Citations

Abstract Background: Over the last two decades several phenotypic, molecular, and chromosomal markers have been identified that are significantly associated with the prognosis of CLL patients. Therefore, clinicians managing CLL patients would benefit from a simplified prognostic index. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from 337 Binet A CLL patients enrolled in Italian the O-CLL1-GISL protocol with the aim of developing scores capable of predicting treatment free survival (TFS). Factors independently associated with TFS were included in the prognostic indexes. To account for differences in the magnitude of the association between the individual independent factors and TFS, we assigned a weighted risk score to each factor based on ranges of their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (i.e., 1 point for HR 1.1-1.9; 2 points for HR 2.0-2.9, etc.). The total risk score was then calculated by the sum of the ratings of each factor on individual basis. Risk groups were identified combining risk categories with a non-statistically different TFS. Results: We developed two scores based on weighted multivariable models: the first included clinical and laboratory parameters [clinical score (c-score)], while the second was based on biological markers [biological score (b-score)] (Table 1). The c-score allowed to predict the TFS of patients through the combination of Rai stage, b2-microglobulin and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), while the b-score predicted TFS by IGHV mutational status and CD38 expression. The c-score showed a C-statistic of 0.72, while the b-score was 0.67, although cases stratified according to the b-score showed a more specific mRNA/microRNA profile. When the two scores were forced in a multivariate analysis, both showed an independent predictive value on TFS with a similar HR, demonstrating their complementarity. Thus, we attempted to integrate the two scores performing a further multivariate analysis in which all parameters, significantly associated with TFS at univariate analysis, were tested (Table 1). ALC, Rai stage, b2-microglobulin together with IGHV mutational status, resulted independently associated with TFS. We constructed a weighted score [comprehensive score (co-score)], including all the above 4 variables, which allowed the identification of 3 different risk groups with significantly different TFS (Figure 1). The C-statistic of the g-score was 0.75, showing a better concordance than the other two scores. Moreover, its validity was externally validated in a series of 297 newly diagnosed Binet A CLL patients from the Mayo Clinic, USA. Conclusions: Using this multistep process and external validation, we developed a score with high discriminatory power and predictive significance on the individual patient level. Table 1. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional Hazards Models Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Clinical model Biological model Comprehensive model HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score Age (years) <60/>60 1.12 (0.73-1.74) 0.59 - - - - - - - - - Sex Male/Female 0.93 (0.6-1.44) 0.93 - - - - - - - - - Rai stage 0/I-II 2.30 (1.47-3.50) <0.0001 2.13 (1.24-3.03) 0.004 0/2 - - - 1.76 (1.11-2.78) 0.015 0/1 ALC (109/L) <10/>10 3.43 (1.99-5.92) <0.0001 2.91 (1.85-5.20) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.70 (1.54-4.72) 0.001 0/2 b-2 microglobulin normal/elevated 3.04 (1.96-4.70) <0.0001 2.78 (1.79-4.30) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.65 (1.66-4.21) <0.0001 0/2 LDH normal/elevated 1.25 (0.57-2.71) 0.57 - - - - - - - - - CD38 negative/positive 3.22 (2.06-5.02) <0.0001 - - - 2.11 (1.15-3.16) 0.02 0/2 1.40 (0.80-2.42) 0.24 - ZAP-70 negative/positive 2.34 (1.51-3.61) <0.0001 - - - 1.21 (0.70-2.16) 0.485 - 1.0 (0.98-1.01) 0.72 - IGHV mutated/unmutated 3.57 (2.32-5.50) <0.0001 - - - 2.10 (1.12-3.90) 0.019 0/2 2.39 (1.27-4.50) 0.007 0/2 FISH risk low+int/high 2.93 (1.46-5.90) 0.002 - - - 1.65 (0.76-3.34) 0.216 - 1.80 (0.84-3.88) 0.13 - Abbreviations: ALC: absolute lymphocyte count; CI: confidential interval; HR: hazard ratio. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Disclosures Shanafelt: Cephalon: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kay:Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating event occurring in approximately 5% of patients treated with standard R-CHOP (Thanarajasingam et al, ASH 2015, abs 1456). Isolated CNS relapse is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. New treatment regimens with agents that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are needed. The combination of lenalidomide with R-CHOP (R2CHOP) has shown promising results in activated B-cell (ABC) type DLBCL in phase 2 studies and is currently being evaluated in randomized trials. Lenalidomide crosses the BBB and has been demonstrated to have single-agent activity in relapsed CNS lymphoma. Accordingly, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP may decrease the risk of CNS relapse. Here we characterize the combined incidence of isolated CNS relapse in a population of DLBCL patients who received R2CHOP for induction therapy in two independent phase 2 studies. Methods We analyzed the incidence of isolated CNS relapse in patients with histologically-confirmed DLBCL enrolled in two R2CHOP phase 2 trials - one conducted by Mayo Clinic (MC) and the other by Italian Lymphoma Foundation (FIL) - in the context of clinical variables that included age, gender, disease stage, cell of origin, and administration of CNS prophylaxis. We assessed CNS-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) factors (age, stage, lactate dehydrogenase level, ECOG performance status, extranodal sites, adrenal/kidney involvement) and classified patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of CNS relapse. The risk of CNS relapse in R2CHOP-treated patients was then estimated and compared against published rates in RCHOP-treated patients based on CNS-IPI score. Results One hundred thirty-six patients with DLBCL from both cohorts (87 MC patients, 49 FIL patients) were included in this analysis. Mean age was 65 and median follow-up in 104 patients still alive was 48.2 months (range: 2.1-88.5). 61.8% of patients were male; 86.0% had stage III disease or higher; 44.1% had ECOG performance status of 0; cell of origin phenotype by immunohistochemistry according to Hans algorithm was germinal center B-cell (GCB), non-GCB (ABC), and not available in 43.4%, 36.8%, and 19.8%, respectively; 14.7% received intrathecal (IT) methotrexate for CNS prophylaxis per local practice. No patients received intravenous methotrexate. 10.3%, 71.3%, and 18.4% of patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high-risk CNS-IPI groups, respectively. Only one of 136 patients developed isolated CNS relapse, corresponding to an estimated incidence of CNS relapse of 0.007 (0.7%). Conclusions Despite a large proportion of patients with intermediate and high risk of CNS relapse treated in both phase 2 studies, induction therapy with R2CHOP in patients with DLBCL is associated with a lower-than-expected rate of isolated CNS relapse. The latter is unlikely to be explained by use of IT chemotherapy, which is considered to be marginally effective in this setting and was implemented only in a small proportion of patients. This suggests that addition of CNS-penetrating small molecules, such as lenalidomide, to R-CHOP may decrease the risk of CNS relapse. Disclosures Chiappella: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Nowakowski:Morphosys: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cavallo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gaidano:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Spina:Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Vitolo:Takeda: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Gilead: Other: Honoraria for lectures; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Honoraria for lectures.

Abstract Background. Trisomy 12 (tris12) is a recurrent cytogenetic abnormality in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), occurring in approximately 15-20% of cases, often as the unique cytogenetic alteration, that is usually considered a clonal driver lesion occurring early in CLL evolution. In the Dohner hierarchical categorization, tris12 CLL are identified as having an intermediate prognostic risk, although recent reports suggest a more complex and heterogeneous clinical behavior. Compared to CLL lacking this cytogenetic abnormality, tris12 CLL show more atypical morphology and immunophenotype, more frequent expression of the negative prognostic markers CD49d and CD38, and presence of NOTCH1 mutations and an unmutated (UM) IGHV gene status. The increased fraction of tris12 CLL carrying adverse prognostic features is in contrast to the intermediate clinical behavior associated with most tris12 CLL cases. Aim. To perform a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of the major genetic, immunogenetic and immunophenotypic prognostic markers in tris12 CLL. Methods. The study was based on a multicenter series of tris12 CLL defined according to Dohner (n=283, including 73 cases also bearing del13q), and a comparison group (control) of 553 cases with either del13q (n=308) or without any cytogenetic abnormality (no del17p, del11q, tris12, del13q, n=245). Median follow-up of patients in the tris12 and control groups were 4 years (range 0-22) and 7 years (range 0-28), with 54% and 57% treated patients, and 18% and 15% deaths, respectively. Patient characterization included modified Rai stage, CD49d (CD49dhigh, ≥30% positive cells by flow cytometry), CD38 (CD38high, ≥30% positive cells by flow cytometry) and ZAP-70 (ZAP-70high, ≥20% positive cells by flow cytometry) expression, and IGHV mutational status (mutated, M, or UM according to the 2% cutoff). TP53, BIRC3, NOTCH1 andSF3B1 mutations were screened either at diagnosis or before therapy by NGS with at least 1000X coverage and 1% of sensitivity. Groups were compared by chi-square test; overall survival (OS) was computed from diagnosis to death or censored at last observation, and analyzed by Cox regression analysis. Results. Comparing the tris12 and the control groups, median age was 64 years (range 30-92) vs 66 years (range 33-92), male gender 55% vs 56% (p=0.86), the modified Rai stage was early in 52% vs 54%, intermediate in 41% vs 42% and advanced in 7% vs 4% (p=0.20). As previously reported, tris12 CLL were characterized by a higher prevalence of cases expressing CD49d (85% vs 31%) and CD38 (62% vs 17%; all p<0.0001), and of UM IGHV cases (55% vs 25%, p<0.0001). Analysis of recurrent mutations highlighted a higher prevalence of NOTCH1 mutations (26% vs 8%, p<0.0001) and of BIRC3 mutations (21% vs 1%, p<0.0001) in tris12 vs control group CLL. Conversely, no differences were found in the fraction of cases with TP53 mutations (3% vs 4%, p=0.38) or SF3B1 mutations (7% vs 7%, p=0.89), and in cases expressing ZAP-70 (62% vs 52%, p=0.09). The impact of these features on OS was tested by univariate analysis: in tris12 CLL, only the UM IGHV gene status predicted shorter OS (HR=2.37, p=0.0063), while none of the other characteristics reaching statistical significance as OS predictors (CD49d HR=1.36, p=0.36; CD38 HR=0.42, p=0.052; ZAP-70 HR=3.12, p=0.07; TP53 HR=2.33, p=0.25; NOTCH1 HR=1.40, p=0.22; SF3B1 HR=2.05, p=0.17; BIRC3 HR=1.22, p=0.61). On the other hand, in the control cohort, a significantly higher HR was found for CD49d (HR 3.11, p<0.0001) and CD38 (HR 3.45, p<0.0001) expression, TP53 (HR 2.88, p=0.0026), NOTCH1 (HR 3.57, p<0.0001), and SF3B1 (HR 2.57, p=0.0038) mutations, as well as for the UM IGHV gene status (HR=2.81, p<0.0001), but not for ZAP-70 expression and BIRC3 mutations (HR=1.74 and HR=1.91, p=0.15 and p=0.37, respectively). Conclusions. Mutational status of IGHV genes was the sole prognostic factor able to stratify OS in tris12 CLL. Despite the high frequency of NOTCH1 and BIRC3 mutations, as well as of CD49d and CD38 overexpression, these markers failed to convey a prognostic risk in tris12 CLL. The lack of a significant clinical impact for TP53 and SF3B1 mutations might be partly explained by the low number of mutated cases combined with a relative short follow up in our tris12 cohort. These findings are in keeping with the hypothesis of a different patho-biological mechanism occurring in tris12 CLL, which however remains to be fully elucidated. Disclosures D'Arena: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Rossi:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janseen: Honoraria. Gaidano:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.

AbstractObjectivesAlthough the reliability of frozen sections for the intraoperative assessment of complete tumour excision has been established, the best location for collection and the impact of the type of sampling are still debated. We retrospectively investigated the reliability of frozen sections when collected from the surgical bed as tissue strips representative of the whole superficial margin and as a bowl of tissue underlying the resection site for deep margin, and the possibility of relying on frozen section negativity to consider resections complete.Materials and MethodsFrozen section reliability was calculated by comparing histology before and after formalin embedding and then categorised by sampling type, in 182 patients undergoing transoral resection of oral cancer.ResultsComparing frozen and permanent histology, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 69%, 98% and 96%, respectively; categorisation by sampling type failed to produce statistically significant differences. Based on frozen section negativity after formalin embedding, complete resections were obtained in 91.7% of patients with multiple‐strip and bowl frozen sections.ConclusionFrozen sections collected as tissue strips and bowl are as reliable as point sampling in the intraoperative guidance of surgical resections. They effectively provide for margin enlargement, thereby increasing the surgeon's confidence that negative margins are clear.

ABSTRACT The last decade has seen a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications describing physiological and pathological functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a collective term covering various subtypes of cell‐released, membranous structures, called exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes, oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, and many other names. However, specific issues arise when working with these entities, whose size and amount often make them difficult to obtain as relatively pure preparations, and to characterize properly. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (“MISEV”) guidelines for the field in 2014. We now update these “MISEV2014” guidelines based on evolution of the collective knowledge in the last four years. An important point to consider is that ascribing a specific function to EVs in general, or to subtypes of EVs, requires reporting of specific information beyond mere description of function in a crude, potentially contaminated, and heterogeneous preparation. For example, claims that exosomes are endowed with exquisite and specific activities remain difficult to support experimentally, given our still limited knowledge of their specific molecular machineries of biogenesis and release, as compared with other biophysically similar EVs. The MISEV2018 guidelines include tables and outlines of suggested protocols and steps to follow to document specific EV‐associated functional activities. Finally, a checklist is provided with summaries of key points.