Citations

AbstractBackground and PurposeTo compare the performance of the photon‐counting detector (PCD)‐CT against a cutting‐edge energy‐integrated detector (EID)‐CT to visualize different segments of the chorda tympani nerve.Materials and MethodsAn IRB‐approved protocol prospectively enrolled patients for temporal bone CT on both EID‐CT and PCD‐CT scanners. Fellowship‐trained neuroradiologists compared visualization of chorda tympani segments on each scanner using a 5‐point Likert scale (1 indicating EID is far superior to PCD, 3 indicating they are equivalent, and 5 indicating PCD is far superior to EID). Scores were averaged across segments and tested using a one‐sample Wilcoxon signed‐rank test with a one‐sided alternative hypothesis.ResultsForty temporal bones were evaluated. Average Likert scores for visualization of chorda tympani segments‐chorda tympani canal/proximal segment, middle ear/posterior tympanic segment, and petrotympanic fissure/distal segment‐ on the PCD compared to EID scanner were 4.2 (SD = 0.4), 4.4 (0.5), and 4 (0.0), respectively. The anterior tympanic segment of the chorda tympani was not well visualized on either platform or therefore not scored. PCD compared to the EID scanner had better overall performance (Median = 4.2, 95% CI: [4.1, 5.0], p‐value < .001).ConclusionPCD‐CT improves visualization of the petrous and intratympanic chorda tympani nerve segments, chorda tympani canaliculus, and petrotympanic fissure compared to comparable EID‐CT examinations. The improved visualization of the chorda tympani is important for the characterization of middle ear pathology involving this structure and presurgical planning to determine the size of the facial recess for cochlear implantation and to estimate the risk of nerve injury.

OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to evaluate the variability of Medicaid reimbursement and compare it with Medicare reimbursement using the 20 most commonly billed orthopaedic trauma Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes nationwide. The authors anticipate significant variability between states and hypothesize that Medicaid payment will be significantly less than Medicare payment. METHODS: The top 20 most common orthopaedic trauma surgery procedural codes were identified from a previous analysis performed by Haglin et al. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule was used to determine reimbursement rates from Medicare, and state Medicaid fee schedules were used to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid. State Medicaid rates were compared with their corresponding Medicare rates to determine a dollar difference. In addition, the dollar difference for each CPT code was divided by its respective physician relative value unit. This was used to acknowledge the possible variability in the complexity of orthopaedic procedures and the related physician effort. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates based on the cost of living for the state as well. Coefficients of variation were calculated to represent overall variability in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. RESULTS: The mean reimbursement rates for Medicaid were lower for all 20 procedures compared with Medicare. On average, Medicaid reimbursed 16.0% less than Medicare and 29.6% less when adjusting for cost of living. MCD reimbursed at a higher rate than MCR for all procedures in only 9 states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, and South Dakota) while 38 states reimbursed at a lower rate than MCR, on average. The coefficient of variation ranged from 0.24 to 0.34 for the Medicaid unadjusted group and from 0.35 to 0.46 for the Medicare Wage Index–adjusted group. By contrast, the Medicare group was consistent at 0.06 for all 20 procedures. The average dollar difference across the 20 CPT codes for Medicaid reimbursement compared with Medicare reimbursement ranged from −$76.89 to −$225.17, and the dollar difference per relative value unit ranged from −$5.96 to −$15.16. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a high amount of variation between state Medicaid reimbursement rates and average rates that were significantly lower than Medicare reimbursement rates for the top 20 most used orthopaedic trauma CPT codes as identified by Haglin et al. The discrepancy in reimbursement was increased when Medicaid rates were adjusted for state cost of living. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Patients with telomere biology disorders (TBD) develop hepatic disease, including hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatopulmonary syndrome. No specific treatment exists for TBD-related liver disease, and the role of liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. Our study objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients with TBD-related liver disease, and their LT outcomes. Methods: Data from 83 patients with TBD-associated liver disease were obtained from 17 participating centers in the Clinical Care Consortium of Telomere-Associated Ailments and by self-report for our retrospective, multicenter, international cohort study. Results: Group A (“Advanced”) included 40 patients with advanced liver disease. Of these, 20 underwent LT (Group A T ). Group M (“Mild”) included 43 patients not warranting LT evaluation, none of whom were felt to be medically unfit for liver transplantation. Supplemental oxygen requirement, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and higher bilirubin and international normalized ratio values were associated with Group A. Other demographics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory findings were similar between groups. Six group A patients were declined for LT; 3 died on the waitlist. Median follow-up post-LT was 2.9 years (range 0.6–13.2 y). One-year survival post-LT was 73%. Median survival post-LT has not been reached. Group A T patients had improved survival by age compared to all nontransplant patients (log-rank test p = 0.02). Of 14 patients with pretransplant hypoxemia, 8 (57%) had improved oxygenation after transplant. Conclusions: LT recipients with TBD do not exhibit excessive posttransplant mortality, and LT improved respiratory status in 57%. A TBD diagnosis should not exclude LT consideration.

Importance Pediatric consensus guidelines recommend antibiotic administration within 1 hour for septic shock and within 3 hours for sepsis without shock. Limited studies exist identifying a specific time past which delays in antibiotic administration are associated with worse outcomes. Objective To determine a time point for antibiotic administration that is associated with increased risk of mortality among pediatric patients with sepsis. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from 51 US children’s hospitals in the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes collaborative. Participants included patients aged 29 days to less than 18 years with sepsis recognized within 1 hour of emergency department arrival, from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. Piecewise regression was used to identify the inflection point for sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality, and logistic regression was used to evaluate odds of sepsis-attributable mortality after adjustment for potential confounders. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2024. Exposure The number of minutes from emergency department arrival to antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality. Sepsis-attributable 30-day mortality was a secondary outcome. Results A total of 19 515 cases (median [IQR] age, 6 [2-12] years) were included. The median (IQR) time to antibiotic administration was 69 (47-116) minutes. The estimated time to antibiotic administration at which 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased was 330 minutes. Patients who received an antibiotic in less than 330 minutes (19 164 patients) had sepsis-attributable 3-day mortality of 0.5% (93 patients) and 30-day mortality of 0.9% (163 patients). Patients who received antibiotics at 330 minutes or later (351 patients) had 3-day sepsis-attributable mortality of 1.2% (4 patients), 30-day mortality of 2.0% (7 patients), and increased adjusted odds of mortality at both 3 days (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.20-9.93; P = .02) and 30 days (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.59-8.30; P = .002) compared with those who received antibiotics within 330 minutes. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of pediatric patients with sepsis, 3-day and 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality increased with delays in antibiotic administration 330 minutes or longer from emergency department arrival. These findings are consistent with the literature demonstrating increased pediatric sepsis mortality associated with antibiotic administration delay. To guide the balance of appropriate resource allocation with time for adequate diagnostic evaluation, further research is needed into whether there are subpopulations, such as those with shock or bacteremia, that may benefit from earlier antibiotics.

e15046 Background: ctDNA assays can be used to assess molecular residual disease, and the value of ctDNA monitoring in disease surveillance and treatment response assessment has been demonstrated in colon, breast, lung, and bladder cancers. However, the data of ctDNA in rare cancers has been lacking. We conducted this retrospective study to investigate the potential roles of ctDNA monitoring in rare tumors in both surveillance and response evaluation. Methods: ctDNA assay results of 12 patients (pts) with rare cancers including adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (4 pts), salivary gland cancers (3 pts), pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (4 pts), and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (1pt) undergoing treatment or surveillance in 2023 at Mayo Clinic Florida were analyzed. The trends of ctDNA levels were correlated with radiographic images findings. Results: Among the 12 patients, ctDNA was detected in at least one time point in 9 (75%) pts, including 1 (100%) ATC pt, 2 (66%) salivary gland pts, 3 (75%) malignant mesothelioma pts, and 3 (75%) ACC pts. Among these 9 pts, 5 pts had ctDNA collected at more than one timepoints, and the trends of ctDNA levels were consistent with image findings in all 5 pts. Among these 5 pts, one pt received definitive surgery for ACC with clearance of ctDNA after the surgery and one salivary gland cancer pt was undergoing surveillance and later developed disease progression. The other 3 pts were undergoing palliative systemic therapy and had responded to treatments. Conclusions: ctDNA was detectable in majority of the patients with rare malignancies reviewed in this study, including ACC, ATC, pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma, and salivary gland cancers. Further study is warranted to investigate the role of ctDNA monitoring in surveillance and treatment response evaluation in rare malignancies.

2087 Background: PCNSL is a rare and aggressive form of NHL in the central nervous system or vitreoretinal space. Despite high initial rates of responses to HD-MTX-based induction chemotherapies, most patients relapse in two years. R/R PCNSL is associated with poor prognosis, representing a clear unmet medical need, as there are no currently approved treatments for this disease. IRAK4 kinase activity is required for TLR and IL-1R signaling in a variety of myeloid and lymphoid cell types, including PCNSL. Recruitment of IRAK4 to these receptors and subsequent activation is facilitated by the MyD88 adaptor protein, which is mutated in ~70% of PCNSL. This leads to constitutive activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, increased inflammation, and tumor growth. Emavusertib is a novel and potent oral inhibitor of IRAK4 and FLT3, which has demonstrated the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier in PCNSL xenografts. In preclinical studies, the combination of emavusertib with ibrutinib overcomes resistance to BTK inhibitors. This combination has an acceptable safety profile across a broad population of R/R NHL patients, including PCNSL. Here we present updated safety and efficacy data for emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib in patients with R/R PCNSL. Methods: The safety, clinical activity, and potential biomarkers of emavusertib in R/R PCNSL are being investigated in the ongoing open-label, Phase 1/2 TakeAim Lymphoma trial (NCT03328078). The eligible patients with R/R PCNSL received emavusertib (100-300 mg BID) in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg QD) in a 21-day cycle until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Here, we present updated data from R/R PCNSL patients with prior ibrutinib exposure who were treated with emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. The median number of prior lines of anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range: 2-5), all patients were R/R to both frontline therapy and subsequent ibrutinib regimens. Prior responses to ibrutinib based regimens included only 1 CR. Here, we report a higher CR rate when these patients are subsequently treated with emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib.Results revealed no dose-limiting toxicities. Conclusions: Emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy in R/R PCNSL patients with previous exposure to ibrutinib (BTKi). Enrollment in this trial is ongoing (NCT03328078). Clinical trial information: NCT03328078 .

Objective To describe the rare process of osteolytic labyrinthitis, previously referred to as labyrinthine sequestrum, which involves progressive obliteration of the bony and membranous labyrinth with eventual supplantation with soft tissue and, in some cases, bony sequestrum. Patients Three patients with diverse presentations of osteolytic labyrinthitis from two tertiary care academic medical centers. Intervention(s) Case series report analyzing the relevant clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and surgical data on our patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis and comparing these index cases to the existing literature. Main Outcome Measure(s) We describe the varying image findings seen in osteolytic labyrinthitis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Also, we report successful surgical intervention and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation in patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis. Results Our three patients presented with profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo consistent with labyrinthitis. None of the three patients had a history of chronic otitis media. Imaging workup revealed varying degrees of erosion to the otic capsule bone demonstrating the spectrum of disease seen in osteolytic labyrinthitis. Although two cases showed osteolytic changes to the semicircular canals and vestibule, the first case revealed frank bony sequestrum within the obliterated labyrinth. The three cases were taken for surgical debridement and cochlear implantation. Conclusions We propose the new term, osteolytic labyrinthitis—previously referred to as labyrinthine sequestrum—to describe the rare spectrum of disease characterized by destruction of the osseous and membranous labyrinth and potential supplantation with bony sequestrum. Cochlear implantation is a viable option in selected patients with osteolytic labyrinthitis.

Objective To examine patient preference after stapedotomy versus cochlear implantation in a unique case of a patient with symmetrical profound mixed hearing loss and similar postoperative speech perception improvement. Patients An adult patient with bilateral symmetrical far advanced otosclerosis, with profound mixed hearing loss. Intervention Stapedotomy in the left ear, cochlear implantation in the right ear. Main Outcome Measure Performance on behavioral audiometry, and subjective report of hearing and intervention preference. Results A patient successfully underwent left stapedotomy and subsequent cochlear implantation on the right side, per patient preference. Preoperative audiometric characteristics were similar between ears (pure-tone average [PTA] [R: 114; L: 113 dB]; word recognition score [WRS]: 22%). Postprocedural audiometry demonstrated significant improvement after stapedotomy (PTA: 59 dB, WRS: 75%) and from cochlear implant (PTA: 20 dB, WRS: 60%). The patient subjectively reported a preference for the cochlear implant ear despite having substantial gains from stapedotomy. A nuanced discussion highlighting potentially overlooked benefits of cochlear implants in far advanced otosclerosis is conducted. Conclusion In comparison with stapedotomy and hearing aids, cochlear implantation generally permits greater access to sound among patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Though the cochlear implant literature mainly focuses on speech perception outcomes, an underappreciated benefit of cochlear implantation is the high likelihood of achieving “normal” sound levels across the audiogram.

Abstract Purpose This study uses a large national legal database to analyze characteristics of malpractice claims involving U.S. medical students. Method The Westlaw database was searched in September 2023 for malpractice cases involving medical students from January 1, 1900, through September 1, 2023. Each case was independently reviewed by 2 authors, abstracting each variable. Categorical data were summarized as frequency of occurrence (i.e., number and percentage), and continuous data were summarized with means, medians, and ranges. All authors independently reviewed the dataset to identify potential themes and codes. Results There were 65 cases that met the inclusion criteria. Reported patient outcomes were death (19, 29%), pain (25, 38%), and disability (36, 55%). The most common specialties involved were emergency medicine (16, 25%), general surgery (14, 22%), and obstetrics and gynecology (13, 20%). The most common primary alleged errors attributed to students related to medical decision-making (30, 46%), procedural complication (24, 37%), and poor communication (11, 17%). Among 23 (35%) cases reporting year of training, 1 (4%) included a second-year student, 13 (57%) included third-year students, and 9 (39%) included fourth-year students. Of the 65 lawsuits, 28 (43%) resulted in a settlement or verdict against the medical student. The total amount paid in these cases was $78,192,612, with a mean (median) of $3,007,408 ($1,050,000) per case. Of these 28 cases, 14 (50%) cited minimal or no physician supervision. Conclusions Medical malpractice claims involving medical students are rare but commonly relate to medical decision-making, procedural complication, and poor communication, with a lack of supervision being frequently cited. These results can be used to guide students and supervising physicians on how to avoid scenarios that may increase vulnerability to medical malpractice lawsuits.