Back to Authors

Nye, Chad

Mayo Clinic

Acoustic Neuroma Association Cumming Georgia U.S.A

Citations 4

Hearing Status and Aural Rehabilitative Profile of 878 Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma
Macielak, Robert J. , Marinelli, John P. , Spear, Samuel A., Link, Michael J. , Nye, Chad, Carlson, Matthew L. , Carlson, Matthew L , Hahs‐Vaughn, Debbie L.

The Laryngoscope | December 10, 2020 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1378-1381

10.1002/lary.29315 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisTo examine the hearing status and aural rehabilitative profile in a national cohort of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS).Study DesignCross‐sectional surveyMethodsA cross‐sectional survey of Acoustic Neuroma Association members diagnosed with sporadic VS was performed from February 2017 through January 2019. Self‐reported results were used to determine the aural rehabilitative profile of respondents.ResultsAmong survey respondents, 62.2% (546/878) were not using any hearing‐assistive device at time of survey. For the 37.8% (332/878) that were utilizing hearing‐assistive devices, 32.8% (109/332) reported using a behind‐the‐ear hearing aid, 23.8% (79/332) used a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) hearing aid, and 21.7% (72/332) used a bone conduction device. Notably, 41.9% (278/663) of patients who previously underwent tumor treatment reported utilizing a hearing rehabilitation device at some point during VS management compared to 27.0% (58/215) of those undergoing observation with serial imaging (P < .001). Of 275 patients with functional hearing in the ipsilateral ear, 26.5% (73/275) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 24.0% (66/275) reported use of a conventional hearing aid, 0.7% (2/275) a CROS aid, and 0.4% (1/275) a bone conduction device. Among respondents reporting ipsilateral nonfunctional hearing, 44.9% (258/575) reported having used at least one type of hearing device; 13.0% (75/575) a CROS aid, and 12.3% (71/575) a bone conduction device.ConclusionsEven among a cohort with presumably elevated literacy surrounding hearing rehabilitation options, few patients with a history of unilateral vestibular schwannoma ultimately use hearing assistive devices long‐term, suggesting that most patients sufficiently adjust to unilateral hearing loss or are unsatisfied with the benefits achieved with current device options.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 131:1378–1381, 2021
Evolution in Management Trends of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma in the United States Over the Last Half-century
Chan, Stephen A. , Marinelli, John P. , Nye, Chad, Link, Michael J. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Hahs‐Vaughn, Debbie L.

Otology & Neurotology | November 24, 2020 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 300-305

10.1097/mao.0000000000002891 Get It

Objective: Limited data currently characterize management trends of sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) in the United States over recent decades. Serving as the primary patient support organization in the United States, the Acoustic Neuroma Association (ANA) facilitates amalgamation of data from patients treated from 1970 through January 2019. The primary objective of the current study was to characterize the evolution in the management of sporadic VS among ANA survey respondents treated over the last half-century. Study Design/Intervention: Cross-sectional survey. Setting/Patients: ANA survey respondents diagnosed with sporadic VS. Main Outcome Measures: Trends in rates of microsurgery, radiosurgery, and observation from 1970 to 2019. Results: Among 953 patients with VS responding during the study period, 876 (92%) were included. Subjects reported the following management strategies: 220 observation (25%), 454 microsurgery (52%), and 193 radiosurgery (22%). The rate of microsurgery decreased from 86–88% from 1970 to 2000 to 44% in the last decade. The proportion of VS observed increased from 7% of all tumors in the 1990s, to 14% in the 2000s, to 33% in the 2010s. The rate of radiosurgery has increased to 28% in the last decades compared with 7% in the 1990s. The rate of subtotal resection in tumors > 2 cm increased from 34% in the 2000s to 60% in the 2010s (p = 0.0011). Conclusions: Overall, these data support a progression toward fewer patients treated with microsurgery in recent decades. Radiosurgery and observation became increasingly more common after the turn of the century, possibly due to better detection of small and asymptomatic tumors and a greater understanding of the natural history of disease.
Regional Variation in Patient Participation and Treatment among Acoustic Neuroma Association Survey Respondents Across the United States
Marinelli, John P. , Spear, Samuel A., Macielak, Robert J. , Link, Michael J. , Feldman, Allison, Nye, Chad, Carlson, Matthew L. , Hahs‐Vaughn, Debbie L.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base | February 5, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1055/s-0040-1702752 Get It

Evolution in Management Trends of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma from 1970 through 2019 Using the Acoustic Neuroma Association Patient Registry
Chan, Stephen , Marinelli, John P. , Link, Michael J. , Feldman, Allison, Nye, Chad, Carlson, Matthew L. , Hahs‐Vaughn, Debbie L.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base | February 5, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1055/s-0040-1702400 Get It