Barnes, Jason H.

Objective: To determine the impact of modifiable surgical factors on ossiculoplasty outcomes after controlling for ear environment risk. Study Design: Multi-institutional retrospective review. Setting: Six tertiary care centers from 2011 to 2019. Patients Adults and children. Interventions: Ossiculoplasty, including synthetic ossicular replacement prosthesis, autograft interposition, bone cement repair, and mobilization. Main Outcome Measure: Correlation between modifiable surgical factors and pure-tone average air-bone gap (ABG) at most recent audiogram after controlling for preoperative risk using the statistically validated Ear Environment Risk (EER) score. Results: A total of 1,679 cases were included with a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR, 5–51). After controlling for EER score, malleus engagement of prosthesis yielded favorable ABG versus direct contact to tympanic membrane without malleus engagement (beta = −2.4 dB [−3.8, −1.1], p < 0.001). For total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP), use of a footplate prosthesis yielded favorable ABG as compared with no footplate prosthesis (−3.6 dB [−6.1, −1.1], p = 0.005). For synthetic prostheses, polyethylene prostheses had a less favorable ABG compared with full titanium or titanium with hydroxyapatite prostheses ( p < 0.05). In cases where the malleus was not engaged in reconstruction, amputation of the malleus head yielded worse ABG (+3.9 dB [1.2, 6.7], p = 0.005). There was no significant difference ( p > 0.05) in ABG for single-stage versus multistaged approach, use of a cartilage cap over the prosthesis versus no cartilage, use of bone cement to secure a PORP to the stapes versus no cement, mastoid cavity obliteration versus no obliteration, and incudostapedial joint reconstruction with joint prosthesis/bone cement versus synthetic PORP. Conclusions: With statistical correction for ear environment risk, several modifiable surgical factors are noted to impact ossiculoplasty hearing outcomes. Level of Evidence: 4.

Objectives/Hypothesis To describe the pre‐implant audiometric profile of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients to investigate whether current binaural candidacy requirements prevent access to patients who could benefit from CI. Study Design Retrospective case series. Methods Retrospective review from 2016 to 2018 evaluating preoperative pure‐tone thresholds and speech perception scores in the ipsilateral and contralateral ear. Results A total of 252 adult CI recipients undergoing 270 implants were identified. Median age at time of implantation was 70.5 years (IQR 61.3–78.3) for those undergoing unilateral implantation and 59.0 (IQR 48.0–72.3) for those undergoing bilateral implantation ( P < .01). For unilateral implantation, median pre‐implantation speech perception performance in the ear to be implanted was 8.0% (IQR 0%–26.0%) for CNC word scores, and 9.0% (IQR 0%–34.0%) for AzBio sentence scores in quiet. Median speech perception performance in the contralateral ear was 36.0% (IQR 14.0%–60.0%) on CNC word scores, and 48.5% (IQR 17.5%–76.0%) on AzBio sentence tests. Speech perception scores were significantly different between ears for word and sentence tests ( P < .01). Patients older than age 65 were significantly less likely to undergo bilateral implantation ( P = .03). Conclusions Adult CI recipients exhibit substantially poorer pre‐implant speech perception scores than the commonly utilized ipsilateral qualifying threshold of 50% on sentence testing. Yet, existing insurance paradigms limit patients by excessively stringent binaural best‐aided requirements. This limitation likely leads to worse device performance as patients often wait years for their binaural hearing to qualify while their ear to be implanted potentially experiences an unnecessarily extended duration of deafness. Older patients also experience a unique delay in referral for cochlear implantation. Level of Evidence 3‐ Retrospective review Laryngoscope , 131:E2007–E2012, 2021

ObjectivesUrine leukotriene E4 (uLTE4) is a biomarker of leukotriene synthesis and is elevated in patients with aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). It can also be useful to help delineate aspirin‐tolerant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) patients from AERD patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if uLTE4 biomarker levels are associated with objective and subjective markers of disease severity in patients with CRSwNP.MethodsA retrospective analysis of CRSwNP patients who underwent uLTE4 testing was completed to determine the association of uLTE4 levels to markers of disease severity. uLTE4 levels, as well as presenting subjective (Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 [SNOT22] scores, asthma control test [ACT] scores) and objective data (Lund‐Mackay CT score, spirometry and lab values) were collected.ResultsAmong the 157 CRSwNP patients who met inclusion criteria, uLTE4 levels were associated with history of asthma (P< .001), aspirin sensitivity (P< .001), worse Lund‐Mackay CT scores (P= .002) and other objective markers of disease severity including serum IgE (P= .05), presenting blood eosinophil level (P< .001), and the highest recorded eosinophil level (P< .001). In subgroup analysis, associations of uLTE4 to disease markers had stronger correlations in the aspirin sensitive CRSwNP group (Rrange 0.31–0.52) than the aspirin tolerant CRSwNP group (Rrange −0.30–0.24). uLTE4 levels were not associated with subjective symptom scores (SNOT22 and ACT scores).ConclusionElevated uLTE4 biomarker levels are associated with worsened objective markers of disease severity in CRSwNP patients but not patient‐reported symptom measures.Level of Evidence3Laryngoscope, 131:961–966, 2021

Electrocochleography (ECochG) is an electrophysiological technique that records electrical potentials generated by different components of the inner ear and peripheral cochlear nerve in response to acoustic stimulation. ECochG responses can be analyzed into (1) cochlear microphonics (CM), (2) auditory nerve neurophonics, (3) summating potential, and (4) compound action potential. Over the past few decades, there have been ongoing refinements in technique and updates in the understanding of recorded potentials. Historically, ECochG found its main application in the diagnostic evaluation of Meniere's disease (MD). However, in the last decade, the focus has shifted towards cochlear implantation (CI). In patients with residual hearing after CI, combined electric and acoustic stimulation has resulted in improved hearing and speech outcomes. Despite efforts to mitigate trauma during electrode insertion, hearing preservation rates vary after surgery. During implantation, real‐time ECochG offers an opportunity to measure frequency specific CMs elicited from a localized region in the cochlea as the surgeon inserts the electrode array. In extracochlear ECochG recordings, the recording electrode can be placed on the promontory, the stapes, or the tympanic membrane. Intracochlear ECochG can be performed by inserting a recording electrode into the cochlea or by using one of the CI electrodes as the recording electrode. The loss of intraoperative ECochG signal may indicate cochlear trauma from electrode insertion, but the association between intraoperative ECochG changes and cochlear trauma remains controversial. The ability to monitor cochlear trauma during CI electrode placement holds promise to improve hearing preservation outcomes, modify surgical techniques, and change electrode design. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the electrophysiology and history of ECochG, discuss its recent applications in CI, and explore the ongoing research in this expanding field.