Parker, Monica W.

The brain changes of Alzheimer’s disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one’s biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information.

Background: Underrepresentation of African American women as research participants contributes to health disparities. Contemporary studies have focused on clinical trial (CT) participation; epidemiologic and genetic studies utilizing medical records and/or biological samples have received less attention. In partnership with The Links, Incorporated (The Links), a national service organization of professional African American women, this study sought to examine attitudes regarding chart review (CR) studies, genetic studies/biobanking (GEN), and CTs; develop; and evaluate an online education-to-action program. Methods: In phase 1, focus groups were convened with members of The Links to inform the content and format of the program. Phases 2 and 3 involved designing and evaluating the program, respectively. Results: Thirty-four women across three focus groups shared attitudes and perceptions regarding research and provided guidance for program development. Subsequently, 244 women completed the program (77% response rate), including pre- and post-assessments. Participants indicating that they “definitely” or “probably” (responses combined) intend to participate in research increased from 36.5% to 69.3% (pre/post-program). Agreement with the statement “research in the U.S. is ethical” increased (52.9% to 74.4%) as did factual knowledge regarding each of the study types. There was a decrease in reporting “little or no understanding” of study types (Pre/Post: GEN: 66%/24.9%, CR: 62.9%/18.4%, CTs: 40.7%/15.5%). Pre-program, few were “very positive” about the study types (14.3% GEN, 15.0% CR, 28.6% CTs); post-program ratings increased and equalized (42.8% GEN, 43.0% CR, 42.5% CTs). Conclusions: An online education-to-action program targeting professional African American women improved knowledge, perceptions of ethics, and intent to participate in biomedical research.

Abstract Addressing underrepresentation of minorities and women as research participants has largely focused on clinical trials, while little is known about attitudes and knowledge regarding other types of biomedical research, e.g., epidemiologic and genetic studies. These types of studies are essential for advances in cancer research, including development of targeted therapies for women and minorities. As part of an academic/community partnership between Mayo Clinic and The Links, Incorporated, a national volunteer service organization of professional African American women, this study sought to: (1) examine attitudes regarding participation in research involving access to the medical record, genetic studies/biobanking, and clinical trials; and (2) develop and evaluate a novel, targeted online educational program addressing these 3 types of biomedical research. Initial qualitative inquiry via 3 focus groups (n=34) found that most women associated health-related research with clinical trials; few women were familiar with other study types. Women expressed more concerns about how information is collected, used, and shared by investigators than with personal mistreatment in research regardless of study type (genetic research (GEN), chart review (CR), clinical trial (CT)) or the kind of information (social, health, genetic) collected. The importance of investigator transparency regarding the significance of the disease in African Americans, research funding source, the investigator’s agenda, and commitment to the population being studied was emphasized. Qualitative results informed development of the educational program. A total of 244 Links members completed the program (77% response rate) and answered pre- and post-assessments of intentions, attitudes and knowledge. The percent of women indicating that they “definitely” or “probably” intend to participate in research increased from 9.4% to 19.5% and 27.1% to 49.8%, respectively, after program completion. Agreement with the statement “research in the U.S. is ethical” increased from 52.9% to 74.4%. Factual knowledge related to each of the 3 study types also increased. Prior to completing the program many women reported “little or no understanding” of the 3 types of studies (66% GEN, 62.9% CR, 40.7% CT) whereas after program completion, these numbers decreased to 24.9%, 18.4%, and 15.5%, respectively. While few women rated their opinion of the study types as “very positive” prior to beginning the program (14.3% GEN, 15.0% CR, 28.6% CT), upon completion these proportions increased and equalized (42.8% GEN, 43.0% CR, 42.5% CT). Two-month follow-up will evaluate longer-term impact including knowledge dissemination, visiting clinicaltrials.gov, and enrolling in ResearchMatch. An online education-to-action program targeting professional African American women improved knowledge, perceptions of research ethics, and intent to participate in biomedical research. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Karen P. Williams, Jennifer L. Ridgeway, Alice L. Strong Simmons, Monica W. Parker, Michele Y. Halyard, Sharonne N. Hayes. Linking education to action: A program to increase research participation among African American women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4233. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4233

Objective: To examine perceptions and attitudes toward health-related research participation among professional African American women. Methods: Participants were members of an African American women's service organization, The Links, Incorporated. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaires at The Links, Incorporated 2012 National Assembly. Sociodemographics, prior research experience, intention to participate (ITP), willingness to participate (WTP) in a variety of research studies and attitudes about research participation were measured. Results: A total of 381 surveys were analyzed. A majority of respondents were married (66%), employed (69%), and college educated (96%). Median age was 59; 38% reported prior research participation. Overall, 78% agreed with the statement, “Participation in research will mean better care,” 24% agreed “Participation in research is risky” and 3% agreed “Scientists cannot be trusted.” Fifty-two percent agreed with the statement, “Research conducted in the U.S. is ethical.” Mean ITP in research was 4.9±1.7 on a rating scale of 1 (“definitely no”) to 7 (“definitely yes”). WTP was highest for an interview study and providing a blood sample, and lowest for clinical trial and medical record review. Conclusion: Attitudes toward research participation were generally favorable among professional African American women; many expressed WTP in a variety of research study types.