were used to assess CR after treatment according to four Gleason grade classifications at biopsy and RP: Group 1: ≤6 versus 7 versus ≥8; Group 2: ≤6 versus 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3 versus ≥8; Group 3: ≤6 versus 7 versus 8 versus ≥9; Group 4: ≤6 versus 3 + 4 versus 4 + 3 versus 8 versus ≥9. Same analyses were repeated in patients who had BCR (n = 1,624). Decision curve analyses were performed to evaluate and compare the net benefit associated with the use of the four Gleason grade classifications.RESULTSOverall, 443 (4.6%) patients had CR. The hazard ratio of the GS 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8, and ≥9 relative to GS ≤6 were 3.63, 5.93, 11.44, 18.08 and 4.93, 9.99, 15.31 and 25.12 in the pre‐ and post‐treatment models, respectively. The C‐index of the five‐tier GG system was slightly higher relative to the other 3 Gleason grade classifications both in the pre‐ (range: 0.001–0.006) and post‐treatment models (range: 0–0.008). Similar findings were observed when we focused our analyses in patients with BCR after RP. The use of the five‐tier GG system did not result into higher net‐benefit relative to the other three Gleason grade classifications.CONCLUSIONSThe difference in accuracy between the five‐tier GG system and the other Gleason grade classifications, using CR as an endpoint, is clinically negligible. Current evidence suggests that the five‐tier GG system represents a simplified user‐friendly scheme available for patient counseling rather than a new histopathological diagnostic system that improves the prediction of CR. Prostate 77:263–273, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Long‐term utility of adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy
Moschini, Marco , Sharma, Vidit , Gandaglia, Giorgio , Zaffuto, Emanuele , Montorsi, Francesco , Briganti, Alberto , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Larcher, Alessandro , Zaffuto, Emanuele , Karnes, Robert Jeffrey, Dell’Oglio, Paolo , Fossati, Nicola , Moschini, Marco

BJU International | October 18, 2016 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 69-75

10.1111/bju.13683 | PMID 27753192 Get It

Objective To investigate the long‐term utility of adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion ( SVI ; pT 3b), as the published data are conflicting. Patients and Methods Patients with SVI during RP and pelvic lymph node dissection at two major referral centres from 1986 to 2014 were included. Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine if adjuvant radiotherapy ( aRT ) and adjuvant hormonal therapy ( aHT ) were predictors of biochemical recurrence ( BCR ), cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ) and overall mortality ( OM ). Subset analyses were performed for pN 0 patients and pN + patients. Results Overall, 3 279 patients with prostate cancer and SVI were included with a median follow‐up of 148 months. Considering the whole SVI population, 1 387 (42%) received no adjuvant therapy, 1 179 (36%) received aHT , 461 (14.1%) received aRT , while 252 (7.7%) received both aHT and aRT . The 10‐year BCR , CSM , and OM rates were 64%, 14%, and 27%, respectively. In the overall population, aRT and aHT were predictors of BCR , CSM and OM (all P < 0.04). When only pT 3bN0 patients were considered, aHT was a significant multivariate predictor of BCR [hazard ratio ( HR ) 0.50, P < 0.001), CSM ( HR 0.62, P = 0.01) and OM ( HR 0.75, P = 0.004). Conversely, aRT was not associated with survival outcomes (all P > 0.05). When only the subgroup pT 3bN+ was considered, the use of aRT was related to an improvement in CSM ( HR 0.65, P = 0.03) and OM (HR 0.78, P = 0.03). Conclusions aHT + aRT seems to be effective in pT 3b patients. However, when stratified according to the presence of nodal metastases, aHT remains effective only in the node‐negative subgroup, while aRT remains effective only in the node‐positive subgroup. Further data including prospective trials are warranted to study the utility of adjuvant therapies in this setting.
Investigating the possible causal role of coffee consumption with prostate cancer risk and progression using Mendelian randomization analysis
Taylor, Amy E. , Martin, Richard M. , Geybels, Milan S., Stanford, Janet L. , Shui, Irene M. , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Doug , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Muir, Kenneth , Grönberg, Henrik , Haiman, Christopher A. , Schleutker, Johanna , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Travis, Ruth C. , Neal, David E. , Pashayan, Nora , Blot, William J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Maier, Christiane, Kibel, Adam S. , Brenner, Hermann , Park, Jong, Kaneva, Radka , Batra, Jyotsna , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Pandha, Hardev, Donovan, Jenny , Munafò, Marcus R. , Thibodeau, Stephen, Easton, Douglas F. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Giles, Graham G. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Cybulski, Cezary , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Teixeira, Manuel R , Eeles, Rosalind A , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Travis, Ruth C , Pashayan, Nora , Brenner, Hermann , Martin, Richard M , Batra, Jyotsna

International Journal of Cancer | October 14, 2016 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 322-328

10.1002/ijc.30462 | PMID 27741566 Get It

Coffee consumption has been shown in some studies to be associated with lower risk of prostate cancer. However, it is unclear if this association is causal or due to confounding or reverse causality. We conducted a Mendelian randomisation analysis to investigate the causal effects of coffee consumption on prostate cancer risk and progression. We used two genetic variants robustly associated with caffeine intake (rs4410790 and rs2472297) as proxies for coffee consumption in a sample of 46,687 men of European ancestry from 25 studies in the PRACTICAL consortium. Associations between genetic variants and prostate cancer case status, stage and grade were assessed by logistic regression and with all‐cause and prostate cancer‐specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression. There was no clear evidence that a genetic risk score combining rs4410790 and rs2472297 was associated with prostate cancer risk (OR per additional coffee increasing allele: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98,1.03) or having high‐grade compared to low‐grade disease (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.97,1.04). There was some evidence that the genetic risk score was associated with higher odds of having nonlocalised compared to localised stage disease (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06). Amongst men with prostate cancer, there was no clear association between the genetic risk score and all‐cause mortality (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97,1.04) or prostate cancer‐specific mortality (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98,1.08). These results, which should have less bias from confounding than observational estimates, are not consistent with a substantial effect of coffee consumption on reducing prostate cancer incidence or progression.
The effect of arterial hypertension on thrombosis in low‐risk polycythemia vera
Barbui, Tiziano , Carobbio, Alessandra , Rumi, Elisa , Gisslinger, Heinz , Ruggeri, Marco , Randi, Maria Luigia , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Gisslinger, Bettina, Pieri, Lisa , Thiele, Jüergen, Pardanani, Animesh , Tefferi, Ayalew , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Finazzi, Guido , Cazzola, Mario , Rambaldi, Alessandro

American Journal of Hematology | October 14, 2016 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.24583 | PMID 27737508 Get It

PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS
Southey, Melissa C. , Goldgar, David E, Winqvist, Robert , Pylkäs, Katri , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Heikkinen, Tuomas , Hopper, John L. , Dörk, Thilo , Claes, Kathleen , Teo, Zhi L. , Radice, Paolo , Catucci, Irene, Peterlongo, Paolo , Odefrey, Fabrice, Dowty, James G., Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Verhoef, Senno, Carpenter, Jane, Clarke, Christine L. , Scott, Rodney J. , Fasching, Peter A. , Haeberle, Lothar, Ekici, Arif B. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Peto, Julian , Fletcher, Olivia , Johnson, Nichola , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Tomlinson, Ian , Kerin, Michael J. , Miller, Nicola, Marmé, F., Burwinkel, Barbara , Guénel, Pascal , Truong, Thérèse , Sanchez, Marie, Bojesen, Stig E. , Nielsen, Sune F. , Flyger, Henrik, Benı́tez, Javier , Zamora, M. Pilar , Menéndez, Primitiva, Brenner, Hermann , Stegmaier, Christa, Brauch, Hiltrud , Brüning, Thomas , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Muranen, Taru , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Blomqvist, Carl , Bogdanova, Natalia , Antonenkova, Natalia, Lindblom, Annika , Margolin, Sara , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Investigators, kConFab, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Wauters, Els , Smeets, Dominiek, Beuselinck, Benoit , Floris, Giuseppe , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Vachon, Celine M. , McLean, Catriona , Haiman, Christopher A., Henderson, Brian E., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Kristensen, Vessela, Alnæs, Grethe Grenaker, Zheng, Wei , Hunter, David J. , Lindström, Sara, Hankinson, Susan E. , Kraft, Peter , Andrulis, Irene L. , Knight, Julia A. , Glendon, Gord, Mulligan, Anna Marie , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, Arja , Grip, Mervi, Kauppila, Saila , Devilee, Peter , Tollenaar, Robert A.E.M., Seynaeve, Caroline, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Darabi, Hatef, Eriksson, Mikael , Eccles, Diana M, Tapper, William , Gerty, Sue, Hooning, Maartje J. , Collée, J. Margriet, Tilanus‐Linthorst, Madeleine M.A., Li, Jingmei , Brand, Judith S. , Humphreys, Keith , Reed, Malcolm , Luccarini, Craig , Baynes, Caroline, Dunning, Alison M. , Hamann, Ute, Torres, Diana , Ulmer, Hans Ulrich, Rüdiger, Thomas , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Jaworska, Katarzyna, Durda, Katarzyna, Slager, Susan, Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Ashworth, Alan , Orr, Nick , Jones, Michael E. , González‐Neira, Anna , Pita, Guillermo , Alonso, M. Rosario, Álvarez, Núria, Herrero, Daniel, Tessier, Daniel C., Vincent, Daniel , Bacot, François, Simard, Jacques , Dumont, Martine , Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind A. , Muir, Kenneth , Grönberg, Henrik , Schleutker, Johanna , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Weischer, Maren , Travis, Ruth C. , Neal, David E. , Donovan, Jenny , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Stanford, Janet L. , Blot, William J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Kelley, Joseph L., Maier, Christiane, Kibel, Adam S. , Butterbach, Katja, Kaneva, Radka , Batra, Jyotsna , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Hartmann, Arndt , Hein, Alexander , Ruebner, Matthias , Lambrechts, Diether , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Lambretchs, Sandrina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Nickels, Stefan , Eilber, Ursula, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Odunsi, Kunle , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Friel, Grace , Lurie, Galina, Killeen, Jeffrey , Goodman, Marc T. , Runnebaum, Ingo B., Hillemanns, Peter , Pelttari, Liisa M. , Edwards, Robert P., Ness, Roberta B., Moysich, Kirsten B., Heitz, Florian , Harter, Philipp , Kommoss, Stefan , Walsh, Christine , Lester, Jenny, Jensen, Allan , Høgdall, Estrid , Peissel, Bernard , Bernard, Loris, Goode, Ellen L. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Cunningham, Julie M. , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Kalli, Kimberly R., Liang, Dong , Lu, Karen H., Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Wu, Xifeng , Levine, Douglas A. , Bisogna, Maria, Iversen, Edwin S., Marks, Jeffrey R. , Akushevich, Lucy , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Stampfer, Meir J. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Olson, Sara H. , Salvesen, Helga B., Altena, Anne M. van , Aben, Katja K.H. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Bean, Yukie T., Kelemen, Linda E., Le, Nhu D. , Górski, Bohdan , Menkiszak, Janusz , Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte , Engelholm, Svend Aage, Dicks, Ed , Campbell, Ian , McNeish, Iain A. , Whittemore, Alice S. , Rothstein, Joseph H. , McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva , Cai, Hui , Teten, Rachel Threet, Sutphen, Rebecca , McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A., Phelan, Catherine M., Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Fenstermacher, David, Lin, Hui‐Yi , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Chen, Zhihua , Gayther, Simon A. , Ramus, Susan J. , Menon, Usha , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C., Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Plisiecka-Hałasa, Joanna, Moes-Sosnowska, Joanna , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Song, Honglin , Winship, Ingrid , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Tavtigian, Sean V. , Easton, Doug , Lu, Karen H. , Durocher, Francine , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Vachon, Celine, Pankratz, Vernon S, Thibodeau, Stephen, Goldgar, David E, Couch, Fergus J. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Foulkes, William D. , Dennis, Joe , Nevanlinna, Heli , Reis‐Filho, Jorge S. , Tsimiklis, Helen , Broeks, Annegien , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Yang, Rongxi , Ménégaux, F. , Sanchez, Marie, Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Ziogas, Argyrios , Clarke, Christina A. , Arndt, Volker , Mannermaa, Arto, Spurdle, Amanda B. , Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Rudolph, Anja , Seibold, Petra , Olson, Janet E. , Vachon, Celine M. , Pankratz, V. Shane , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Hankinson, Susan E. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Czene, Kamila , Eriksson, Mikael , Eccles, Diana M, Rafiq, Sajjad , Hooning, Maartje J. , Martens, John W.M. , Hall, Per N , Cox, Angela , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Cybulski, Cezary , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Park, Jong, Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Renner, Stefan P. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Modugno, Francesmary , Moysich, Kirsten B., Bois, Andreas du , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Bonanni, Bernardo , Fridley, Brooke L. , Larson, Melissa C. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Dao, Fanny , Berchuck, Andrew , Cramer, Daniel W. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Orlow, Irene , Bjørge, Line , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Cook, Linda S. , Gronwald, Jacek , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Paul, James , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Glasspool, Rosalind , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , McLaughlin, John R, Permuth, Jennifer B. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Berg, David Van Den , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Giles, Graham G. , Milne, Roger L. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Peterlongo, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J , Teixeira, Manuel R , Tworoger, Shelley S , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Radice, Paolo , Lissowska, Jolanta , Claes, Kathleen B M , Campbell, Ian G , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Menkiszak, Janusz , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Travis, Ruth C , Lin, Hui-Yi , Fogarty, Zachary C , Dunning, Alison M , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Jones, Michael E , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Brenner, Hermann , Guénel, Pascal , Li, Jingmei , Muranen, Taru A , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Winship, Ingrid M , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Hartikainen, Jaana M , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Kraft, Peter , Benitez, Javier , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Batra, Jyotsna , Pylkäs, Katri , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Devilee, Peter , Lubinski, Jan , Fletcher, Olivia , Bojesen, Stig E , Goodman, Marc T , Truong, Therese , Mclean, Catriona , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick

Journal of Medical Genetics | September 5, 2016 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 800-811

10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103839 | PMID 27595995 Get It

Background The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. Methods We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. Results For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10−5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10−8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. Conclusions This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.