Thanarajasingam, Uma

Abstract Introduction The underlying immunopathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis (IA) immune-related adverse event (irAE) remains obscure. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where autoantibodies and B cell dysfunction are central features, the contribution of humoral immunity to IA-irAE is unclear. Methods Here, we performed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood from IA-irAE patients, and compared them with seronegative RA patients, ICI-treated patients without irAE, and healthy controls. Results IA-irAE was marked with increased cytotoxic gene expression and metabolic activation in T cells, and reduced CXCR3 and CCR6 expression in CD4+ T cells. Contrary to seronegative RA, IA-irAE patients displayed no significant elevation in autoantibody levels or atypical CD11c+CD21⁻ B cells. IA-irAE was further characterized by elevated levels of IL-6, IL-12, and type I IFN, which correlated with the T cell activation phenotypes. Conclusion Altogether, our findings define IA-irAE as a disease with certain immunological features distinctive from RA, representing a potentially T cell driven, autoantibody-independent autoimmunity. These results offer insights into immune tolerance breakdown and therapeutic targeting in irAEs. Funding Source National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Mark E. and Mary A. Davis Initiative in Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Topic Categories Basic Autoimmunity (BA)

Objective We aim to identify risk factors to enable stratification of patients' susceptibility to inflammatory arthritis immune‐related adverse events (IA‐irAEs). This retrospective study mainly examines whether preexisting osteoarthritis (OA) increases the likelihood of de novo IA‐irAEs. Methods The prevalence of OA among immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–treated patients who developed IA‐irAE, those who developed other types of irAEs but not IA (non‐IA irAEs), and those who did not develop any irAEs (non‐irAEs) were compared. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 181 de novo IA‐irAE patients, 140 non‐IA irAE patients, and 170 non‐irAE patients were included. The prevalence of OA was significantly higher in the IA‐irAE group (69%) than in the non‐IA irAE group (48%) and the non‐irAE group (48%) (both P < 0.001). The IA‐irAE group demonstrated a higher frequency of multisite OA, with more predominant hand involvement (62%) than the non‐IA irAE with OA group (13%) and the non‐irAE with OA group (13%) (both P < 0.001). A family history of autoimmune disease (AID) (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–4.05), preexisting OA (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.85–4.52), and melanoma (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56–4.47) were identified as risk factors for the development of IA‐irAE. Conclusion OA was more prevalent among ICI‐treated patients developing IA‐irAE than those who were not. Hand OA was the most common OA pattern in IA‐irAE patients. Preexisting OA, melanoma, and a family history of AID were associated with IA‐irAE.

The underlying immunopathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis (IA) immune-related adverse event (irAE) remains obscure. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where autoantibodies and B cell dysfunction are central features, the contribution of humoral immunity to IA-irAE is unclear. Here, we performed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood from patients with IA-irAE and compared them with patients with seronegative RA, immune checkpoint inhibition–treated patients without irAE, and healthy controls. IA-irAE was marked with increased cytotoxic gene expression and metabolic activation in T cells and reduced CXCR3 and CCR6 expression in CD4 + T cells. Contrary to seronegative RA, patients with IA-irAE displayed no substantial elevation in autoantibody levels or atypical CD11c + CD21 − B cells. IA-irAE was further characterized by elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, and type I interferon, which correlated with the T cell activation phenotypes. Together, our findings define IA-irAE as a disease with certain immunological features distinctive from RA, representing a potentially T cell–driven, autoantibody-independent autoimmunity. These results offer insights into immune tolerance breakdown and therapeutic targeting in irAEs.

ABSTRACT Objective Identifying risk factors enables stratification of patients’ susceptibility to inflammatory arthritis immune-related adverse events (IA-irAE). This retrospective study examines whether preexisting osteoarthritis (OA) increases the likelihood of de novo IA in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods The prevalence of OA among ICI–treated patients who developed IA-irAE, those who developed other types of irAEs but not IA (non-IA irAE), and those who did not develop any irAEs (non-irAE) were compared. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Group comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results 181 de novo IA-irAE patients, 140 non-IA irAE patients and 170 non-irAE patients were included. The prevalence of OA was significantly higher in the IA-irAE group (69%) than the non-IA irAE group (48%) and the non-irAE group (48%) (both p < 0.001). The IA-irAE group demonstrated a higher frequency of multisite OA, with predominant hand involvement (62%) than the non-IA irAE with OA group (13%) and the non-irAE with OA group (13%) (both p < 0.001). A family history of autoimmune disease (AID) (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.02–4.05), preexisting OA (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.85–4.52) and melanoma (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.56–4.47) were identified as risk factors for the development of IA-irAE. Conclusions OA was more prevalent among ICI-treated patients developing IA-irAE than those who did not. Hand OA was the most common OA pattern in IA-irAE patients. Preexisting OA, melanoma and a family history of AID were risk factors for IA-irAE.

ObjectiveWe aimed to characterize presentation and care pathways of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and delays in access to SLE‐specialized care.MethodsWe included patients with incident SLE from the Lupus Midwest Network registry. Time from the first medical encounter for SLE clinical manifestation to access to SLE‐specialized care, physician diagnosis, and treatment was estimated. Delays were defined as ≥6 months to access specialized care. We compared SLE manifestations, disease activity, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage indexes (SDI) between patients with and without delays. Logistic regression models assessed associations with delays.ResultsThe study included 373 patients with SLE. The median time to access SLE‐specialized care was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–1.5) months, time to diagnosis was 30.6 (95% CI 18.9–48.1) months, and time to treatment initiation was 4.7 (95% CI 3.9–8.4) months. Approximately 25% of patients (93 out of 373) experienced delays accessing specialized care, which were associated with fewer SLE manifestations at first SLE‐related encounter (fewer than two SLE domains; 92% vs 72%, P < 0.001). Patients with mucocutaneous or musculoskeletal manifestations were less likely to experience delays, whereas hematologic (odds ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% CI 1.03–2.84) or antiphospholipid antibodies domains (OR 6.05, 95% CI 2.46–14.88) were associated with delays. Delays were associated with damage at first access to SLE‐specialized care (SDI ≥1; 30% vs 7%, P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients follow a heterogeneous pathway to receive care. One‐fourth of patients experienced delays accessing SLE‐specialized care, which was associated with disease‐related damage. Fewer manifestations, hematologic manifestations, or antiphospholipid antibodies were associated with delays.image

Abstract Background Viral infection outcomes vary widely between individuals, ranging from mild symptoms to severe organ failure and death, and it is clear that host genetic factors play a role in this variability. Type I interferon (IFN) is a critical anti-viral cytokine, and we have previously noted differences in type I IFN levels between world populations. Methods In this study, we investigate the interrelationship between regional European genetic ancestry, type I IFN levels and severe viral infection outcomes. Results In cohorts of European ancestry lupus patients living in Europe, we noted higher IFN in the Northwestern populations as compared to Southeastern populations. In an independent cohort of European ancestry lupus patients from the USA with varying proportional regional European genetic admixture, we observed the same Northwest vs. Southeast European ancestry IFN gradient. We developed a model to predict type I IFN level based on regional European ancestry (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.73, P = 6.1e-6). Examining large databases containing serious viral outcomes data, we found that lower predicted IFN in the corresponding European country was significantly correlated with increased viral infection fatality rate, including Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), viral hepatitis and HIV [correlation coefficients: −0.79 (P = 4e-2), −0.94 (P = 6e-3) and −0.96 (P = 8e-2), respectively]. Conclusions This association between predicted type I IFN level and viral outcome severity suggests a potential causal relationship, as greater intrinsic type I IFN is beneficial in host defense against viruses. Genetic testing could provide insight into individual and population level risk of fatality due to viruses prior to infection, across a wide range of viral pathogens.

Abstract Objectives The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence and incidence of multimorbidity and its association with the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) among patients with SLE. Methods Using prevalent and incident population–based cohorts of patients with SLE and their matched comparators, we assessed 57 chronic conditions. Chronic conditions were categorized as SDI-related or SDI-unrelated. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more chronic conditions. The prevalence of multimorbidity for both cohorts was compared using logistic regression. Cox models were used to examine the development of multimorbidity after SLE incidence. Results The prevalent cohort included 449 patients with established SLE on 1 January 2015. They were three times more likely to have multimorbidity compared with non-SLE comparators [odds ratio (OR) 2.98, 95% CI 2.18–4.11]. The incident cohort included 270 patients with new-onset SLE. At SLE incidence, patients with SLE were more likely to have multimorbidity than comparators (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.59–3.27). After incidence, the risk of developing multimorbidity was 2-fold higher among patients with SLE than among comparators [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11, 95% CI 1.59–2.80]. The development of multimorbidity was higher in patients with SLE based on SDI-related conditions (HR 2.91, 95% CI 2.17–3.88) than on SDI-unrelated conditions (HR 1.73, 95% CI, 1.32–2.26). Conclusion Patients with SLE had a higher burden of multimorbidity, even before the onset of the disease. The risk disparity continued after SLE classification and was also seen in a prevalent SLE cohort. Multimorbidity was driven both by SDI-related and unrelated conditions.

Background Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment. Results We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04). Conclusion Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs ( NCT04940299 , NCT03999749 ).