Citations

Purpose We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 10 6 plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 10 8 plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related. Conclusion The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.

Abstract Purpose: Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to VEGF, is used routinely in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, very little is known regarding the effects of bevacizumab on the cells in the perivascular space in tumors. Experimental Design: Established orthotopic xenograft and syngeneic models of GBM were used to determine entry of monoclonal anti-VEGF-A into, and uptake by cells in, the perivascular space. Based on the results, we examined CD133+ cells derived from GBM tumors in vitro. Bevacizumab internalization, trafficking, and effects on cell survival were analyzed using multilabel confocal microscopy, immunoblotting, and cytotoxicity assays in the presence/absence of inhibitors. Results: In the GBM mouse models, administered anti-mouse-VEGF-A entered the perivascular tumor niche and was internalized by Sox2+/CD44+ tumor cells. In the perivascular tumor cells, bevacizumab was detected in the recycling compartment or the lysosomes, and increased autophagy was found. Bevacizumab was internalized rapidly by CD133+/Sox2+-GBM cells in vitro through macropinocytosis with a fraction being trafficked to a recycling compartment, independent of FcRn, and a fraction to lysosomes. Bevacizumab treatment of CD133+ GBM cells depleted VEGF-A and induced autophagy thereby improving cell survival. An inhibitor of lysosomal acidification decreased bevacizumab-induced autophagy and increased cell death. Inhibition of macropinocytosis increased cell death, suggesting macropinocytosis of bevacizumab promotes CD133+ cell survival. Conclusions: We demonstrate that bevacizumab is internalized by Sox2+/CD44+-GBM tumor cells residing in the perivascular tumor niche. Macropinocytosis of bevacizumab and trafficking to the lysosomes promotes CD133+ cell survival, as does the autophagy induced by bevacizumab depletion of VEGF-A. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 7059–71. ©2017 AACR.

ObjectiveWe describe a 38‐year‐old woman who presented with a history of inflammatory arthritis, rash, and daily fevers. She was noted to have chronic parvovirus infection with persistently detectable viral titers and a novel mutation in the ELANE gene. ELANE encodes neutrophil elastase, a neutrophil serine protease with important antimicrobial effects, and is found as part of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) complexes. Pathogenic ELANE mutations have been identified in forms of hereditary neutropenia. However, our patient never had neutropenia. Because of the striking clinical scenario, we investigated this mutation functionally.MethodsNET formation by neutrophils was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Neutrophil activation and neutrophil elastase production were evaluated by flow cytometry and fluorescent substrate–based functional assay, respectively. A multiplex assay was used to quantitate neutrophil inflammatory cytokine production. PyMOL software was used to generate 3‐dimensional models of mutant elastase.ResultsActivated neutrophils from the patient demonstrated a significantly decreased ability to form NETs on scanning electron microscopy, as well as quantitative defects in neutrophil activation and neutrophil elastase activity. The patient's neutrophils showed altered levels of interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) and IL‐8, which are key cytokines for antiviral immunity and neutrophil chemotaxis. Three‐dimensional mapping revealed that the mutation could alter protein folding and surface charge distribution, potentially perturbing protein trafficking. Thus, the mutation could affect neutrophil function by decreasing NETosis and altering key antiviral activities of neutrophils.ConclusionThis is the first report of a human pathogenic ELANE mutation associated with a defect in NETosis and a distinct syndrome of recurrent viral infection and chronic inflammation.

Objective: Explore the perspectives, decision-making process, and final mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous C-section (Cesarean section) in a general public sector hospital in Lima, Peru. Methods: A qualitative prospective study using semistructured interviews at two time points in the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a public sector, university-affiliated reference hospital in Lima, Peru. Seventeen adult pregnant women with a prior C-section who were deemed by their attending obstetrician to be candidates for a trial of labor were interviewed. The first interview was between 37 and 38 weeks of pregnancy, and the second interview was 24 to 48 hours after delivery. Main outcome measures: Predelivery decision-making process and final mode of delivery. Results: Among the 17 participants, about half (9) of the participants stated that the physician explained that they had two approaches for delivery, a trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) or elective repeated C-section (ERCD). Two women stated that their respective providers explained only one option, either an ERCD or TOLAC. However, 6 women did not receive any information from their providers about their delivery options. Of the 10 participants that decided TOLAC, 8 ended up having a C-section, and of the 7 patients that had planned an ERCD, 1 ended up having a vaginal delivery. Conclusion: Many participants affirmed that they made the decision about their approach of delivery. However, most of the participants that decided a TOLAC ended up having a C-section because of complications during the final weeks of pregnancy or during labor.

Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.

Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecologic system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.

Abstract Introduction: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. ZUMA-1 is a multicenter registrational trial of axi-cel in patients with refractory, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In a pre-specified interim analysis, ZUMA-1 met its primary endpoint with a 76% objective response rate and 47% complete response. The incidence of Grade 3 and higher (Gr 3+) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) was 13% and 29%, respectively, in 93 patients with 1 month follow-up (Neelapu ASH 2016). We present novel immune signatures of Gr 3+ CRS and NE by analyzing the axi-cel-related biomarker profile in association with clinical outcomes. Methods: In this interim analysis of 62 patients, 44 serum analytes pre- and post-axi-cel treatment were measured via ELISA at multiple timepoints during the first month. The number of CAR+ cells in blood was determined by qPCR. Kinetics and association of these markers with CRS and NE were analyzed. The treatment-related profile was defined by analytes with at least double an increase over baseline in at least 50% of patients. These analytes were selected and evaluated for association with Gr 3+ CRS or NE. Immune signatures were determined based on p-values applied to peak or cumulative levels of analytes and adjusted for multiplicity (stepdown method). Results: Out of 44 analytes measured, 12 demonstrated an increase by double over baseline in at least 50% of patients. This axi-cel-related biomarker profile includes immune proliferative/modulating cytokines, pro-inflammatory cytokines, markers of myeloid activation, and chemokines. Markers with the highest median-fold increase were IFNγ (44x), IL-10 (31x), IL-6 (26x), IL-15 (20x), and GRZB (17x). These peaked within 7-14 days and generally returned to baseline within 1 month post-treatment. Within this panel of 12 analytes elevated post-axi-cel treatment, markers associated with Gr 3+ CRS (p<0.05) were IL-10, IL-6, IL-2Rα, IL-8, MCP-1, IFNγ, IL-1Rα, and IP-10. Markers associated with Gr 3+ NE (p<0.05) were IL-6, IL-15, IL-8, and MCP-1. Peak levels of CAR T cells in blood, occurring within 14 days post-infusion, were associated with Gr 3+ NE (p=0.02) but not Gr 3+ CRS (p=0.6). A majority of patients with Gr 3+ NE had only Gr 0-2 CRS (16/22) while nearly 50% of patients with Gr 3+ CRS had Gr 0-2 NE (5/11). Conclusions: Biomarker and clinical evaluation suggests mechanistic differences underlying CRS and NE following axi-cel treatment. While Gr 3+ NE was associated with CAR T cell expansion, Gr 3+ CRS was instead associated with a broader array of serum markers, many linked to systemic myeloid activation. Further understanding of these immune signatures may provide insight into managing AEs associated with anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Citation Format: Frederick L. Locke, John Rossi, Xiaodong Xue, Sattva S. Neelapu, Daniel H. Ryan, Armin Ghobadi, Lazaros J. Lekakis, David Miklos, Caron A. Jacobson, Ira Braunschweig, Olalekan Oluwole, Tanya Siddiqi, Yi Lin, John Timmerman, Patrick M. Reagan, Marika Sherman, Janice Nagatani, Xiao Zhang, Lynn Navale, William Y. Go, Jeff Wiezorek, Adrian Bot. Immune signatures of cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events in a multicenter registrational trial (ZUMA-1) in subjects with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (KTE-C19) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT020. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT020

Abstract Introduction: Outcomes for pts with refractory aggressive NHL are poor with current therapies (Crump, ASCO 2016). Results from the interim analysis of (n=62) of ZUMA-1, the 1st multicenter trial of an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell, axi-cel, in refractory aggressive NHL, showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 79% (complete response [CR] 52%; Blood 2016;128:LBA-6). Here we present results from the primary analysis of ZUMA-1. Methods: Pts received a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg after lowdose conditioning with cy/flu. Eligible pts (≥18 y) had diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL); an ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1; and refractory disease (progressive or stable disease as best response to last prior therapy, or relapsed ≤12 m of autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT]). The primary endpoint for this analysis was ORR in the combined DLBCL, PMBCL, and TFL population. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and frequency of adverse events (AEs). The primary analysis was triggered when 92 pts had at least 6 m of follow-up. Results: As of January 27, 2017, 111 pts from 22 institutions were enrolled; 101 pts (91%) received axi-cel. Median age was 58 y (range, 23-76), 67% male, 85% stage IIIIV, 47% IPI 3-4, 77% refractory to ≥2nd line of therapy, and 21% relapsed ≤12 m of ASCT. Axi-cel was successfully manufactured in 110/111 (99%) pts with an average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site of 17 d. With an ORR of 82% (n = 92; P<.0001) the study met the primary endpoint. The ORR in the mITT analysis set of 101 pts was 82% (CR 54%, PR 28%), and was consistent across key covariates including disease subtype, refractory status, stage, and IPI score. At a median follow up of 8.7 m, 44% of pts were in response and 39% were in CR. The median DOR was 8.2 m overall and not reached for pts who achieved a CR. Median OS was not reached; 80% of pts remained alive at 6 m. The most common Gr ≥3 treatmentemergent AEs were neutropenia (66%), leukopenia (44%), anemia (43%), febrile neutropenia (31%), and encephalopathy (21%). Gr ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) occurred in 13% and 28% of pts, respectively. All CRS and all NE resolved except 1 Gr 1 memory impairment. As previously reported, there were 3 Gr 5 AEs (3%). Peak and cumulative CAR T levels post-axi-cel were associated with durable responses. Conclusions: Axi-cel significantly improved ORR in patients with refractory aggressive NHL. The CR rate was 7-fold higher compared to historical controls (Crump, ASCO 2016) and nearly half the patients have an ongoing response. Axi-cel demonstrated significant clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in pts lacking curative treatment options.[F.L.L. and S.S.N. contributed equally to this study.] Funding source: Kite Pharma and in part by funding from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Therapy Acceleration Program treatment options. Citation Format: Frederick L. Locke, Sattva S. Neelapu, Nancy L. Bartlett, Lazaros J. Lekakis, David Miklos, Caron A. Jacobson, Ira Braunschweig, Olalekan Oluwole, Tanya Siddiqi, Yi Lin, John Timmerman, Jonathan W. Friedberg, Adrian Bot, John Rossi, Lynn Navale, Yizhou Jiang, Jeff Aycock, Meg Elias, Jeff Wiezorek, William Y. Go. Primary results from ZUMA-1: a pivotal trial of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axicel; KTE-C19) in patients with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT019. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT019

Abstract Addressing underrepresentation of minorities and women as research participants has largely focused on clinical trials, while little is known about attitudes and knowledge regarding other types of biomedical research, e.g., epidemiologic and genetic studies. These types of studies are essential for advances in cancer research, including development of targeted therapies for women and minorities. As part of an academic/community partnership between Mayo Clinic and The Links, Incorporated, a national volunteer service organization of professional African American women, this study sought to: (1) examine attitudes regarding participation in research involving access to the medical record, genetic studies/biobanking, and clinical trials; and (2) develop and evaluate a novel, targeted online educational program addressing these 3 types of biomedical research. Initial qualitative inquiry via 3 focus groups (n=34) found that most women associated health-related research with clinical trials; few women were familiar with other study types. Women expressed more concerns about how information is collected, used, and shared by investigators than with personal mistreatment in research regardless of study type (genetic research (GEN), chart review (CR), clinical trial (CT)) or the kind of information (social, health, genetic) collected. The importance of investigator transparency regarding the significance of the disease in African Americans, research funding source, the investigator’s agenda, and commitment to the population being studied was emphasized. Qualitative results informed development of the educational program. A total of 244 Links members completed the program (77% response rate) and answered pre- and post-assessments of intentions, attitudes and knowledge. The percent of women indicating that they “definitely” or “probably” intend to participate in research increased from 9.4% to 19.5% and 27.1% to 49.8%, respectively, after program completion. Agreement with the statement “research in the U.S. is ethical” increased from 52.9% to 74.4%. Factual knowledge related to each of the 3 study types also increased. Prior to completing the program many women reported “little or no understanding” of the 3 types of studies (66% GEN, 62.9% CR, 40.7% CT) whereas after program completion, these numbers decreased to 24.9%, 18.4%, and 15.5%, respectively. While few women rated their opinion of the study types as “very positive” prior to beginning the program (14.3% GEN, 15.0% CR, 28.6% CT), upon completion these proportions increased and equalized (42.8% GEN, 43.0% CR, 42.5% CT). Two-month follow-up will evaluate longer-term impact including knowledge dissemination, visiting clinicaltrials.gov, and enrolling in ResearchMatch. An online education-to-action program targeting professional African American women improved knowledge, perceptions of research ethics, and intent to participate in biomedical research. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Karen P. Williams, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Alice L. Strong Simmons, Monica W. Parker, Michele Y. Halyard, Sharonne N. Hayes. Linking education to action: A program to increase research participation among African American women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4233. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4233