Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

920 citation(s) found for "Yu, Cheng".

A phase I trial of the farnesyltransferase (FT) inhibitor, BMS-214662 (B) in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) in patients with advanced cancer
Dy, Grace K. , Bruzek, Laura M., Croghan, Gary A., Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Peethambaram, Prema P. , Hanson, L., Erlichman, Charles , Cheng, Shinta

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 5, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 14_suppl | Pages: 3066-3066

10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.3066 Get It

Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure
Vyas, Krishna S. , Velaga, Santhosh, Davenport, Daniel L. , Saha, Sibu P. , Cheng, Ivy

International Journal of Angiology | March 15, 2017 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 083-088

10.1055/s-0037-1601053 | PMID 28566933 Get It

AbstractCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis, although the optimal surgical technique is debated. The literature suggests that patch angioplasty reduces complication risk, although primary closure shortens cross-clamp time and eliminates complications associated with grafts.The objective of this study was to assess the complication rate after CEA with primary closure.Retrospective review of 240 consecutive patients between 2002 and 2010. Of these patients, 70% returned for follow-up visits for at least 2 or more years.Primary closure was used in all patients. The average cross-clamp time was 18 minutes. Complications in the immediate postoperative period within 30 days were as follows: stroke (n = 3; 1.1%), transient ischemic attack (TIA; n = 4; 1.5%), myocardial infarction (MI; n = 3; 1.1%), and death (n = 1; 0.4%). Short-term follow-up revealed eight patients who were found to have significant restenosis (>80%) by carotid duplex imaging. Two to ten year postoperative complication rates were as follows: stroke (n = 7; 4.2%), TIA (n = 7; 4.2%), amaurosis fugax (n = 1; 0.6%), MI (n = 8; 4.8%), and death (n = 28; 17%). Mortality was due to stroke or heart attack (n = 2; 1.2%), cancer (n = 7; 4.2%), and unknown causes (n = 19; 11%).This study presents our experience with complications after primary closure after CEA. In our experience, CEA is a safe and effective surgical means of preventing stroke in the short term. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm specific patient characteristics in which primary closure and patch angioplasty are indicated.
BRCA2 Hypomorphic Missense Variants Confer Moderate Risks of Breast Cancer
Mesman, Romy L.S. , Nicolai, Catharina Von , Ehlén, Åsa , Guidugli, Lucia, Martin, Charlotte , Calléja, Fabienne M.G.R., Hallberg, Emily, Hinton, Jamie, Lilyquist, Jenna , Hu, Chunling , Aalfs, Cora M. , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Benı́tez, Javier , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Børresen‐Dale, Anne‐Lise , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brennan, Paul , Brenner, Hermann , Brouwers, Barbara , Brüning, Thomas , Burwinkel, Barbara , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Cheng, Ching‐Yu , Choi, Ji‐Yeob , Collée, J. Margriet, Darabi, Hatef, Dörk, Thilo , Fasching, Peter A. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Flyger, Henrik, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Glendon, Gord, Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A., Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Hopper, John L. , Jakubowska, Anna , Kang, Daehee , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lai, Kah-Nyin, Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Lindblom, Annika , Lubiński, Jan , Macháčková, Eva , Mannermaa, Arto, Margolin, Sara , Matsuo, Keitaro , Miao, Hui , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Muir, Kenneth , Olswold, Curtis, Oosterwijk, Jan J.C., Osório, Ana , Peterlongo, Paolo , Peto, Julian , Pylkäs, Katri , Radice, Paolo , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rhenius, Valerie , Sangrajrang, Suleeporn , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Seynaeve, Caroline, Shah, Mitul , Shrubsole, Martha J. , Slager, Susan, Southey, Melissa C. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Truong, Thérèse , Kolk, Lizet E. van der, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert , Wu, Anna H. , Yu, Jyh‐Cherng , Zheng, Wei , Zheng, Ying , Leary, Jennifer, Walker, Logan C. , Foretová, Lenka , Claes, Kathleen , Varesco, Liliana , Moghadasi, Setareh , Easton, Douglas F. , Devilee, Peter , Vrieling, Harry , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Goldgar, David E., Carreira, Aura , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Shimelis, Hermela , Meeks, Huong , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Broeks, Annegien , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dennis, Joe , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Dunning, Alison M. , Giles, Graham G. , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Ito, Hidemi , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lophatananon, Artitaya , Mannermaa, Arto, Marmé, Frederik , Milne, Roger L. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Olson, Janet E. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Rudolph, Anja , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Stram, Daniel O. , Asperen, Christi J. van , Wang, Qin, Fostira, Florentia , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Goldgar, David E., Couch, Fergus J. , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Peterlongo, Paolo , Teo, Soo H , Shrubsole, Martha J , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Vreeswijk, Maaike P G , Radice, Paolo , Claes, Kathleen B M , Southey, Melissa C , Muir, Kenneth , Matsuo, Keitaro , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Guénel, Pascal , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Hu, Chunling , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Benitez, Javier , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Bowtell, David D , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad U , Devilee, Peter , Lubinski, Jan , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Truong, Therese , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Kang, Daehee

Cancer Research | March 10, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2789-2799

10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2568 | PMID 28283652 Get It

Abstract Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case–control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789–99. ©2017 AACR.
Abstract P1-08-03: Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor
Kuffel, MJ, Kudgus, RA, Huang, Zheng , Bode, AM, Cheng, Jingwei , Suman, VJ, Reid, J. J., Bruinsma, ES, Subramaniam, Malayannan , Ames, M, Hawse, JR, Goetz, MP, Guo, C, Kuffel, Mary J., Kudgus, Rachel A.

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P1-08-03-P1-08-03

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-08-03 Get It

Abstract Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα. Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα. Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen. Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.
Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases
Haycock, Philip , Burgess, Stephen , Nounu, Aayah , Zheng, Jie , Okoli, George N. , Wade, Kaitlin H. , Timpson, Nicholas J. , Evans, David M. , Willeit, Peter , Aviv, Abraham , Gaunt, Tom R. , Hemani, Gibran , Mangino, Massimo , Ellis, Hayley, Kurian, Kathreena M. , Pooley, Karen A. , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Lee, Jeffrey E. , Fang, Shenying , Chen, Wei V., Law, Matthew H. , Bowdler, Lisa, Iles, Mark M. , Worrall, Bradford B. , Markus, Hugh S. , Hung, Rayjean J., Amos, Chris, Thompson, Deborah J. , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Wolpin, Brian M. , Ámundadóttir, Laufey T. , Trichopoulou, Antonia , Onland‐Moret, N. Charlotte , Lund, Eiliv , Canzian, Federico , Severi, Gianluca , Overvad, Kim , Gunter, Marc J. , ­Tumino, ­Rosario , Svenson, Ulrika, Rij, André van, Baas, Annette F., Bown, Matthew J. , Samani, Nilesh J. , t’Hof, Femke N.G. van, Tromp, Gerard , Jones, Gregory T. , Kuivaniemi, Helena , Elmore, James R. , Johansson, Mattias , McKay, James , Scélo, Ghislaine , Carreras‐Torres, Robert , Gaborieau, Valérie , Brennan, Paul , Bracci, Paige M. , Olson, Sara H. , Gallinger, Steven , Li, Donghui , Petersen, Gloria M. , Han, Jiali , Abnet, Christian C. , Freedman, Neal D. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Vermeulen, Sita H. , Walsh, Kyle M. , Wrensch, Margaret , Rice, Terri, Turnbull, Clare , Litchfield, Kevin , Paternoster, Lavinia , Standl, Marie , Mijatovic, Vladan, Sapkota, Yadav , Zondervan, Krina T. , Nyholt, Dale R. , Heel, David A. van , Arking, Dan E. , Ashar, Foram N., Sotoodehnia, Nona, Woo, Daniel , Comeau, Mary E. , Brown, W. Mark , Silverman, Edwin K. , Hokanson, John E. , Hui, Jennie , Thompson, Philip J. , Morrison, Alanna C. , Smith, Nicholas L. , Christiano, Angela M. , Petukhova, Lynn , Betz, Regina C. , Zhang, Xuejun, Zhu, Caihong, Langefeld, Carl D. , Thompson, Susan D. , Wang, Feijie , Fingerlin, Tasha E. , Rotter, Jerome I. , Cotch, Mary Frances , Jensen, Richard A., Munz, Matthias , Dommisch, Henrik , Schäefer, Arne S. , Ollila, Hanna M. , Hillary, Ryan P. , Zeng, Chenjie , Zheng, Wei , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Reis, André , Uebe, Steffen , Hüffmeier, Ulrike , Kawamura, Yoshiya, Otowa, Takeshi , Sasaki, Tsukasa, Dávila, Sonia , Siminovitch, Katherine A. , Bei, Jin‐Xin , Zeng, Yi‐Xin , Chen, Bowang , Franke, Andre, Fischer, Annegret, Ellinghaus, David , Flores, Carlos , Noth, Imre , Ma, Shwu‐Fan , Foo, Jia Nee , Liu, Jianjun , Cox, David G. , Delattre, Olivier , Mirabeau, Olivier , Skibola, Christine F., Tang, Clara Sze-Man , Garcia-Barceló, Mercè, Su, Wen-Hui , Chang, Yu‐Sun , Wade, Tracey , Lee, Chaeyoung , Kubo, Michiaki , Cha, Pei-Chieng , Nakamura, Yusuke, Levy, Daniel , Hunt, S. E., Spector, Tim D. , Soranzo, Nicole , Barr, R. Graham, Kahali, Bratati , Speliotes, Elizabeth K. , Yerges-Armstrong, Laura M. , Cheng, Ching‐Yu , Wong, Tien Yin , Fogh, Isabella , Powell, John , Rice, Kenneth , Relton, Caroline L. , Martin, Richard M. , Smith, George Davey , Hung, Rayjean J. , Bowden, Jack , Yang, Qiong , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Rachael Z. , Duell, Eric J. , Neale, Rachel Ε. , Risch, Harvey A. , Klein, Alison P. , Taylor, Philip R. , Maris, John M. , Wiencke, John K. , Abecasis, Gonçalo R. , SanGiovanni, John Paul , Li, Yong , Low, Siew‐Kee , Montgomery, Grant W. , Hunt, Karen A. , Rosand, Jonathan M. , Cho, Michael H. , Ferreira, Manuel A. R. , Felix, Janine F. , Fan, Xing Hua , Xu, Lin , Schwartz, David A. , Han, Fang , Albagha, Omar , Ralston, Stuart H. , Sasaki, Tsukasa, Hibberd, Martin Lloyd , Xie, Gang , Försti, Asta , Landi, Stefano , Ellinghaus, David , Kim, Jong‐Won , Chang, Kai‐Ping , Martin, Nicholas G. , Gordon, Scott D. , Kimura, Masayuki , Hwang, Shih‐Jen , Manichaikul, Ani , Barr, R. Graham, Jonas, Jost B , Lin, Kuang , Amundadottir, Laufey , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Eeles, Rosalind A , van Heel, David A , Gunter, Marc J , Canzian, Federico , Hung, Rayjean J , O'Mara, Tracy A , Abnet, Christian C , Haycock, Philip , Tumino, Rosario , Han, Jiali , Martin, Richard M , Severi, Gianluca , Reis, André , Zheng, Wei , Rotter, Jerome I , Carreras-Torres, Robert , Law, Matthew H , Davey Smith, George , Johansson, Mattias , Iles, Mark M , Morrison, Alanna C , Rice, Ken , Freedman, Neal D , Foo, Jia Nee , Levy, Daniel , Rice, Kenneth , Sapkota, Yadav , Wong, Tien Y , Liu, Jing

JAMA Oncology | February 27, 2017 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 636

10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5945 | PMID 28241208 Get It

Morbidity and Mortality Differences Between Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors and Other Cancer Survivors
Chow, Eric J. , Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L. , Khera, Nandita , Lee, Stephanie J. , Leisenring, Wendy M. , Mueller, Beth A. , Cheng, Guang‐Shing , Boeckh, Michael, Martin, Paul J. , Schwartz, Stephen M, Baker, K. Scott, Boeckh, Michael , Schwartz, Stephen Mark , Baker, Kevin Scott , Leisenring, Wendy , Chow, Eric J , Lee, Stephanie J

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 306-313

10.1200/jco.2016.68.8457 | PMID 27870568 Get It

Purpose To compare the risks of serious health outcomes among hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors versus a matched population of patients with cancer who did not undergo HCT, where the primary difference may be exposure to HCT. Methods Two-year HCT survivors treated at a comprehensive cancer center from 1992 through 2009 who were Washington State residents (n = 1,792; 52% allogeneic and 90% hematologic malignancies) were frequency matched by demographic characteristics and underlying cancer diagnosis (as applicable) to non-HCT 2-year cancer survivors, using the state cancer registry (n = 5,455) and the general population (n = 16,340) using driver’s license files. Late outcomes for all three cohorts were ascertained from the state hospital discharge and death registries; subsequent cancers were ascertained from the state cancer registry. Results After median follow-up of 7.1 years, HCT survivors experienced significantly greater rates of hospitalization compared with matched non-HCT cancer survivors (280 v 173 episodes per 1,000 person-years, P < .001) and greater all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.3). HCT survivors had more hospitalizations or death with infections (10-year cumulative incidence, 31% v 22%; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.6) and respiratory complications (cumulative incidence, 27% v 20%; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5). Risks of digestive, skin, and musculoskeletal complications also were greater among HCT versus non-HCT cancer survivors. The two groups had similar risks of circulatory complications and second cancers. Both HCT and non-HCT cancer survivors had significantly greater 10-year cumulative incidences of all major organ-system outcomes versus the general population. Conclusion History of HCT was associated with late morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. In particular, clinicians who care for HCT survivors should be aware of their high rates of late respiratory and infectious complications.
Preoperative Prediction of Surgical Margin Status in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy
Cheng, Liang , Bergstralh, Erik J., Myers, Robert P., Zincke, Horst, Bostwick, David G., Slezak, Jeff M. , Cheng, Liang

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2862-2868

10.1200/jco.2000.18.15.2862 | PMID 10920134 Get It

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the preoperative factors associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 339 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic. None received preoperative adjuvant therapy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 45 to 79 years). All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Positive surgical margin was defined as the presence of cancer cells at the inked margins. Numerous pathologic characteristics in needle biopsies and preoperative clinical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 24%. In univariate analysis, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, perineural invasion, percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens, and number and percentage of biopsy cores involved by cancer were all associated with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, preoperative serum PSA level (odds ratio for a doubling of PSA levels, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.4; P < .001) and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens (odds ratio for a 10% increase, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4; P < .001) were predictive of margin status in radical prostatectomy. With use of preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy as predictors of surgical margins, the overall accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens were independently associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The combination of these two factors provides a high level of predictive accuracy for margin status.
Predicting Cancer Progression in Patients With Stage T1 Bladder Carcinoma
Cheng, Liang , Neumann, Roxann M., Weaver, Amy L. , Spotts, Bruce E., Bostwick, David G., Cheng, Liang , Cheng, Liang

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 3182-3187

10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3182 | PMID 10506616 Get It

PURPOSE: A significant number of patients with stage T1 bladder carcinoma are at risk for cancer progression. We sought to identify factors associated with cancer progression in a series of patients with stage T1 bladder carcinoma treated with a contemporary therapeutic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 83 consecutive patients in whom stage T1 bladder carcinoma was diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic between 1987 and 1992. All patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) and had histologic confirmation of the diagnosis. The mean age was 71 years (range, 47 to 94 years). The male-to-female ratio was 3.9:1. The mean length of follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 1 day to 10.4 years). The depth of lamina propria invasion in the TURB specimens was measured with an ocular micrometer. Cancer progression was defined as the development of muscle-invasive or more advanced stage carcinoma, distant metastasis, or death from bladder cancer. RESULTS: The overall 5- and 7-year progression-free survival rates were 82% and 80%, respectively. The depth of invasion in the TURB specimens was associated with cancer progression (hazards ratio, 1.6 for doubling of depth of invasion; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.4; P = .037). The 5-year progression-free survival rate for patients with depth of invasion of ≥ 1.5 mm was 67%, compared with 93% for those with depth of invasion of less than 1.5 mm (P = .009). No other variable, including age, sex, tobacco use, alcohol use, the presence of carcinoma-in-situ, histologic grade, lymphocytic infiltration, or muscularis mucosae invasion, was associated with cancer progression. CONCLUSION: The depth of invasion in the TURB specimens, measured with a micrometer, is predictive of cancer progression in patients with stage T1 bladder carcinoma.
Incidence of and Risk Factors for Skin Cancer in Organ Transplant Recipients in the United States
Garrett, Giorgia L., Boscardin, John, Lloyd, Amanda Abramson, Ahmed, Rehana L. , Anthony, Tiffany, Bibee, Kristin , Breithaupt, Andrew, Cannon, Jennifer, Chen, Amy , Cheng, J , Fuxench, Zelma C. Chiesa , Colegio, Oscar R. , Curiel‐Lewandrowski, Clara , Guzzo, Christina A. Del, Disse, Max, Dowd, Margaret , Eilers, Robert, Ortiz, Arisa , Golden, Spring, Graves, Michael S., Griffin, John R., Hopkins, R. Samuel, Huang, Conway C. , Jambusaria, Anokhi, Jennings, Thomas , Khetarpal, Shilpi , Kim, Chang-Hyun , Klintmalm, Göran B. , Konicke, Kathryn, Koyfman, Shlomo A. , Lam, Charlene , Leitenberger, Justin J. , Loh, Tiffany Y. , Lowenstein, Stefan E. , Madankumar, Reshmi, Moreau, Jacqueline F. , Nijhawan, Rajiv I. , Ochoa, Shari A. , Olasz, Edit , Otchere, Elaine , Otley, Clark C. , Oulton, Jeremy, Patel, Parth H., Prabhu, Arpan V. , Pugliano‐Mauro, Melissa , Schmults, Chrysalyne D. , Schram, Sarah E., Shih, Allen F. , Shin, Thuzar M. , Soon, Seaver L. , Stein, Jennifer , Sternhell‐Blackwell, Kara, Taylor, Stan, Vidimos, Allison T. , Wu, Peggy A. , Zajdel, Nicholas, Zelac, Daniel E. , Arron, Sarah T. , Kim, Changhyun, Ochoa, Shari, Otley, Clark, Blanc, Paul David , Boscardin, W. John , Morris, Caroline Rose , Bae, Gordon Hyeonjin , Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Karia, Pritesh S. , Lee, Peter, Patel, Vishal Anil , Soriano, Teresa T. , Srivastava, Divya , Nj, Zajdel

JAMA Dermatology | January 17, 2017 | Volume: 153 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 296

10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4920 | PMID 28097368 Get It