Dornhoffer, Jim R.

ABSTRACT Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma resection remains a challenging complication. Historically, surgeons reopened the prior retrosigmoid incision for transmastoid repair because the safety of creating a separate postauricular incision was uncertain, with concerns regarding wound breakdown and infection. However, limited data support this practice, and a focused mastoid incision may offer improved access and patient tolerance. This study evaluated wound healing outcomes following transmastoid repair using a new postauricular incision for persistent CSF leak after retrosigmoid surgery in patients without serviceable hearing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent transmastoid repair for persistent postoperative CSF leak after retrosigmoid craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma (2000–2025). Demographics, operative details, timing of leak diagnosis and repair, wound complications, readmissions, antibiotic use, and culture results were analyzed. Results Median age was 48 years (IQR 41–56); 67% were male, and mean BMI was 29.0 kg/m 2 . Mastoid obliteration was performed in 96%, with fat grafting in 93%. A new postauricular incision was used in all cases. Median time to leak diagnosis was 13 days (IQR 4–79), and median time to repair was 2 days (IQR 1–5). One patient (3.7%) developed a superficial wound abscess; no dehiscence or flap necrosis occurred. At median follow‐up of 34 months (IQR 2.9–87.7), all wounds were healed. CSF leak recurred in two patients (7.4%) and three (11.1%) required reoperation. Conclusion A separate postauricular incision for transmastoid CSF leak repair was not associated with increased wound morbidity. Durable wound healing was achieved in all patients, with 93% legal control, supporting this anatomy‐driven approach. Level of Evidence 4

Objective: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) often show transient loss of central tumor enhancement. We hypothesized that this loss of enhancement may correlate with better tumor control on follow-up imaging. Methods: We evaluated 198 consecutive patients from a single center who met eligibility criteria. Tumor volumes on the pre-SRS and post-SRS scans were quantified along with regions of loss of enhancement on the first post-SRS study. The latter was correlated with tumor volumes at follow-up, radiation isocenter density, and loss of serviceable hearing. Results: For the entire cohort, the median loss of enhancement on the first post-SRS scan was 14% (IQR: 6 to 25) and median rate of change in tumor volume was −4.5% per year (IQR: −10.5 to 1.5). Percent loss of central enhancement showed significant negative correlation with tumor growth not only for the entire cohort (correlation coefficient: −0.18, P =0.01), but also for the subset of patients who had available imaging until at least 2 years (n=185) and 4 years (n=179) post-SRS. Loss of enhancement also strongly correlated positively with tumor volumes and number of radiation isocenters and negatively with isocenter density. Finally, patients with greater percent loss of enhancement had an increased likelihood of progression to non-serviceable hearing, although this association was not statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings suggest that loss of central tumor enhancement in VSs post-SRS may be associated with improved tumor control.

Objective To examine patient preference after stapedotomy versus cochlear implantation in a unique case of a patient with symmetrical profound mixed hearing loss and similar postoperative speech perception improvement. Patients An adult patient with bilateral symmetrical far advanced otosclerosis, with profound mixed hearing loss. Intervention Stapedotomy in the left ear, cochlear implantation in the right ear. Main Outcome Measure Performance on behavioral audiometry, and subjective report of hearing and intervention preference. Results A patient successfully underwent left stapedotomy and subsequent cochlear implantation on the right side, per patient preference. Preoperative audiometric characteristics were similar between ears (pure-tone average [PTA] [R: 114; L: 113 dB]; word recognition score [WRS]: 22%). Postprocedural audiometry demonstrated significant improvement after stapedotomy (PTA: 59 dB, WRS: 75%) and from cochlear implant (PTA: 20 dB, WRS: 60%). The patient subjectively reported a preference for the cochlear implant ear despite having substantial gains from stapedotomy. A nuanced discussion highlighting potentially overlooked benefits of cochlear implants in far advanced otosclerosis is conducted. Conclusion In comparison with stapedotomy and hearing aids, cochlear implantation generally permits greater access to sound among patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Though the cochlear implant literature mainly focuses on speech perception outcomes, an underappreciated benefit of cochlear implantation is the high likelihood of achieving “normal” sound levels across the audiogram.

Abstract Background Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-related schwannomatosis is an autosomal dominant tumor-predisposition syndrome characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS). In patients with VS associated with NF2, vascular endothelial growth factor A inhibitor, bevacizumab, is a systemic treatment option. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate NF2 patient responses to bevacizumab on VS growth and symptom progression. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Rochester Multidisciplinary NF2 Clinic. Results Out of 76 patients with NF2 evaluated between 2020 and 2022, we identified 19 that received treatment with bevacizumab. Thirteen of these patients discontinued bevacizumab after median treatment duration of 12.2 months. The remaining 6 patients are currently receiving bevacizumab treatment for a median duration of 9.4 months as of March, 2023. Fifteen patients had evaluable brain MRI data, which demonstrated partial responses in 5 patients, stable disease in 8, and progression in 2. Within 6 months of bevacizumab discontinuation, 5 patients had rebound growth of their VS greater than 20% from their previous tumor volume, while 3 did not. Three patients with rebound growth went on to have surgery or irradiation for VS management. Conclusions Our single-institution experience confirms prior studies that bevacizumab can control progression of VS and symptoms associated with VS growth. However, we note that there is the potential for rapid VS growth following bevacizumab discontinuation, for which we propose heightened surveillance imaging and symptom monitoring for at least 6 months upon stopping anti-VEGF therapy.