Buss, Mary K.

Most palliative care (PC) physicians will change jobs over the course of their career, yet few supports exist to guide them through this often unfamiliar process. Job transitions frequently elicit stress and uncertainty, as individuals balance personal and professional priorities, navigate complex negotiations, and assume the inherent risks of pursuing new opportunities. Yet, when approached intentionally, a job transition can also be a transformative process that allows for self-discovery, cultivation of new skills and connections, and reshaping of one’s professional identity. This article, written by a team of PC physicians who have made job transitions themselves, offers 10 tips for navigating this professional step successfully. With emphases on authentic communication, skilled mentorship, relationship building, and exploration of local culture—the article offers practical advice to help PC physicians navigate a job transition confidently, while staying grounded in their personal values and the work they find most meaningful.

BACKGROUND: “Moral distress” describes the psychological strain a provider faces when unable to uphold professional values because of external constraints. Recurrent or intense moral distress risks moral injury, burnout, and physician attrition but has not been systematically studied among neurosurgeons. OBJECTIVE: To develop a unique instrument to test moral distress among neurosurgeons, evaluate the frequency and intensity of scenarios that may elicit moral distress and injury, and determine their impact on neurosurgical burnout and turnover. METHODS: An online survey investigating moral distress, burnout, and practice patterns was emailed to attending neurosurgeon members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Moral distress was evaluated through a novel survey designed for neurosurgical practice. RESULTS: A total of 173 neurosurgeons completed the survey. Half of neurosurgeons (47.7%) reported significant moral distress within the past year. The most common cause was managing critical patients lacking a clear treatment plan; the most intense distress was pressure from patient families to perform futile surgery. Multivariable analysis identified burnout and performing ≥2 futile surgeries per year as predictors of distress ( P < .001). Moral distress led 9.8% of neurosurgeons to leave a position and 26.6% to contemplate leaving. The novel moral distress survey demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.89). CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable survey assessing neurosurgical moral distress. Nearly, half of neurosurgeons suffered moral distress within the past year, most intensely from external pressure to perform futile surgery. Moral distress correlated with burnout risk caused 10% of neurosurgeons to leave a position and a quarter to consider leaving.