Carlson, Matthew L

ABSTRACT Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after retrosigmoid vestibular schwannoma resection remains a challenging complication. Historically, surgeons reopened the prior retrosigmoid incision for transmastoid repair because the safety of creating a separate postauricular incision was uncertain, with concerns regarding wound breakdown and infection. However, limited data support this practice, and a focused mastoid incision may offer improved access and patient tolerance. This study evaluated wound healing outcomes following transmastoid repair using a new postauricular incision for persistent CSF leak after retrosigmoid surgery in patients without serviceable hearing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent transmastoid repair for persistent postoperative CSF leak after retrosigmoid craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma (2000–2025). Demographics, operative details, timing of leak diagnosis and repair, wound complications, readmissions, antibiotic use, and culture results were analyzed. Results Median age was 48 years (IQR 41–56); 67% were male, and mean BMI was 29.0 kg/m 2 . Mastoid obliteration was performed in 96%, with fat grafting in 93%. A new postauricular incision was used in all cases. Median time to leak diagnosis was 13 days (IQR 4–79), and median time to repair was 2 days (IQR 1–5). One patient (3.7%) developed a superficial wound abscess; no dehiscence or flap necrosis occurred. At median follow‐up of 34 months (IQR 2.9–87.7), all wounds were healed. CSF leak recurred in two patients (7.4%) and three (11.1%) required reoperation. Conclusion A separate postauricular incision for transmastoid CSF leak repair was not associated with increased wound morbidity. Durable wound healing was achieved in all patients, with 93% legal control, supporting this anatomy‐driven approach. Level of Evidence 4

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of advanced large language models from OpenAI (GPT‐3.5 and GPT‐4), Google (PaLM2 and MedPaLM), and an open source model from Meta (Llama3:70b) in answering clinical test multiple choice questions in the field of otolaryngology—head and neck surgery.MethodsA dataset of 4566 otolaryngology questions was used; each model was provided a standardized prompt followed by a question. One hundred questions that were answered incorrectly by all models were further interrogated to gain insight into the causes of incorrect answers.ResultsGPT4 was the most accurate, correctly answering 3520 of 4566 questions (77.1%). MedPaLM correctly answered 3223 of 4566 (70.6%) questions, while llama3:70b, GPT3.5, and PaLM2 were correct on 3052 of 4566 (66.8%), 2672 of 4566 (58.5%), and 2583 of 4566 (56.5%) questions. Three hundred and sixty‐nine questions were answered incorrectly by all models. Prompts to provide reasoning improved accuracy in all models: GPT4 changed from incorrect to correct answer 31% of the time, while GPT3.5, Llama3, PaLM2, and MedPaLM corrected their responses 25%, 18%, 19%, and 17% of the time, respectively.ConclusionLarge language models vary in their understanding of otolaryngology‐specific clinical knowledge. OpenAI's GPT4 has a strong understanding of core concepts as well as detailed information in the field of otolaryngology. Its baseline understanding in this field makes it well‐suited to serve in roles related to head and neck surgery education provided that the appropriate precautions are taken and potential limitations are understood.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 135:629–634, 2025

Objectives/Hypothesis To describe the pre‐implant audiometric profile of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients to investigate whether current binaural candidacy requirements prevent access to patients who could benefit from CI. Study Design Retrospective case series. Methods Retrospective review from 2016 to 2018 evaluating preoperative pure‐tone thresholds and speech perception scores in the ipsilateral and contralateral ear. Results A total of 252 adult CI recipients undergoing 270 implants were identified. Median age at time of implantation was 70.5 years (IQR 61.3–78.3) for those undergoing unilateral implantation and 59.0 (IQR 48.0–72.3) for those undergoing bilateral implantation ( P < .01). For unilateral implantation, median pre‐implantation speech perception performance in the ear to be implanted was 8.0% (IQR 0%–26.0%) for CNC word scores, and 9.0% (IQR 0%–34.0%) for AzBio sentence scores in quiet. Median speech perception performance in the contralateral ear was 36.0% (IQR 14.0%–60.0%) on CNC word scores, and 48.5% (IQR 17.5%–76.0%) on AzBio sentence tests. Speech perception scores were significantly different between ears for word and sentence tests ( P < .01). Patients older than age 65 were significantly less likely to undergo bilateral implantation ( P = .03). Conclusions Adult CI recipients exhibit substantially poorer pre‐implant speech perception scores than the commonly utilized ipsilateral qualifying threshold of 50% on sentence testing. Yet, existing insurance paradigms limit patients by excessively stringent binaural best‐aided requirements. This limitation likely leads to worse device performance as patients often wait years for their binaural hearing to qualify while their ear to be implanted potentially experiences an unnecessarily extended duration of deafness. Older patients also experience a unique delay in referral for cochlear implantation. Level of Evidence 3‐ Retrospective review Laryngoscope , 131:E2007–E2012, 2021

Objectives/HypothesisTo examine the hearing status and aural rehabilitative profile in a national cohort of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS).Study DesignCross‐sectional surveyMethodsA cross‐sectional survey of Acoustic Neuroma Association members diagnosed with sporadic VS was performed from February 2017 through January 2019. Self‐reported results were used to determine the aural rehabilitative profile of respondents.ResultsAmong survey respondents, 62.2% (546/878) were not using any hearing‐assistive device at time of survey. For the 37.8% (332/878) that were utilizing hearing‐assistive devices, 32.8% (109/332) reported using a behind‐the‐ear hearing aid, 23.8% (79/332) used a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aid, and 21.7% (72/332) used a bone conduction device. Notably, 41.9% (278/663) of patients who previously underwent tumor treatment reported utilizing a hearing rehabilitation device at some point during VS management compared to 27.0% (58/215) of those undergoing observation with serial imaging (P < .001). Of 275 patients with functional hearing in the ipsilateral ear, 26.5% (73/275) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 24.0% (66/275) reported use of a conventional hearing aid, 0.7% (2/275) a CROS aid, and 0.4% (1/275) a bone conduction device. Among respondents reporting ipsilateral nonfunctional hearing, 44.9% (258/575) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 13.0% (75/575) a CROS aid, and 12.3% (71/575) a bone conduction device.ConclusionsEven among a cohort with presumably elevated literacy surrounding hearing rehabilitation options, few patients with a history of unilateral vestibular schwannoma ultimately use hearing assistive devices long‐term, suggesting that most patients sufficiently adjust to unilateral hearing loss or are unsatisfied with the benefits achieved with current device options.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 131:1378–1381, 2021

ObjectiveIgG4‐related disease (IgG4‐RD) is a recently recognized disease characterized by fibroinflammatory infiltrates rich in IgG4+ plasma cells that can present as isolated tumor‐like lesions of the head and neck. The objective of the current study was to describe the cranial base manifestations of IgG4‐RD.MethodsReview of all cases at three tertiary‐referral centers since disease description in 2003.ResultsEleven patients were identified at a median age at presentation of 58 years (IQR, 38–65; 55% male). Ten (91%) patients had isolated skull base masses without systemic disease. Cranial neuropathies were commonly observed in the abducens (45%), trigeminal (18%), and facial nerves (18%). Lesions frequently involved the cavernous sinus (55%; 6/11) with extension to the petroclival junction in 50% (3/6). Infiltration of the internal auditory canal was present in 27% (3/11) with one case demonstrating erosion of the bony labyrinth. Preliminary clinical diagnoses commonly included nasopharyngeal cancer, pituitary macroadenoma, cholesteatoma, and meningioma / multiple meningioma syndrome. Local biopsy demonstrated >30 IgG4‐positive plasma cells per high‐powered field or an IgG4:IgG ratio greater than 40% in all cases. Rapid and durable clinical improvement was seen in 91% following corticosteroid and rituximab therapy.ConclusionsIgG4‐RD nonspecifically presents as a rare cause of the skull base mass. Often presenting without concomitant systemic disease, local diagnostic biopsies are required. Obtaining adequate tissue specimen is complicated by densely fibrotic cranial base lesions that are frequently in close proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Primary medical therapy with corticosteroids and rituximab is effective in most patients.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 130:2574–2580, 2020